Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-rxg44 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-17T05:17:43.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

There Is No Such Thing as Expected Moral Choice-Worthiness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2023

Nicolas Côté Open the ORCID record for Nicolas Côté [Opens in a new window]
Nicolas Côté*
Affiliation:
Philosophy department, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland
*
Email: Nicolas.Cote@glasgow.ca.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents some impossibility results for certain views about what you should do when you are uncertain about which moral theory is true. I show that under reasonable and extremely minimal ways of defining what a moral theory is, it follows that the concept of expected moral choiceworthiness is undefined, and more generally that any theory of decision-making under moral uncertainty must generate pathological results.

Keywords

moral uncertaintynormative ethicsprobability theorydecision theory

Information

Type
Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , January 2023 , pp. 1 - 20
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Canadian Journal of Philosophy

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Article last updated 25 October 2023.

References

Bradley, Richard., and List, Christian. 2009. “Desire-as-Belief Revisited.” Analysis 69: 31–37.10.1093/analys/ann005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, Richard., and Stefánsson, Orri.. 2010. “Desire, Belief, and Invariance.” Mind 125: 691–725.10.1093/mind/fzv200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, Richard. 2017. Decision Theory with a Human Face. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9780511760105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, John. 1991. “Desire, Beliefs, and Expectation.” Mind 100: 265–67.10.1093/mind/C.398.265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietrich, Franz, and Jabarian, Brian. 2021. “Decision under Normative Uncertainty.” Economics and Philosophy 38 (3): 372–94.10.1017/S0266267121000201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enoch, David. 2013. “A Defense of Moral Deference.” Journal of Philosophy: 229–58.Google Scholar
Gracely, Edward. 2013. “On the Noncomparability of Judgments Made by Different Ethical Theories.” Metaphilosophy 3: 327–32.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, Johann., and Torpman, Olle. 2014. “In Defence of My Favorite Theory.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly: 159–74.10.1111/papq.12022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, Elizabeth. 2015. “The Irrelevance of Moral Uncertainty.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics, vol. 10, edited by Landau, Russ Shafer, 53–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198738695.003.0003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedden, Brian. 2013. “Does MITE Make Right? Decision-Making under Normative Uncertainty.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics, vol. 11, edited by Landau, Russ Shafer, 102–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, Amelia (2021). “Non-ideal prescriptions for the morally uncertain” Philosophical Studies 179 (4):1039–106410.1007/s11098-021-01686-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, B. 2013. “Confidence in Preferences.” Social Choice and Welfare 39: 273–302.10.1007/s00355-011-0637-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kernohan, Andrew. 2021. “Descriptive Uncertainty and Maximizing Expected Choice-Worthiness.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 24: 197–211.10.1007/s10677-020-10139-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Zoë Johnson. 2022. “Who’s Afraid of Normative Externalism?” In Meaning, Decision, and Norms: Themes From the Work of Allan Gibbard, edited by Dunaway, Billy and Plunkett, David. Michigan Publishing Services.Google Scholar
Lewis, David 1980. “A Subjectivist’s Guide to Objective Chance.” In Jeffrey, R. C.(Ed.) Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, vol. II. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1988. “Desire-as-Belief.” Mind 97: 323–32.10.1093/mind/XCVII.387.323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David. 1996. “Desire-as-Belief II.” Mind 105: 303–13.10.1093/mind/105.418.303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockhart, Ted. 2000. Moral Uncertainty and Its Consequences. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacAskill, William. 2013. “The Infectiousness of Nihilism.” Ethics 123: 508–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacAskill, William, and Ord, Toby. 2018. “Why Maximize Expected Choice-worthiness?” Noûs 54: 1–27.Google Scholar
MacAskill, William, Bykvist, Krister, and Ord, Toby. 2020. Moral Uncertainty. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nissan-Rozen, Ittay. 2015. “Against Moral Hedging.” Economics and Philosophy 349–69.Google Scholar
Nissan-Rozen, Ittay. 2018. “Is Value under Hypothesis Value?’ Ergo 5.Google Scholar
Podgorski, Abelard. 2020. “Normative Uncertainty and the Dependence Problem.” Mind 129: 43–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hillary. 2002. The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hillary. 2004. Ethics without Ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Riedener, Stefan. 2020. “An Axiomatic Approach to Axiological Uncertainty. Philosophical Studies 177 (2): 483–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riedener, Stefan. 2021. Uncertain Values: An Axiomatic Approach of Axiological Uncertainty. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110736199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Pamela. 2021. “Is Normative Uncertainty Irrelevant If Your Descriptive Uncertainty Depends on It?” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 103 (4): 874–99.10.1111/papq.12379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Jacob. 2006. “Rejecting Ethical Deflationism.” Ethics 116 (4): 742–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1971. “Choice Functions and Revealed Preference.” Review of Economic Studies 38: 307–17.10.2307/2296384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepielli, Andrew. 2009. “What to Do When You Don’t Know What to Do.” Oxford Studies in Metaethics 4: 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepielli, Andrew. 2013. “Moral Uncertainty and the Principle of Equity among Moral Theories.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86 (3): 580–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepielli, Andrew. 2016. “Moral Uncertainty and Fetishistic Motivation.” Philosophical Studies: 2951–68.10.1007/s11098-016-0645-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steuwer, Bastian. 2021. “Aggregation, Balancing, and Respect for the Claims of Individuals.” Utilitas 33: 17–34.10.1017/S0953820820000217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarnsey, Christian. 2021. “Vive la Différence? Structural Diversity as a Challenge for Metanormative Theories.” Ethics: 151–82.Google Scholar
Temkin, Larry. 2012. Rethinking the Good: Moral Ideals and the Nature of Practical Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199759446.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tessman, Lisa. 2015. Moral Failure: On the Impossible Demands of Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Voorhoeve, Alex. 2014. “How Should We Aggregate Competing Claims?” Ethics 125: 64–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weatherson, Brian. 2014. “Running Risks Morally.” Philosophical Studies 1: 141–63.10.1007/s11098-013-0227-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weatherson, Brian. 2021. Normative Externalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. Forthcoming. “Moral Anti-Exceptionalism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Moral Realism, edited by Bloomfield, Paul and Copp, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar