Introduction
The importance of trees as an instrument for recording environmental and climatic changes is well known and well documented (e.g. Reference FrittsFritts, 1976; Reference SchweingruberSchweingruber, 1996) since trees respond with variations in tree-ring growth and tree morphology. Trees growing near glacierized areas progressively record the climate variations responsible for glacier fluctuations. In their advancing phases, glaciers can also directly damage trees growing in the foreland. Buried and damaged trees allow the reconstruction of glacier history, especially of the more recent Little Ice Age fluctuations (e.g. Reference Luckman, Dean, Meko and SwetnamLuckman, 1996, Reference Luckman2000; Reference Holzhauser and ZumbuhlHolzhauser and Zumbuhl, 1999; Reference PelfiniPelfini, 1999, 2003). Trees close to the glacier allow the study of surge advancing phases (Reference KaiserKaiser, 1993) and the reconstruction of ice movement direction by means of buried and deformed trunks (e.g. Reference Fleisher, Lachniet, Muller and BaileyFleisher and others, 2006). Moreover, as a valuable proxy of climate, tree rings also allow dendrochronologically based mass-balance reconstructions (e.g. Reference NicolussiNicolussi, 1994; Reference Watson and LuckmanWatson and Luckman, 2004; Reference Larocque and SmithLarocque and Smith, 2005).
On debris-covered glaciers, vegetation can colonize the surface when the debris is thick enough to retard ablation. In most cases, vegetation cover is comprised of grasses, sedges and alpine plants, but in temperate regions trees can also establish (Reference Benn and EvansBenn and Evans, 1998). Dendroglaciological analysis of supraglacial trees is an example of applied dendro-geomorphological methods for reconstructing glacier variations. Supraglacial trees react to glacier pushing and to vertical movements related to freezing and melting processes, assuming characteristic shapes and recording growth disturbances in tree-ring morphology.
This paper aims to improve our understanding of glacier dynamics by studying supraglacial trees. Using tree-ring analysis, we investigate the relationship between the development and the distribution of trees located on a debris-covered glacier (Miage glacier, western Italian Alps), their growth anomalies and the superficial movements of ice and debris in the lower part of the tongue.
The Study Area
Miage glacier (45°47’ N, 6°52’ E) is the most famous and representative debris-covered glacier in the Italian Alps. With a surface area of about 11 km2 (Reference Diolaiuti, Kirkbride, Smiraglia, Benn, D’Agata and NicholsonDiolaiuti and others, 2005a) and a length of 6 km, Miage glacier is the third largest Italian glacier; it drains the southwest slope of Mont Blanc in Val Veny, Valle d’Aosta, (Figs 1 and 2). The continuous debris covering of the ablation tongue (2.9 km2 wide), starts at an altitude of ~2400 m, initially with medial moraines, and continues across the entire surface below, mainly due to rockfalls (Reference Pelfini, Bozzoni and SantilliPelfini and others, 2005).
Map of the study area and location of the different groups of supraglacial and reference trees analyzed.
Using old descriptions, (e.g. Reference SaussureSaussure, 1774, Reference Saussure1786; Reference BarettiBaretti, 1880; Reference SaccoSacco, 1917), Reference DelineDeline (2002) reconstructed the clean-glacier/debris-covered-glacier transformation at the end of the 19th century. The Miage morainic amphitheatre has also allowed reconstruction of the neoglacial history of the glacier advances dated to the early neoglacial, end of Göschener I, end of Göschener II and the Little Ice Age (Reference Deline and OrombelliDeline and Orombelli, 2005).
Much glaciological research was conducted on this glacier, particularly focusing on calving processes at Miage lake, in order to estimate volumetric ice-cliff loss, surface velocity (Reference Diolaiuti, Kirkbride, Smiraglia, Benn, D’Agata and NicholsonDiolaiuti and others, 2005a) and surface elevation changes (Reference Thomson, Kirkbride and BrockThomson and others, 2000). However, less attention was paid to the supraglacial vegetation that adds an important ecological value to Miage glacier when it is proposed as a glacial geomorphosite (Reference Pelfini, Biancotti and MottaPelfini and Smiraglia, 2003; Reference PanizzaPanizza, 2005; Reference Pelfini, Bozzoni and SantilliPelfini and others, 2005). A geomorphosite is a landform with particular and significant attributes which may be equated with a component of the cultural heritage of a given territory (Reference PanizzaPanizza, 2001; Reference Coratza and GiustiCoratza and Giusti, 2005; Reference Diolaiuti, Kirkbride, Smiraglia, Benn, D’Agata and NicholsonDiolaiuti and others, 2005b). Potential attributes contributing value to a landform are scientific, cultural, socio-economic and scenic (Reference Panizza and PiacentePanizza and Piacente, 1989).
