Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-92wsb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-25T01:21:13.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Feldspar mineralogy and rare-earth element (re)mobilization in iron-oxide copper gold systems from South Australia: a nanoscale study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2018

Alkis Kontonikas-Charos*
Affiliation:
School of Physical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
Cristiana L. Ciobanu
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
Nigel J. Cook
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
Kathy Ehrig
Affiliation:
BHP Billiton Olympic Dam, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
Roniza Ismail
Affiliation:
School of Physical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
Sasha Krneta
Affiliation:
School of Physical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
Animesh Basak
Affiliation:
Adelaide Microscopy, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nanoscale characterization (TEM on FIB-SEM-prepared foils) was undertaken on feldspars undergoing transformation from early post-magmatic (deuteric) to hydrothermal stages in granites hosting the Olympic Dam Cu-U-Au-Ag deposit, and from the Cu-Au skarn at Hillside within the same iron-oxide copper-gold (IOCG) province, South Australia. These include complex perthitic textures, anomalously Ba-, Fe-, or REE-rich compositions, and REE-flourocarbonate + molybdenite assemblages which pseudomorph pre-existing feldspars. Epitaxial orientations between cryptoperthite (magmatic), patch perthite (dueteric) and replacive albite (hydrothermal) within vein perthite support interface-mediated reactions between pre-existing alkali-feldspars and pervading fluid, irrespective of micro-scale crystal morphology. Such observations are consistent with a coupled dissolution-reprecipitation reaction mechanism, which assists in grain-scale element remobilization via the generation of transient interconnected microporosity. Micro-scale aggregates of hydrothermal hyalophane (Ba-rich K-feldspar), crystallizing within previously albitized areas of andesine, reveal a complex assemblage of calc-silicate, As-bearing fluorapatite and Fe oxides along reaction boundaries in the enclosing albite-sericite assemblage typical of deuteric alteration. Such inclusions are good REE repositories and their presence supports REE remobilization at the grain-scale during early hydrothermal alteration. Iron-metasomatism is recognized by nanoscale maghemite inclusions within ‘red-stained’ orthoclase, as well as by hematite in REE-fluorocarbonates, which reflect broader-scale zonation patterns typical for IOCG systems. Potassium-feldspar from the contact between alkali-granite and skarn at Hillside is characterized by 100–1000 ppm REE, attributable to pervasive nanoscale inclusions of calc-silicates, concentrated along microfractures, or pore-attached. Feldspar replacement by REE-fluorcarbonates at Olympic Dam and nanoscale calc-silicate inclusions in feldspar at Hillside are both strong evidence for the role of feldspars in concentrating REE during intense metasomatism. Differences in mineralogical expression are due to the availability of associated elements. Lattice-scale intergrowths of assemblages indicative of Fe-metasomatism, REE-enrichment and sulfide deposition at Olympic Dam are evidence for a spatial and temporal relationship between these processes.

Information

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society 2018
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Sketch map of the Gawler Craton, South Australia, showing the location of the Olympic Cu-Au province, the Olympic Dam deposit, the Hillside deposit, and other deposits/prospects mentioned in the text. (b) Sketch, after Barton and Johnson (1996), showing proposed crustal settings of selected South Australian IOCG deposits.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Schematic sketches and photomicrographs illustrating and providing a textural context for the four case studies from Olympic Dam considered in this contribution (ad). Locations of FIB cuts are shown. Abbreviations: Ab, albite; BSG, bastnäsite–synchysite group minerals; CP, cryptoperthite; Hm, hematite; Hyal, hyalophane; Kfs, K-feldspar; Mol, molybdenite; Olg, oligoclase; PP, patch perthite; Ser, sericite.

