Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-dqfph Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-15T04:47:19.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Barriers and facilitators of mental health help-seeking behaviours among school-going adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative evidence synthesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2026

Adrian Ivan Kakinda*
Affiliation:
Division of Psychology, School of Humanities, Social Sciences and Law, University of Dundee , UK
Tim J. Croudace
Affiliation:
Division of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Dundee , UK
Rachel A. Plouffe
Affiliation:
Division of Psychology, School of Humanities, Social Sciences and Law, University of Dundee , UK
Kennedy Amone-P’Olak
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Kyambogo University , Uganda
*
Corresponding author: Adrian Ivan Kakinda; Email: 2612662@dundee.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Content of image described in text.

The prevalence of mental health problems (MHPs) among school-going adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) remains high. However, help-seeking behaviours are disproportionately low in this population. This qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) aimed to identify and integrate existing qualitative findings on the barriers and facilitators of formal and informal mental health (MH) help-seeking behaviours in this population. The objective was to generate insights from relevant studies and settings to inform the development of effective interventions for culturally grounded public mental health initiatives in schools in SSA. We conducted a systematic search across six databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO, ERIC and Google Scholar) for qualitative studies published until September 2025. Eligible studies were appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist. Thematic synthesis was employed to analyse and interpret the findings. Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. Six key barriers were identified: (1) perceived stigma, (2) gender norms as a barrier to help-seeking, (3) poor mental health knowledge, misconceptions and awareness gaps, (4) privacy, trust and confidentiality concerns with MH professionals, (5) lack of accessibility and availability of MH services and (6) family and parental attitudes, peer influence and alternative support. Facilitators included (1) MH education and literacy enhancement, (2) supportive school environment or climate, (3) improved professional services, (4) family, community involvement and peer support and (5) improved service accessibility and affordability. This synthesis highlights the significant structural and sociocultural determinants of help-seeking behaviour in school-going adolescents in SSA. The scarcity of qualitative studies in this area underscores a critical gap in the existing literature. Further context-sensitive qualitative research is urgently needed to gain insights into adolescents’ lived experiences with MHPs and to guide responsive school-based MH interventions.

Information

Type
Overview Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Application of the SPIDER tool to the review questionsTable 1. long description.

Figure 1

Table 2. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for the included articlesTable 2. long description.

Figure 2

Figure 1. PRISMA diagram for study selection.Figure 1. long description.

Figure 3

Table 3. Characteristics of included studies and their contribution to the review question (12)Table 3. long description.

Figure 4

Table 4. Barriers to mental health help-seekingTable 4. long description.

Figure 5

Table 5. Facilitators of mental health help-seekingTable 5. long description.

Supplementary material: File

Kakinda et al. supplementary material

Kakinda et al. supplementary material
Download Kakinda et al. supplementary material(File)
File 46.3 KB

Author comment: Barriers and facilitators of mental health help-seeking behaviours among school-going adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative evidence synthesis — R0/PR1

Comments

Adrian Ivan Kakinda

PhD Candidate, Psychology

School of Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

University of Dundee

Nethergate, Dundee DD1 4HN, Scotland

2612662@dundee.ac.uk

08/01/2026

Professor Judy Bass

Editor-in-Chief

Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Maryland, USA,

Dear Prof. Bass,

I am pleased to submit the manuscript titled “Barriers and Facilitators of mental health help-seeking behaviours among school-going adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative evidence synthesis” for consideration in Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health.

This manuscript presents a rigorous qualitative evidence synthesis of mental health help-seeking behaviours among school-going adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa. Mental health challenges among adolescents remain a neglected priority in the region, despite growing demand for contextually grounded interventions. Our synthesis integrates findings from eight qualitative studies conducted across multiple Sub-Saharan countries, using thematic synthesis to identify common barriers, cultural dynamics, and pathways influencing school going adolescents’ willingness and ability to seek help for mental health problems.

The study addresses a pressing gap in global adolescent mental health literature by focusing on underrepresented populations. It offers analytical clarity on the role of stigma, informal care systems, gendered perceptions of vulnerability, and structural school-level influences. Our synthesis contributes to knowledge translation by highlighting locally informed strategies for improving adolescent engagement with mental health support systems.

We believe Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health is the most appropriate venue for this work given its global readership, commitment to evidence-based psychological science, and relevance to both clinical and public health practice. Our manuscript presents a timely and policy-relevant contribution to ongoing conversations on mental health equity and access in low-resource settings.

The manuscript has not been published or submitted elsewhere. All authors have reviewed and approved the final version and agree to its submission to Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health. There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Thank you for considering our work. We welcome the opportunity for it to contribute to the critical discourse on adolescent mental health and help-seeking.

