Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:06:11.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hittites, Ottomans and Turks: Ağaoğlu Ahmed Bey and the Kemalist construction of Turkish nationhood in Anatolia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Can Erimtan
Can Erimtan
Affiliation:
c/oBritish Institute at Ankara
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article analyses the position of the Hittites in the theoretical development of Turkish nationalism in the 20th century. The piece provides an outline of the full content of the Hittite claim in a Turkish nationalist context, particularly its promulgation as part of the so-called ‘Turkish History Thesis’. Following this, I will give full weight to the historical circumstances surrounding the emergence of the Hittite trope in Turkish writing. Basing myself on the work of Mete Tunçay, I will give proper prominence to the publication of the propaganda tract Pontus Meselesi (1922). It is my contention that the Turkish intellectual of Azerî descent, Ağaoğlu Ahmed Bey, was the sole author of the text Pontus Meselesi. The remainder of the article consists of a close reading of this geo-text. I will demonstrate that Ağaoğlu's discovery of the Hittites as worthy forebears for the Anatolian Muslims, whom he refers to as ‘Turks’ in his text, was the outcome of an ideologically motivated reading of 19th century European accounts of ancient Near Eastern history. The article shows that the propagation of the Kemalist concept of Turkish nationalism in Anatolia dates back to 1922, a year prior to the establishment of the Republic of Turkey.

Özet

Bu makalede, 20. yüzyıl Türk milliyetçiliğinin teorik gelişiminde Hititlerin yeri incelenmektedir. Burada özellikle Türk milliyetçiliğinin arka planında görülen ve ‘Türk Tarihi Tezi’ nin bir parçası olarak resmiyet kazanmış olan Hitit teması anahatları ile ele alınmaktadır. Ardından Türk yazımında ortaya çıkan Hitit mecazlarını açıklar nitelikteki tarihi gerçekler tüm boyutları ile değerlendirilmektedir. Mete Tunçay tarafından yapılan çalışmaya dayanarak, propaganda konusu olan Pontus Meselesi (1922) yayınına vurgu yapılmaktadır. Bu makalenin yazarı, Azeri kökenli Türk entellektüeli Ağaoğlu Ahmed Bey'in Pontus Meselesi metninin tek yazarı olduğu görüşündedir. Makalenin geri kalanında bu coğrafi-metin yakından incelenmektedir. Ağaoğlu, metin içinde Anadolu müslümanlarını ‘Türk’ olarak adlandırır ve onların atası olarak da Hititleri gösterir. Bu makale, Ağaoğlu çıkarımının 19. yüzyıl Avrupasındaki Eski Yakın Doğu tarihi anlatımlarındaki ideolojik yönlendirmeyle şekillendiği göstermektedir. Makalede Anadolu Türk milliyetçiliğindeki Kemalist kavram yayılımının Türkiye Cumhuriyeti'nin kurulmasından bir yıl önceye, 1922 yılına dayandığı anlatılmaktadır.

Type
Research Article
Information
Anatolian Studies , Volume 58 , December 2008 , pp. 141 - 171
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute at Ankara 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adivar, Halide Edib 1926: Memoirs. LondonGoogle Scholar
Adivar, Halide Edib 1928: The Turkish Ordeal. New York, LondonGoogle Scholar
Adivar, Halide Edib 1930: Turkey Faces West. New Haven, LondonGoogle Scholar
Ağaoğlu, 1942: İhtilâl Mi, İnkilâp Mi. AnkaraGoogle Scholar
Alp, T. 1928: Türkleşdirme. IstanbulGoogle Scholar
Alp, T. 1936: Kemalizm. IstanbulGoogle Scholar
Altınay, A.R. 1327: Küçük Tarih-i Osmanî. IstanbulGoogle Scholar
Andrews, P.A. 1992: Türkiye'de Etnik Gruplar. Tr. M. Küpüşoglu, . IstanbulGoogle Scholar
