Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-zzw9c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-17T17:05:03.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feeling, Knowledge, Self-Preservation: Audre Lorde's Oppositional Agency and Some Implications for Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2020

CALEB WARD
CALEB WARD*
Affiliation:
STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY ward.caleb@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Throughout her work, Audre Lorde maintains that her self-preservation in the face of oppression depends on acting from the recognition and valorization of her feelings as a deep source of knowledge. This claim, taken as a portrayal of agency, poses challenges to standard positions in ethics, epistemology, and moral psychology. This article examines the oppositional agency articulated by Lorde's thought, locating feeling, poetry, and the power she calls ‘the erotic’ within her avowed project of self-preservation. It then explores the implications of taking seriously Lorde's account, particularly for theorists examining ethics and epistemology under nonideal social conditions. For situations of sexual intimacy, for example, Lorde's account unsettles prevailing assumptions about the role of consent in responsibility between sexual partners. I argue that obligations to solicit consent and respect refusal are not sufficient to acknowledge the value of agency in intimate encounters when agency is oppositional in the way Lorde describes.

Keywords

agencyAudre Lordeblack feminismfeminist ethicssexual consentsources of knowledge and justification

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the American Philosophical Association , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , Winter 2020 , pp. 463 - 482
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © American Philosophical Association 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

This project benefited enormously from comments by Megan Craig, Kris Sealey, Hannah Bacon, Anne O'Byrne, Stephen Darwall, and two anonymous reviewers, as well as discussions with Eva Kittay, Andrea Warmack, Michèle Leaman, and Lori Gallegos de Castillo. Special thanks to Sara Haq for early encouragement. Thanks also to audiences at philoSOPHIA, Society for Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy, and Stony Brook University, as well as to the Stony Brook Philosophy Department and Graduate School for generous travel grants.

