Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-dqfph Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-11T09:30:26.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Milrinone in late tetralogy of Fallot repair: physiologic rationale, clinical evidence, and perspectives from low- and middle-income countries—a state-of-the-art review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2026

Joram Lawrence Nyandat*
Affiliation:
Pediatric Critical Care, Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital, Kenya Cardiothoracic Centre, Tenwek Hospital, Kenya
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Milrinone is commonly used after congenital heart surgery, yet its role following late repair of tetralogy of Fallot remains poorly defined. In many low- and middle-income country settings, children present for repair at older ages after prolonged exposure to right ventricular pressure overload and chronic cyanosis, resulting in post-operative physiology that differs fundamentally from early infant repair. Extrapolation from heterogeneous paediatric cardiac surgery populations may therefore be inappropriate. This review examines the pathophysiologic substrate of late-presenting tetralogy of Fallot and explores how milrinoneʼs pharmacologic profile intersects with dominant post-operative vulnerabilities.

Physiologic Considerations:

Restrictive right ventricular physiology, combined with pulmonary vascular hyperreactivity and impaired ventriculo-arterial coupling, creates a fragile right ventricular–pulmonary arterial unit with limited reserve after repair. As a phosphodiesterase-3 inhibitor, milrinone produces coordinated effects on right ventricular lusitropy, pulmonary vasodilation, and inotropy that directly target these mechanisms, supporting selective use when diastolic dysfunction and elevated afterload predominate.

Current Evidence:

The existing evidence base is derived largely from infant cohorts and mixed CHD populations, with few data addressing older children undergoing late tetralogy of Fallot repair and none specific to low- and middle-income countries. In the absence of lesion-specific evidence, routine or prophylactic use cannot be justified. Instead, a pragmatic, physiology-guided approach is proposed.

Conclusion:

The central question is not whether milrinone is beneficial after tetralogy of Fallot repair, but in whom, when, and why. Addressing this gap will require pragmatic trials or prospective registries focused on late tetralogy of Fallot repair that integrate physiologic and clinically meaningful outcomes. Until such data emerge, selective, mechanism-based use represents a rational strategy in resource-variable settings.

Information

Type
Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Figure 1 long description.Pathophysiologic cascade in late-presenting tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) and mechanistic targets of milrinone. The left panel illustrates the maladaptive pathophysiology of late-presenting TOF. Chronic right ventricular (RV) pressure overload leads to hypertrophy, interstitial fibrosis, and restrictive physiology, while prolonged cyanosis drives erythrocytosis, endothelial dysfunction, and pulmonary vascular hyperreactivity. These processes converge to create a fragile RV–pulmonary arterial (PA) unit characterised by impaired ventriculo-arterial coupling and limited physiologic reserve. The right panel depicts milrinone’s cellular mechanism as a phosphodiesterase-3 (PDE3) inhibitor, increasing intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) in cardiomyocytes and vascular smooth muscle, thereby producing coordinated lusitropy, pulmonary and systemic vasodilation, and modest inotropy. Collectively, these effects target the dominant haemodynamic vulnerabilities after late TOF repair and aim to stabilise the high-risk post-operative state. PVR = pulmonary vascular resistance; SERCA2a = sarco/endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase 2a.

Figure 1

Figure 2. The milrinone evidence landscape in repaired tetralogy of Fallot (TOF): existing data and critical gaps. The schematic illustrates a hierarchy of evidence supporting the use of milrinone after congenital heart surgery. The broad upper tier represents robust data from landmark randomised controlled trials (e.g., PRIMACORP) conducted in heterogeneous paediatric cardiac surgery populations, predominantly infants. The intermediate tier reflects limited observational data from CHD cohorts that include some TOF patients, often across mixed age groups. The narrow lower tier highlights the critical evidence gap: the absence of dedicated, high-quality studies focusing specifically on older, cyanotic children undergoing late TOF repair—particularly in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) settings, where delayed presentation is common and post-operative physiology differs fundamentally from early-repair cohorts. This gap underscores the need for future pragmatic, lesion-specific research to define optimal therapeutic use. RCT = randomised controlled trial.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Proposed physiology-guided algorithm for post-operative management after late tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) repair in resource-limited settings. This algorithm emphasises integrated clinical and echocardiographic assessment rather than invasive haemodynamic monitoring. Key decision points focus on identifying physiologic markers of RV–PA vulnerability, including echocardiographic evidence of restrictive RV filling, elevated RV afterload, or clinical signs of low cardiac output. In selected patients, milrinone is initiated cautiously—typically without a loading bolus—and titrated according to clinical and echocardiographic response. Boxes highlighted in yellow denote considerations particularly relevant to low- and middle-income country (LMIC) contexts, including drug availability, cost constraints, and the role of milrinone as a primary pulmonary vasodilator in the absence of inhaled nitric oxide or advanced mechanical support. The algorithm reinforces a pragmatic, patient-tailored strategy rather than a universal protocol. RV = right ventricle; LCOS = low cardiac output syndrome; iNO = inhaled nitric oxide.