Long-Term Working Memory and Language Comprehension

doi:10.1017/9781108955638.009

6 - Long-Term Working Memory and Language Comprehension

from Part II - Models and Measures

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 July 2022

R. Lane Adams and

Peter F. Delaney

Edited by

John W. Schwieter and

Zhisheng (Edward) Wen

Show author details

John W. Schwieter: Affiliation:
Wilfrid Laurier University
Zhisheng (Edward) Wen: Affiliation:
Hong Kong Shue Yan University

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Working memory’s limited capacity places significant constraints on people's ability to hold information while processing. However, skilled readers are able to effectively encode important information into long-term memory during comprehension. This chapter describes the long-term working memory theory (LT-WM), originally developed to explain how experts in various domains (including reading) enhance their working memory capacity by relying on rapid, skilled use of long-term memory. We first trace the development of the theory and the reasons it took the form it did in the mid-1990s. We explain that LT-WM was not viewed as a new form of memory, but rather as highly practiced use of long-term memory to rapidly and reliably link information together using meaningful associations, retrieval structures, and preexisting knowledge. Next, we describe how the theory accounted for many central phenomena in discourse comprehension. More recent work has proposed a form of LT-WM for syntactic processing as well, and we discuss current critiques of the original evidence advanced to support LT-WM. Finally, we describe recent studies on neural activity associated with LT-WM development in reasoning skills and language comprehension.

Keywords

long-term working memory comprehension skilled memory reading comprehension

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Working Memory and Language , pp. 98 - 119

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108955638.009 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 2(4), 89–195.CrossRef Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working Memory. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417–423.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. Cognition and the Development of Language, 279(362), 1–61.Google Scholar

Bilalić, M. (2017). The Neuroscience of Expertise. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bilalić, M. (2018). The double take of expertise: Neural expansion is associated with outstanding performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(6), 462–469.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brown, J. (1958). Some tests of the decay theory of immediate memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10(1), 12–21.Google Scholar

Campitelli, G. (2015). Memory behavior requires knowledge structures, not memory stores. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1696.Google Scholar

Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S. (1995a). Aphasic disorders of syntactic comprehension and working memory capacity. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12(6), 637–649.CrossRef Google Scholar

Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S. (1995b). On the nature of the phonological output planning processes involved in verbal rehearsal: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language, 48(2), 191–220.Google Scholar

Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S. (1999). Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 77–94.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Caplan, D., & Waters, G. (2013). Memory mechanisms supporting syntactic comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(2), 243–268.Google Scholar

Cavanna, A. E., & Trimble, M. R. (2006). The precuneus: A review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain, 129 (3), 564–583.Google Scholar

Charness, N. (1976). Memory for chess positions: Resistance to interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2(6), 641–653.Google Scholar

Chase, W. G., & Ericsson, K. A. (1982). Skill and working memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 16, 1–58.Google Scholar

Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4(1), 55–81.CrossRef Google Scholar

Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (1994). Working memory and retrieval: A resource-dependent inhibition model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123(4), 354–373.Google Scholar

Coughlin, L. D., & Patel, V. L. (1987). Processing of critical information by physicians and medical students. Journal of Medical Education, 62 (10), 818–828.Google Scholar

Cowan, N. (2008). What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory? Progress in Brain Research, 169, 323–338.Google Scholar

Crutcher, R. J., & Ericsson, K. A. (2000). The role of mediators in memory retrieval as a function of practice: Controlled mediation to direct access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(5), 1297.Google Scholar

Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(4), 450–466.Google Scholar

Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1983). Individual differences in integrating information between and within sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9(4), 561–584.Google Scholar

Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(4), 422–433.Google Scholar

DeGroot, A. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. Mouton.Google Scholar

Delaney, P. F. (2018). The role of long-term working memory and template theory in contemporary expertise research. Journal of Expertise, 1 (3), 155–161.Google Scholar

