Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-j4x9h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-10T19:33:33.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A latent trait analysis of an inventory designed to detect symptoms of anxiety and depression using an elderly community sample

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

A. Mackinnon ,
H. Christensen ,
A. F. Jorm ,
A. S. Henderson ,
R. Scott  and
A. E. Korten
A. Mackinnon*
Affiliation:
NH&MRC Social Psychiatry Research Unit, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
H. Christensen
Affiliation:
NH&MRC Social Psychiatry Research Unit, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
A. F. Jorm
Affiliation:
NH&MRC Social Psychiatry Research Unit, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
A. S. Henderson
Affiliation:
NH&MRC Social Psychiatry Research Unit, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
R. Scott
Affiliation:
NH&MRC Social Psychiatry Research Unit, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
A. E. Korten
Affiliation:
NH&MRC Social Psychiatry Research Unit, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr A. Mackinnon, NH&MRC Social Psychiatry Research Unit, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

An 18-item inventory designed by Goldberg et al. (1987) to detect symptoms of anxiety and depression was administered to an elderly general population sample. Latent trait analysis was used to assess the dimensionality of the inventory and the location and discriminatory ability of the symptoms. The items showed different patterns of discrimination in this group compared to the sample of general practice attenders on which the inventory was developed. Overall, the items did define two correlated dimensions of anxiety and depression. In addition, a third dimension of sleep disturbance was detected. Both individual scales and the total symptom scores were sensitive and relatively specific detectors of depressive disorders assessed according to ICD-10 and DSM-III-R criteria. The retention of sleep items on their original scales did not affect the sensitivity of the scales to detect depressive disorders. A two-step administration procedure suggested for use in the administration of the scales was investigated but found to be sensitive to differences between the current sample and the sample on which the inventory was developed. This symptom inventory can be recommended for use in epidemiological investigations as a brief, valid and acceptable method of detecting elevated levels of anxiety and depression in elderly persons.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , November 1994 , pp. 977 - 986
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd edn, revised. American Psychiatric Association: DC.Google Scholar
Duncan-Jones, P., Grayson, D. A. & Moran, P. A. P. (1986). The utility of latent trait models in psychiatric epidemiology. Psychological Medicine 16, 391–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraser, C. (1987). NOHARM II: An IBM PC computer program for fitting both unidimensional and multidimensional normal ogive models of latent trait theory. Unpublished computer program manual, Centre for Behavioural Studies, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.Google Scholar
Gibbons, R. D., Clark, D. C., Cavanaugh, S. V. & David, J. M. (1985). Application of modern psychometric theory in psychiatric research. Journal of Psychiatric Research 19, 43–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, D. P., Bridges, K., Duncan-Jones, P. & Grayson, D. (1987). Dimensions of neuroses seen in primary-care settings. Psychological Medicine 17, 461–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, D. P., Bridges, K., Duncan-Jones, P. & Grayson, D. (1988). Detecting anxiety and depression in general medical settings. British Medical Journal 297, 897–899.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grayson, D. A. (1986). A latent trait analysis of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Journal of Psychiatric Research 20, 217–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hambleton, R. K. & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item Response Theory. Kluwer Nijhoff: Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanley, J. A. & McNeil, B. J. (1982). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143, 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hattie, J. (1985). Assessing the unidimensionality of test and items. Applied Psychological Measurement 9, 139–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, A. S., Jorm, A. F., Mackinnon, A. J., Christensen, H., Scott, L. R., Korten, A. E. & Phillips Doyle, C. (1993). The prevalence of depressive disorders and the distribution of depressive symptoms in later life: a survey using Draft ICD-10 and DSM-III-R. Psychological Medicine 23, 719–729.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jorm, A. F., Henderson, S., Scott, R., Mackinnon, A. J., Korten, A. E. & Christensen, II. (1993). The disabled elderly living in the community: care received from family and formal services. Medical Journal of Australia, 158, 383–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackinnon, A., Christensen, H., Cullen, J. S., Doyle, C. J., Henderson, A. S., Jorm, A. F., Korten, A. E. & Scott, L. R. (1993). The Canberra Interview for the Elderly: assessment of its validity in the diagnosis of dementia and depression. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 87, 146–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, R. P. (1967). Numerical methods for polynomial models in nonlinear factor analysis. Psychometrika 32, 77–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, R. P. (1981). The dimensionality of tests and items. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 34, 100–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, R. P. (1982 a). Linear versus non-linear models in item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement 6, 379–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, R. P. (1982 b). Some alternative approaches to the improvement of measurement in education and psychology: fitting latent trait models. In The Improvement of Measurement in Education and Psychology (ed. Spearitt, D.), pp. 379–496. Australian Council for Educational Research: Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia.Google Scholar
McDonald, R. P. & Ahlawat, K. S. (1974). Difficulty factors in binary data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 27, 82–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Social Psychiatry Research Unit (1992). The Canberra Interview for the Elderly: a new field instrument for the diagnosis of dementia and depression by ICD-10 and DSM-III-R. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 85, 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surtees, P. G., Dean, C., Ingham, J. G., Kreitman, N. B., Miller, P. McC. & Sashidharan, S. P. (1983). Psychiatric disorder in women from an Edinburgh community: associations with demographic factors. British Journal of Psychiatry 142, 238–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swift, C. G. & Shapiro, C. M. (1993). Sleep and sleep problems in elderly people. British Medical Journal 306, 1468–1471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization (1990). ICD-10 1990 Draft of the Chapter V: Categories F00–F99, Mental and behavioural disorders (including disorders of psychological development). Diagnostic Criteria for Research. (WHO/MNH/MEP/87.1 Rev 2). World Health Organization, Division of Mental Health: Geneva.Google Scholar