Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-nlwjb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T18:37:51.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ice-free valleys in the Neptune Range of the Pensacola Mountains, Antarctica: glacial geomorphology, geochronology and potential as palaeoenvironmental archives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2021

David Small*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK
Michael J. Bentley
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK
David J.A. Evans
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK
Andrew S. Hein
Affiliation:
School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XP, UK
Stewart P.H.T. Freeman
Affiliation:
Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre, East Kilbride, G75 0QF, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We describe the glacial geomorphology and initial geochronology of two ice-free valley systems within the Neptune Range of the Pensacola Mountains, Antarctica. These valleys are characterized by landforms associated with formerly more expanded ice sheet(s) that were at least 200 m thicker than at present. The most conspicuous features are areas of supraglacial debris, discrete debris accumulations separated from modern-day ice and curvilinear ridges and mounds. The landsystem bears similarities to debris-rich cold-based glacial landsystems described elsewhere in Antarctica and the Arctic where buried ice is prevalent. Geochronological data demonstrate multiple phases of ice expansion. The oldest, occurring > 3 Ma, overtopped much of the landscape. Subsequent, less expansive advances into the valleys occurred > 2 Ma and > ~1 Ma. An expansion of some local glaciers occurred < 250 ka. This sequence of glacial stages is similar to that described from the northernmost massif of the Pensacola Mountains (Dufek Massif), suggesting that it represents a regional signal of ice-sheet evolution over the Plio-Pleistocene. The geomorphological record and its evolution over millions of years makes the Neptune Range valleys an area worthy of future research and we highlight potential avenues for this.

Information

Type
Physical Sciences
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Antarctic Science Ltd
Figure 0

Fig. 1. a. Location map showing the Weddell Sea Embayment (WSE) in the context of the Antarctic continent. EAIS = East Antarctic Ice Sheet; WAIS = West Antarctic Ice Sheet. b. Current ice-sheet configuration and location of the Pensacola Mountains in the WSE with measured flow velocities (Rignot et al.2011). AG = Academy Glacier; FIS = Foundation Ice Stream. c. Hill-shaded digital elevation model (Reference Elevation Model of Antarctica 8 m; Howat et al.2019) of the Neptune Range and main geographical features mentioned in the text.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Location map of Washington Escarpment showing geographical features mentioned in the text, major ice-free areas, debris accumulations and sharp ridge crests indicative of alpine-like topography. White arrows denote main points where ice from Iroquois Plateau overtops the escarpment. Small, black arrows indicate lobes of ice that spill back to block the entrances of the valleys described in this study. Red dots indicate locations of cosmogenic nuclide samples from the crest of Elliot Ridge. Background imagery is the hill-shaded Reference Elevation Model of Antarctica 8 m digital elevation model (Howat et al.2019).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Overview satellite image of the Miller Valley area showing the main features mentioned in the text and the locations of cosmogenic nuclide samples. Insets denote locations of panels in Figs 9 & 19. Orange annotations indicate locations (squares) and directions (chevrons open in direction of view) of field photographs in Figs 13, 15 & 18 (satellite imagery - WorldView3 30 cm resolution - ©2018 DigitalGlobe, Inc., a Maxar company). Contours (50 m intervals) extracted from Reference Elevation Model of Antarctica 8 m digital elevation model (Howat et al.2019).

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Overview satellite image of the Hawkes Valleys area showing the main features mentioned in the text. Insets denote locations of panels in Figs 9 & 19. Orange annotations indicate locations (squares) and directions (chevrons open in direction of view) of field photographs in Figs 13, 15 & 18 (satellite imagery - WorldView3 30 cm resolution - ©2018 DigitalGlobe, Inc., a Maxar company). Contours (50 m intervals) extracted from Reference Elevation Model of Antarctica 8 m digital elevation model (Howat et al.2019).

