In the above article there are five instances where references were withheld for blind review and not amended.

On page 3, the following sentences are amended:

“In pitching their approach to the reference group, the authors drew on a POSH approach to explore brilliance in healthcare (Fulop et al., 2018).”

“In previous papers, the authors have demonstrated how POSH can help define and clarify brilliant healthcare, in its various manifestations and permutations (Fulop et al., 2018).”

“Inspired by MacLeod (2009) as well as others (e.g., Bate, Mendel, and Robert, 2008), the authors and their colleagues began the brilliance project (Hayes et al., 2012).”

On page 17, the following sentences are amended:

“Additional material gathered in the study via discovery interviews (Bate and Robert, 2007) will be analysed to clarify the perspectives of key organizational players within and beyond the RDC-B with reference to positive institutional work (PIW) (Fulop et al., 2018; Nilsson, 2015).” “Our two preliminary constructs of HQCs and relational coordination will add depth and greater understanding to PIW in healthcare, a relatively new field of study (Fulop et al., 2018).”

The full references for those mentioned are as follows:

1. Fulop, L., Kippist, L., Dadich, A., Hayes, K., Karimi, L., & Smyth, A. (2018). What makes a team brilliant? An experiential exploration of positivity within healthcare. Journal of Management & Organization, Epub-ahead-of-print.

2. Hayes, K. J., Campbell, S., Curry, J., Dadich, A., Ditton, M., Eljiz, K., Fitzgerald, J. A., Fulop, L., Isouard, G., Herington, C., Karimi, L., & Smyth, A. (2012). Building a research community of practice, and researching brilliance in health care: Now for something different. Perth, WA.

The authors and Publisher would like to apologize for this error.