Arai, M. 1992: Turkish Nationalism in the Young Turk Era. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, H.C. 1932: Grey Wolf: Mustafa Kemal – An Intimate Study of a Dictator. LondonGoogle Scholar
Atatürk, 1963: A Speech Delivered by Mustafa Kemal Atatürk 1927. IstanbulGoogle Scholar
Aybars, E. 1975: İstiklal Mahkemeleri. IstanbulGoogle Scholar
Bahadır, İ. 2001: Ümmetten Millete Türk Ulusu'nun İnşası (1860–1945). AnkaraGoogle Scholar
Balcıoğlu, M. 1991: Belgelerle Millî Mücadele Sırasında Anadolu'da Ayaklanmalar ve Merkez Ordusu. AnkaraGoogle Scholar
Behar, B.E. 1996: İktidar ve Tarih. Türkiye'de ‘Resmi Tarih’ Tezinin Oluşumu (1929–1937) (2nd edition). IstanbulGoogle Scholar
Bell-Fiakoff, A. 1993: ‘A brief history of ethnic cleansing’ Foreign Affairs 72/3 (Summer): 110–21Google Scholar
Bittel, K. 1976: Die Hethiter. MunichGoogle Scholar
Blue Book 1916: Bryce, Lord, Toynbee, A. (eds), The Treatment of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire, 1915–1916: Documents Presented to Viscount Frey of Falloden. London, http://net.lib.byu.edu/~rdh7/wwi/1915/bryce/Google Scholar
Bolluk, H. (ed.) 2003: Kurtuluş Savaşının İdeolojisi. Hâkimiyeti Milliye Yazıları. IstanbulGoogle Scholar
Bryce Report 1915: Primary Documents: Bryce Report into German Atrocities in Belgium, 12 May 1915. http://www.firstworldwar.com/source/brycereport.htmGoogle Scholar
BTTK 1932: Birinci Türk Tarih Kongresi. Maarif Vekaleti ve Türk Tarihi tetkik Cemiyeti tarafından tertip edilmiştir. AnkaraGoogle Scholar
BTU 1912: Refik, Ahmed, Büyük Tarih-i Umûmî (vol. I) IstanbulGoogle Scholar
Bunsen, C. 1854: Christianity and Mankind, Their Beginnings and Prospects (7 vols). LondonGoogle Scholar
Burke, P. 1997: ‘Origins of cultural history’ in Burke, P., Varieties of Cultural History. Cambridge: 1–22Google Scholar
Butterfield, H. 1931: The Whig Interpretation of History. LondonGoogle Scholar
Cagaptay, S. 2004: ‘Race, assimilation and Kemalism: Turkish nationalism and the minorities in the 1930s’ Middle Eastern Studies 40/3: 86–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahun, L. 1896: Introduction à l'histoire de l'Asie. Turcs et Mongols des origines à 1405. ParisGoogle Scholar
Chrysanthos, P. 1919: The Euxine Pontus Question. Memorandum Submitted to the Peace Conference. ParisGoogle Scholar
Czaplicka, M.A. 1918: The Turks of Central Asia in History and at the Present Day: an Ethnographical Inquiry into the Pan-Turanian Problem. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Çağla, C. 2002: ‘Les Fondements Historiques de l'Etat-Nation en Azerbaidjan’ Cahiers d'études sur la Méditerranée orientale et le monde turco-iranien 31: 89–110Google Scholar
Çetin, A. 1982: ‘Osmanlı Devlet Arşivi'nin Kuruluşu ve Tasnif Çalışmaları’ Türk Dünyası Araştırmaları 21: 98–102Google Scholar
Dadrian, V.N. 1995: The History of the Armenian Genocide: Ethnic Conflict from the Balkans to Anatolia to the Caucasus. Providence, RIGoogle Scholar
Darmesteter, 1971: ‘Race and tradition’ in Jastrow, M. Jr (ed.), Selected Essays of James Darmesteter. Freeport, NYGoogle Scholar
Demirel, A. 1994: Birinci Meclis'te Muhalefet. IstanbulGoogle Scholar
Dumont, P. 1983: Mustapha Kemal invente la Turquie moderne. ParisGoogle Scholar
Duru, Kâzım Nami 1999: ‘Türkşe mi, Osmanlıca mı?’ in Parlatır, İ., Çetin, N. (eds), Genç Kalemler Dergisi. Ankara: 39–40Google Scholar
Dündar, F. 2001: İttihat ve Terakki'nin Müslümanlari İskan Politikasi (1913–1918). IstanbulGoogle Scholar
