Introduction
Recent research (Kellermann et al. Reference Kellermann, Johnson, Stercho and Hackett2008, Johnson et al. Reference Johnson, Kellermann and Stercho2010) indicated that ecosystem services provided by birds found on coffee farms can lead to economically significant reduction of coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei infestation. In Jamaica, this reduction of the world’s primary coffee pest resulted in an increased coffee crop yield valued at over US $4,000 across a 62.6 ha study area in high-elevation coffee farms (Kellermann et al. Reference Kellermann, Johnson, Stercho and Hackett2008). This amount is near Jamaica’s average per capita gross national income ($5,241; United Nations Statistics Division 2010). A study in a middle-elevation Jamaican coffee farm found a yet stronger effect of birds on borer infestation, totalling US $5,495 over 18 ha (Johnson et al. Reference Johnson, Kellermann and Stercho2010).
However, the provisioning of this ecosystem service may be dependent on landscape composition as well as the movement of these mobile consumers (Kremen et al. Reference Kremen2007, Kellerman et al. Reference Kellermann, Johnson, Stercho and Hackett2008, Luck et al. Reference Luck2009). In Jamaica, coffee farms are typically small (< 100 ha) and occur in complex landscapes composed of residual and regenerating forest patches, mixed agriculture, and rural housing with associated gardens and horticulture. Very little information is currently available on movement patterns of birds in and around coffee farms.
Recent evidence suggests that some wintering Nearctic-Neotropical migratory songbirds utilise nocturnal roost sites that do not spatially overlap with their respective diurnal home ranges (Smith et al. Reference Smith, Reitsma, Rockwood and Marra2008). This type of roosting behaviour has been confirmed for Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea (Warkentin and Morton Reference Warkentin and Morton1995) and Northern Waterthrush Seiurus noveboracensis (Reitsma et al. Reference Reitsma, Hunt, Burson and Steele2002, Burson et al. Reference Burson, Reitsma and Hunt2005, Hunt et al. Reference Hunt, Reitsma, Burson and Steele2005). In addition, anecdotal observations of unmarked migrants moving away from diurnal activity areas at dusk suggest commutes to nocturnal roost locations for several other species (Smith et al. Reference Smith, Reitsma, Rockwood and Marra2008), including Gray Catbird Dumetella carolinensis (Alsop Reference Alsop1995), Northern Parula Parula americana, Cape May Warbler Dendroica tigrina, Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor (Stacier Reference Stacier, Hagan and Johnston1992, Baltz Reference Baltz2000, Latta Reference Latta2003), and Palm Warbler Dendroica palmarum (Latta Reference Latta2003). Still needed are in-depth, within-species studies that describe the basic ecology of roosting behaviour and quantify its prevalence in individually marked birds (Smith et al. Reference Smith, Reitsma, Rockwood and Marra2008). Roosting behaviours have conservation implications because multiple habitats may require protection for species that roost in habitats separate from their diurnal activities (Brown and Sherry Reference Brown and Sherry2008). The theoretical importance of roost site selection to ecosystem services and conservation coupled with a general lack of knowledge pertaining to wintering migrant night roosts should encourage more attention. We used radio telemetry to test the hypothesis that birds commute between nocturnal roosts and diurnal foraging ranges in coffee habitat.
Methods
Study species
Many species of non-flocking migrant passerines establish resource-based territories that are defended for at least part of the wintering season (Brown et al. Reference Brown, Stouffer and Strong2000), including Black-throated Blue Warblers Dendroica caerulescens in Jamaica (Holmes et al. Reference Holmes, Sherry and Reitsma1989).
The Black-throated Blue Warbler breeds in south-eastern Canada through the north-eastern United States and migrates along the eastern seaboard to the Caribbean, where it winters in forested habitats of the Greater Antilles from Puerto Rico to Cuba, Jamaica, and Hispaniola, with some birds in the Bahamas and a few along the Yucatán coast and Belize (Holmes et al. Reference Holmes, Rodenhouse, Sillett and Poole2005). Stable isotope study suggests that birds wintering in Jamaica come from the northern portion of the breeding range in Canada, from southern Ontario to southern Québec (Rubenstein et al. Reference Rubenstein, Chamberlain, Holmes, Ayres, Waldbauer, Graves and Tuross2002).
