Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-7262s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-16T05:16:07.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

BIA400 versus Ponto Wide: a long-term retrospective analysis of implant stability, tolerability and survival in bone conduction devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2026

Florine de Haan*
Affiliation:
Otorhinolaryngology, Deventer Hospital, Netherlands
Jeroen Peters
Affiliation:
Otorhinolaryngology, Deventer Hospital, Netherlands
Pauline van Kempen
Affiliation:
Otorhinolaryngology, Deventer Hospital, Netherlands
Ruben Strijbos
Affiliation:
Otorhinolaryngology, Deventer Hospital, Netherlands
Steven Bom
Affiliation:
Otorhinolaryngology, Deventer Hospital, Netherlands
*
Corresponding author: Florine de Haan; Email: florine@dehaan.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this single-centre retrospective study was to determine the long-term outcomes of the BIA400 and Ponto Wide, in terms of implant stability, soft tissue reactions, skin thickening and implant loss.

Methods

Adults who had the BIA400 or Ponto Wide implanted between January 2013 and December 2023 and had at least two follow-up appointments were included, leading to a cohort of 93 BIA400 and 114 Ponto Wide implants.

Results

Significantly more soft tissue reactions with a Holgers Scale score of 1 or greater (p = 0.003), adverse soft tissue reactions of Holgers Scale score of 2 or greater (p = 0.018), skin thickening (p < 0.001) and skin thickening requiring treatment (p ≤ 0.001) occurred in the BIA400 group. No difference in implant stability was found. One BIA400 implant (1.1 per cent) and three Ponto Wide implants (2.7 per cent) were lost.

Conclusion

Both implants have excellent implant stability and similar implant survival rates. The Ponto Wide has favourable outcomes in terms of (adverse) soft tissue reaction and skin thickening (requiring treatment).

Information

Type
Main Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED.
Figure 0

Figure 1. Inclusion flowchart.

Figure 1

Table 1. Baseline characteristicsTable 1 long description.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier survival curves showing time to soft tissue reaction. A. Soft tissue reaction Holgers ≥ 1 (p = 0.003). B. Adverse soft tissue reaction Holgers ≥ 2 (p = 0.018).Figure 2 long description.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier survival curves showing time to skin thickening. A. Skin thickening (p < 0.001) B. Skin thickening requiring treatment (p < 0.001).Figure 3 long description.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Boxplot of ISQ trend on date of surgery and standard follow-up visits, per abutment length.Figure 4 long description.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Boxplot of change in ISQ values relative to baseline on standard follow-up visits, per abutment length.Figure 5 long description.