Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-f97m6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-25T02:48:37.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The influence of social support on the relationship between HIV-related stigma, mental health and suicidality among young women living with HIV in South Africa: A moderated mediation analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2026

Wylene Saal
Affiliation:
Department of Social Sciences, Sol Plaatje University , South Africa
Siyanai Zhou
Affiliation:
Centre for Social Science Research, University of Cape Town, South Africa
Christina Laurenzi*
Affiliation:
Institute for Life Course Health Research, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University , South Africa
Kathryn J. Steventon Roberts
Affiliation:
Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford , UK
Lulama Sidloyi
Affiliation:
Centre for Social Science Research, University of Cape Town, South Africa
Babalwa Taleni
Affiliation:
Centre for Social Science Research, University of Cape Town, South Africa
Lucie Cluver
Affiliation:
Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford , UK Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, South Africa
Elona Toska
Affiliation:
Centre for Social Science Research, University of Cape Town, South Africa Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford , UK
*
Corresponding author: Christina Laurenzi; Email: christinalaurenzi@sun.ac.za
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) living with HIV are at increased risk of developing suicidality. Yet little is known about the effects of HIV-related stigma, mental health challenges and social support on suicidality among AGYW living with HIV. We analysed cross-sectional data from 711 AGYW living with HIV who participated in two large prospective South African cohort studies, Mzantsi Wakho (2017–2018) and HEY BABY (2018–2019). Standardised and validated questionnaires were used to measure HIV-related stigma, mental health symptomology (mediator), social support (moderator) and suicidality (outcome). A moderated mediation analysis was used to investigate (1) the direct effects of HIV-related stigma on suicidality, (2) the indirect effects as mediated through mental health symptomology and (3) the moderating effects of social support on mental health issues and suicidality, adjusted for potential confounders. Higher HIV-related stigma (β = 0.45 [0.13, 0.78], p < 0.001) was directly associated with higher suicidality. Mental health symptomology was associated with increased risk of suicidality (β = 1.05 [0.66, 1.44], p < 0.001) and partially mediated the effect of HIV-related stigma on suicidality. Social support buffered the indirect effects of HIV-related stigma on suicidality (β = 0.86, bias-corrected 95% CI [0.01, 2.41]). HIV-related stigma is associated with higher suicidality. Programmes that simultaneously address stigma and strengthen social support services may improve mental health and reduce suicidality among AGYW living with HIV.

Topics structure

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press or the rights holder(s) must be obtained prior to any commercial use.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Hypothesised models for mediation analysis (hypothesis 1) and moderated mediation analysis (hypothesis 2) assessing associations between HIV-related stigma, mental health symptomology, social support and suicidality.

Figure 1

Table 1. Descriptive statistics and frequencies (N = 711)Table 1. long description.

Figure 2

Table 2. Analysis of total, direct and indirect effectsTable 2. long description.

Figure 3

Figure 2. Direct effects for the mediation model for hypothesis 1 (Hayes model 4). Note: *Single-headed arrows indicate regression paths, and rectangles represent measured variables. Coefficients are shown for statistically significant paths, whereas paths with dashed lines were not significant. Adjusted for age (years), rural residence, informal housing, poverty (do not have access to all basic necessities), motherhood, being in a relationship and mode of HIV acquisition. *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; *p < 0.05.

Figure 4

Figure 3. Moderated mediation model examining the interaction between HIV-related stigma and social support in relation to mental health symptomology and suicidality (n = 711). *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; *p < 0.05.Figure 3. long description.

Figure 5

Table 3. Conditional indirect and direct effects of HIV-related stigma on suicidality, at different levels of social support, with bias-corrected 95% confidence intervalsTable 3. long description.

Supplementary material: File

Saal et al. supplementary material 1

Saal et al. supplementary material
Download Saal et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 21.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Saal et al. supplementary material 2

Saal et al. supplementary material
Download Saal et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 65.7 KB

Author comment: The influence of social support on the relationship between HIV-related stigma, mental health and suicidality among young women living with HIV in South Africa: A moderated mediation analysis — R0/PR1

Comments

15 September 2025

To the Editors

Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health

Special Issue: Self-harm and Suicide: A Global Priority

Dear Editors,

We are pleased to submit our manuscript entitled “The influence of social support on the relationship between HIV-related stigma, mental health, and suicidality among young women living with HIV in South Africa: A moderated mediation analysis” for consideration in your special issue on Self-harm and Suicide: A Global Priority.

Adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) living with HIV in South Africa face disproportionately high levels of psychological distress and suicide risk. Yet, the mechanisms linking HIV-related stigma to suicidality—and the potential protective role of social support—remain insufficiently explored. Our study addresses this gap by examining whether mental health symptomology mediates the association between stigma and suicidality, and whether social support buffers these effects.

The analysis draws on data from 711 AGYW living with HIV, pooled from two large South African cohort studies (Mzantsi Wakho and HEY BABY). Using validated measures and a moderated mediation approach, we found that HIV-related stigma was directly associated with suicidality and partially mediated through mental health symptomology. We also found that social support significantly moderated the pathway from stigma to mental health symptoms, thereby reducing the indirect effect of stigma on suicidality among those with higher levels of social support.

These findings have important implications for suicide prevention in low- and middle-income settings. Interventions that simultaneously reduce stigma, strengthen mental health services, and enhance social support may offer meaningful protective benefits for vulnerable populations such as AGYW living with HIV.

We believe this work aligns closely with the aims of Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health, which seeks evidence from LMICs on suicide prevention, particularly for adolescent populations at elevated risk. The manuscript has not been submitted elsewhere, and the authors declare no conflicts of interest.

We thank you for considering our submission and look forward to your feedback.

Sincerely,

Dr. Wylene Saal

On behalf of all authors

Review: The influence of social support on the relationship between HIV-related stigma, mental health and suicidality among young women living with HIV in South Africa: A moderated mediation analysis — R0/PR2

Conflict of interest statement

No COI to report.

Comments

The paper addresses a very important topic involving mental health in those living with HIV. However, I’ve found that the introduction is a bit hard to follow, and authors could dedicate some effort aiming at increasing flow and clarity. The rationale is not extensively presented, and descriptions of past studies are needed. There are sentences with confounding word choices (such as “geographic distribution of evidence” and “population is significant and underserved”). The methods are equally confusing. Nonetheless, my comments are detailed next:

Introduction: Needs extensive work. Regarding internalised stigma, I was wondering if the measure does not overlap with core symptoms of depression. In order to ‘internalise’ guilt, shame and other elements captured by the scale, I would assume that some time might have passed so these processed are ingrained in oneself.

The introduction would benefit from using subheadings, in which blocks of ideas are put together. It also needs to be expanded, mainly because some topics are just touched, without in-depth analysis.

The role of gender in suicidal behaviour might also overlap with other variables included in the study. Hence, studies comparing suicide tendencies in girls with and without HIV must be scrutinized and point estimates compared and discussed in-depth.

Data on the stigma index, conducted by UNAIDS, would enhance your literature review immensely. UNAIDS has an interactive dashboard in which you can visualise the data on stigma across the globe.

You can either stick with internalised stigma and expand on it, or discuss all the other types of stigmas experienced by those living with HIV. Please, have a look at the reports from the Stigma Index research for reference.

The following statement is rather ambitious “However, there is a limited understanding of the pathways through which mental health symptomology and HIV-related stigma may act to increase the risk of suicidality”. It is known that depression is a strong predictor of suicide, and stressful live events (such as the impact of HIV diagnosis) greatly increases the likelihood of suicide attempts. Please, revise the wording or put in perspective/context.

Methods: It is also hard to follow, as information is presented in an unorganised manner. Please, clearly indicate your design. Also, use guidelines to assure readability of each section. In your case, I assume the STROBE statement applies. Attach it when sending your revised manuscript.

It is not clear if data is longitudinal (2017 and 2019) or cross-sectional. If cross-sectional, statistical terminology will differ. References to consult include PMID: 38127571.

Ho was HIV diagnosis based (rapid tests or blood analyses)? How many experienced any serious harm or risk? This is of vital importance as many scholars are studying this subject nowadays. I know that is might look ‘bad’ for the paper to brutally inform such events, but we are dealing with serious issues, and the scientific community might learn a lot on how other scholars are dealing with potential risks in their research endeavours.

I do not see the necessity of this “In 2021, the referral process was strengthened by the signing of a new contract with Masithethe counselling services, which enabled participants to speak to a counsellor immediately through a dedicated referral line” within the methods since it appears that your data goes back to 2019.

Did you validate the ALHIV-SS for the study? If so, data from CFA are needed. Moreover, does this measure capture internalised stigma? If not, your introduction should focus more on general HIV-related stigma.

Alphas for some instruments were not presented. Please, do not be vague (i.e., “All measures performed well in this sample” and “robust construct validity”). How did you assess this?

The mediators and moderators should be depicted at the end of the introduction, following a strong rationale that leads to the current study.

In the discussion, please discuss the significant findings and provide point estimates along with p values and CI. Several claims are presented in the discussion that are lacking proper reference (ex.: combined burden of HIV with motherhood, HIV vertical transmission, and so on).

The causal language in the discussion must be revised with total attention since it appears that your data is cross-sectional. Again, use the Strobe statement as a guide to ensure all key elements are included.

Figures have notes of abbreviations not used in them. Double-check this, please.

Review: The influence of social support on the relationship between HIV-related stigma, mental health and suicidality among young women living with HIV in South Africa: A moderated mediation analysis — R0/PR3

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Good paper, some minor suggestions

Introduction

- What is mental health symptomology? Could you define? Do you mean poor mental health ?