References

Acampora, Christa Davis. (2007) ‘Authorizing Desire: Erotic Poetics and the Aisthesis of Freedom in Morrison and Shange’. In Acampora, Christa Davis and Cotten, Angela L. (eds.), Unmaking Race, Remaking Soul: Transformative Aesthetics and the Practice of Freedom (Albany: State University of New York Press), 59–78.Google Scholar
Ahmed, Sara. (2004) The Cultural Politics of Emotion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ahmed, Sara. (2006) Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Ahmed, Sara. (2010) The Promise of Happiness. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcoff, Linda. (1988) ‘Cultural Feminism versus Post-structuralism: The Identity Crisis in Feminist Theory’. Signs, 13, 405–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcoff, Linda Martín. (2018) Rape and Resistance. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Larry. (2014) ‘The Ontology of Consent’. Analytic Philosophy, 55, 102–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Michelle J. (2005) ‘Negotiating Sex’. Southern California Law Review, 78, 101–38.Google Scholar
Archard, David. (2018) ‘Sexual Consent’. In Müller, Andreas and Schaber, Peter (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of the Ethics of Consent (London: Routledge), 174–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. (2002) Must We Mean What We Say? 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cherry, Myisha. (2019) ‘Love, Anger, and Racial Justice’. In Martin, Adrienne M. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Love in Philosophy (New York: Routledge), 157–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. (2000) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Rev. ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Davis, Emmalon. (2018) ‘On Epistemic Appropriation’. Ethics, 128, 702–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dotson, Kristie. (2012) ‘A Cautionary Tale: On Limiting Epistemic Oppression’. Frontiers, 33, 24–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dotson, Kristie, and Gilbert, Marita. (2014) ‘Curious Disappearances: Affectability Imbalances and Process-Based Invisibility’. Hypatia, 29, 873–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, Tom. (2015) ‘Yes Means Yes: Consent as Communication’. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 43, 224–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanon, Frantz. (2008) Black Skin, White Masks. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Roderick A. (2012) ‘Of Sensual Matters: On Audre Lorde's “Poetry Is Not a Luxury” and “Uses of the Erotic”’. Women's Studies Quarterly, 40, 295–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, Estelle B. (2013) Redefining Rape: Sexual Violence in the Era of Suffrage and Segregation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fricker, Miranda. (2015) ‘Epistemic Contribution as a Central Human Capability’. In Hull, George (ed.), The Equal Society: Essays on Equality in Theory and Practice (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books), 73–90.Google Scholar
Ginzberg, Ruth. (1991) ‘Philosophy Is Not a Luxury’. In Card, Claudia (ed.), Feminist Ethics (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas), 126–45.Google Scholar
Ginzberg, Ruth. (1992) ‘Audre Lorde's (Nonessentialist) Lesbian Eros’. Hypatia, 7, 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Cheryl. (1998) ‘Politics, Ethics, and the “Uses of the Erotic”: Why Feminist Theorists Need to Think about the Psyche’. In On, Bat-Ami Bar and Ferguson, Ann (eds.), Daring to Be Good: Essays in Feminist Ethico-Politics (New York: Routledge), 3–14.Google Scholar
Havis, Devonya N. (2014) ‘“Now, How You Sound”: Considering a Different Philosophical Praxis’. Hypatia, 29, 237–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
hooks, bell. (2004) We Real Cool: Black Men and Masculinity. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, Gloria T. (1990) ‘Living on the Line: Audre Lorde and Our Dead behind Us’. In Wall, Cheryl A. (ed.), Changing Our Own Words: Essays on Criticism, Theory, and Writing by Black Women (New York: Routledge), 150–72.Google Scholar
Ibrahimhakkioglu, Fulden. (2017) ‘The Revolutionary Politics of Love: Pussy Riot and Punk Rock as Feminist Practice’. In Adams, Sarah LaChance et al. (eds.), New Philosophies of Sex and Love: Thinking through Desire (London: Rowman & Littlefield International), 125–43.Google Scholar
Keating, AnaLouise. (2013) Transformation Now! Toward a Post-oppositional Politics of Change. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeling, Kara. (2019) Queer Times, Black Futures. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kukla, Rebecca. (2018) ‘That's What She Said: The Language of Sexual Negotiation’. Ethics, 129, 70–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langton, Rae. (1993) ‘Speech Acts and Unspeakable Acts’. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 22, 293–330.Google Scholar
Lorde, Audre. (1978) The Black Unicorn. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Lorde, Audre. (1980) The Cancer Journals. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.Google Scholar
Lorde, Audre. (1982) Zami: A New Spelling of My Name. Freedom: Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Lorde, Audre. (1984) Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches. Freedom: Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Lorde, Audre. (2009) I Am Your Sister: Collected and Unpublished Writings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lugones, María. (2006) ‘On Complex Communication’. Hypatia, 21, 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, Joan. (2013) ‘Sexual Consent’. In LaFollette, Hugh (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Ethics (Malden: Blackwell), 8:4834–40.Google Scholar
Meyers, Diana Tietjens. (2004) Being Yourself: Essays on Identity, Action, and Social Life. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Musser, Amber Jamilla. (2014) Sensational Flesh: Race, Power, and Masochism. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musser, Amber Jamilla. (2018) Sensual Excess: Queer Femininity and Brown Jouissance. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, Jennifer C. (2013) ‘Practicing Love: Black Feminism, Love-Politics, and Post-Intersectionality’. Meridians, 11, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. (1995) ‘Objectification’. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 24, 249–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, Mariana. (2006) ‘Being Lovingly, Knowingly Ignorant: White Feminism and Women of Color’. Hypatia, 21, 56–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, David. (2011) ‘The Possibility of Consent’. Ratio, 24, 402–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pallikkathayil, Japa. (2020) ‘Consent to Sexual Interactions’. Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 19, 107–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shotwell, Alexis. (2011) Knowing Otherwise: Race, Gender, and Implicit Understanding. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, Amia. (2017) ‘The Aptness of Anger’. Journal of Political Philosophy, 26, 123–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Lindsey. (2017) ‘Work the Root: Black Feminism, Hoodoo Love Rituals, and Practices of Freedom’. Hypatia, 32, 103–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tessman, Lisa. (2005) Burdened Virtues: Virtue Ethics for Liberatory Struggles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Veaux, Alexis. (2004) Warrior Poet: A Biography of Audre Lorde. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Wertheimer, Alan. (2003) Consent to Sexual Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Robin. (1995) ‘The Harms of Consensual Sex’. American Philosophical Association Newsletters, 94, 52–55.Google Scholar
Willey, Angela. (2016) Undoing Monogamy: The Politics of Science and the Possibilities of Biology. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Patricia J. (1991) The Alchemy of Race and Rights: Diary of a Law Professor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar