Book contents
- Democracy, Liberty, and Judicial Review
- Democracy, Liberty, and Judicial Review
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I The Majoritarian Critique and the Constitutionalist Response
- Part II Indirect Attacks on Judicial Review
- Part III Democracy, Liberty, and Judicial Review
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2025
Book contents
- Democracy, Liberty, and Judicial Review
- Democracy, Liberty, and Judicial Review
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I The Majoritarian Critique and the Constitutionalist Response
- Part II Indirect Attacks on Judicial Review
- Part III Democracy, Liberty, and Judicial Review
- References
- Index
- References
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Democracy, Liberty, and Judicial Review , pp. 287 - 296Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2026
References
Allan, James. 1996. “Bills of Rights and Judicial Power: A Liberal’s Quandary.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 16 (2): 337–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, Andrew. 1990. Critical Legal Studies: A Liberal Critique. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous. 1775. The Crisis, Number XI (N.Y.), 81–87. Cited in Wood, Gordon. (1969) 1998. The Creation of the American Republic. Chapel Hill. University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle. 1986. Aristotle’s Politics. Trans. Apostle, H.G. and Gerson, L.P.. Grinnell, IA: The Peripatetic Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, Randy E. 1999. “An Originalism for Nonoriginalists.” Loyola Law Review 45: 611–54.Google Scholar
Barnett, Randy E. 2004. Restoring the Lost Constitution: The Presumption of Liberty. Princeton. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, Randy E. 2005. “Why You Should Read My Book Anyhow.” Cornell Law Review 90: 873–91.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Beerbohm, Eric. 2015. “Is Democratic Leadership Possible?” American Political Science Review 109: 639–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, Richard. 1996. “The Political Form of the Constitution: The Separation of Powers, Rights and Representative Democracy.” Political Studies 44: 436–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, Richard. 2007. Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, Richard and Castiglione, Dario. 1997. “Constitutionalism and Democracy: Political Theory and the American Constitution.” British Journal of Political Science 27 (4): 595–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benn, S. I. and Peters, R. S.. 1959. Social Principles and the Democratic State. London. George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Bennett, Robert W. and Solum, Lawrence B.. 2011. Constitutional Originalism. Ithaca. Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Raoul. 1977. Government by Judiciary: The Transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment. Indianapolis. Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Bickel, Alexander M. 1970. The Supreme Court and the Idea of Progress. New Haven. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Blair, Roger D. and Cotter, Thomas F.. 1987. “An Economic Analysis of Damages Rules in Intellectual Property.” William and Mary Law Review 39: 1585–694.Google Scholar
Blaug, Mark. 1992. The Methodology of Economics, 2nd ed. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bork, Robert H. 1971. “Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems.” Indiana Law Review 47: 1–47.Google Scholar
Brest, Paul. 1980. “The Misconceived Quest for Original Understanding.” Boston University Law Review 60: 204–38.Google Scholar
Cannon, James. 1776. “Cassandra.” In Ed. Force, Peter. American Archives 4th Series, V. Washington, 1094.Google Scholar
Carnes, Nicholas. 2013. White Collar Government: The Hidden Role of Class in Economic Policy Making. Chicago. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartledge, Paul. 2009. Ancient Greek Political Thought in Practice. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheibub, Jose Antonio and Przeworski, Adam. 1999. “Democracy, Elections, and Accountability for Economic Outcomes.” In Ed. Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan C., and Manin, Bernard. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chemerinsky, Erwin. 2011. Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies, 4th edn. Frederick, MD. Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Chemerinsky, Erwin. 2014. The Case Against the Supreme Court. New York. Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Christiano, Thomas. 2008. The Constitution of Equality. Oxford. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Joshua. 1997. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy.” In Eds. Bohman, James and Rehg, William. Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge, MA. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua. 1998. “Democracy and Liberty.” In Ed. Elster, Jon. Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, Jules. 1982. “The Economic Analysis of Law.” In Ed. J. Roland Pennock. Economics and the Law: NOMOS XXIV. Reprinted in Kuperberg and Bitz (1983), pp. 102–22.Google Scholar
Cooter, Robert B. Jr. and Ulen, Thomas. 2014. Law and Economics, 6th edn. Essex. Pearson.Google Scholar