Figure 2

Table 1. Overview of samples investigated and correlation with previous work.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Overview of case study at Hillside (HS): (a) polished block of sample showing the locations of FIB cuts used in present study (Key as in Fig. 2); (b) LA-ICP-MS downhole profile showing flat signals for REE and Y in the feldspars analysed; (c–f) chondrite-normalized REY fractionation trends for feldspar (Trend 1), feldspar (Trend 2, in which abundant sub-micrometre-scale inclusions are present), garnet and titanite. Note the very similar appearance of fractionation trends for feldspar with inclusions and titanite and/or garnet.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. BF-TEM images (ac) showing the main type of perthites (cryptoperthite: CP; patch perthite: PP, and vein perthite: VP) (case study A). Note the superimposition of lamellar PP onto CP in (b) in an area marked by the white rectangle in (a). In detail, such PP lamellae show replacement boundaries against the CP (dashed line) in (c). White circles in (a) represent micropores.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. BF-TEM images (a,b) and corresponding SAED patterns down to [010] zone axis in feldspars as marked in (c,d) showing the epitaxial orientation between all three types of perthites from foil representing case study A (abbreviations as in Fig. 4). White circles mark the SAED areas, where (c) is for CP in (a), and (d) represents both PP and VP [circles in (b)]. Note the presence of satellite reflections (arrowed) in (cd), indicating the orthoclase (Ort) and albite (Ab) intergrowths [spinodal decomposition in CP from (c)]. In (c,d), the presence of h00 (h≠2n) and h0l (h≠2n) reflections, forbidden for the C2/m monoclinic (M) symmetry, indicates transition to triclinic (T) symmetry. (e,f) Intervals between two main reflections along directions || to c* axis from SAEDs in (c,d), respectively, showing details of the two types of satellite reflections. Note the absence of satellites marking the feldspar intergrowths/decomposition present in CP (e) but not in PP, VP (f).

Figure 6

Fig. 6. BF-TEM images (a,b), SAED pattern (c) and TEM-EDS spectrum (d) of sericite inclusions along the vein albite crosscutting the cryptoperthite (CP) and patch perthite (PP). (a) Inclusions location along the vein. Micropores are indicated by circles. (b) Detail showing the different morphologies and orientations of these inclusions, i.e. stubby and lamellar. (c) SAED pattern obtained from the larger, stubby inclusion where the weaker reflections (circled) are attributable to the coarser (sericite) inclusion within albite down the zone axis as shown in Fig. 5d. (d) Note the Fe peak on the spectrum obtained from the coarser inclusions (spot size ~50 nm). Cps: counts per second.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. BF-TEM (a) and HAADF-STEM (b) images of foil containing hyalophane (Hyal84; case study B). Line colours on (a) are drawn to show contacts between albite (Ab) and hyalophane (white), sericite inclusions (yellow), and inclusions of Fe oxides (Fe-ox, red), fluorite (Fl, purple), epidote (Ep, green), and apatite (Ap, blue).

Figure 8

Fig. 8. HAADF-STEM (a,b) showing details of the hyalophane (Hyal) aggregate in the middle part of the foil (case study B) surrounding an inclusion core comprising fluorite (Fl) and sericite (Ser).

Figure 9

Fig. 9. BF-TEM images of sericite (Ser; a) and chlorite (Chl; b) within albite with corresponding SAEDs on zone axes as marked in (c,d) respectively. (ef) HAADF-STEM image and corresponding spectrum for an inclusion of As-bearing fluorapatite (Ap) within sericite. The arrow in (e) indicates the location of the beam for the EDS spectrum (~5–6 nm). In (f), note F and As peaks in the apatite spectrum. (gi) BF-TEM image, SAED (down to zone axis as marked), and TEM-EDS spectrum of an epidote (Ep) inclusion located at the boundary between hyalophane (Hyal) and albite (Ab). Note the envelope of sericite around the epidote in (g).

Figure 10

Fig. 10. Selected SAED patterns showing zone axes as marked (square brackets) in feldspars from the foil representing case study B. (ac) Highest-order zone axes obtained from hyalophane (Hyal) in different parts of the foil and at different specimen tilting. (d) SAED down the [132] zone axis in albite (Ab) is obtained at the same tilt with SAED down the [1¯10] zone axis in adjacent hyalophane shown in (a).

Figure 11

Fig. 11. BF-TEM image showing red-stained K-feldspar foil and minerals identified in case study C (K-feldspar, Fe oxide and chlorite). Inclusions of Fe oxides are circled in (a). White squares are locations of areas shown in Fig. 12. Black arrows indicate micropores.