The glacier terminus is characterized by two main lobes and a small intermediary lobe (Figs 1 and 2a). The presence of supraglacial debris allows vegetation development in relation to the thickness, stability, morphometric and chemical/physical characteristics of the debris itself. The southern lobe appears to be more stable despite the fact that debris movement can be observed by comparing photographs taken only 1 year apart (Reference Pelfini, Bozzoni and SantilliPelfini and others, 2005). For the upper part, Reference DelineDeline (2002) estimated an average velocity, obtained by similarities with the Mer de Glace, of 55 ma–1. He also described the 1945 rockfall deposit path on the glacier which was found about 3100 m further down-valley in 1997; this would give a surface velocity of ~60ma¯1 (3100 m in 52 years). Direct measurements on the glacier surface, revealed an average velocity for the same sector of 50–70 m a–1(Reference Diolaiuti, Kirkbride, Smiraglia, Benn, D’Agata and NicholsonDiolaiuti and others, 2005a). At the area close to Miage lake, the surface velocity reaches peaks of 76ma–1, while in the median area of the glacier, towards the opposite margin at the same altitude, it is 45 m a–1 (values of 38–51 m a–1). This velocity then reduces notably towards the glacier terminus. The surface velocity is 0–4 m a–1 near the front, ~4–10 m a–1in the medial portion of the southern lobe and reaches 15–22ma–1 close to the southern-lobe origin (data reconstructed from field surveys of Reference LescaLesca (1974) relating to the period 1965–71) (Reference Diolaiuti, Kirkbride, Smiraglia, Benn, D’Agata and NicholsonDiolaiuti and others, 2005a).
The debris-covered glacier surface on the frontal lobes appears undulating in a variable way, owing to the presence of niches, depression zones and channels delineating a morphology mostly created by differential ablation. The surface is covered by a layer of debris which grows progressively thicker in the down-valley direction, rarely exceeding 2 m (Reference DelineDeline, 2002). In summer 2005 the debris thickness at the internal margin of the southern lobe of the glacier varied between 40 and 110cm, with an average of 90 cm (Fig. 2b).
(a) Panoramic view of the Miage glacier tongue in 2004; (b) detail of trees (larches) growing on the debris above the ice cliff in 2004 (the asterisk in (a) indicates the location of (b)); and (c) a tilted supraglacial tree in 2005.
Transformation from a clean glacier to a debris-covered glacier has modified the behaviour of Miage glacier with respect to other alpine glaciers which are currently distant from their frontal moraines, deposited at the Little Ice Age maximum. In fact, mass variations are translated into thickness changes in this glacier (and also in the lower snout sector where trees grow) which tends to swell or contract with the passage of kinematic waves instead of moving frontally (Reference Smiraglia, Diolaiuti, Casati and KirkbrideSmiraglia and others, 2000). For example, Miage glacier experienced a general thickening in the upper part of the tongue and a lowering at the terminus between 1967 and 1975, followed by a net volume increase in the lower part of the tongue during the period 1975–99 (Reference Thomson, Kirkbride and BrockThomson and others, 2000). Our dendroglaciological analysis was conducted on the frontal lobes of Miage glacier, the only glacier portion where trees grow.
Supraglacial and Periglacial Vegetation
The lower part of the Miage glacier tongue is partially colonized by trees (European larch, Larix decidua Mill., and Norway spruce, Picea abies Karst), shrubs (Salix spp.) and herbaceous vegetation. Supraglacial tree vegetation is dominated by scattered larches, some as high as 3–4 m, while only a few spruce, up to some decimetres tall, are present. On the southern lobe, the vegetation is more developed than on the northern lobe.
