Hostname: page-component-77c78cf97d-lphnv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-04T20:32:26.949Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New paradigms in electrocatalysis with alternative oxidation reactions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2025

Sina Pourebrahimi
Affiliation:
Chemical Engineering, McGill University, Canada
Ali Seifitokaldani*
Affiliation:
Chemical Engineering, McGill University, Canada
*
Corresponding author: Ali Seifitokaldani; Email: ali.seifitokaldani@mcgill.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Electrochemical systems are rapidly evolving beyond traditional water electrolysis, including cathodic hydrogen evolution (HER) and anodic oxygen evolution (OER) reactions, to enhance energy efficiency and generate value-added products simultaneously. Cathodic reactions now facilitate multifunctional reductions – ranging from CO2 conversion into oxygenates and hydrocarbons to nitrogen (N2) fixation, and nitrate (NO3) reduction – by tuning operational parameters. Hybrid co-reduction approaches, such as CO2/nitrile or CO2/nitrate, further enable the synthesis of valuable amines, amides and urea derivatives, among many others. Notably, even in the most advanced electrochemical configurations, the inclusion of the OER – or a functionally equivalent alternative – remains the most convenient oxidation reaction for maintaining charge balance within the cell. As highlighted in recent studies, alternative oxidation reactions (AORs) coupled with cathodic reduction reactions, such as CO2RR, HER, N2RR and NO3RR, are essential for overcoming the limitations of OER. These AORs include oxidation of biomass-derived alcohols and aldehydes, chlorine and water contaminants. In this perspective, we discuss the emerging promise of AORs – with a particular focus on aldehyde electrooxidation – as innovative alternatives to traditional OER. This strategy not only reduces the energy requirements for electrochemical hydrogen production by circumventing the sluggish and energy-intensive OER, but also enables concurrent hydrogen generation at both electrodes. Additionally, integrating AORs into electrolyzer design enables the direct coupling of CO2 reduction at the cathode with high-value chemical transformations at the anode, offering new opportunities for process intensification and enhanced economic viability in the synthesis of sustainable fuels and chemicals.

Information

Type
Perspective
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press or the rights holder(s) must be obtained prior to any commercial use.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Schematic 1. Schematic illustration of the electrochemical co-production system, along with IV curves and the typical required potentials at the cathode and anode for co-electrolysis.

Figure 1

Schematic 2. Schematic representation of paired electrolysis: (a) cathodic CO2RR coupled with anodic HMFOR (Choi et al., 2020), and (b) cathodic NO3RR coupled with anodic SO3OR (Cui et al., 2023).

Figure 2

Table 1. An overview of integrated eCO2RR platforms paired with anodic alcohol, biomass and chlorine oxidation reactions, outlining the electrocatalysts, electrolytes, cell designs, membranes, operating voltages, key products and the highest Faradaic efficiencies achieved for each cathodic and anodic pathway

Author comment: New paradigms in electrocatalysis with alternative oxidation reactions — R0/PR1

Comments

Dear Professors Garcia de Arquer and Dinh,

We would like to thank you for the invitation and the opportunity to submit this perspective to the journal Cambridge Prisms: Carbon Technologies, entitled “New Paradigms in Electrocatalysis with Alternative Oxidation Reactions”. We hope this short discussion be an added-value to the journal and help the electrocatalysis community working on CO2 conversion and green fuel synthesis to improve the energy efficiency of their electrocatalytic systems.

We would be happy to further improve the quality of the manuscript upon receiving feedback from the reviewers and editors.

Thanks for your consideration.

Sincerely yours,

Ali Seifitokaldani, PhD, PEng.,

Associate Professor and Canada Research Chair

Department of Chemical Engineering

McGill University

Montreal, Canada

Review: New paradigms in electrocatalysis with alternative oxidation reactions — R0/PR2

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

This perspective addresses a highly relevant and timely topic, highlighting the need to shift from OER to alternative oxidation reactions to improve energy efficiency and the possibility to generate value-added products, supported by updated references, most of them from the last 3 years.

However, the clarity and impact of the manuscript can be significantly enhanced if the authors add a summary table of all the strategies they reported, including the key performance indicators. For example, they can report on: the oxidation reaction considered, products obtained and their distribution (either faradaic efficiencies or selectivities), electrolyte composition, electrocatalyst, current density, anodic potential vs RHE, coupling cathodic reaction, main benefits of the coupling reactions (energy efficiency), durability (if reported), and limitations or bottlenecks.

Additionally, the economic viability (lines 247-249) does not depend only on the three factors reported by the authors. Selectivity (or faradaic efficiency) has a direct impact on the energy cost for a given product. Additionally, product separation costs should also be taken into account, although this has been discussed in section 5.

Recommendation: New paradigms in electrocatalysis with alternative oxidation reactions — R0/PR3

Comments

Dear Sina and Ali,

We have received some constructive feedback that you will find appended in this email.

We encourage you to review it and implement it promptly to improve the quality of the manuscript before acceptance.

Best regards,

Pelayo

Decision: New paradigms in electrocatalysis with alternative oxidation reactions — R0/PR4

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: New paradigms in electrocatalysis with alternative oxidation reactions — R1/PR5

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Recommendation: New paradigms in electrocatalysis with alternative oxidation reactions — R1/PR6

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: New paradigms in electrocatalysis with alternative oxidation reactions — R1/PR7

Comments

No accompanying comment.