Sincerely,

Adrian Ivan Kakinda

PhD Candidate, Psychology

School of Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

University of Dundee

(on behalf of all co-authors)

Review: Barriers and facilitators of mental health help-seeking behaviours among school-going adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative evidence synthesis — R0/PR2

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Peer Review Report

For: Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health

Manuscript ID: GMH-2026-0007

Title: Promotion of Mental Health Help-Seeking Among School-Going Adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis

Overall Recommendation: Accept with Minor Revisions

Section-by-Section Feedback for Authors

1. Abstract & Impact Statement: The abstract clearly summarizes the objective, methods, results, and implications. The Impact Statement effectively highlights the relevance of the findings for intervention design in SSA. However, there is some overlap in content between the Abstract and Impact Statement. To improve, refine the Impact Statement to focus more on the novel implications and translational value of the synthesis, rather than restating results. Also, ensure consistency in terminology (e.g., “MPHs” should be “MHPs”).

2. Introduction: This section provides a compelling rationale, clearly establishes the research gap, and situates the study within global and regional contexts. The objectives are well-defined. Authors should consider briefly noting how the SSA-focused review contributes to global understandings of adolescent help-seeking, particularly in terms of contextualizing universal barriers within region-specific realities.

3. Methods: The methodological approach of this manuscript is rigorous, transparent, and well-documented. The appropriate application of established frameworks, SPIDER, ENTREQ, PRISMA, CASP, and GRADE-CERQual, significantly enhances the study’s credibility. The search strategy is comprehensively described and appears fully reproducible. The “Data Extraction and Study Characteristics” section clearly outlines a systematic process, detailing the extraction of study characteristics, methodological features, participant details, and relevant constructs. However, the actual data representing these extracted elements, particularly the content spanning pages 13–17 intended as Table 3, is not presented in a coherent format. Currently, this content is fragmented, misaligned, and contains interrupted text, which prevents verification of the extraction process and systematic assessment of the included studies. To resolve this, the detailed study characteristics should be consolidated into a clear, standalone table, either in the main text or an appendix, with standardized domains such as title, author, year, country, sample, methods, and key findings. Furthermore, the reporting of study characteristics should be enhanced to include an in-depth analysis of how each included article addresses the specific research questions, moving beyond mere description to a more synthetic and critical presentation of the evidence, as this is a qualitative manuscript. This restructuring will ensure the methodological transparency described in the text is fully reflected in the presented data.

4. Results (Thematic Synthesis): The thematic presentation is logical, well-structured, and richly illustrated with participant quotes. The identification of six barriers and five facilitators is insightful and grounded in the data. Ensure terminological consistency across sections (e.g., “Mental Health Knowledge, misconceptions and awareness gaps” in Results vs. “low mental health literacy” in Discussion). Additionally, authors should consider deepening the analysis of facilitators by exploring interactions between themes (e.g., how mental health literacy and peer support jointly overcome stigma).

5. Discussion: The section effectively interprets findings, links them to existing literature, and draws meaningful implications for practice, policy, and research. The contrast between SSA and high-income settings is well-articulated. Authors are advised to include a dedicated paragraph that explicitly summarizes how SSA-specific findings (e.g., reliance on informal/religious networks, cultural stigma) compare and contrast with the global evidence base, and what unique lessons SSA offers to global mental health. Furthermore, authors should clarify any thematic overlap noted in the summary of barriers (e.g., “Mental Health Knowledge” vs. “low mental health literacy”).

6. Conclusion: This section succinctly reiterates the importance of schools as platforms for mental health support and calls for more context-sensitive qualitative research. However, the ending feels somewhat abrupt. Consider adding a final, impactful sentence that underscores the transformative potential of school-based mental health initiatives in SSA.

Review: Barriers and facilitators of mental health help-seeking behaviours among school-going adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative evidence synthesis — R0/PR3

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

The manuscript addresses an important qualitative research gap in a global context specifically in Africa. The study design and methods are acceptable, and the results provide clear existing qualitative findings on the barriers and facilitators of both formal and informal mental health help-seeking behaviours among adolescents in Sub Saharan Africa.

I appreciate the clarity of the standard qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) for the methodology, and logical structure of the results presented.

A few minor revisions are suggested to the authors as below.

Abstract: Page 1 line 10, Clarify in the abstract which short form or abbreviation it is for mental health problems MPHs or MHPs.

Results: Pg 18-21, Considering ‘stigma is the most robust barrier,’ authors could consider clarifying the stigma variable and subthemes. For example, In Table 4 of barriers to mental health help seeking, ‘Social stigma, anticipated stigma, public stigma, cultural stigma, self-stigma are mentioned although some are not fully expounded or discussed. Consider if appropriate to merge subthemes like public stigma and social stigma as quotation used for public stigma, is also social stigma including friends and family(mothers) or reflect on using another clear distinguishing quotation.