The warbler has been reported as the most significant potential coffee berry borer predator in high-elevation coffee farms in eastern Jamaica (Kellermann et al. Reference Kellermann, Johnson, Stercho and Hackett2008, Sherry et al. unpubl. data), and was the most frequently captured understorey-foraging insectivore in the farms used in this study (S. Wadham unpubl. data).
Study areas
Our study sites were located in western Jamaica on two privately-owned coffee farms. The Seven Rivers farm (56 ha) is located near Montpelier, St. James (140 m; 18˚20’N, 77˚55’W). Kew Park farm (18 ha) is near Betheltown, Westmoreland (300 m; 18˚15’N, 77˚56’W).
The Seven Rivers farm is uniformly flat, but the area outside the farm perimeter rises sharply to steep limestone hillsides with young second growth forest. While the midstorey is relatively open in the forest, abundant vines create a complex network of suspended vegetation. Within the farm, coffee Coffea arabica is grown with banana Musa sp. and coconut Cocos nucifera over most of the farm area, which is shaded by various tree species including Inga vera, Leucaena glauca and Ceiba pentandra. The western side of Seven Rivers contains a small (< 10 ha) citrus orchard. Several small rivers include narrow (< 50 m) riparian strips composed of various trees and shrubs, especially Hibiscus elatus, Spathodea campanulata, Cedrela odorata and Gliricidia sepium.
Kew Park is a farm with varied topography and coffee interspersed on gentler slopes. As in Seven Rivers, forested areas outside Kew Park’s perimeter are characterised by a karst landscape containing steep limestone hills covered in second growth forest and jagged rocks, linked to an upper canopy with a dense tangle of thin vines. Dominant species include Bumelia sp., Brosimum alicastrum and Calophylum jacquinii. Pasture, agricultural fields and rural housing are present in the east and south-east of the farm. Approximately 70% of the farm is shaded by Cedrela odorata, Swietenia mahagoni, Ceiba pentandra, Terminalia latifolia, Inga vera, Mangifera indica, Ficus spp. and various fruit trees typically 8–15 m in height.
Data collection
In December 2008–January 2009 we captured warblers using mist nets (12 × 2.6 m, 30 mm mesh size) distributed throughout the study farms. We attached radio transmitters (0.35 g, LB-2N Holohil Systems Ltd., Carp, ON, Canada) using eyelash glue (DUO eyelash adhesive, American International Ind., USA; Sekercioglu et al. Reference Sekercioglu, Loarie, Brenes, Ehrlich and Daily2007) to 24 warblers weighing ≥ 8.7 g (corresponding to radio weight ≤ 5% of body weight). In addition to the transmitter, each bird was fitted with a standard USGS aluminium band and a unique colour-band combination. Age and sex determination of captured birds were based on plumage colour and morphometric measurements (Pyle Reference Pyle1997). Each individual was measured (wing chord and wing patch) and weighed to the nearest 0.1 g using an Ohaus® scale.
To allow the birds time to adjust to the transmitter, we started tracking the day following capture. Diurnal and nocturnal radio-tracking was conducted using three-element Yagi antennas equipped with either a Wildlife Materials TRX-2000S or Communication Specialists R-1000 receiver. Birds were tracked from sunrise to sunset to construct diurnal foraging home ranges. We obtained 2–8 diurnal locations per bird per day (mean = 4.4) for 7–10 days, yielding 30–40 total locations per bird (mean = 34.5). Three birds exhibited abnormal behaviour following transmitter attachment, such as strongly reduced movement and weak flight, erratic signal strength, or early signal cessation. In these cases we suspected stress from handling, faulty transmitter attachment, or battery failure, so these individuals were excluded from the study, yielding 21 birds with complete data. Following the data-gathering period, five uniquely colour-marked and radio-tracked individuals were observed without transmitters, indicating at least some transmitters fell off prior to migration.
Roost search
We refer to “roost” as a geographic location where a bird spends night-time hours, regardless of whether it rests solitarily or with other individuals. We obtained two roost locations for each of the 21 radio-tagged birds. Following the location of an initial roost, we acquired a second roost location for each bird between one and three nights later. Starting one hour after sunset, a roost location was determined by homing in directly on a bird to within a 5 m diameter area. Out of 42 locations, direct visual observation of the birds was not possible in most cases (n = 35) due to dense vegetation and invariant signal strength within 5 m of the bird. Upon detection of a roosting bird or closest possible area, we georeferenced the location using a Garmin GPSmap 60 Cx GPS unit and flagged the location for subsequent vegetation measurements.