Delaney, P. F., & Ericsson, K. A. (2016). Long-term working memory and transient storage in reading comprehension: What is the evidence? Comment on Foroughi, Werner, Barragán, and Boehm-Davis (2015). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(10), 1406–1409.Google Scholar

Delaney, P. F., Wallander, R., & Preheim, G. A. (2018). Protocol analysis. In Dunn, D. S. (Ed.), Oxford bibliographies online: Psychology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, P., & Sharma, A. (2019). Distraction and temporal order in narrative situation models. Discourse Processes, 56(5–6), 402–414.Google Scholar

Engle, R. W., Cantor, J., & Carullo, J. J. (1992). Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: A test of four hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18 (5), 972–992.Google Scholar

Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J., & Tuholski, S. W. (1999). Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In Miyake, A. & Shah, P. (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 102–134). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A., & Delaney, P. F. (1998). Working memory and expert performance. In Logie, R., & Gilhooly, K. J. (Eds.), Working memory and thinking (pp. 93−114). Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A., & Delaney, P. F. (1999). Long-term working memory as an alternative to capacity models of working memory in everyday skilled performance. In Miyake, A. & Shah, P. (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 257–297). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A., Delaney, P. F., Weaver, G. E., & Mahadevan, S. (2004). Uncovering the structure of a memorist’s superior “basic” memory capacity. Cognitive Psychology, 49 (3), 191–237.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102(2), 211–245.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Rev. ed.). MIT Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A., & Staszewski, J. J. (1988). Skilled memory and expertise: Mechanisms of exceptional performance. In Klahr, D. & Kotovsky, K. J. (Eds.), Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert A. Simon (pp. 235–267). Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Estevez, A., & Calvo, M. G. (2000). Working memory capacity and the time course of predictive inferences. Memory, 8(1), 51–61.Google Scholar

Eva, K. W., Norman, G. R., Neville, A. J., Wood, T. J., Brooks, L. R. (2002). Expert-novice differences in memory: A reformulation. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 14(4), 257–263.Google Scholar

Ferreira, F., Henderson, J. M., Anes, M. D., Weeks, P. A., & McFarlane, D. K. (1996). Effects of lexical frequency and syntactic complexity in spoken-language comprehension: Evidence from the auditory moving-window technique. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(2), 324–335.Google Scholar

Ferstl, E. C., Neumann, J., Bogler, C., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2008). The extended language network: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on text comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 29(5), 581–593.Google Scholar

Fischer, B., & Glanzer, M. (1986). Short-term storage and the processing of cohesion during reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38A(3), 431–460.Google Scholar

Fletcher, C. R. (1981). Short-term memory processes in text comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(5), 264–274.Google Scholar

Foroughi, C. K., Werner, N. E., Barragán, D., & Boehm-Davis, D. A. (2015). Interruptions disrupt reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(3), 704–709.Google Scholar

Gauthier, I., Williams, P., Tarr, M. J., & Tanaka, J. (1998). Training “greeble” experts: A framework for studying expert object recognition processes. Vision Research, 38(15–16), 2401–2428.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Givón, T. (1995). Coherence in text vs. coherence in mind. In Givón, T. & Gernsbacher, M. A. (Eds.), Coherence in natural text (pp. 59–116). John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Glanzer, M., Dorfman, D., & Kaplan, B. (1981). Short-term storage in the processing of text. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(6), 656–670.Google Scholar

Glanzer, M., Fischer, B., & Dorfman, D. (1984). Short-term storage in reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23(4), 467–486.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gobet, F., & Simon, H. A. (1996a). Recall of rapidly presented random chess positions as a function of skill. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(2), 159–163.Google Scholar

Gobet, F., & Simon, H. A. (1996b). Templates in chess memory: A mechanism for recalling several boards. Cognitive Psychology, 31(1), 1–40.Google Scholar

Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Levine, W. H. (2002). Memory-load interference in syntactic processing. Psychological Science, 13(5), 425–430.Google Scholar