- Page 3

o line 55 – mental health burden among emerging adults

o Line 57 – higher rates of mental health symptomology – do you mean more commonly report symptoms of depression and suicidal ideation compared to boys? However, boys are more likely to attempt suicide than girls? Sentence not clear

- Page 4

o Line 74 negative effect of HIV-related shame … on mental health?

o Lien 88 untreated mental health disorders?

Methods

- TO clarify, is this all cross-sectional data? Sometimes you refer to data as “baseline” data, but I can’t tell if everything was collected at the same time point.

- Measures

○ Outcome – You’ve created a binary variable for past-month suicidal ideation or behaviors?

○ Stigma – Binary variable – why did you define the binary as any agreement on any items vs none?

○ Mental Health

□ Depression symptoms (past two 194 weeks) were measured using the Child Depression Inventory-Short Form (CDI-S), a widely 195 used 10-item version (Kovacs, 1985). validated in other South African studies (Allgaier et al., 196 2012). – sentence confusing, clarify

□ A cut-off score >3 was used to assess the presence of depressive symptoms, and a score ≥ 10 was 199 used to indicate symptomology consistent with a positive screen for anxiety. – so mental health symptomology is elevated symptoms of depression and/or anxiety. Would you not just say that and not use “mental health symptomology”

○ Social support – is there a justification for your binary categorization?

○ HIV control variables – might be better described as potential confounders

□ Recent vs perinatal is a bit misleading. If you keep recent, potentially provide some range of how recent in your results

□ Define relationship status

□ Definition of food insecurity is unclear

□ Is poverty binary?

Results

- Could you add confidence intervals to your Figure 3. Confirm -0.26 is correct

Discussion

- Under one-third (31.1%) of participants experienced some level of HIV-related stigma, evidence of how widespread this phenomenon is, even today – what is this phenomenon

Implications for future research

- Family participation, community-based mentorship programmes, and peer support groups may reduce the psychological effects of HIV-related stigma. Furthermore, schools, faith-based groups and youth organisations can play a significant role in reducing HIV-related stigma and increasing access to social support. - you could probably add some relevant citations here

Recommendation: The influence of social support on the relationship between HIV-related stigma, mental health and suicidality among young women living with HIV in South Africa: A moderated mediation analysis — R0/PR4

Comments

Dear Dr. Laurenzi and Co-Authors,

We have now received two reviews of your manuscript and recommend a major revision of your submission. If you are able to thoroughly address the comments of both reviewers, we will consider a resubmission of your manuscript. Thank you for considering the special issue on Self-harm and Suicide: A Global Priority as an outlet for your work.

Kristin Kosyluk

Guest Editor

Decision: The influence of social support on the relationship between HIV-related stigma, mental health and suicidality among young women living with HIV in South Africa: A moderated mediation analysis — R0/PR5

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: The influence of social support on the relationship between HIV-related stigma, mental health and suicidality among young women living with HIV in South Africa: A moderated mediation analysis — R1/PR6

Comments

21 March 2026

To the Editors

Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health

Special Issue: Self-harm and Suicide: A Global Priority

Dear Editors,

Thank you for the opportunity to revise and resubmit our manuscript entitled, “The influence of social support on the relationship between HIV-related stigma, mental health, and suicidality among young women living with HIV in South Africa: A moderated mediation analysis.”

We are grateful to the Editor and Reviewers for their thoughtful and constructive feedback, which has significantly strengthened the manuscript. In response, we have carefully revised the paper and addressed all comments in detail in the accompanying point-by-point response document. All changes have been tracked in the revised manuscript for ease of review.

This study provides evidence on how HIV-related stigma is associated with suicidality both directly and indirectly via mental health symptomology, and how social support may buffer these associations among adolescent girls and young women living with HIV in South Africa. These findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of suicide risk pathways in this population and highlight potential targets for intervention in low- and middle-income settings.

We believe the revised manuscript aligns closely with the aims of Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health and the special issue on suicide prevention. The manuscript has not been submitted elsewhere, and the authors declare no conflicts of interest.

We thank you for considering our submission and look forward to your feedback.

Sincerely,

Dr. Wylene L. Saal

On behalf of all authors

Review: The influence of social support on the relationship between HIV-related stigma, mental health and suicidality among young women living with HIV in South Africa: A moderated mediation analysis — R1/PR7

Conflict of interest statement

No COIs

Comments

Authors have improved the paper up to the expected standards

Recommendation: The influence of social support on the relationship between HIV-related stigma, mental health and suicidality among young women living with HIV in South Africa: A moderated mediation analysis — R1/PR8

Comments

Dear Dr. Laurenzi and colleagues,

I have had a chance to review your revised manuscript and response to the reviewers‘ comments, and I agree that you have done a nice job addressing the reviewers’ concerns. We are pleased to accept your manuscript for publication in the special issue of Global Mental Health.

Best,

Kristin Kosyluk, Ph.D.

Guest Editor

Decision: The influence of social support on the relationship between HIV-related stigma, mental health and suicidality among young women living with HIV in South Africa: A moderated mediation analysis — R1/PR9

Comments

No accompanying comment.