Habitat quantification
Habitat measurements were taken, centred on the roost site. To remove possible personal biases in the precise location of estimated roost placement for locations without visual confirmation, we used a short random distance and bearing (0–3 m, 0–360°, respectively) from our estimate of the bird location as the centre of the plot. Vegetation density was evaluated using the “stacked cube” method (Kus Reference Kus1998). We determined the percent volume filled by vegetation in a three-dimensional cuboid space with a 2 × 2 m base standing 6 m high. We further divided the cuboid into three equal sections: 0–2 m, 2–4 m, 4–6 m, and visually estimated the percentage filled by forbs, grass, woody plants, tree trunk, and coffee. We recorded the distance and diameter at breast height (DBH) of the three nearest trees and estimated canopy cover using a concave spherical densiometer (Forestry Suppliers Inc. Jackson, MS, USA) at each of the cardinal directions while standing in the center of the plot. We defined trees as any woody, non-coffee plant with a DBH of at least 3 cm.
To describe the farm area where the birds were captured and the majority of their diurnal habitat occurred, we used GIS software to systematically distribute 226 locations, 40 m apart, throughout the two study farms (98 in Kew Park and 128 in Seven Rivers). We located these points with a GPS and collected the same data as at roost sites.
Analyses and statistical methodology
Diurnal home ranges were constructed using minimum convex polygons (MCPs) created with the Hawth’s Tools extension (v.3) in ArcGIS version 9.2 (ESRI, Redlands, CA). A one-tailed t-test was used to determine whether the mean distance from roosts to the nearest edge of the diurnal home range was greater than 0 m, and whether the mean distance from roosts to nearest farm perimeter was greater than 0 m. Roost locations within the home range or farm were assigned values of 0 for distance to home range or farm, respectively. We defined the “farm perimeter” as the area delineated by the last coffee shrubs at the edge of the farm (i.e. coffee perimeter). Data were transformed using natural log to normalise for analysis.
We estimated a resource selection function with logistic regression (RSF; Manly et al. Reference Manly, McDonald, Thomas, McDonald and Erickson2002) to test whether birds selected forest and shade trees over coffee habitat. RSF compares resource attributes at used points (roost locations) to available points (randomly distributed). Consistent with most RSF analyses (Manly et al. Reference Manly, McDonald, Thomas, McDonald and Erickson2002), we treated each location (two per bird) as a used data point because they were obtained at least 24 hours apart and changed for most birds from night to night (see Results), indicating that the process of selection was occurring each night. To constrain the distribution of random points to be biologically relevant, we created buffer zones around each home range. We chose buffer distances for home ranges in each of the two farms separately, using the average distance commuted to roosts by all birds within the respective farm (Kew Park = 78 m, Seven Rivers = 119 m, excluding a strong outlier of 950 m). For each bird, we then randomly distributed points at a density of five points per hectare in the area comprising its home range and the associated home range buffer zone. We classified each roost and random location into one of five vegetation categories: coffee, continuous forest, tree (individual trees and shade trees), grassland (including pastures), and urban areas (roads and buildings). Classification was completed manually in ArcGIS based on aerial photography. We assumed that grassland and urban points were biologically not available for roosting; thus only points in continuous forest, individual trees, and coffee were used in the analysis. In all, we compared 1,033 (available) random points to 42 (used) roosts.
Results
Average distance between the two roost locations indentified per individual in Kew Park and Seven Rivers was 25 m and 53 m, respectively (range 0 to 155 m), indicating that roost selection can occur nightly.
Despite coffee comprising the majority of the warbler’s diurnal home range, only one nocturnal roost (2%) was located in a coffee shrub. This bird roosted outside the farm area during the following tracking night. Fourteen (33%) roosts were found within their respective diurnal home ranges and eight (19%) were located within the perimeter of a farm. Four of the eight roosts positioned within farm boundaries, however, occurred in non-cultivated spaces such as expansive shade trees or vegetated riparian strips (Table 1).
Nocturnal roost location summary for Black-throated Blue Warbler Dendroica caerulescens in Kew Park and Seven Rivers farms in western Jamaica.
Mean distance from roost to diurnal home range was 119 ± 27 m and was significantly larger than zero (P < 0.0001, t = 4.46, df = 41). Mean roost distance to farm perimeter was 62 ± 17 m, indicating that on average, birds roosted a significant distance outside the farm perimeter (P < 0.0001, t = 3.62, df = 41).