Dalvi, Manoj and Refalo, James F.. 2008. “An Economic Analysis of Libel Law.” Eastern Economic Journal 34: 74–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Palma, . 1990. To Craft Democracies: An Essay on Democratic Transitions. Berkeley. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dickinson, John. (1766) 1895. “An Address to the Committee of Correspondence in Barbados.” In Ed. Ford, Peter. The Life and Writings of John Dickinson. Philadelphia. Historical Society of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1985. A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1990. “Equality, Democracy, and the Constitution: We the People in Court.” Albert Law Review XXVIII: 324–46.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1979. Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1988. “Consequences of Constitutional Choice: Reflections on Tocqueville.” In Elster, Jon and Slagstad, Ruth. Constitutionalism and Democracy. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabre, Cecil. 1998. “Constitutionalising Social Rights.” Journal of Political Philosophy 6: 263–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabre, Cecil. 2000. “The Dignity of Rights.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20: 271–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallon, Richard H. Jr. 2008. “The Core of an Uneasy Case for Judicial Review.” Harvard Law Review 121: 1693–736.Google Scholar
Fallon, Richard H. Jr. 2018. Law and Legitimacy in the Supreme Court. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Farrand, M. (1787) 1911–1937. Records of the Federal Convention of 1787. New Haven. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ferrara, Alessandro. 2001. “Of Boats and Principles: Reflections on Habermas’ ‘Constitutional Democracy’.” Political Theory 29: 782–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, James E. 2012. “The Substance of Self-Government.” Law, Culture, and the Humanities 11 (2): 184–97.Google Scholar
Fleming, James E. 2022. Constructing Basic Liberties: A Defense of Substantive Due Process. Chicago. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, George P. 1972. “Fairness and Utility in Torts Theory.” Harvard Law Review 85: 537–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, Charles. 2020. “I Was Reagan’s Solicitor General. Here’s What Biden Should Do with the Court.” The New York Times. October 18, 2020.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert. 1986. “Laundering Preferences.” In Eds. Elster, Jon and Hylland, Aanund. Foundations of Social Choice Theory. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, 75–101.Google Scholar
Goodman, John C. 1978. “An Economic Theory of the Evolution of Common Law.” Journal of Legal Studies 7: 393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Donald P. and Shapiro, Ian. 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander. [1788a] 1987. The Federalist Number XXXV: “The Same Subject Continued.” In Ed. Kramnick, Isaac. The Federalist Papers. London. Penguin Books, 231–5.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander. [1788b] 1987. The Federalist Number LXXVIII: “A View of the Constitution of the Judiciary Department in Relation to the Tenure of Good Behavior.” In Ed. Kramnick, Isaac. The Federalist Papers. London. Penguin Books, 436–42.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander. [1788c] 2001. “Speech in the New York Ratifying Convention on Representation, June 21, 1788.” In Ed. Freeman, Joanne B.. Alexander Hamilton: Writings. New York, NY. The Library of America, 487–95.Google Scholar
Hansen, Mogens Herman. 1991. The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes. Oxford. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hardin, Russell. 1999. Liberalism, Constitutionalism, and Democracy. Oxford. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsanyi, J. C. 1955. “Cardinal Utility in Welfare Economics and in the Theory of Risk-Taking.” Journal of Political Economy 63: 309–21.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1983. Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy. Oxford. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkings, David. 2018. “Wealth of Congress: Richer Than Ever, but Mostly at the Very Top.” Roll Call 2/27/18.Google Scholar
Henderson, James M. and Quandt, Richard E.. 1980. Microeconomic Theory: A Mathematical Approach. New York. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Holmes, Stephen. 1988. “Precommitment and the Paradox of Democracy.” In Eds. Elster, Jon and Slagstad, Ruth. Constitutionalism and Democracy. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, Stephen. 1995. Passions and Constraints: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Honig, Bonnie. 2001. “Dead Rights, Live Futures: A Reply to Habermas’ ‘Constitutional Democracy’”. Political Theory 29: 792–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. [1776] 2008. “Of the Original Contract.” In Eds. Copley, Stephen and Edgar, Andrew. Selected Essays. Oxford. Oxford University Press, 274–91.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Allan C. 2009. “A ‘Hard Core’ Case Against Judicial Review.” Harvard Law Review 121: 57–64.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. (1777, 1779) 1984. “A Bill for Establishing Religious Freedom.” In Ed. Peterson, Merrill D.. Thomas Jefferson: Writings. New York, NY. The Library of America, 346–8.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. (1786) 1984. “Answers to Demeunier’s First Queries, January 24, 1786.” In Ed. Peterson, Merrill D.. Thomas Jefferson: Writings. New York, NY. The Library of America, 575–9.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. (1787) 1984. “Notes on the State of Virginia.” In Ed. Peterson, Merrill D.. Thomas Jefferson: Writings. New York, NY. The Library of America, 123–325.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. (1789) 1984. “Letter to James Madison March 15, 1789.” In Ed. Peterson, Merrill D.. Thomas Jefferson: Writings. New York, NY. The Library of America, 942–6.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. (1814) 1984. “Letter to Dr. Thomas Cooper (February 10, 1814).” In Ed. Peterson, Merrill D.. Thomas Jefferson: Writings. New York, NY. The Library of America, 1321–9.Google Scholar