Trees growing in the forefield and on the north-facing valley slope are larger and taller, forming an open-canopy forest cover dominated by larches. A comparison performed during preliminary studies on a subsample of trees showed that supraglacial trees were ~30°% shorter than trees growing outside the glacier (Reference Pelfini, Bozzoni and SantilliPelfini and others, 2005). This difference in tree growth could be related to soil nutrients, water availability and/or soil temperature (Reference Körner and HochKörner and Hoch, 2006).
On the glacier, shrubs and herbaceous vegetation are mostly concentrated in small niches along the glacier tongue, while vegetation outside the glacier is rich and continuous. In some morphological situations such as hollows, depressions or niches, local conditions facilitate better growth of trees. In these situations, more complex vegetation patterns are found, along with a higher population density. In other cases, the bases of some trees are covered by debris or show exposed roots, revealing the continuous movement of clasts and blocks. Some trees bear cones, indicating their potential reproduction capacity above the glacier, suggesting that colonization does not only occur by seeds from outside.
Trees record annual events within the tree rings and in the tree-stem morphology, permitting recognition of the glacier evolution. Variations in tree morphology include bent, deformed, twisted, bifurcated, stunted and bow-shaped stems (Fig. 2c), tree-ring width and eccentricity, and the production of compression wood. The ice sliding down- valley, the transmission of kinematic waves, glacio-karst phenomena and debris-cover instability are precisely recorded by the vegetation moving down-valley, following the glacier movement (Reference Richter, Fickert and GruningerRichter and others, 2004).
Materials and Methods
Sampling
Many field surveys were carried out in order to map the tree distribution on the glacier surface and to take cores. This research concerns only the European larch which is the most abundant species.
For sampling, we used a Pressler’s increment borer with a 5 mm diameter and variable length in relation to tree size. Each sampled tree was located on a topographic map (enlargements from scale 1:10000). For each tree we collected the following data: height, diameter, morphological characteristics, altitude and the conditions of the surrounding surface.
Fifty-two larches were sampled on the northern lobe (11 samples, group A in Fig. 1) and the southern lobe (41 samples, group B in Fig. 1); we looked for the larger, and presumably older, trees in each sampling area. Cores were taken near the stem base, ~10–15cm above the surface, extracting a single sample per tree, crossing the stem through the pith. Drilling was preferably executed in the local upslope–downslope direction, but was also conditioned by the presence of branches starting from the stem base and the possibility of turning the borer. This direction allowed us to include compression wood in our samples, which is a reaction wood typically developed on the downhill sides of the tilted stems of conifers to recover their vertical position (Reference TimellTimell, 1986). Using the same methods as before, nine larches were also sampled on the inner lateral moraine since they were clearly bent by the glacier and had thus developed compression wood (group C in Fig. 1).
Three reference chronologies were constructed, based on undisturbed larches growing outside the glacier, for comparison with tree-ring data from supraglacial trees. Tree growth outside the glacier is not directly influenced by glacier fluctuations since the sampling areas were not covered by the glacier in recent centuries (Reference DelineDeline, 2002). Therefore, the three reference chronologies can be used to identify growth anomalies induced in supraglacial trees by glacier surface movements. Climate is common to all trees in the valley, outside and on the glacier, influencing tree-ring growth mostly at the highest altitudes. Larch is known to be sensitive to climate, and useful for dendroclimatology (e.g. Reference Hüsken and SchirmerHüsken and Schirmer, 1993; Reference Carrer and UrbinatiCarrer and Urbinati, 2006). Forty-six larches which grew in undisturbed conditions were sampled outside the glacier in the proglacial area. We chose only dominant trees with vertical stems, without disturbance in the crown, and similar in age and size to the supraglacial trees. The sample sites were chosen considering two types of substrata: the first group of trees grows on gravel and debris substratum similar to the glacier surface (reference G in Fig. 1);the second grows on developed soil without limiting edaphic conditions (reference S in Fig. 1).
We also used 11 tree-ring growth series constructed from previous research (unpublished data) to build another reference chronology (reference T in Fig. 1). These growth series are from larches growing at the tree line in undisturbed locations in the valley (north-facing slope), close to Miage glacier. These trees are older and have grown at a higher altitude than those of the references G and S, and thus contain a stronger climatic signal (Reference Carrer and UrbinatiCarrer and Urbinati, 2004; Reference Frank and EsperFrank and Esper, 2005).