Dündar, F. 2001: ‘Fuat Dündar: 1915 was part of a “systematic ethnic engineering” project’, interview by Talin Suciyan (16 April 2007). http://www.armeniangenocide.com/showthread.php?t=2507Google Scholar
Düstur 1929: Düstur: Kanunları, Tefsırleri ve B.M. M.si Kararlarını, Nizamname ve Muahede ve Umuma ait Mukavelâtı muhtevidir. 8 Mart 1338 – 8 Şubat 1339 (series 3, vol. 3). IstanbulGoogle Scholar
Earle, E.M. 1925: ‘The new constitution of Turkey’ Political Science Quarterly 40/1: 73–100Google Scholar
Etibank Kanunu 1960: 14 Haziran 1935. Resmî Gazete ile Neşir ve İlanı 2/VI/1935 Sayı 3635Google Scholar
Eyice, S. 1968: ‘Atatürk'ün Büyük Bir Tarih Yazdırma Teşebbüsü: Türk Tarihin Ana Hatları’ Belleten 32/128: 509–26Google Scholar
Fourteen Points: ‘President Woodrow Wilson's Fourteen Points’. http://wwi.lib.byu.edu/index.php/President_Wilson%27s_Fourteen_Points; ‘The Allies' Conditional Acceptance of the Fourteen Points’. http://wwi.lib.byu.edu/index.php/The_Allies%27_Conditional_Acceptance_of_the_Fourteen_PointsGoogle Scholar
Gençkaya, Ö.F. 1876: ‘The Ottoman Constitution 23 December 1876’. http://www.bilkent.edu.tr/~genckaya/documentsl.htmlGoogle Scholar
Georgeon, F. 1982: ‘Les foyers turcs à l'époque kémaliste (1923–1931)’ Turcica 14: 168–215Google Scholar
Goloğlu, M. 1973: Anadolu'nun Millî Devleti Pontos. IstanbulGoogle Scholar
Göçgün, Ö. 1999: Namık Kemal'in Şairliği ve Bütün Şiirleri. AnkaraGoogle Scholar
Gökalp, Z. 1980: ‘İnkılâpçılık ve Muhafazakârlık’ Anadoluda Yeni Gün no. 1180–3 (17 May 1339/1923) in Beysanoğlu, Ş. (ed.), Makeleler IX. Yeni Gün-Yeni Türkiye-Cumhuriyet Gazeterlerinde Yazılar. Istanbul: 38–42Google Scholar
Güneş, İ. 1997: Birinci TBMM'nin Düşünce Yapısı (1920–1923). AnkaraGoogle Scholar
Halo, T. 2000: Not Even My Name: From a Death March in Turkey to a New Home in America, a Young Girl's True Story of Genocide and Survival. New YorkGoogle Scholar
de Hammer, J. 1835: Histoire de l'Empire Ottoman (vol. 1). Ed. Hellert, J.J.. ParisGoogle Scholar
Hionides, C. 1997: ‘The Pontian Greek genocide: an introduction’ Journal of the Centre for Comparative Genocide Studies 13/1: 18–22Google Scholar
Hommel, F. 1888: Geschichte Babyloniens und Assyriens. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Hrozny, F. 1915: Die Lösung des Hethitischen Problems. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Hrozny, F. 1917: Die Sprache der Hethiter. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Huntington, S. 1993: ‘The clash of civilizations’ Foreign Affairs 72/3: 22–49Google Scholar
İğdemir, U. 1973: Cumhuriyetin 50. Yılında Türk Tarih Kurumu. AnkaraGoogle Scholar
İnan, Â. 1963: Atatürk ve İlim. AnkaraGoogle Scholar
İnsel, A. 2005: ‘Irkçı olamayan milliyetçilik’ Radikal İki 442 (27 March). http://www.radikal.com.tr/ek_haber.php?ek=r2äGoogle Scholar
Ibn Khaldun, 1958: The Muqaddimah: an Introduction to History (3 vols). Tr. Franz, Rosenthal. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Jäschke, G. 1966: ‘Neuordnung der geistlichen Verwaltung in der Türkei’ Die Welt des Islams (new series) 10, 3/4: 181–92Google Scholar
Jaeschke, G. 1989: Türk Kurtuluş Savaşı Kronolojisi. Mondros'tan Mudanya'ya Kadar (30 Ekim 1918–11 Ekim 1922) (2nd edition). AnkaraGoogle Scholar
Jung, D., Piccoli, W. 2001: Turkey at the Crossroads. Ottoman Legacies and a Greater Middle East. London, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. 2004: ‘Territorializing Armenians: geo-texts, and political imaginaries in French-occupied Cilicia, 1919–1922’ History and Anthropology 15/4: 399–423Google Scholar