Kagan, Elena. (1995). “Confirmation Messes, Old and New.” University of Chicago Law Review 62: 919–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Alexander. 1997. “Reason, Self-Legislation and Legitimacy: Conceptions of Freedom in Rousseau and Kant.” Review of Politics 59 (1), 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan. 1976. “Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication.” Harvard Law Review 89: 1685–778. Reprinted in ed. Allan C. Hutchinson. 1989. Critical Legal Studies. Totowa, NJ. Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 36–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopmans, Tim. 2003. Courts and Political Institutions: A Comparative View. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramnick, Isaac. 1987. “Editor’s Introduction.” In Ed. Kramnick, Isaac. The Federalist Papers. London. Penguin Books, 11–82.Google Scholar
Kreps, David M. 1990. A Course in Microeconomic Theory. Princeton. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, Gary. 1997. “On Reading Recipes…and Constitutions.” Georgetown Law Journal 85: 1823–36.Google Scholar
Layard, P. R. G. and Walters, A. A.. 1978. Microeconomic Theory. New York. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Lever, Annabelle. 2009. “Democracy and Judicial Review: Are They Really Incompatible?” Perspectives on Politics 7: 805–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, Carol. 2010. “Realism as Self-forgetfulness: Gender, Ethics and Great Expectations.” In Bloom, H., ed. Charles Dickens’s Great Expectations. New York, NY. Infobase Publishing, 99–114.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles. 1988. Democracy and the Market System. Oxford. Norwegian University Press.Google Scholar
Livingston, P. 1774. The Other Side of the Question: Or A Defence of the Liberties of North-America. New York. James Rivington.Google Scholar
Locke, John. (1689) 1994. Two Treatises of Government. Ed. Laslett, Peter. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mackie, Gerry. 2003. Democracy Defended. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madison, James. (1787) 1999a. “Vices of the Political System of the United States. April 1787.” In Ed. Rackove, Jack. Madison: Writings. New York, NY. Library of America, 69–80.Google Scholar
Madison, James. (1787) 1999b. “Speech in the Federal Convention on Factions, June 6, 1787.” In Ed. Rackove, Jack. Madison: Writings. New York, NY. Library of America,Google Scholar
Madison, James. (1787) 1999c. The Federalist Number 10, November 22, 1787. In Ed. Rackove, Jack. Madison: Writings. New York, NY. Library of America, 160–7.Google Scholar
Madison, James. (1788) 1987. The Federalist Number 48, February 1, 1788. In Ed. Kramnick, Isaac. The Federalist Papers, London. Penguin Books, 308–12.Google Scholar
Madison, James. (1788) 1999a. The Federalist Number 49, February 2, 1788. In Ed. Rackove, Jack. Madison: Writings. New York, NY. Library of America, 286–90.Google Scholar
Madison, James. (1788) 1999b. The Federalist Number 51, February 6, 1788. In Ed. Rackove, Jack. Madison: Writings. New York, NY. Library of America, 294–98.Google Scholar
Madison, James [1788] 1987. The Federalist Number LVII: “The Same Subject Continued in Relation to the Supposed Tendency of the Plan of the Convention to Elevate the Few Above the Many.” In Ed. Kramnick, Isaac. The Federalist Papers. London. Penguin Books, 302–8.Google Scholar
Madison, James. (1788) 1999c. “Speech in the Virginia Ratifying Convention in Defense of the Constitution, June 6, 1788.” In Ed. Rackove, Jack. Madison: Writings. New York, NY. Library of America, 354–65.Google Scholar
Madison, James. (1788) 1999d. “Letter to Thomas Jefferson October 17, 1788.” In Ed. Rackove, Jack. Madison: Writings. New York, NY. Library of America, 418–23.Google Scholar
Manin, Bernard. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, Jennifer E. 2018. Membership in the 115th Congress: A Profile. Washington, DC. Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97: 515–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maravall, Jose Maria. 1999. “Accountability and Manipulation.” In Ed. Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan C., and Manin, Bernard. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marsilius of Padua. 1956. The Defender of Peace. Trans. and Ed. Gewirth, Alan. New York. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Mas-Colell, Andreu, Whinston, Michael D., and Green, Jerry R.. 1995. Microeconomic Theory. Oxford. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McGinnis, John O. and Rapaport, Michael B.. 2013. Originalism and the Good Constitution. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meese, Edwin. 1985. Speech to American Bar Association on “Jurisprudence of Original Intention.” July 9, 1985, www.justice.gov/default/files/ag/legacy/2011/08/07-09-1985.pdf.Google Scholar