The samples were prepared and polished with sandpaper for microscope analysis and measured following standard procedures (Reference SchweingruberSchweingruber, 1988).
Analysis
Tree rings were counted in each sample, checking for the same number of rings on both cores (or rays) of a tree. The cambial age of each sample was determined by counting the number of annual rings (Reference SchweingruberSchweingruber, 1988). Missing rings in the samples without pith were estimated according to Reference JoszaJozsa (1988). The obtained age is a minimum, since it is necessary to add the years between the soil surface and the sampling point (~10–T5 cm) to determine the total age of a tree. The number of missing years depends on the species, the sampling site and the environmental conditions (Reference Gutsell and JohnsonGutsell and Johnson, 2002).
Tree-ring widths were measured and single growth curves were built for each sample using the LINTAB-TSAP (Reference RinnRinn, 1996) and WINDENDRO image-analysis systems. Crossdating was performed both visually on screen and statistically using TSAP and COFECHA software, respectively (Reference HolmesHolmes, 1983). Each reference chronology was constructed by averaging synchronized tree-ring series after eliminating those series presenting a low correlation coefficient (<0.2) with the mean curve.
By comparing single growth curves of supraglacial trees with reference chronologies (T, G and S) it was possible to check the correct dating of each ring. The comparison was performed both with the longest chronology (reference T) and with references G and S to compare supraglacial trees with trees of similar age (i.e. with similar growth trends) and of similar substrata (reference G).
In order to identify the temporal distribution of the growth disturbances in supraglacial trees, possibly induced by debris instability and glacier movements, we adopted two main approaches: a tree-ring growth series analysis performed on ring-width measurements (pointer years and abrupt growth changes) and skeleton plots made by a visual assessment of samples (event years). In detail, we considered:
1. Tree-ring growth series analysis
-
1. Pointer years, according to Reference Huber and Giertz-SiebenlistHuber and Giertz-Siebenlist (1969). Pointer years are defined as years when more than 75% of the samples show the same interval trend (positive indicates growth release, negative indicates growth suppression). They were considered as indicators of glacier disturbance when not present in the reference chronologies. The trees on the southern lobe (group B) were divided into a further four groups (B1–B4) according to their position along the lobe (Fig. 3).
-
2. Abrupt growth changes. We calculated the percentage growth variation with respect to the mean of the four previous years, for each year. Threshold values of positive or negative variations were fixed at 40%, 55% and 70% (Reference Schweingruber, Wehrli, Aellen-Rumo and AellenSchweingruber and others, 1991; Reference Rolland, Baltensweiler and PetitcolasRolland and others, 2001). To compare abrupt growth changes among the trees belonging to the two groups (A and B) and to the three reference chronologies (G, S and T), we considered the periods defined by the presence of at least 50% of total cores per group with the period (1960– 2003) covered by the tree-ring series of the supraglacial trees. Since the sample size of the five groups is different and varies over time, we calculated the mean percentage of cores per year presenting an abrupt growth change (for each group of cores and for each interval of growth variation).
Both pointer years and abrupt growth changes indicate rapid changes in environmental conditions.
Location of the sampled supraglacial trees and their cambial age. The results refer only to the sampled trees and not to the whole supraglacial tree population.
2. Skeleton plots
Growth anomalies were identified by visual analysis of the samples. These represent event years, defined as years characterized by conspicuous features observed visually in the assessment of single tree-ring series (Reference Schweingruber, Eckstein, Bachet and BrächerSchweingruber and others, 1990). In this category we considered different types of growth anomalies: single very narrow or wide tree rings, missing rings, rings with many resin ducts, eccentricity variations, abrupt growth changes (here defined by ring width at least 40% smaller or 160% wider than that of the preceding 4 years, lasting for more than 4 years) (Reference SchweingruberSchweingruber, 1986; Reference Z’GraggenZ’Graggen, 1987) and compression wood. Because the production of compression wood can continue for more than 1 year, we considered only the first ring in which it is present, corresponding to the instability occurrence. This indicator was considered more important than the others because of its clear dependence on substrate instability (e.g. surface glacier movements).
The considered event years represent growth disturbance: for example single, very wide rings with respect to the same ring on the opposite side of the stem indicate eccentric growth induced by substratum instability. Moreover, since anomalous rings can also be formed in the wake of different kinds of damage (e.g. wounds caused by rockfall, insect outbreaks, animal browsing), dendrochronological analysis must be conducted together with geomorphological and glaciological investigations in order to better define the causes of tree damage and growth disturbances.
