Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-bp2c4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-15T12:47:27.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preparing for a Foreign Animal Disease Outbreak Using a Novel Tabletop Exercise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2018

Eric J. Linskens ,
Abby E. Neu ,
Emily J. Walz ,
Kaitlyn M. St. Charles ,
Marie R. Culhane ,
Amos Ssematimba ,
Timothy J. Goldsmith ,
David A. Halvorson  and
Carol J. Cardona
Eric J. Linskens
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota USA
Abby E. Neu
Affiliation:
Extension, University of Minnesota, Willmar, Minnesota USA
Emily J. Walz
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota USA
Kaitlyn M. St. Charles
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota USA
Marie R. Culhane
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota USA
Amos Ssematimba
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota USA
Timothy J. Goldsmith
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota USA
David A. Halvorson
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota USA
Carol J. Cardona*
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota USA
*
Correspondence: Carol Cardona, DVM, PhD 1971 Commonwealth Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55108 USA E-mail: ccardona@umn.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction

Foreign animal disease (FAD) outbreaks can have devastating impacts, but they occur infrequently in any specific sector anywhere in the United States (US). Training to proactively discuss implementation of control and prevention strategies are beneficial in that they provide stakeholders with the practical information and educational experience they will need to respond effectively to an FAD. Such proactive approaches are the mission of the Secure Food System (SFS; University of Minnesota; St. Paul, Minnesota USA).

Methods

The SFS exercises were designed as educational activities based on avian influenza (AI) outbreaks in commercial poultry scenarios. These scenarios were created by subject matter experts and were based on epidemiology reports, risk pathway analyses, local industry practices, and site-specific circumstances. Target audiences of an exercise were the groups involved in FAD control: animal agriculture industry members; animal health regulators; and diagnosticians. Groups of industry participants seated together at tables represented fictional poultry premises and were guided by a moderator to respond to an on-farm situation within a simulated outbreak. The impact of SFS exercises was evaluated through interviews with randomized industry participants and selected table moderators. Descriptive statistics and qualitative analyses were performed on interview feedback.

Results

Eleven SFS exercises occurred from December 2016 through October 2017 in multiple regions of the US. Exercises were conducted as company-wide, state-wide, or regional trainings. Nine were based on highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) outbreaks and two focused on outbreaks of co-circulating HPAI and low pathogenicity avian influenza (LPAI). Poultry industry participants interviewed generally found attending an SFS exercise to be useful. The most commonly identified benefits of participation were its value to people without prior outbreak experience and knowledge gained about Continuity of Business (COB)-permitted movement. After completing an exercise, most participants evaluated their preparedness to respond to an outbreak as somewhat to very ready, and more than one-half reported their respective company or farms had discussions or changed actions due to participation.

Conclusion:

Evaluation feedback suggests the SFS exercises were an effective training method to supplement preparedness efforts for an AI outbreak. The concept of using multi-faceted scenarios and multiple education strategies during a tabletop exercise may be translatable to other emergency preparedness needs.

LinskensEJ, NeuAE, WalzEJ, St. CharlesKM, CulhaneMR, SsematimbaA, GoldsmithTJ, HalvorsonDA, CardonaCJ. Preparing for a Foreign Animal Disease Outbreak Using a Novel Tabletop Exercise. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(6):640–646.