Guida, A., Gobet, F., Tardieu, H., & Nicolas, S. (2012). How chunks, long-term working memory and templates offer a cognitive explanation for neuroimaging data on expertise acquisition: A two-stage framework. Brain and Cognition, 79(3), 221–244.Google Scholar

Guida, A., Gras, D., Noel, Y., Le Bohec, O., Quaireau, C., & Nicolas, S. (2013). The effect of long-term working memory through personalization applied to free recall: Uncurbing the primacy-effect enthusiasm. Memory & Cognition, 41(4), 571–587.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M., & Petersson, K. M. (2004). Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science, 304(5669), 438–441.Google Scholar

Jacoby, L. L., & Wahlheim, C. N. (2013). On the importance of looking back: The role of recursive remindings in recency judgments and cued recall. Memory & Cognition, 41(5), 625–637.Google Scholar

James, A. N., Fraundorf, S. H., Lee, E. K., & Watson, D. G. (2018). Individual differences in syntactic processing: Is there evidence for reader-text interactions? Journal of Memory and Language, 102, 155–181.Google Scholar

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(1), 47–70.Google Scholar

King, J., & Just, M. A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(5), 580–602.Google Scholar

Kintsch, W. (1988). The use of knowledge in discourse processing: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182Google Scholar

Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kintsch, W. (1992a). A cognitive architecture for comprehension. In Pick, H. L. Jr., van den Broek, P., & Knill, D. (Eds.), Cognition: Conceptual and methodological issues (pp. 143–164). American Psychological Association.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kintsch, W. (1992b). How readers construct situation models for stories: The role of syntactic cues and causal inferences. In Healy, A. F., Kosslyn, S. M., & Shiffrin, R. M. (Eds.), From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (pp. 261–278). Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Kintsch, W. (1994a). Discourse processes. In d’Ydewalle, G., Eelen, P., & Bertelson, P. (Eds.), Current advances in psychological science: An international perspective (Vol. 2, pp. 135–155). Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Kintsch, W. (1994b). Text comprehension, memory, and learning. American Psychologist, 49(4), 294–303.Google Scholar

Kintsch, W., Patel, V. L., & Ericsson, K. A. (1999). The role of long-term working memory in text comprehension. Psychologia, 42(4), 186–198.Google Scholar

Kintsch, W, & Welsch, D. M. (1991). The construction-integration model: A framework for studying memory for text. In Hockley, W. E. & Lewandowsky, S. (Eds.), Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennett B. Murdoch (pp. 367–385). ErlbaumGoogle Scholar

Kintsch, W., Welsch, D., Schmalhofer, F., & Zimny, S. (1990). Sentence memory: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(2), 133–159.Google Scholar

Klein, K. A., Shiffrin, R. M., & Criss, A. H. (2007). Putting context in context. In Nairne, J. S. (Ed.), The foundations of remembering: Essays in honor of Henry L. Roediger III (p. 171–189). Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lehman, M., & Karpicke, J. D. (2016). Elaborative retrieval: Do semantic mediators improve memory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(10), 1573–1591.Google Scholar

MacDonald, M. C., Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity. Cognitive Psychology, 24(1), 56–98.Google Scholar

McElree, B., & Dyer, L. (2013). Beyond capacity: the role of memory processes in building linguistic structure in real time. In Sanz, M., Laka, I., and Tanenhaus, M. K (Eds.), Language down the garden path: The cognitive and biological basis for linguistic structures (pp. 229–240). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

McGugin, R. W., Gatenby, J. C., Gore, J. C., & Gauthier, I. (2012). High-resolution imaging of expertise reveals reliable object selectivity in the fusiform face area related to perceptual performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(42), 17063–17068.Google Scholar

McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2010). Adrift in the stream of thought: The effects of mind wandering on executive control and working memory capacity. In Gruszka, A., Matthews, G., & Szymura, B. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in cognition (pp. 321–334). Springer.Google Scholar

Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97.Google Scholar

Miller, J. R., & Kintsch, W. (1980). Readability and recall for short passages: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6(4), 335–354.Google Scholar

Myers, J. L., O’Brien, E. J., Balota, D. A., & Toyofuku, M. L. (1984). Memory search without interference: The role of integration. Cognitive Psychology, 16 (2), 217–242.Google Scholar

Neath, I., Brown, G. D. A., Poirier, M., & Fortin, C. (2005). Short-term and working memory: Past, progress, and prospects. Memory, 13(3/4), 225–235.Google Scholar

Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Perfetti, C. A., & Lesgold, A. M. (1977). Discourse comprehension and sources of individual differences. In Just, M. A. & Carpenter, P. A. (Eds.), Cognitive processes in comprehension (pp. 1–65). Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Peterson, L., & Peterson, M. J. (1959). Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(3), 193–198.Google Scholar

Pettijohn, K. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (2016). Narrative event boundaries, reading times, and expectation. Memory & Cognition, 44(7), 1064–1075.Google Scholar

Reder, L. M., & Anderson, J. R. (1980). A partial resolution of the paradox of interference: The role of integrating knowledge. Cognitive Psychology, 12(4), 447–472.Google Scholar

Sachs, J. S. (1967). Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse. Perception & Psychophysics, 2(9), 437–442.Google Scholar

Sahakyan, L., Delaney, P. F., Foster, , & Abushanab, B. (2013). List-method directed forgetting in cognitive and clinical research: A theoretical and methodological review. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 59, 131–189.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84(1), 1–66.Google Scholar

Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84(2), 127–190.Google Scholar

Singer, M. (1990). Psychology of language: An introduction to sentence and discourse processes. Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Speer, N. K., Reynolds, J. R., Swallow, K. M., & Zacks, J. M. (2009). Reading stories activates neural representations of visual and motor experiences. Psychological Science, 20(8), 989–999.Google Scholar

Speer, N. K., Reynolds, J. R., & Zacks, J. M. (2007). Human brain activity time-locked to narrative event boundaries. Psychological Science, 18(5), 449–455.Google Scholar

Trabasso, T., & Suh, S. Y. (1993). Using talk-aloud protocols to reveal inferences during comprehension of text. Discourse Processes, 16(1), 3–34.Google Scholar

Unsworth, N., Fukuda, K., Awh, E., & Vogel, E. K. (2014). Working memory and fluid intelligence: Capacity, attention control, and secondary memory retrieval. Cognitive Psychology, 71, 1–26.Google Scholar

Unsworth, N., Spillers, G. J., & Brewer, G. A. (2012). Working memory capacity and retrieval limitations from long-term memory: An examination of differences in accessibility. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(12), 2397–2410.Google Scholar

van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press.Google Scholar

Wahlheim, C. N., & Jacoby, L. (2013). Experience with proactive interference diminishes its effects: Mechanisms of change. Memory & Cognition, 39(2), 185–195.Google Scholar

Wanner, H. E., & Maratsos, M. (1978). An ATN approach to comprehension. In Halle, M. A., Bresnan, J., & Miller, G. A. (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality (pp. 119–161). MIT Press.Google Scholar

Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (1995). What the study of patients with speech disorders and of normal speakers tells us about the nature of rehearsal. In Campbell, R. and Conway, M. (Eds.), Broken memories: Case studies in memory impairment (pp. 302–330). Blackwell.Google Scholar

Whitney, C., Huber, W., Klann, J., Weis, S., Krach, S., & Kircher, T. (2009). Neural correlates of narrative shifts during auditory story comprehension. NeuroImage, 47(1), 360–366.Google Scholar

van Berkum, J. J. A., Zwitserlood, P., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2003). When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect. Cognitive Brain Research, 17(3), 701–718.Google Scholar

Zwaan, R. A. (1994). Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 920–933.Google Scholar

Zwaan, R.A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 44, 35–62.Google Scholar

Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6(5), 292–297.Google Scholar

Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(2), 386–397.Google Scholar

Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.