Kifner, J. 2007: ‘Armenian genocide of 1915: an overview’ The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/ref/timestopics/topics_armeniangenocide.htmlGoogle Scholar
Kili, S. 1969: Kemalism. IstanbulGoogle Scholar
Knudtzon, J.A. 1902: Die zwei Arzawa Briefe: die ältesten Urkunden in Indo-Germanischer Sprache. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Lemkin, R. 1944: Axis Rule in Occupied Europe: Laws of Occupation – Analysis of Government – Proposals for Redress. Washington DCGoogle Scholar
Lemkin, R. 1946: ‘Genocide’ American Scholar 15/2: 227–30Google Scholar
Lewis, B. 1968: ‘The Mongols, the Turks and the Muslim polity’ Transactions of the Royal Historical Society (5th series) 18: 49–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacMillan, M. 2003: Paris 1919: Six Months That Changed the World. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Macridy-Bey, T. 1908: La porte des sphinx à Euyuk. Fouilles du Musée Impérial Ottoman (Mitteilungen der Vorderasiatischen Gesellschaft 13/3). BerlinGoogle Scholar
Mango, A. 2002: Atatürk: The Biography of the Founder of Modern Turkey. Woodstock, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Mango, A. 2002: ‘Kemalism in a new century’ in Beeley, B. (ed.), Turkish Transformation: New Century – New Challenges. Huntingdon: 22–36Google Scholar
Mercure de France June 1724 (Slatkine Reprints 1969). GenevaGoogle Scholar
Manual 1920: A Manual on Turanians and Pan-Turianism. LondonGoogle Scholar
Max Muller, F. 1895: ‘James Darmesteter and his studies in Zend literature: 1849–1894’ The Jewish Quarterly Review 7/2: 173–94Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. 1980: ‘Greeks statistics on Ottoman-Greek population’ International Journal of Turkish Studies 1/2: 66–76Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. 1983: Muslims and Minorities: The Population of Ottoman Anatolia and the End of the Empire. New York, LondonGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, J. 1996: Death and Exile. The Ethnic Cleansing of Ottoman Muslims 1821–1922. PrincetonGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, J. 2001: The Ottoman Peoples and the End of Empire. London, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Morgan, J. de 1889: Mission scientifique au Caucase, études archéologiques & historiques. ParisGoogle Scholar
Moscati, S. 1968: The World of the Phoenicians. LondonGoogle Scholar
Mumcu, A. 1982: Tarih Açısından Türk Devriminin Temelleri ve Gelişimi (7th edition). IstanbulGoogle Scholar
Namık Kemal, M. 1910–1911/1326: Osmanlı Tarihi (new edition). IstanbulGoogle Scholar
Nobel 1919: ‘Woodrow Wilson. The Nobel Peace Prize 1919’. http://nobelprize.org/peace/laureates/1919/wilson-bio.htmlGoogle Scholar
Nûr, R. 1242–1244: Türk Tarihi (12 vols). IstanbulGoogle Scholar
NYT: http://www.aihgs.com/New%20York%20Times.htmGoogle Scholar
NYT, 24/9: ‘500,000 Armenians Said To Have Perished’ The New York Times (24 September 1915). http://www.armenian-genocide.org/9-24-15.htmlGoogle Scholar
NYT, 7/10: ‘800, 000 Armenians Counted Destroyed’ The New York Times (7 October 1915). http://www.armenian-genocide.org/10-7-15.htmlGoogle Scholar
NYT, 21/8: ‘Armenians Dying in Prison Camps’ The New York Times (21 August 1916). http://www.armenian-genocide.org/8-21-16.htmlGoogle Scholar
Onur, M. 2004: ‘Pontusçu Rumların Avrupa'daki Faaliyetleri ve Paris Barış Konferansı'ndaki Girişimleri’ Ata Dergisi 12: 93–104Google Scholar