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Field photographs showing the context of selected cosmogenic nuclide samples from Miller Valley (a.–d.) and Elliot Ridge (e.). a. Looking along the frontal slope (dashed line) of the large discrete debris accumulation (DDA) in Miller Valley from location of MIL-1/2/3. Location of MIL-4/5/6 is arrowed. b. Location of MIL-4/5/6 on the crest of the DDA, view is back towards the location of MIL-1/2/3 (arrowed). c. Looking back from the location of MIL-7/8, on an older moraine bench. Note crosscutting relationship of the DDA denoted by the dashed line. Also note the increased weathering compared to clasts in panels a. and c. Location of MIL-4/5/6 is arrowed. d. Location of sample MIL-9 (MIL-10 just out of view to the right). Note the increased degree of weathering of clasts. e. Sample JON-2 on the crest of Elliot Ridge. Note the distinct difference in appearance compared to the local bedrock.

Figure 5

Table I. Sample location, 10Be chemistry and accelerator mass spectrometry data.

Figure 6

Table II. 26Al chemistry and accelerator mass spectrometry data.

Figure 7

Table III. Apparent exposure ages and production rate-normalized 26Al/10Be ratios of all samples from Miller Valley and Elliot Ridge. Italicized ratios plot below the erosion island (Fig. 12).

Figure 8

Fig. 6. a. Oblique aerial photograph (TMA1507 - L0176 - 18/12/64) showing the contrast in ridge morphology between the sharp arête extending from the summit of Mount Hawkes and the probable ice-moulded ridge on the other side of the glacial breach. Note the rock glacier in the cirque. b. & c. Field photographs of bedrock morphology observed on the summit of Elliot Ridge showing potential large-scale ice smoothing, although the direction of flow is ambiguous. d. & e. Examples of cavernous weathering observed on the ridge crest.

Figure 9

Fig. 7. Geomorphological map of the main features identified in the Miller Valley area (n.b. moraine mounds are not shown at this scale). Base imagery is WorldView3 30 cm resolution - ©2018 DigitalGlobe, Inc., a Maxar company.

Figure 10

Fig. 8. Geomorphological map of the main features identified in the Hawkes Valleys area (n.b. moraine mounds and debris cones are not shown at this scale). Base imagery is WorldView3 30 cm resolution - ©2018 DigitalGlobe, Inc., a Maxar company.

Figure 11

Fig. 9. Examples of geomorphological features mapped in Miller Valley. a. & b. WorldView imagery and interpreted map of moraine ridges and mounds on the central valley floor. Location of cosmogenic nuclide samples MIL-9/10 is shown. c. & d. Sharp moraine ridges and broad boulder-belt/drop moraine at the lower section of the unnamed valley floor (n.b. at this scale the drop moraine is shown as a polygon, shown as a line in Fig. 7). e. & f. Discrete debris accumulation and moraine ridges in Miller Valley. Locations of cosmogenic nuclide samples MIL-1/2, -4/5 and -7 are shown.

Figure 12

Fig. 10. Examples of geomorphological features mapped in the Hawkes Valleys. a. & b. WorldView imagery and interpreted map of the series of moraine ridges and mounds on valley floor. Note the overprinting moraine and difference in moraine morphologies. c. & d. Circular moraine features on the floor of Central Hawkes Valley. e. & f. Controlled moraine and associated debris cones and mounds at the ice margin in North Hawkes Valley. Note the frozen bodies of water and more distal moraine ridges. g. & h. Discrete debris accumulation in North Hawkes Valley with moraine ridge, mounds and debris cones on its surface. Note the positive relief and polygonized surface of the feature compared to the nearby valley floor. Also note the broad similarity in appearance with the present controlled moraine at the ice margin.

Figure 13

Table IV. Landform identification criteria.

Figure 14

Fig. 11. a. WorldView imagery and b. interpreted map of viscous flow features in cirques immediately south of Mount Hawkes (cf. Fig. 6a).

Figure 15

Fig. 12. Two-isotope (banana) plot of normalized (*) 26Al/10Be ratios and 10Be concentrations for all samples with paired 26Al/10Be analyses.

Figure 16

Fig. 13. Field photographs of landforms evidencing cold-based glaciation in Miller Valley and North Hawkes Valley (cf. Tables IV & V; cf. Atkins, 2013). a. Thin and patchy drift near the ice margin in Miller Valley. Note the bedrock outcropping in the lower right corner of the photograph. b. Inferred trimline or boulder-belt moraine (dashed line) extending trend of the frontal slope of the discrete debris accumulation in Miller Valley. Note the contrast in colour (i.e. weathering) in the material inside/outside this limit. c. Scattered boulders and patchy drift in the upper Miller Valley. Boulders in the foreground are approximately 1 m in length. d. Debris cones proximal to the active controlled moraine in North Hawkes Valley. e. Potential compressed surface in mid-Miller Valley, metre stick for scale.