Discussion: Pg. 42, In the discussion introduction it may be helpful to readers for authors to provide a global outlook or snapshot and then narrowing down to current work in Sub Saharan Africa rather than stating the research gap. Authors may consider how this synthesis fits into the continent or globally.

Implications or conclusion: Pg 45-47, Authors could consider providing some more social cultural perspective on SSA in the implications or conclusions.

Overall, this is a promising paper that would benefit from minor revision before publication.

Review: Barriers and facilitators of mental health help-seeking behaviours among school-going adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative evidence synthesis — R0/PR4

Conflict of interest statement

None

Comments

Overall

The review aimed to synthesise evidence on barriers and facilitators of both formal and informal mental health help-seeking behaviours among school-going adolescents. Some key structural and sociocultural inhibiting and facilitating factors were identified, against which key recommendations have been made.

1. This review would be incomplete without acknowledging the policy landscape that shapes healthcare in these settings, particularly the significant gaps in policies and guidelines on mental health for the general population, and even more so for school-going adolescents and young people.

For example, the reviewers found out that supportive school environments were facilitators for mental health help-seeking behaviours. But were these school environments anchored in policy or law? Did these schools implement the WHO Health Promoting Schools framework? ?

2. Because there is an overlap between barriers and facilitators i.e. same structural and sociocultural factors can be barriers and facilitators depending on how they present, perhaps the authors should present these side by side (under the same heading), showing how, say, family can be a barrier if it is dysfunctional, and if it offers support, it can be a facilitator. This way, one gets the full picture.

Methods

The methods as described are clear and straightforward. The five databases explored are relevant to the topic.

1. However, considering the authors were interested in qualitative evidence, it would have been great for them to review other niche-specific and region-specific journals that could publish research from the social sciences. These journals could be archived in AJOL, EMBASE, etc.

2. It is also notable that “the first search was conducted in March 2024, with updates in July 2024, and June 2025.” This is atypically long to carry out searches and updates of articles to include in a systematic review. It would be great to know why the authors felt this approach was optimal for this manuscript.

3. Why was “Manual citation tracking of pertinent articles conducted” in this day and age, when we have robust tools, some even freely available/open source, that they could use for this process?

4. It would be good to hear from the authors about how many instances they had to write to the selected authors of studies that were eligible, but where their academic library subscriptions did not allow them to access the full-text versions of papers. How successful was this approach?

5. Eligibility criteria: Why did the authors find it necessary to cite Zhang et al. 2023 when describing the inclusion of 10 – 19-year-olds in the study? Why do they feel this criterion is attributable to Zhang et al. 2023?

6. When discussing exclusion criteria, the authors should not wander outside the scope of sub-Saharan Africa. This sentence, “Studies outside Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).....and quantitative studies were excluded from the synthesis”, is redundant. The authors should tell us why otherwise eligible studies in scope and type of design were excluded, and for what reason they were excluded.

7. Page 7”: this explanation “Endnote.....reference management software designed to organise the retrieved references” is superfluous for the audience the authors are producing this manuscript for.

8. Page 8, lines 44 – 45: This is the first time the authors indicate they also searched Google Scholar in addition to the five databases earlier listed.

9. Page 10: PRISMA Flowchart: Can the authors use the updated 2020 PRISMA Flowchart and Statement?

Findings

1. Theme 2: “Gender differences” seems to be an analysis of how the barriers and facilitators are distributed, as opposed to being a barrier or facilitator. The authors need to arrange the themes based on a framework and logical flow. Or else the authors need to rename “Gender” as a risk factor/barrier to mental health help-seeking among school-going adolescents.

2. The use of terms “one participant” and “one respondent” makes it sound as if the data are transcripts, and not findings from published manuscripts. The authors need to find better ways to report findings from the articles they cite.

3. The authors conflate ‘education’ with ‘knowledge/literacy’ across the manuscript. These terms must be properly reviewed and correctly presented.

Conclusions

This sentence, “Overall, our findings revealed that schools offer a powerful yet often overlooked platform for the economic delivery of adolescent mental health services” is not clear. Do the authors mean that schools offer an opportunity to deliver cost-effective mental health services to school-going adolescents?

Recommendation: Barriers and facilitators of mental health help-seeking behaviours among school-going adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative evidence synthesis — R0/PR5

Comments

Please address all the revisions suggested by the reviewers.

