Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-n8gtw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T09:16:49.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Orchid embryo-to-seed (E:S) ratio as an indicator of germination behaviour and its ecological implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 December 2024

Spyridon Oikonomidis*
Affiliation:
Section of Botany, Department of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 15784, Greece
Costas A. Thanos
Affiliation:
Section of Botany, Department of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 15784, Greece
*
Corresponding author: Spyridon Oikonomidis; Email: soikonomidis@biol.uoa.gr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although the seeds of various Orchidaceae members can be readily germinated on sterile nutrient media, numerous species exhibit complete asymbiotic germination failure. Also, while seed morphology in orchids has been previously linked to dispersal, associations with germinability have not been widely explored. We compiled seed morphometric and germination data for 203 orchid species globally, drawing from international literature and our lab's unpublished findings. Based on (a) final germination percentage and (b) pre-treatment duration, two distinct groups of asymbiotic germination behaviour emerged – termed compliant and defiant, respectively. Additionally, a statistically significant relationship between germinability and the embryo-to-seed (E:S) length ratio was observed. E:S values tended to be lower in species with defiant germination and higher in those with compliant germination. We further correlated seed morphometric and germination data with phylogenetically and ecologically significant parameters (subfamily, growth form, mycoheterotrophy level, climatic zone and habitat shadiness). Notably, lower E:S values and defiant germination predominate in orchids of shaded habitats, while compliant germination is more prevalent in open habitats. Lastly, considering the mycoheterotrophy continuum, we propose that the reduction in the E:S ratio is linked to the adaptation of various orchid lineages to shaded habitats through both an increased dispersal ability and their greater reliance on fungal symbiosis.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Dataset breakdown by Orchidaceae subfamilies

Figure 1

Figure 1. The relationship of E:S with germination type (A), habitat shadiness (B), climate zone (C), mycoheterotrophy level (D) and growth form (E) for a dataset of 203 members of the family Orchidaceae (see Table 1). The yellow dot inside each viol-boxplot corresponds to the mean of the group (m). The test statistics [loge(WMann–Whitney)], P-value (P), effect size (r), its confidence interval (CI95%), and the total number (nobs) of observations are shown on the top of each diagram. The number of observations in each category is displayed beneath the group name on the x-axis.

Figure 2

Figure 2. The relationship of E:S with germination type and habitat shadiness is depicted separately for the subfamilies Epidendroideae (A, B) and Orchidoideae (C, D). The yellow dot inside each viol-boxplot corresponds to the mean of the group (m). The test statistics [loge(WMann–Whitney)], P-value (P), effect size (r), its confidence interval (CI95%), and the number (nobs) of observations are shown on the top of each diagram.

Figure 3

Figure 3. FAMD factor maps, obtained through the factor analysis for mixed data approach (FAMD analysis), depict the clustering patterns of the 203 species in the dataset based on the five variables studied (E:S, germination type, habitat shadiness, growth form and climate zone). Each factor map corresponds to the clustering pattern of the species based on one of the four categorical variables in the dataset. For each variable in the corresponding factor map, the convex hull and the 95% confidence interval ellipse are presented, with the group mean at its centre.

Figure 4

Figure 4. The relationship between E:S and FG percentage is accompanied by the best-fitted second-degree polynomial curve. The colour of the dots represents the ‘trait index’ as shown in the legend (for the explanation of the TI values, see Materials and Methods). The equation of the GLM regression is also shown in the inset box, along with the three pseudo-R2 values, which correspond to (1) McFadden, (2) Cox and Snell, and (3) Nagelkerke, respectively.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Variable tree representing the complete dataset of the study. In each box, the number of observations, the percentage in the group and the level of the dividing factor are presented. The root of the tree represents the number of observations in the entire dataset. The name of the dividing factor for each step of the tree is also presented at the base of the graph.

Supplementary material: File

Oikonomidis and Thanos supplementary material 1

Oikonomidis and Thanos supplementary material
Download Oikonomidis and Thanos supplementary material 1(File)
File 10.2 MB
Supplementary material: File

Oikonomidis and Thanos supplementary material 2

Oikonomidis and Thanos supplementary material
Download Oikonomidis and Thanos supplementary material 2(File)
File 40.3 MB
Supplementary material: File

Oikonomidis and Thanos supplementary material 3

Oikonomidis and Thanos supplementary material
Download Oikonomidis and Thanos supplementary material 3(File)
File 42.6 KB