Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-7zcd7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T20:07:24.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Timescales of magmatism and metamorphism in the Connemara Caledonides: insights from the thermal aureole of the Dawros–Currywongaun–Doughruagh Complex, western Ireland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2021

Brian O’Driscoll*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
David M. Chew
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
*
Author for correspondence: Brian O’Driscoll, Email: brian.odriscoll@manchester.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Zircon separates from the contact aureole of the syn-tectonic Dawros–Currywongaun–Doughruagh Complex, western Ireland, are studied to constrain the nature and timing of magmatism associated with the early stages of the Grampian Orogeny. The samples analysed come from the uppermost part of the Dalradian Supergroup in northern Connemara (the Ben Levy Grit Formation), where a laterally extensive (>10 km) package of metamorphosed siliciclastic sedimentary rocks containing heavy mineral seams crops out. The seams mainly comprise magnetite, but zircon is also present in greater than accessory quantities. The seams have been locally reworked at granulite-facies metamorphic conditions during intrusion of the Dawros–Currywongaun–Doughruagh Complex magmas. Here we combine in situ mineral chemical and U–Pb geochronological analyses of zircons from samples of these heavy mineral seams collected at different locations in the Dawros–Currywongaun–Doughruagh Complex thermal aureole. An important finding is that the zircons studied have magmatic trace-element compositions, interpreted here as a function of their growth during contact metamorphic-induced partial melting. The zircons yield a range of U–Pb spot ages whose uncertainties suggest a maximum duration of zircon growth of ˜11 Ma, between 477.1 and 466.1 Ma, though it is likely that zircon growth occurred much more quickly than this. The age constraints revealed here match well with the range of 475 to 463 Ma previously proposed for the Grampian Orogeny overall in Connemara and lend useful support to models that argue for high-intensity, relatively short-lived Grampian orogenesis in the Connemara Caledonides.

Information

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Geological map of the Caledonides of NW Ireland and Scotland, adapted from Chew et al. (2010), with the location and tectonic relationship of Shetland to the area covered in the main panel shown in the inset at top left. The positions of the major terrane bounding structures are approximate. (b) Geological sketch map of Connemara, western Ireland (position of this panel is indicated by black rectangle in (a) above), showing the location of the intrusions of the DCDC (the mafic-ultramafic bodies within the orange-coloured rectangle) and the locations of the samples studied here (in red squares), where the localities labelled A and B denote the Creggauns and Lough Fee localities, respectively. The inset at top right shows the geological detail of the area around Lough Fee, with the LF-12-02 locality marked by a green star. The Renvyle–Bofin Slide referred to in the text is labelled. The main bodies of the Metagabbro Gneiss Complex in southern Connemara are denoted MGC. The main panel is adapted from O’Driscoll et al. (2005) and the Lough Fee inset is adapted from Wellings (1998). The coordinate system shown in (b) is that of the Irish National Grid.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (a) Field photograph of the magnetite–quartz banding at Lough Fee. (b) Thin-section scan of magnetite-rich sample from Lough Fee. The red circle highlights the position of ‘Opx-pblt’ labelled in (c). (c) Interpretative sketch of fold in the thin-section illustrated in (b). The orthopyroxene crystal highlighted is interpreted as being folded into a micro-parasitic structure on the limb of this fold, which is close to isoclinal in geometry. (d) Irregularly shaped patch of leucosome material (quartzofeldspathic), elongate along the main foliation orientation, in the Lough Fee area.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. (a–d) Petrographic images of magnetite-rich layers at Lough Fee. (a) Cross-polarized image of mixed magnetite–quartz (Qtz) rock, showing typical appearance of zircon in these materials (circled in red). Note rounded shape of the grains and their location in or close to magnetite (Mg)-rich domains. (b) Plane-polarized light image of the orthopyroxene (Opx) porphyroblast highlighted in Figure 2b, c. The red and blue outlines highlight the edges of the orthopyroxene crystal and its quartz–amphibole-bearing corona, respectively. (c) Cross-polarized image of the same crystal as shown in (b). Despite appearing as separate crystals in this plane of observation, this crystal is in optical continuity (i.e. the three domains highlighted in red in (b) are in optical continuity). A zircon crystal is highlighted by the red circle. (d) Cross-polarized light image of an orthopyroxene porphyroblast (with another to the bottom-right). Note the alteration haloes or coronas on these grains, composed of amphibole. (e) Back-scattered electron micrograph of two zircon crystals hosted in sintered magnetite. Note the wedge-shaped ilmenite lamellae along crystallographic planes. (f) Rounded zircon crystal containing a relatively bright core, surrounded by a darker outer mantle, hosted in magnetite.

Figure 3

Table 1. LA-ICP-MS analytical and standard information (see text for further detail)

Figure 4

Fig. 4. (a) Orthopyroxene from LF-12-02 plotted on the MgO + FeO + Fe2O3 versus Al2O3 orthopyroxene discrimination diagram of Bhattacharyya (1971), with the transition zone of Rietmeijer (1983) delineated by the solid black lines. (b) Quantified MgO element map of orthopyroxene porphyroblast from LF-12-02. (c) Quantified TiO2 map of the same area as in (b). Note the titanomagnetite–ilmenite intergrowths in the oxide grains surrounding the orthopyroxene.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Cathodoluminescence images of zircons from LF-12-02. The positions of (b) and (c) are marked in (a). Note the propensity for many grains to have relatively weakly luminescent cores and more luminescent rims. See text for discussion.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. (a) Chondrite-normalized REE plot for zircons from samples LF-12-02 and DC-12-02. (b) Ratio of Th/U versus chondrite-normalized Sm/Yb (SmN/YbN). (c) Thorium versus U (ppm). The symbols in (c) are the same as in (b). The values for CI chondrite used are from McDonough & Sun (1995).

Figure 7

Fig. 7. U–Pb concordia diagrams for (a, b) LF-12-02 and (c) DC-12-02. The area shown in higher resolution in (b) is approximately that contained within the blue square in (a). See text for further details.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. A comparison of the new zircon ages reported in this study (red symbols) with those from Friedrich et al. (1999a,b). Sample labels as follows: CUR – mafic pegmatite from Currywongaun; C-LW – gabbro from the Cashel-Lough Wheelaun intrusion of the MGC; G-PEG – granite pegmatite from the MGC; QTZ-D – quartz-diorite gneiss/migmatite from the MGC; MET-P – metapelite from the MGC; Di-1–3 – metasomatic diopside-bearing marbles, Central Connemara; Ought – Oughterard Granite.

Supplementary material: File

O’Driscoll and Chew supplementary material

Tables S1-S2b

Download O’Driscoll and Chew supplementary material(File)
File 54 KB