We considered all the possible tree-ring indicators to identify, date and localize possible movements of the glacier and/or debris cover. In addition, we considered the years which presented different signals at the same time as the most reliable. We also defined the yearly spatial distribution of the event years of the supraglacial trees during the period I960–2003 to examine whether it was possible to identify the areas of the glacier tongue with particularly unstable substrates for certain years.
Previous studies relating to glacier dynamics and photointerpretation were analyzed to interpret dendrochrono- logical data and to correlate them with the glacier dynamics. In detail, mean superficial velocity data of the glacier tongue (~10ma–1) (derived from Reference Diolaiuti, Kirkbride, Smiraglia, Benn, D’Agata and NicholsonDiolaiuti and others, 2005a) were used to reconstruct the location of the supraglacial trees during their lives. Surface-elevation changes (Reference Thomson, Kirkbride and BrockThomson and others, 2000) and aerial photos (Reference Giard¡no, Mortara and BonettoGiardino and others, 2001) were used to correlate the areas of maximum glacier deformation with the occurrence of tree growth disturbance.
Results
In all, 89 single growth curves (one or two per tree) and three reference tree-ring chronologies were built. Growth curves from supraglacial trees show great individual variability with respect to the reference chronologies, and in relation to the local conditions. Tree cambial age, and temporal and spatial distribution of years with growth disturbances, provide information about the glacier dynamics.
Tree age
In the southern lobe, the cambial age of the trees tends to increase down-valley (Fig. 3), even if the altitude difference between the glacier front and the origin of the southern lobe is only about 200 m. The two oldest sampled trees (class age >40 years) colonized the glacier surface before 1960. Class age 30–39 years is located in the lower part of the tongue (seven trees). The most common class is 20–29 years, with trees located on both the lobes (23 trees) near the internal margin. Upward and towards the internal margin of the southern lobe the most common age classes are 10–19 years (15 trees) and <9 years (5 trees).
The youngest trees are located in the upper part of the southern lobe (Fig. 3) but mainly in niches characterized by fine debris. Here, where the debris thickness is very shallow and unstable, there are no trees. Moreover, many swallow holes are present, probably induced by differential ablation and a higher superficial velocity (Reference Diolaiuti, Kirkbride, Smiraglia, Benn, D’Agata and NicholsonDiolaiuti and others, 2005a).
Tree colonization is more intense on the internal margin of the southern lobe. However, this is the present situation and may differ from the time when the trees germinated. In fact, if we use the velocity vectors reported by Reference Diolaiuti, Kirkbride, Smiraglia, Benn, D’Agata and NicholsonDiolaiuti and others (2005a), trees were probably located in the central part of the lobe at the beginning of their lives. Considering a mean surface velocity of 10ma–1, the oldest tree (sample 103 in Fig. 3, marked in Fig. 4) germinated almost 400 m up-glacier. Nevertheless, we have not recently found young trees in that vicinity.
Reconstructed position of trees on the glacier every 10 years assuming a mean velocity of 10 m a–1. This value was determined as a mean of the velocity data reported in Reference Diolaiuti, Kirkbride, Smiraglia, Benn, D’Agata and NicholsonDiolaiuti and others (2005a). The two oldest trees (referring to their cambial age) are marked with larger circles.
Reference chronologies
Reference chronology T, for Val Veny, is 395 years long (1603–1997);reference chronology S covers the period 1821–2003 and is composed of 34 samples (most are younger than 40 years);and reference chronology G covers the time interval 1904–2003 and is built from 30 samples.
As the larches composing the reference chronologies do not manifest any disturbance in the crown or stem, their growth variations are highly related to the general climatic conditions. Even if the reference chronology trends are also influenced by the number of samples and by their age, the three curves developed use only the 1960–2003 segment, because the first measurable ring in the supraglacial trees dates back to 1960 (Fig. 5a).
Pointer years according to Reference Huber and Giertz-SiebenlistHuber and Giertz-Siebenlist (1969) (more than 75% of samples with positive or negative variations in the same years) identified in the reference chronologies and in the supraglacial trees. Only the years not present in the reference (a) are reported in (b–f).