Mercuro, Nicholas and Medema, Steven G.. 1997. Economics and the Law. Princeton. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, James. [1823] 1992. “Government.” In Ed. Ball, Terence. James Mill: Political Writings. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1861] 2015. “Considerations on Representative Government.” In Ed. Philip, Mark and Rosen, Frederick. John Stuart Mill: On Liberty, Utilitarianism, and Other Essays. Oxford. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles-Louis de Secondat. [1748] 1989. The Spirit of the Laws. Eds. Cohler, Anne M., Miller, Basia Caroline, and Stone, Harold Samuel. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morrison, Trevor. W. 2005. “Lamenting Lochner’s Loss: Randy Barnett’s Case for a Libertarian Constitution.” Cornell Law Review 90: 839–72.Google Scholar
Nelson, Eric. 2018. “Representation and the Fall.” In Modern Intellectual History. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, 1–30.Google Scholar
Nelson, Eric. 2019. The Theology of Liberalism: Political Philosophy and the Justice of God. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ober, Josiah. 1989. Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens. Princeton. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ober, Josiah. 2015. The Rise and Fall of Classical Greece. Princeton. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ober, Josiah. 2017. Demopolis: Democracy Before Liberalism in Theory and Practice. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otis, James. (1764) 1998. “Rights of the British Colonies.” In Ed. Bailyn, . Pamphlets I. Cited in G. Wood, The Creation of the American Republic. Chapel Hill. University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Pennock, J. Roland. 1979. Democratic Political Theory. Princeton. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, R. Eric. 2012. Representatives and Senators: Trends in Member Characteristics Since 1945. Washington, DC. Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hannah Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley. University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitkin, Hannah Fenichel. 2004. “Representation and Democracy: Uneasy Alliance.” Scandinavian Political Studies 27: 335–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, A. Mitchell. 2019. An Introduction to Law and Economics, 5th edn. New York. Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 1983a. “The Ethical and Political Basis of the Efficiency Norm in Common Law Adjudication.” In Eds. Kuperberg, Mark and Beitz, Charles. Law and Economics: A Critical Introduction with Applications to the Law of Torts. Savage, MD. Rowman & Littlefield, 81–101.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 1983b. The Economics of Justice. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, H. Jefferson. 1985. “The Original Understanding of Original Intent.” Harvard Law Review 98: 885–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, A. C. and Zywicki, Todd J. 1999. “Finding the Constitution: An Economic Analysis of Tradition’s Role in Constitutional Interpretation.” University of North Carolina Law Review 77: 429–521.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putterman, Ethan. 2010. Rousseau, Law and the Sovereignty of the People. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. [1971] 1999. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. 1999. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press, including the paper “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited.”Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 2007. Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1978. “Professor Dworkin’s Theory of Rights.” Political Studies 26: 123–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1998. “Disagreement in Politics.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 43: 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, Eugene F. Jr. and Grafton, Anthony. [1990] 1994. The Foundations of Modern Europe, 1460–1559. New York. Norton.Google Scholar
Riley, Patrick. 1982. Will and Political Legitimacy. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, Lionel. 1935. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, 2nd edn. London. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. [1750, 1754] 1964. The First and Second Discourses. Trans. R. D. and Masters, J. R.. New York. St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. [1756] 1978. Geneva Manuscript. Trans. R. D. and Masters, J. R.. New York. St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. [1762] 1978. On the Social Contract. Trans. Masters, J. R.. New York. St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Rutkus, Denis Steven. 2010. Questioning Supreme Court Nominees About Their Views on Legal or Constitutional Issues: A Recurring Issue. Washington, DC. Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Sabl, Andrew. 2015. “The Two Cultures of Democratic Theory: Responsiveness, Democratic Quality, and the Empirical-Normative Divide.” Perspectives on Politics 13 (2): 345–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Andrew. 2010. “Great Expectations.” In Ed. Bloom, H.. Charles Dickens’s Great Expectations. New York, NY. Infobase Publishing, 157–68.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1987. The Theory of Democracy Revisited: Part Two. Chatham, NJ. Chatham House.Google Scholar
Scalia, Antonin. 1997. A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law. Princeton. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press (Belknap Press).Google Scholar