Figure 17

Table V. Depositional landforms related to cold-based glaciation in Antarctica (cf. Atkins 2013) observed in the Neptune Valleys.

Figure 18

Fig. 14. Conceptual model of glacial landform formation in the Neptune Valleys. The overall prevalence of landforms will be a function of the debris content of the ice. CMF = circular moraine feature.

Figure 19

Fig. 15. Field photographs of evidence for expanded ice in Miller Valley and North Hawkes Valley (NHV). a. Varied lithology of heavily weathered patchy drift in the upper Miller Valley, near the sample site of MIL-9/10. Large boulders are ~0.5 m in length. b. Potential trimlines/drift limits (arrowed) on the flank of the upper Miller Valley, looking approximately south from sample location of MIL-9/10. c. Frontal slope of the discrete debris accumulation in Miller Valley where it crosscuts the older moraine bench. Note where the fresher clasts have apparently rolled off this feature and now sit atop older and more weathered material. d. Large erratic boulder in the central NHV. The uppermost mound (in shadow with snow) and the circular depositional feature (CDF; in sun) are visible in the mid-background. The person is ~2 m in height. e. Looking down NHV towards the controlled moraine and ice margin, the medial debris band is visible on the right-hand side of the ice tongue. Note the uppermost CDF in the lower right and the sequence of moraine ridges (red dashed lines) stepping back towards the present-day ice margin. The main ice flow in the background is from right to left.

Figure 20

Fig. 16. Schematic depiction of postulated ice limits in Miller Valley. Blue denotes postulated ice-sheet advance and red denotes postulated local glacier advance. Ages shown are individual 10Be exposure ages from different cobbles/boulders at the four locations within Miller Valley (cf. Table III).

Figure 21

Fig. 17. Schematic depiction of postulated ice limits in Hawkes Valley. Dashed arrows denote postulated ice thickening. Blue denotes postulated ice-sheet advance and red denotes postulated local glacier advance.

Figure 22

Fig. 18. Field photographs from Miller Valley and North Hawkes Valley (NHV) showing contrasts in degree of weathering. a. Material comprising the surface of the discrete debris accumulation in Miller Valley. Sample MIL-4 is visible immediately left of the cloth bag (sample bag is ~0.3 cm in length). b. Material at sample site of MIL-1/2, with no clear difference from the material in a. (sample bags ~0.3 m in length) c. Cavernous weathering observed on the floor of the main valley inside the outermost ridges. Boulder measures ~0.5 m across. d. Surficial material in the upper Miller Valley, beyond the outermost band of ridges on the valley floor. Note the contrast with the materials in panels a. and b. e. Fresh material on the moraine ridge in the lower NHV. Note the contrast with f., which shows weathered material beyond the uppermost mound (right) and circular depositional feature (CDF; left) in NHV.

Figure 23

Table VI. Glacial stages inferred from geomorphological evidence in Dufek Massif (Hodgson et al.2012) and their potential equivalents in the Neptune Valleys.

Figure 24

Table VII. Distinctive geomorphic features, landforms and erosion rates for each microclimate zone in the McMurdo Dry Valleys (MDVs) and the Neptune Valleys.

Figure 25

Fig. 19. Satellite imagery of potential locations of buried ice. a. Discrete debris accumulation (DDA) in Miller Valley. High-centred polygons are visible in the lower right of the image. b. Lobate DDA in the unnamed valley north of Miller Valley. c. Lateral DDA in Central Hawkes Valley. The edge of this feature is delimited by a scarp face ~3 m in height. d. DDA in South Hawkes Valley. Note the moraine mounds and ridges at the margins of this feature. Also note the polygonized (deep trough high centres) surfaces generally associated with these features, akin to sublimation-type polygons (Marchant et al.2002). A small scarp face is just visible above the labelled 900 m contour.