Logistic regression analysis confirmed birds strongly selected continuous forest (β = 3.61 ± 1.02) and individual trees (β = 3.23 ± 1.10) over coffee for roosting. Thirty-four of 42 observed roosts (81%) were positioned in the forest outside the farm perimeter. This trend was apparent both in Kew Park and Seven Rivers farms (Figure 1). We did not attempt to quantify the timing of movement to and from roost sites, but anecdotal observations suggest that departures generally occurred shortly after sunset, and were direct and rapid.
Black-throated Blue Warbler roosts in the Seven Rivers coffee farm in western Jamaica. Diurnal foraging ranges (black polygons) were positioned entirely or almost entirely within coffee farm perimeter. We collected two roost locations for each the 11 birds in this study area, most of which were found within the surrounding forest. All except one roost located within the farm perimeter were either in shade trees or thin forested riparian strip. Dashed lines represent the most direct path from a roost to its respective diurnal range.
Roosting sites were physiognomically very different from diurnal home ranges. Roosts had generally closed canopy, averaging 94%, while within-farm systematic vegetation surveys revealed a mean canopy cover of 36%. Systematic farm surveys yielded an average nearest tree distance of 6.6 m and an average distance to the nearest three trees to be 10.1 m. Average nearest tree distance and average distance to nearest three trees in roosting areas was 1.1 m and 2.3 m, respectively, indicating a much higher tree density in roosting areas.
Discussion
Roosting ecology
Black-throated Blue Warblers captured on Jamaican coffee farms strongly selected forest habitat for roosting, to which they commuted sometimes considerable distances away from their diurnal foraging ranges (Figure 1). All of the study birds were captured in cultivated coffee patches, where the birds spent the majority of the daytime (B. Campos unpubl. data). Quantitative studies of winter roosting of Nearctic-Neotropical migrants are limited to three species: one that roosts within its diurnal foraging range – Ovenbird Seiurus aurocapilla, and two that roost in separate habitats from their daytime activity – Prothonotary Warbler and Northern Waterthrush; Brown and Sherry Reference Brown and Sherry2008, Smith et al. Reference Smith, Reitsma, Rockwood and Marra2008). Our study suggests Black-throated Blue Warbler can also use separate diurnal and nocturnal habitats. This project examined roosting behaviour of birds whose diurnal foraging ranges were placed largely in coffee farms. We emphasise that Black-throated Blue Warblers with diurnal ranges in other habitats may not necessarily commute to roosting areas. To discern whether commuting behaviours are widespread, more work with migrants outside farms is needed. Due to movements to roosting sites, habitat preferences of individual birds cannot be inferred from diurnal studies or mist net data alone (Burson et al. Reference Burson, Reitsma and Hunt2005).
Although the few roosting birds we managed to see slept solitarily, our study cannot rule out the possibility of communal roosting. Seven Rivers farm contained a region where a number of individuals roosted in close proximity (Figure 1). This area was heavily dominated by an introduced species of bamboo Bambusa vulgaris with a very tall, dense and complex canopy. Interestingly, several roosts (n = 11) were located in bamboo. Although selection among available forested habitats was not part of our study, the birds may have selected bamboo out of proportion to its availability in the area.
Movements to roost sites appeared to be direct and rapid. In one instance, we positioned a radio-tracker at a known roost location of the longest-commuting individual and another tracker near the bird’s diurnal home range at dusk just before the bird’s departure to roost. The signal faded quickly in the home range, and was heard shortly thereafter (< 1 min) at the roost site, 950 m away (Figure 1).
