Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-pn7tm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-12T18:24:19.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modified Lothrop procedure in cystic fibrosis patients: does it have a role?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2013

M-C Jaberoo*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
M-A Pulido
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
H A Saleh
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Charing Cross and Royal Brompton Hospitals, Imperial College London, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Miss M-C Jaberoo, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Northwick Park Hospital, Middlesex HA1 3UJ, UK Fax: 0208 8692964 E-mail: mcjaberoo@gmail.com

Abstract

Background:

The management of frontal sinus disease in cystic fibrosis patients represents a challenge for many surgeons. Procedures can vary from the minimally invasive to those involving extensive open surgery.

Objective:

This study describes the outcomes of the endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure, in terms of safety and morbidity, for cystic fibrosis patients with frontal sinus disease who did not improve following traditional functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Method and results:

The study setting was a tertiary referral unit in a London teaching hospital, the largest national base for adult cystic fibrosis patients. Two patients diagnosed in childhood with cystic fibrosis presented with histories of recurrent, severe frontal sinusitis; both had previously undergone multiple endoscopic sinus surgical procedures. The modified Lothrop procedure was performed on both patients. The outcome measures were symptom resolution and post-operative complications.

Conclusion:

The endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure was beneficial in the cystic fibrosis patients with frontal sinus disease who failed to respond to standard functional endoscopic sinus surgery procedures.

Information

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable