Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-xh428 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-15T09:36:42.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Viséan of the eastern Jebilet: biostratigraphic refinements and chronology events

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2026

Ali Bouari
Affiliation:
Geology, Faculty of Sciences Semlalia, Cadi Ayyad University, Morocco
Pedro Cózar
Affiliation:
Instituto de Geociencias (CSIC-UCM), Spain
Nezha Lazreq*
Affiliation:
Geology, Faculty of Sciences Semlalia, Cadi Ayyad University, Morocco
Kamal Mghazli
Affiliation:
Geology, Faculty of Sciences Semlalia, Cadi Ayyad University, Morocco
*
Corresponding author: Nezha Lazreq; Email: lazreq@uca.ac.ma
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The eastern Jebilet successions record major palaeogeographic and tectono-sedimentary changes during the Variscan orogeny, but the chronology of key events remains incompletely constrained because of the many allochthonous carbonate units and the strong deformation. Here, three autochthonous outcrops and six allochthonous units of the eastern Jebilet nappe were sampled for microfossils, with emphasis on Viséan foraminifers recovered from washed residues and thin sections. Forty-five out of 155 samples yielded diagnostic assemblages which allowed a more precise biostratigraphy. The base of the Kharrouba Formation is dated for the first time as at least middle Viséan Cf5, and the middle and upper parts are Asbian Cf6γ1-2. An Upper Devonian age for the pre-Viséan deposits of eastern Jebilet is indicated by reworked Famennian conodonts collected from the base of the Kharrouba Formation. Most allochthonous units contain upper Viséan foraminiferal associations. These new data provide improved chronological constraints on (i) the Viséan transgression in eastern Jebilet, (ii) the emplacement of the eastern Jebilet nappe, (iii) the provenance of the nappe units and (iiii) the regional correlations between the Meseta and adjacent domains. Our results confirm a marine connection with the Palaeotethys Ocean, suggesting the proximity of the Meseta to Gondwana.

Information

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Figure 1 long description.Location of the Jebilet in the Moroccan Meseta after Cózar et al., (2023) and the eastern Jebilet (a) and simplified geological overview of the central and western part of the eastern Jebilet showing the location of studied sections, extracted from the 1:100 000 geological map of the central Jebilet by Huvelin (1972) (b). Dj: Dar Jaïdet, T: Jebel Tekzim, oo: Ouled Omar, Sb: Lamkhalif, Mr: Marabout, Mj: Koudiat El Menjel, Dt: Douar Tolba, D: Douar Fokra and Gr: El Gargabat.

Figure 1

Table 1. Studied sections and distribution of samples and fossiliferous samples in the eastern JebiletTable 1 long description.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Figure 2 long description.Stratigraphic log of Dar Jaïdet-Jebel Tekzim (eastern Jebilet), combining the Dar Jaïdet section (samples Dj1 to Dj5), the Jebel Tekzim section (samples T2, T3, Dj6 to Dj14) and the three limestone bars of Jebel Tekzim (B1, B2 and B3); distribution of foraminifera, algae and algospongia.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Figure 3 long description.Photograph showing the olistostrome with bioclastic limestone blocks embedded in a micritic siliceous matrix on the northern slope of Jebel Tekzim (a) and schematic section north of Jebel Tekzim and Dar Jaïdet, after Andre (1989) (b).

Figure 4

Figure 4. Figure 4 long description.Stratigraphic log and distribution of foraminifera, algae and algospongia of the Ouled Omar section.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Figure 5 long description.Stratigraphic log and distribution of foraminifera, algae and algospongia of the Lamkhalif section.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Figure 6 long description.View of the outcrop of the allochthonous unit (Marabout section) of the eastern Jebilet nappe, showing massive bioclastic limestones (a) and stratigraphic log and distribution of foraminifera, algae and algospongia of the studied Marabout section (b).

Figure 7

Figure 7. Figure 7 long description.Stratigraphic log and distribution of foraminifera, algae and algospongia of the Koudiat El Menjel section.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Figure 8 long description.View of the Douar Tolba section showing the Devonian outcrops at the base, overlain by the Viséan limestones toward the top (a), detail of the normal contact between the Viséan deposits and the Devonian red nodular limestones, separated by an unconformity (b) and stratigraphic log and distribution of foraminifera of the Douar Tolba section (c).

Figure 9

Figure 9. Figure 9 long description.Stratigraphic log and distribution of foraminifera, algae and algospongia of the Douar Fokra section.