Decision: Barriers and facilitators of mental health help-seeking behaviours among school-going adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative evidence synthesis — R0/PR6

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Barriers and facilitators of mental health help-seeking behaviours among school-going adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative evidence synthesis — R1/PR7

Comments

07 April 2026

Editor-in-Chief

Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health

Dear Prof Chibanda,

Re: Barriers and Facilitators of Mental Health Help-Seeking Behaviours among School-Going Adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis

We are pleased to resubmit the revised version of our manuscript, titled “GMH-2026-0007: Barriers and facilitators of mental health help-seeking behaviours among school-going adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative evidence synthesis,” for consideration in Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health.

We have comprehensively addressed all editorial and reviewer comments. We provide a structured response comprising three sections: Reviewer comments, Author responses, and Revisions implemented. All changes have been clearly indicated with their respective locations (page and line numbers) to facilitate the review process.

We are grateful for the time and critical input provided during the review. These revisions have strengthened the clarity, rigor, and translational value of the manuscript.

Thank you for considering our manuscript for publication.

Sincerely,

Adrian Ivan Kakinda

University of Dundee

(On behalf of all authors)

Review: Barriers and facilitators of mental health help-seeking behaviours among school-going adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative evidence synthesis — R1/PR8

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

The authors have adequately addressed comments with clear reponses and made changes to improve the manuscrpit.

Review: Barriers and facilitators of mental health help-seeking behaviours among school-going adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative evidence synthesis — R1/PR9

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

At this point of the manuscript, I have no comments for the authors.

Recommendation: Barriers and facilitators of mental health help-seeking behaviours among school-going adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative evidence synthesis — R1/PR10

Comments

Thank you for submitting the revised manuscript. The reviewers agree that the revised paper is clear. However, before accepting the paper please make a final essential revision.

The Introduction should end with an aim and a research question. It should not include a statement of what was done. Please remove the statement and place it in the Discussion and add a study aim.

Please make these final changes and submit your revised paper.

Decision: Barriers and facilitators of mental health help-seeking behaviours among school-going adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative evidence synthesis — R1/PR11

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Barriers and facilitators of mental health help-seeking behaviours among school-going adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative evidence synthesis — R2/PR12

Comments

Revised Manuscript Submission – GMH-2026-0007.R1

14 May 2026

Dixon Chibanda

Editor-in-Chief

Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health

Dear Prof Chibanda,

Re: Barriers and Facilitators of Mental Health Help-Seeking Behaviours among School-Going Adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis

Thank you for the constructive feedback and the opportunity to revise and resubmit our manuscript entitled, “Barriers and Facilitators of Mental Health Help-Seeking Behaviours among School-Going Adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis” (Manuscript ID: GMH-2026-0007.R1).

In response to the Handling Editor’s recommendation, we revised the concluding section of the Introduction so that it now ends with a clear study aim and research question. The interpretive contribution-focused statement was relocated to the Discussion section while retaining a brief contextual statement in the Introduction in line with Reviewer 1’s earlier recommendation.

We have uploaded both clean and tracked-changes versions of the manuscript together with the graphical abstract and supporting files.

We sincerely appreciate the time, guidance, and constructive input provided by the reviewers and editorial team throughout the review process.

Kindest Regards,

Adrian Ivan Kakinda

Division of Psychology

University of Dundee

United Kingdom

(On behalf of all authors)

Recommendation: Barriers and facilitators of mental health help-seeking behaviours among school-going adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative evidence synthesis — R2/PR13

Comments

Thank you for your response, I note that you retained the Impact Statement in the Introduction, please remove it and place it in the Discussion. I cannot reach a decision about publication until this change has been made.

Decision: Barriers and facilitators of mental health help-seeking behaviours among school-going adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative evidence synthesis — R2/PR14

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Barriers and facilitators of mental health help-seeking behaviours among school-going adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative evidence synthesis — R3/PR15

Comments

Cover Letter – Revised Manuscript Submission GMH-2026-0007.R2

Dear Prof. Chibanda,

Please find attached the revised version of our manuscript entitled, “Barriers and Facilitators of Mental Health Help-Seeking Behaviours among School-Going Adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis” (Manuscript ID: GMH-2026-0007.R2), submitted to Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health.

We are grateful for the constructive feedback provided by the editorial team and reviewers. In response to the Handling Editor’s recommendation, we revised the manuscript accordingly and uploaded both clean and tracked-changes versions together with the graphical abstract and accompanying submission files.

We appreciate your continued consideration of our manuscript and look forward to your response.

Kindest Regards,

Adrian Ivan Kakinda

Division of Psychology

University of Dundee

United Kingdom

Recommendation: Barriers and facilitators of mental health help-seeking behaviours among school-going adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative evidence synthesis — R3/PR16

Comments

Thank you for submitting the revised paper, which I am pleased to accept.

Decision: Barriers and facilitators of mental health help-seeking behaviours among school-going adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative evidence synthesis — R3/PR17

Comments

No accompanying comment.