Because we did not track birds that typically forage in forested habitats, it is impossible to ascertain why birds foraging in coffee selected forested habitats for roosting. However, there were significant structural differences between these two habitats that could influence roosting habitat selection, and previous work has documented differences in food supply, which could influence foraging habitat selection. In this study, we found that canopy cover and tree density were much higher in roosting areas than on coffee farms. The forested areas where birds roosted were mostly composed of dense second-growth, often spread over rocky limestone hillsides. Vegetation volume in the coffee farms decreased quickly with increasing height, while the opposite was true around roost sites (Figure 2). It is possible that Black-throated Blue Warblers prefer to roost hidden in dense foliage in tree canopies, fairly high off the ground. There may also be strong differences in food supply between the forested and coffee habitats. Previous work (Johnson and Sherry Reference Johnson and Sherry2001, Johnson et al. Reference Johnson, Strong and Sherry2006) has shown that shade trees used in Jamaican coffee farms, especially Inga vera, have a significantly higher biomass of small foliage-dwelling arthropods than on trees in nearby wet limestone forest. Territorial behaviours in wintering Black-throated Blue Warblers (Holmes et al. Reference Holmes, Sherry and Reitsma1989, Murphy et al. Reference Murphy, Pierce, Shoen, Murphy, Campbell and Hamilton2001, Smith unpubl. data) suggest intraspecific competition, likely for food. Thus, the birds in our study may have selected coffee as foraging habitat for its rich food supply, and forests as roosting habitat for its thick vegetation cover. Habitat-specific demography and measures of body condition for American Redstarts Setophaga ruticilla indicate that Jamaican shade coffee farms are higher in quality than some natural habitats (Johnson et al. Reference Johnson, Strong and Sherry2006), but rigorous forest vs. coffee comparisons are not yet available for Black-throated Blue Warblers.
Mean percent vegetation fill in stacked cube columns. Columns are divided into three equal categories from the ground (0 m) to the top (6 m) of the stacked cube, and percent cover represents the three-dimensional space filled by any woody and herbaceous plant. Farm area bars represent points (n = 226) systematically placed throughout each of the two study farms. Roost area bars represent locations surveyed (n = 42) at each roost. Error bars indicate 1.0 standard error.
Conservation implications
Ecosystem services are functions of the natural environment that improve and sustain human life (Daily Reference Daily1997). These services, including pest control, may be produced at a local scale by mobile organisms foraging within and between habitats (Kremen et al. Reference Kremen2007). Managing for ecosystem services thus requires considering habitat at the local scale as well as the larger landscape scale, which reflects both the distribution of resources as well as the movement of the agents themselves (Luck et al. Reference Luck2009).
Black-throated Blue Warblers can deliver economically significant pest control services locally in coffee farms (Kellermann et al. Reference Kellermann, Johnson, Stercho and Hackett2008, Johnson et al. Reference Johnson, Kellermann and Stercho2010). However, these services may be affected by the spatial distribution of resources at a large scale. We found that Black-throated Blue Warblers foraging in coffee habitats during the day commuted to nocturnal roost locations, often off the farm in surrounding forested habitat. Although our results do not confirm that the birds require adjacent habitats from which to commute, or that farms beyond a certain commute threshold are unlikely to be selected for foraging, our findings do raise the possibility that ecosystem services provided by warblers may be dependent on a farm’s proximity to forest where birds roost. Thus, the habitat selection and movement shown by these warblers could provide an incentive for farmers and agricultural policy makers to conserve forest patches in the landscape.
Roosting behaviours have conservation implications because multiple habitats may require protection for species that roost in habitats separate from their diurnal activities (Brown and Sherry Reference Brown and Sherry2008). Since coffee production coincides with biologically diverse tropical latitudes often at the cost of critical habitat loss of many life forms, making coffee farms more bird-friendly by retaining adjacent forest may mitigate biodiversity loss in general.
Breeding bird survey data compiled from 1966 to 2000 shows a correlation between declines in the southern populations of the Black-throated Blue Warbler’s breeding range and heavy deforestation in some areas where these populations are thought to winter, such as in Haiti where < 3% of forest remains (Rubenstein et al. Reference Rubenstein, Chamberlain, Holmes, Ayres, Waldbauer, Graves and Tuross2002). Birds thought to winter in Jamaica and Cuba (Rubenstein et al. Reference Rubenstein, Chamberlain, Holmes, Ayres, Waldbauer, Graves and Tuross2002) demonstrated little change on the breeding grounds, or even increases in abundance (Sauer et al. Reference Sauer, Hines and Fallon2001), perhaps due in part to comparatively stable tree cover on these islands. Intensification of coffee farming practices that cause Jamaican farmers to reduce shade cover (approaching “sun coffee”) or clear forest to expand their farms may reduce habitat quality and quantity for Black-throated Blue Warblers.
Acknowledgements
Funding was provided by an NSF International Research Experience for Students grant. We would like to thank Shannon Wadham, Jay Iwasaki, Dr. Michael Mesler, Jenny Hutchinson, Carol Wilson, and Brian Atkinson for valuable assistance in the field. Additional help came from Dwight Robinson (University of West Indies), Peter Williams of Kew Park farm, and Jared Wolfe.