Özcan, U. 2002: Ahmet Ağaoğlu ve Rol Değişikliği: Yüzyıl Dönümünde Batıcı bir Aydin. IstanbulGoogle Scholar
Paillarès, M. 1922: Le Kémalisme devant les allies. Constantinople, ParisGoogle Scholar
Parla, T. 1985: The Social and Political Thought of Ziya Gökalp 1876–1924. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Parlatır, İ, Çetin, N. 1999: Genç Kalemler Dergisi. AnkaraGoogle Scholar
PEF: http://www.pef.org.uk/Pages/People/Wilson.htmGoogle Scholar
Pentzopoulos, D. 1962: The Balkan Exchange of Minorities and its Impact upon Greece. AthensGoogle Scholar
Perrot, G., Chipiez, C. 1892: History of Art in Phrygia, Lydia, Caria and Lycia. LondonGoogle Scholar
Petrovic, D. 1994: ‘Ethnic cleansing – an attempt at methodology’ European Journal of International Law 5: 1–19Google Scholar
Pontus, 2002: Pontus Meselesi. Arap alfabesinden aktarilan, notlu ve tenkitli şekilde. Ed. Gedikli, Y.. IstanbulGoogle Scholar
Poulton, H. 1997: Top Hat, Grey Wolf and Crescent: Turkish Nationalism and the Turkish Republic. LondonGoogle Scholar
Preece, J.J. 2000: ‘Ethnic cleansing and the normative transformation of international society’. http://www.comm.ucsb.edu/research/mstohl/failed_states/2000/papers/jacksonpreece.htmlGoogle Scholar
Radloff, W. 1894–1899: Die alttürkischen Inschriften der Mongolei (3 vols). St PetersburgGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, W.M. 1890: The Historical Geography of Asia Minor. London (reprinted Amsterdam 1962)Google Scholar
Reid, D. 2002: Whose Pharaohs? Archaeology, Museums and Egyptian National Identity from Napoleon to World War I. Berkeley, LondonGoogle Scholar
Renan, E. 1994: ‘Qu'est qu'une nation?’ in Hutchinson, J., Smith, A.D. (eds), Nationalism. Oxford, New York: 17–18Google Scholar
Sakal, F. 1999: Ağaoğlu Ahmed Bey. AnkaraGoogle Scholar
Sanders, M.L. 1975: ‘Wellington House and British propaganda during the First World War’ The Historical Journal 18/1: 119–46Google Scholar
Shaw, S.J. 1977: History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey (vol. 2). CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Shaw, S.J. 2000: From Empire to Republic (1918–1923): The Turkish War of National Liberation (vol. 2). AnkaraGoogle Scholar
Shissler, A.H. 2003: Between Two Empires. Ahmet Ağaoğlu and the New Turkey. London, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Soteriades, G. 1919: ‘Hellenism in the Near East: an ethnological map compiled from the latest statistics’ The Sphere: An Illustrated Newspaper for the Home (1 March 1919). http://www.imagesonline.bl.uk/results.asp?image=009092&imagex=l&searchnum=3Google Scholar
Şimşir, B. 1985: Malta Sürgünleri. AnkaraGoogle Scholar
TBMM: http://www.tbmm.gov.tr/tarihce/kb5.htmGoogle Scholar
TCEE: The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/lEl-Mithrada.htmlGoogle Scholar
Tevetoğlu, F. 1991: Millî Mücadele Yıllarındaki Kuruluşlar. AnkaraGoogle Scholar
Texier, C. 1839: Description de l'Asie Mineure (3 vols). ParisGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, V. 1919–1931: Samlede afhandlinger, 1842–1927. CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
Toynbee, A.J. 1917: Turkey: A Past and a Future. LondonGoogle Scholar
Toynbee, A.J. 1925: The World After the Peace Conference. LondonGoogle Scholar
Toynbee, A.J., Kirkwood, K.P. 1926: Turkey. LondonGoogle Scholar
Treaty, 1913: ‘Treaty of Peace between Bulgaria and Turkey’ The American Journal of International Law 8/1 supplement: 27–45Google Scholar