Temporal distribution of years with growth disturbances
1. Pointer years, according to Reference Huber and Giertz-SiebenlistHuber and Giertz-Siebenlist (1969)
Fourteen pointer years were identified in the mean reference chronology (mean of the reference chronologies T, S and G) during the period 1960–2003 (Fig. 5a). These pointer years mainly refer to climate influence on tree growth and they were therefore excluded from pointer years found in supraglacial trees.
Pointer years in the northern-lobe trees (group A, Fig. 3) were identified as 1981, 1985 (negative) and 1986 (positive) (Fig. 5b). The opposite trend of the mean chronology of the northern-lobe trees outlines a negative pointer year in 1985 in contrast with the increasing trend in the mean reference chronology.
Pointer years identified for the supraglacial trees of the southern lobe are divided into four groups (groups B1–B4, Fig. 3). Years not present in the mean reference chronology are 1973, 1979, 1984, 1988, 1990, 1994, 2000 and 2002. The comparison shows some significant negative pointer years with the opposite trend of the mean reference chronology (e.g. 1990 (Fig. 5c and d) and 2002 (Fig. 5e and f)).
2. Abrupt growth changes
All trees belonging to the two groups (A and B) and to the three reference chronologies (G, S and T) present cores with abrupt growth changes. Nevertheless, in the period when at least 50% of cores from each group are present, trees growing on the glacier often show the highest mean percentage of cores per year presenting abrupt growth changes (Fig. 6). In the two glacier groups (A and B) and in the three control groups (T, S and G), extreme growth releases (>+70%) present higher percentages than extreme growth suppressions (<–70%), but this is because the maximum growth releases also include variations higher than +100%, while growth reduction cannot be less than –100% (when there is no growth, i.e. a missing ring).
Mean percentages of cores presenting abrupt growth changes in the considered growth variation intervals for all the groups (A, B and references). The percentages of growth variation are calculated with respect to the mean of the four previous years (see text). The numbers in parentheses indicate the first year of the considered period.
Trees growing on the glacier present the highest mean percentages of extreme growth releases >+70%: about 14% of cores per year with abrupt growth changes (Fig. 6). Also the cores of the reference S group show a quite high percentage (8.0%) of cores per year demonstrating abrupt growth changes higher than +70%; this value is similar to that of the reference T group (6.7%). Cores of the reference G group show the lowest value (2.4%) in this growth variation interval.
Considering only the years where there are at least five cores and more than 25% of the total cores per group present growth variation higher than +70%, we obtained the following dates (Fig. 7): group A: 1988, 1989, 1990, 1993; group B: 1976, 1979, 1988, 1989, 1997;reference T: 1967, 1979, 1982;reference S: 1966, 1967, 1974, 1976, (1979; 23%), 1987;reference G: 1960, 1979.
Total number of cores presenting a strong growth change for each growth variation interval during the years 1960–2003. The total number of cores for each group is also shown. Note the different scales for group B. We can see how growth variations of >+70% are more frequent than those of <–70% for all the groups, and that in groups A and B these growth releases are more frequent than in references T, S and G.
Year 1979 is a year in which a strong growth release should not be attributed to the movement of the glacier since it is also visible in the growth series of the reference groups outside the glacier (T, S and G) which present positive abrupt growth change. The other dates found for the supraglacial trees could, however, be attributed to responses of trees to glacier movement. In particular, 1988 and 1989 could be years in which glacier movement occurred in both glacier lobes.
Supraglacial trees also demonstrate high frequencies of abrupt growth suppressions. Considering the cores manifesting growth suppression (<–40%) in each group, we obtained the following significant years (Fig. 7): group A: 1985, 1997; group B: 1975, 1977, 1985, 1991, 2003;reference T: 1963, 1964, 1972, 1973;reference S: 1963, 1964, 1972, 1981; reference G: 1964, 1972, 1975.
Years 1963, 1964, 1972 present growth suppression in the reference growth series, but the sample size of the supraglacial trees is insufficient to make comparisons. Growth suppression in 1975 is especially evident in trees of group B and the reference G group.
3. Event years
The skeleton plot of each of the 52 samples supplied the identification of event years according to Reference Schweingruber, Eckstein, Bachet and BrächerSchweingruber and others (1990), with particular regard to compression wood. Cross-dating with the reference chronologies allowed us to confirm the precise temporal attribution of the identified event years.