Figure 12

Fig. 12. BF-TEM images and SAED patterns for host orthoclase (Ort) and inclusions in case study C. (a) Detail (large rectangle in Fig. 11a) showing size and morphology of Fe oxide and chlorite (Chl) inclusions. Note also the presence of pores. (b,c) Two SAED patterns (obtained at different tilts of the sample) showing the highest-order zone axes (as marked) in orthoclase. (d) Detail (small circle in Fig. 11a) of an area where an inclusion of Fe oxide (maghemite; Mgh?) is located at the boundary between orthoclase and a chlorite inclusion. (e) SAED pattern obtained from area in (d) showing coherent (epitaxial) intergrowths between chlorite and orthoclase (zone axes as marked). Weaker reflections (such as those circled in the white rectangle) could be indexed as maghemite using the P43 space group. (f) Schematic diagram showing the reflections used for maghemite indexing.

Figure 13

Fig. 13. HAADF-STEM (ac) images and TEM-EDS spectra (dg) of mineral assemblages in the case study D. (a) Low-resolution image of foil showing lamellar intergrowths between bastnäsite–synchysite group (BSG) species and molybdenite (Mol). Note the dark spots within the BSG representing thinner areas around Fe-oxide inclusions produced by ion milling (see text for further explanation). (b,c) Higher-resolution images of areas circled in (a). Both are of Fe-oxide inclusions within the BSG. Note the lamellar (b) and hexagonal platelet morphology in (c) consistent with hematite (Hm). Appearance of (b) is due to milling from the TEM. Note the centred dark spot in (c), which correlates with the EDS spot. The arrow pointing at the spot in the centre of the lamellae in (c) indicates the location of EDS spectrum (spot size of ~5 nm). (dg) TEM-EDS spectra of the BSG species (high- and low-Ca), molybdenite, and an Fe-oxide inclusion. Cps: counts per second.

Figure 14

Fig. 14. BF-TEM images showing details of the bastnäsite-synchysite group (BSG) intergrowths from the area marked on Fig. 13a. (a,b) Location and low-magnification image of the BSG and molybdenite (Mol) intergrowths. Note the variation in thickness of the sample in (b). (c) High-resolution TEM image of BSG intergrowths in (b) outlining the more ordered stacking sequences over intervals of ~30–40 nm along the c* axis. Bastnäsite and parisite, as well as a disordered stacking sequence are highlighted.

Figure 15

Fig. 15. SAED patterns of bastnäsite, parisite and molybdenite on zone axes as marked by square brackets from case study D. All SAED patterns are obtained at the same sample tilt. (a) Note the streaking along c* in bastnäsite indicative of stacking disorder. (b) Note the parent reflections of bastnäsite (brighter reflections) and the 6-fold superstructure satellites on c* corresponding to parisite. (c) SAED typical of lattice fringes as those in Fig. 14c, showing disordered BSG phases intergrowths along the c* axis and parallel directions (variation in satellite intensity, streaking). (d) SAED pattern of molybdenite indicative of polytype 2H. Crystal-structural disorder/twinning is indicated by satellite reflections (arrowed) and steaking along rows parallel to c*2H. Indexing of hexagonal cells as hkil, where h + k + i = 0.

Figure 16

Fig. 16. Secondary Electron (SE) images showing feldspar from the Hillside case study (HS): (a) overview of foil locations from an area adjacent to domains from where LA-ICP-MS data were obtained (Fig. 3). (bf) FIB cross-section imaging showing pervasive minute inclusions and pores in feldspar. Note concentration of inclusions and pores along fractures and/or trails (df). (g,h) Aggregated inclusions attached to pores and larger inclusions of garnet. (i) Nanometre-scale inclusions of garnet (Grt).

Figure 17

Fig. 17. BF-TEM images, SAED patterns and TEM-EDS spectra from case study HS. (a) SAED pattern of orthoclase down the [11¯0] zone axis. (b) High-resolution image of microcline (Mc) within orthoclase (Ort). (c) SAED pattern of microcline from (b). (dh) Higher-resolution images of various inclusions within the orthoclase. Note the andradite within (h). (i) SAED pattern on [001] zone axis of andradite in (h). (j) TEM-EDS spectrum for andradite. Abbreviations: Adr – andradite; Mc – microcline; Ort – orthoclase; Qz – quartz.

Supplementary material: File

Kontonikas-Charos et al. supplementary material

Figure S1

Download Kontonikas-Charos et al. supplementary material(File)
File 389.4 KB