Treaty, 1920: Treaty of Peace with Turkey. Signed at Sèvres, August 10, 1920. LondonGoogle Scholar
TTAH 1930: Türk Tarihinin Ana Hatları. IstanbulGoogle Scholar
TTAH 1931: Türk Tarihinin Ana Hatları – Methal Kısmı. IstanbulGoogle Scholar
Tunçay, M. 1981: Türk Cumhuriyetinin Tek Parti Yönetiminin Kurulması (1923–1931). AnkaraGoogle Scholar
Ubicini, A. 1877: La constitution ottomane du 7 zilhidjé 1293 (23 décembre 1876). Expliquée et annottée. ParisGoogle Scholar
UT 1926: Refik, Ahmed, Umûmî Tarih. Tarih-i Kadim-Kurûn-ı Vustâ. IstanbulGoogle Scholar
UT 1928: Refik, Ahmed, Umûmî Tarih. Kurûn-ı Kadim, Garb Kurûn-ı Vustâsı. IstanbulGoogle Scholar
Vefik, A. 1286/1869: Fezleke-i Tarih-i Osmanî. DersaadetGoogle Scholar
Winckler, H. 1892: Geschichte Babyloniens und Assyriens. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Winckler, H. 1899: Die Völker Vorderasiens. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Winckler, H. 1902: Die babylonische Kultur und ihre Beziehungen zur unsrigen: Ein Vortrag (2nd edition). LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Winckler, H. 1906: Die im Sommer 1906 in Kleinasien ausgeführten Ausgrabungen. BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winckler, H. 1907: Die babylonische Geisteskultur in ihren Beziehungen zur Kulturentwicklung der Menschheit. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Winichakul, T. 1994: Siam Mapped: A History of the Geo-Body of a Nation. HonoluluGoogle Scholar
Wright, W. 1884: The Empire of the Hittites. LondonGoogle Scholar
Yeğen Summer, M. 2002: ‘Yurttaşlık ve Türklük’ Toplum ve Bilim 93: 200–17Google Scholar
Yerasimos, S. 1988–1989: ‘Pontus Meselesi (1912–1923)’ Toplum ve Bilim 43/44: 33–76Google Scholar
Yıldırım, O. 2006: Diplomacy and Displacement: Reconsidering the Turco-Greek Exchange of Populations, 1922–1934. New YorkGoogle Scholar
de Zayas, A. 2003: ‘The twentieth-century's first genocide: international law, impunity, the right to reparations, and the ethnic cleansing against the Armenians’ in Várdy, S.B., Tooley, T.H. (eds), Ethnic Cleansing in Twentieth-Century Europe. Boulder: 157–81Google Scholar
Zimmern, H. 2000: The Epic of Kings or Shahname. Ames, IowaGoogle Scholar
Zürcher, E.J. ‘From’: ‘From empire to republic – problems of transition, continuity and change’. www.let.leidenuniv.nl/tcimo/tulp/Research/Fromtorep.htmGoogle Scholar
Zürcher, E.J. ‘Ottoman Sources’: ‘Ottoman sources of Kemalist thought’. http://www.let.leidenuniv.nl/tcimo/tulp/Research/MUNCHEN2.htmGoogle Scholar
Zürcher, E.J. 1984: The Unionist Factor. The Rôle of the Committee of Union and Progress in the Turkish National Movement 1905–1926. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Zürcher, E.J. 1993: Turkey. A Modern History. London, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zürcher, E.J. 1998: ‘The rise and fall of “modern” Turkey’. http://www.let.leidenuniv.nl/tcimo/tulp/Research/Lewis.htmGoogle Scholar
Zürcher, E.J. 2000: ‘The core terminology of Kemalism: Mefkûre, Millî, Muasır, Medenî’ in Georgeon, F. (ed.), Les mots de politique de l'Empire Ottoman à la Turquie Kemaliste. Paris: 55–64Google Scholar
Zürcher, E.J. 2000/2002: ‘Young Turks, Ottoman Muslims and Turkish Nationalists: identity politics, 1908–1938’ in Karpat, K.H. (ed.), Ottoman Past and Today's Turkey. Leiden: 150–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zürcher, E.J. 2003: ‘Greek and Turkish refugees and deportees 1912–1924’. http://www.let.leidenuniv.nl/tcimo/tulp/Research/ejz18.htmGoogle Scholar