On the northern lobe (group A, Fig. 8a), despite the fact that few compression wood rings were detected, two precise periods were identified, 1990–92 and 2001–02, showing that these indicators are not casually distributed. With regard to the other types of indicators of growth disturbance (single, very narrow or wide tree rings, missing rings, rings with many resin ducts, eccentricity variations, abrupt growth changes), single trees reacted in different ways, mainly during the period 1989–98 (Fig. 8b).
Event years ((a) compression wood and (b) other growth anomalies) identified by skeleton plots of supraglacial trees on the northern lobe (group A) and southern lobe (group B).
On the southern lobe (group B, Fig. 8a) 45 more compression wood occurrences were identified. Their distribution partially follows tree cambial age (i.e. the number of signals increases with the increase in sample depth), but some observations can be made:
-
1. in the period 1960–83, compression wood is practically absent, except in 1971 and 1974.
-
2. from 1984 until 2002 many event years occurred, with a high number of signals in 1985, 1988, 1992, 1993 and from 1995 to 2002, with a maximum value in 2001.
The other growth anomalies are mainly concentrated in the period 1983–2003 (Fig. 8b), and some years correspond to years in which compression wood occurred (1985, 1988, 1997 and 2002).
Summary of growth disturbance indicators
Based on the results of our analysis of the tree-ring growth series and the visual assessment of the samples from the supraglacial tree-ring series, we constructed a timeline of events based upon the presence (+1)/absence (0) of each type of growth disturbance indicator.
The years with higher scores are years in which many of the considered indicators are present (Fig. 9). On the northern lobe (Fig. 9a) there are five years with the simultaneous presence of at least two growth disturbance indicators: 1985, 1989, 1990, 1991 and 1993. On the southern lobe (Fig. 9b), ten years present more than three simultaneous growth disturbance indicators: 1984, 1985, 1986, 1988 (all four indicators), 1989, 1990, 1994, 1997, 2000 and 2002. Before 1984 the sample size is lower; nevertheless, it is possible to identify three years with at least two growth disturbance indicators: 1974, 1979 and 1981. The two graphs show a time-lag in the concentration of indicators. In the northern lobe they mainly occur in the period 1989–93 (5 years) and in the southern lobe in the period 1984–90 (7 years).
Time distribution summary of the growth disturbance indicators.
Spatial distribution of event years
The spatial distribution of the compression wood and of the other types of growth disturbance shows that the tree responses are scattered on the lobes (Fig. 10). The apparent concentration of signal on the internal border of the southern lobe is mainly due to the tree localization.
Spatial distribution of (a) compression wood and (b) other growth anomalies, since 1984. Previous years were omitted because of the low number of samples and event years. The position of trees on the map corresponds to the localization at the sampling time (2004).
However, in some years precise disturbance localization can be noted. For example, in 1995 four trees located at the end of the southern lobe started to produce compression wood. In 1997, some trees produced compression wood in the mid-part of the southern lobe, near the internal margin, and in the same year other types of growth disturbance are also present. This year is particularly significant because some trees on the lateral moraine (group C) were also tilted by the glacier pushing, thus producing compression wood (Fig. 11).
Detail for the year 1997 when both trees on the glacier and on the inner lateral moraine (group C) started to produce compression wood (from Reference Pelfini, Bozzoni and SantilliPelfini and others, 2005, modified).
Discussion and Conclusions
Tree distribution on the glacier surface is not homogeneous. Its analysis indicated that areas characterized by more stable debris show more specimens, while the most unstable areas are not colonized, even if the debris thickness is similar. In particular morphological conditions such as small depressions and niches, vegetation probably finds better development conditions and shows more complex vegetation patterns. Field surveys indicate that most tree colonization takes place only where the thickness exceeds 40 cm. Therefore, the local absence of supraglacial trees can give information about the presence of shallow debris layers or great debris instability. A similar situation is documented, for example, on the external part of the two lobes, where trees are absent and the rapid evolution of the glacier is revealed by the presence of small swallow holes. Moreover, since rockfalls from the high surrounding peaks frequently occur (Reference Giard¡no, Mortara and BonettoGiardino and others, 2001), the local thickness increase of the debris layer could be related to the progressive distribution of landslide deposits along the glacier tongue and outlined by the local concentration of trees.
The distribution of the cambial age in the supraglacial trees is problematic. Along the glacier, trees become rapidly younger with increase in elevation, whereas on the surrounding slopes large and old trees (i.e. specimens used for reference chronology T that date back to the 17th century) can frequently be found up to the tree line. The presence of very young trees near their upper limit can again be related to the shallowness of the debris layer and to the higher instability of the supraglacial debris.
The current spatial distribution of trees does not show the pattern at the moment of their germination. As a result of the glacier flow, tree localization is further up-valley. The reconstructed original position of trees does not exceed the origin of the southern lobe, where today no trees grow. The present position of trees confirms the mean surface velocity value derived from the literature.
Concerning the time distribution of growth disturbance indicators, the lack of signals before the beginning of the 1980s and their later concentration can be observed. Aerial photographs taken in 1975 and 1988 (Reference Giard¡no, Mortara and BonettoGiardino and others, 2001) document the growing phase of the glacier tongue, also investigated by Reference Thomson, Kirkbride and BrockThomson and others (2000). The photographs show that Miage glacier rapidly changed between these years, as the frontal lobes were concave in 1975 and convex in 1988, demonstrating a significant mass change. The tongue deformation firstly induced an upheaval of the trees, then a lowering of the surface, with probable changes in their position and possible disturbance to their growth due to surface instability. The growth disturbance signals have mainly occurred since the mid-1980s on the southern lobe and at the beginning of the 1990s on the northern lobe, with a delay of about 5 years. The occurrence of these indicators suggests that the trees on the southern lobe reacted to a variation in substrate stability before the trees on the northern lobe. Thus, the glacier kinematic wave could have reached the southern lobe first and the northern lobe a few years later. Moreover, the disturbance lasts for 7 years on the southern lobe and for 5 years on the northern lobe. The time-lag and the time span suggest that the kinematic wave which crossed the glacier tongue in the 1980s (Reference Giard¡no, Mortara and BonettoGiardino and others, 2001) may have been slower and weaker on the northern lobe.
Some of the years identified as indicators of glacier or debris instability can be related to particular climatic or environmental conditions. An example is the year 1997, when both supraglacial trees (group B) and trees on the inner lateral moraine (group C) were damaged (Fig. 11). In fact, a strong flood occurred throughout Valle d’Aosta in 1996. In particular, intense precipitation occurred during 23 and 24 July in Val Veny and in Val Ferret, causing a strong increase in stream discharge to the point of locally breaking their banks (Reference Bonetto, Cesti and MontelBonetto and others, 1998). It is possible that the overland flow was strong everywhere and affected the glacier as well, thus changing water availability and increasing the movements of the surface debris in relation to the ablation rate of the ice below. In this case, growth disturbances were found in the tree rings of 1997, i.e. just 1 year later. This situation usually occurs because at the end of July the growth season comes to an end at this altitude. Therefore, tree responses can only be found in the following ring (Reference Corominas and MoyaCorominas and Moya, 1999).
The growth anomalies analyzed in this paper, particularly compression wood, correspond to the response of the trees to environmental conditions around them and represents a helpful method of localizing and dating glacier superficial movements. Sometimes it is difficult not only to determine the triggering causes, but also to interpret the high variability in the growth trend of very young trees that can affect the reliability of cross-dating with reference chronologies. Nevertheless, this research carried out on Miage glacier shows for the first time, at least for the Italian Alps, the relation between tree growth disturbance and pulses of increased mass flux (kinematic waves).
Acknowledgements
This research was co-funded by the Ministero Istruzione Universita, Ricerca (MIUR) Cofin 2004 project ‘The geomorphological heritage as a resource for a sustainable tourism’ (National Coordinator: M. Panizza; Local Chief Researcher: M. Pelfini) and by the MIUR Cofin 2005 project ‘Increasing rate of climate change impacts on high mountain areas: cryosphere shrinkage and environmental effects’ (National and Local Coordinator: C. Smiraglia). We acknowledge C. Smiraglia for scientific suggestions, D. Brioschi and P. Bertoglio for their contribution in collecting data, Regione Autonoma Valle d’Aosta for sampling authorization and Cabina di Regia dei Ghiacciai Valdostani. We also thank H. Davies for revising the English.