Schwartzberg, Melissa. 2003. “Rousseau on Fundamental Law.” Political Studies 51: 387–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartzberg, Melissa. 2008. “Voting the General Will: Rousseau on Decision Rules.” Political Theory 36/3: 403–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartzberg, Melissa. 2013. “Was the Graphe Paranomon a Form of Judicial Review?” Cardozo Law Review 34: 149–62.Google Scholar
Segall, Eric J. 2018. Originalism as Faith. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, A.J. 1992. A Lockean Theory of Rights. Princeton. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, A. J. 1993. On the Edge of Anarchy: Locke, Consent, and the Limits of Society. Princeton. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1992. “The Italian City-Republics.” In Ed. Dunn, John. Democracy: The Unfinished Journey 508 BC to AD 1993. Oxford. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Soames, Scott. 2013. “Deferentialism: A Post-Originalist Theory of Legal Interpretation.” Fordham Law Review 82 (2): 597–617.Google Scholar
Soroka, Stuart N. and Wlezien, Christopher. 2010. Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, and Policy. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tracy, James D. 1994. “Taxation and State Debt.” In Eds. Brady, Thomas A., Oberman, Heiko A., and Tracy, James D.. Handbook of European History, 1400–1600. Volume 1: Structures and Assertions. Grand Rapids, MI. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Tribe, Lawrence H. 1988. American Constitutional Law, 2nd edn. Mineola, NY. The Foundation Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 2016. The Sleeping Sovereign: The Invention of Modern Democracy. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tully, James. 1995. Strange Multiplicities. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. [1983] 1989. “Following the Rules Laid Down: A Critique of Interpretivism and Neutral Principles.” Harvard Law Review 96: 781–827. Reprinted in Hutchinson (1989), pp. 157–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 1999. Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts. Princeton. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 2010. “How Different Are Waldron’s and Fallon’s Core Cases for and Against Judicial Review?” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30: 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia. 2006. Representative Government: Principles & Genealogy. Chicago. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia and Warren, Mark E.. 2008. “The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on the Judiciary. 1991. Nomination of David Souter To Be Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, hearings, 101st Cong., 2nd sess., September 13, 14, 17, 18, and 19, 1990. Washington: GPO.Google Scholar
Valentini, Laura. 2012. “Justice, Disagreement, and Democracy.” British Journal of Political Science. 43: 177–99.Google Scholar
Vieira, Monica Brito and Runciman, David. 2008. Representation. Cambridge. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 1993. “A Right-Based Critique of Constitutional Rights.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 13 (1): 18–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 1999a. Law and Disagreement. Oxford. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 1999b. The Dignity of Legislation. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 2006. “The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review,” Yale Law Journal 115: 1146–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 2009. “A Majority in a Lifeboat.” Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series, New York University School of Law. Working Paper No. 09-49.Google Scholar
Warren, Mark E. 2017. “A Problem-Based Approach to Democratic Theory.” American Political Science Review 111: 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, Keith E. 1999. Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review. Lawrence. University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith E. 2019. Repugnant Laws: Judicial Review of Acts of Congress from the Founding to the Present. Lawrence. University Press of KansasCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, James Lindley. 2019. Democratic Equality. Princeton. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Gordon. [1969] 1998. The Creation of the American Republic, 1776–1787. Chapel Hill. University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Zurn, Christopher F. 2007. Deliberative Democracy and the Institutions of Judicial Review. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.2 AAA
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this chapter
complies with version 2.2 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), offering more comprehensive accessibility measures for a broad range
of users and attains the highest
(AAA)
level of WCAG compliance, optimising the user experience by meeting the most extensive
accessibility guidelines.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Visualised data also available as non-graphical data
You can access graphs or charts in a text or tabular format, so you are not excluded if you cannot process visual displays.
You can access graphs or charts in a text or tabular format, so you are not excluded if you cannot process visual displays.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Use of high contrast between text and background colour
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.