Figure 10

Figure 10. Figure 10 long description.Field photo showing the contact between the Devonian and the Viséan within the El Gargabat outcrop (a) and field image of the boundary between the Devonian and the Viséan, showing the reworked Devonian blocks within the Viséan limestones (b).

Figure 11

Figure 11. Figure 11 long description.Stratigraphic log and distribution of foraminifera, algae and algospongia of the El Gargabat section.

Figure 12

Figure 12. Figure 12 long description.Selected foraminifers recorded in the eastern Jebilet. 1.Archaediscus at angulatus stage, sample oo3, Ouled Omar section, early Asbian. 2.Archaediscus at angulatus stage, sample oo10, Ouled Omar section, late Asbian. 3.Omphalotis minima, sample oo10, Ouled Omar section, late Asbian. 4.Archaediscus karreri grandis: note that this species shows facets and is incomplete; sample B.1, Jebel Tekzim section, early Asbian. 5.Pseudoendothyra struvii, sample oo3, Ouled Omar section, early Asbian; the specimen is recrystallized, the usual preservation for specimens of this genus. 6.Pseudoendothyra sublimis (recrystallized), sample D10, Douar Fokra section, late Asbian. 7.Neoarchediscus sp., sample Dj7, Jebel Tekzim section, late Asbian. 8.Neoarchaediscus sp., a primitive form still preserving a marked microgranular wall, sample Mj6, Koudiat El Menjel section, late Asbian. 9.Neoarchaediscus aff. stellatus, sample D10, Douar Fokra section, late Asbian. 10.Neoarchaediscus sp., a primitive form still preserving a marked microgranular wall, sample Mr2, Marabout section, late Asbian. 11.Neoarchaediscus cf. incertus, sample D10, Douar Fokra section, late Asbian. 12.Neoarchaediscus aff. parvus, sample D10, Douar Fokra section, late Asbian. 13.Endothyranopsis crassa (juvenile), sample Gr1, El Gargabat section, late Asbian.

Figure 13

Figure 13. Figure 13 long description.Selected algae and Algospongia from the eastern Jebilet. 1.Ungdarella uralica, sample Mr4, Marabout section, late Asbian. 2.Stacheoides tenuis, sample oo3, Ouled Omar section, early Asbian. 3.Fascifolium pantherinum, sample Gr1, El Gargabat section, late Asbian. 4.Saccamminopsis sp., sample D10, Douar Fokra section, late Asbian. 5.Windsoporella tulayae, sample Mj5, Koudiat El Menjel section, upper Asbian. 6.Aujgalia regularis, sample B.3, Jebel Tekzim section, late Asbian.

Figure 14

Figure 14. Figure 14 long description.Stratigraphic intervals corresponding to the outcrops studied in previous works (Hollard et al.,1977; Essamani, 1988) and the present study, according to the stratigraphic correlation between the foraminiferal zonal schemes in Belgium and northern France (based on Conil et al.,1991; Poty et al.,2006); the British Isles includes zones defined by Conil et al. (1980); and Russian stages and substages. Koudiat Bourkis and Koudiat Lahmara are after Hollard et al. (1977), and Koudiat Kouchina is after Essemani (1988) (a) lithostratigraphic correlation of the Meseta and Anti-Atlas formations according to Cózar et al. (2020b), with the addition of data from the present study. The diagonal lines indicate non-depositional zones; green areas represent lithological successions dominated by siliciclastics with some interbedded carbonates; white areas correspond to successions composed exclusively of siliciclastics (b).

Figure 15

Figure 15. Figure 15 long description.Reworked conodonts from autochthonous and allochthonous bioclastic limestones of the Eastern Jebilet. 1-3: Geniculatus glottoides, oo7; 4: Belodella resima, oo1; 5: Drepanodus sp., oo1; 6: Polygnathus sp., Dj7; 7: Palmatolepis delicatula delicatula, oo4; 8: Palmatolepis glabra prima, oo7; 9: Neopolygnathus c. communis – 9a: upper view, 9b: lower view, Dj6; 10: Icriodus praealternatus praealternatus, oo7; 11: Polygnathus glaber medius – 11a: upper view, 11b: lower view, Dj5; 12: Polygnathus tenellus, Dj6; 13: Palmatolepis sp. A, Dj6; 14: Palmatolepis sp. B, Dj7.