Keywords

avian influenzacontinuing educationdisease outbreakexercisetraining program

Information

Type
Brief Report
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 33 , Issue 6 , December 2018 , pp. 640 - 646
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Halvorson, D. Prevention and management of avian influenza outbreaks: experiences from the United States of America. Revue Scientifique et Technique (International Office of Epizootics). 2009;28(1):359-369.Google ScholarPubMed
2. Kapczynski, DR, King, DJ. Protection of chickens against overt clinical disease and determination of viral shedding following vaccination with commercially available Newcastle disease virus vaccines upon challenge with highly virulent virus from the California 2002 exotic Newcastle disease outbreak. Vaccine. 2005;23(26):3424-3433.10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.01.140CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Falcon, MD. Exotic Newcastle disease. Seminars in Avian and Exotic Pet Medicine. 2004;13(2):79-85.10.1053/j.saep.2004.01.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Congressional Research Service. Update on the Highly-Pathogenic Avian Influenza Outbreak of 2014-2015. http://nationalaglawcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/assets/crs/R44114.pdf. Published 2015. Accessed August 15, 2017.Google Scholar
5. Garber, L, Bjork, K, Patyk, K, et al. Factors associated with highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N2 infection on table-egg layer farms in the Midwestern United States, 2015. Avian Diseases. 2016;60(2):460-466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. USDA APHIS VS. Epidemiologic and Other Analyses of Indiana HPAI/LPAI-Affected Poultry Flocks: March 4, 2016 Report. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/animal_dis_spec/poultry/downloads/indiana-epi-report.pdf. Published 2016. Accessed August 15, 2017.Google Scholar
7. USDA APHIS VS. Epidemiologic and Other Analyses of HPAI/LPAI Affected Poultry Flocks June 26, 2017 Report. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/animal_dis_spec/poultry/downloads/epi-ai.pdf. Published 2017. Accessed August 15, 2017.Google Scholar
8. USDA APHIS VS. APHIS Foreign Animal Disease Framework Roles and Coordination. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/emergency_management/downloads/documents_manuals/fadprep_manual_1.pdf. Published 2016. Accessed August 15, 2017.Google Scholar
9. USAHA. Resolution Number: 54. http://www.usaha.org/upload/Resolution/resolution54-2007.pdf. Published 2007. Accessed September 21, 2017.Google Scholar
10. Goldsmith, TJ, Culhane, MR, Sampedro, F, Cardona, CJ. Proactive risk assessments and the Continuity of Business principles: perspectives on this novel, combined approach to develop guidance for the permitted movement of agricultural products during a foot-and-mouth disease outbreak in the United States. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2017;3:117.10.3389/fvets.2016.00117CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. McAloon, T, McElroy, K, Zils, R, Halvorson, D, Ferrouillet, C, Hueston, W. Planning for Business Continuity During an Outbreak of a Foreign Poultry Disease. Paper presented at: 109th Annual Meeting of the United States Animal Health Association; November 3 - 9, 2005; Hershey, Pennsylvania USA.Google Scholar
12. USDA APHIS VS. Permitted Movement. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/emergency_management/downloads/documents_manuals/fadprep_man6-0_permit-mvmt.pdf. Published 2017. Accessed August 15, 2017.Google Scholar
13. Secure Food Systems Web site. http://securefoodsystems.umn.edu/. Accessed October 30, 2017.Google Scholar
14. Johnson, R. The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Permitted Movement of Poultry and Poultry Products During an HPAI Outbreak. Paper presented at: Sixty-Fifth Western Poultry Disease Conference; April 24- April 27, 2016; Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
15. Halvorson, D. Overview of the 2015 HPAI Outbreak in the Midwestern Region of the USA. Paper presented at: Sixty-Fifth Western Poultry Disease Conference; April 24-27, 2016; Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
16. Naval Postgraduate School. State and local policy considerations for implementing the National Response Plan. https://calhoun.nps.edu/bitstream/handle/10945/2305/05Mar_Cline.pdf?sequence=1. Published 2005. Accessed August 15, 2017.Google Scholar
17. Garner, MG, Dubé, C, Stevenson, MA, Sanson, RL, Estrada, C, Griffin, J. Evaluating alternative approaches to managing animal disease outbreaks–the role of modelling in policy formulation. Vet Ital. 2007;43(2):285-298.Google ScholarPubMed
18. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. New England Foot and Mouth Disease Tabletop Exercise. https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/365967.pdf. Published 2008. Accessed August 15, 2017.Google Scholar
19. USDA APHIS VS. Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Response Plan the Red Book. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/emergency_management/downloads/hpai_response_plan.pdf. Published 2017. Accessed August 15, 2017.Google Scholar
20. Secure Poultry Supply Web site. https://securepoultrysupply.umn.edu/. Accessed November 27, 2017.Google Scholar
21. Likert, R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology. 1932.Google Scholar
22. Creswell, JW. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, California USA: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2009.Google Scholar
23. Charmaz, K. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. 1st ed. Thousand Oaks, California USA: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2005.Google Scholar