Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-76mfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-24T11:29:29.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Culture and National Symbols: Their Impact on the Belarusian Nation-Building Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Astrid Sahm
Astrid Sahm*
Affiliation:
Mannheim Centre of European Social Research at University of Mannheim, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The new states emerging from the break-up of the Soviet Union not only had to manage the task of political and economic reforms but were also forced to develop a suitable national state ideology in order to ensure their achieved independence. The existence of a national consensus is essential for the stability of every state and society, and during periods of transition the question how national identity is defined becomes especially important. Thus, on the one hand, the dominance of a concrete national state concept may facilitate the transformation process because people are ready to bear the social costs of economic reforms in the name of state sovereignty, as was the case in Lithuania. On the other hand, a continuing Soviet cultural hegemony can also block necessary modernization in the post-Soviet period.

Information

Type
Forum: New Directions in Belarusian Studies
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , December 1999 , pp. 649 - 660
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Notes

1. Christophe, Barbara, Staat versus Identität. Zur Konstruktion von “Nation” und “nationalem Interesse” in den litauischen Transformationsdiskursen von 1987 bis 1995 (Cologne: Verlag Wissenschaft ∧ Politik, 1997)Google Scholar

2. David R. Marples, “National Consciousness in Belarus: The Soviet Period and Beyond,” Belarusian Review, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1998, p. 6.Google Scholar

3. Bugrova, Irina, Politische Kultur in Belarus. Eine Rekonstruktion der Entwicklung vom Groβfürstentum Litauen zum Lukašenko-Regime (Mannheim: FKKS, 1998), pp. 7ff.Google Scholar

4. Ibid., p. 19.Google Scholar

5. Sahm, Astrid, “Politische Konstruktionsversuche weißrussischer Identität. Zur Bedeutung des Rückgriffs auf Geschichte für die unabgeschlossene weißrussische Nationalstaatsbildung,” Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas, Vol. 42, No. 4, 1994, pp. 541–561.Google Scholar

6. V. F. Kebich, “Ekonomika, nravstvennost', kul'tura—stolpy nashei gosudarstvennosti,” Rakurs, No. 1, 1993, p. 12.Google Scholar

7. Detlef Lehnert and Klaus Megerle, eds, Politische Identität und nationale Gedenktage (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8. See Sahm, “Politische Konstruktionsversuche,” p. 556.Google Scholar

9. See Ibid., p. 560.Google Scholar

10. David R. Marples, “Ukraine and Belarus in the Post-Soviet Era: A Comparative Study,” Belarusian Review, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1998, p. 14.Google Scholar

11. See Astrid Sahm, “Schleichender Staatsstreich in Belarus. Hintergründe und Konsequenzen des Verfassungsreferendums im November 1996,” Osteuropa, Vol. 47, 1998, pp. 475–487.Google Scholar

12. Abramova, Olga, Integration zwischen Realität und Simulation. Die belarussisch-ruβländischen Beziehungen seit 1991 (Mannheim: FKKS, 1998), p. 21f.Google Scholar

13. Cf. Bugrova, “Politische Kultur in Belarus,” p. 32.Google Scholar

14. Sahm, Astrid, “Kein politischer Frühling in Belarus. Das Scheitern der Parlamentswahlen im Mai 1995 und die Verselbständigungstendenzen der Exekutive,” Osteuropa, Vol. 45, 1995, pp. 1021–1033.Google Scholar

15. Cf. Aleksandr Feduta, “Reverans na stupen'kach politicheskoi lestnitsy,” Imja, No. 14, 1997.Google Scholar

16. Sahm, “Schleichender Staatsstreich in Belarus.”Google Scholar

17. Ibid.; about Kurapaty, see David R. Marples, “Kuropaty: The Investigation of a Stalinist Historical Controversy,” Slavic Review, Vol. 53, No. 2, 1994, pp. 513–523.Google Scholar

18. “Weniger Feiertage in Belarus,” Belarus-News, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1998, p. 7.Google Scholar

19. Sahm, Astrid, Transformation im Schatten von Tschernobyl. Umwelt- und Energiepolitik im gesellschaftlichen Wandel von Belarus und der Ukraine (Münster: LIT, 1999).Google Scholar

20. Marples, “National Consciousness in Belarus,” p. 8.Google Scholar

21. Cf. Bugrova, “Politische Kultur in Belarus,” p. 42.Google Scholar