Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-pksg9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-01-16T15:21:22.266Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multidisciplinary care for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in rural Appalachia: Tales from the Clinic Coordinator

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2026

Jennifer Zorotovich*
Affiliation:
Counseling and Human Services, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA
Courtney Andrews
Affiliation:
Rehabilitative Sciences, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA
*
Corresponding author: Jennifer Zorotovich; Email: zorotovich@etsu.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Information

Type
Essay/Personal Reflection
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Introduction

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that primarily affects motor neurons, leading to muscle atrophy, respiratory failure, and ultimately death. Current treatment options focus on symptom management and maintaining quality of life rather than curing the disease (Hardiman et al. Reference Hardiman, Berg and Kiernan2011). Multidisciplinary care teams are crucial in ALS management due to its complexity, requiring neurologists, various therapists, dietitians, respiratory specialists, and palliative care experts. Such care improves patients’ physical functioning, psychological well-being, and overall satisfaction (Hardiman et al. Reference Hardiman, Berg and Kiernan2011; Sun et al. Reference Sun, Zhao and Li2020).

In the Appalachian region of the United States, systemic and historical factors associated with rural healthcare create challenges for ALS patients in need of quality, specialized care. Rural residents often face barriers such as limited specialty providers, lower socioeconomic status (Kariisa and Seiber Reference Kariisa and Seiber2015; Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Shoben and Felix2023), transportation issues, and knowing that multidisciplinary, specialized care is available and where to find it. Neurological specialty care is particularly scarce, leading to delays in treatment for conditions like ALS (Rhudy et al. Reference Rhudy, Schadler and Huffmyer2023). Free multidisciplinary care helps to bridge gaps between the patient and available healthcare. By alleviating financial strain, such services reduce burdens for families managing chronic illnesses such as ALS. Multidisciplinary teams also provide tailored health education and support, empowering families to manage ALS more effectively (Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Shoben and Felix2023). Care coordinators overseeing multidisciplinary clinics are pivotal in assisting patients in navigating through complex healthcare systems, ensuring that comprehensive treatment and follow-up are experienced in high quality ways that are critical for ALS symptom management (Sun et al. Reference Sun, Zhao and Li2020). This paper is co-authored by the current Clinic Coordinator of East Tennessee State University’s (ETSU) Gary E. Shealy Memorial ALS Clinic as well as the Immediate Past Clinic Coordinator. Together, we share the historical backdrop of the clinic and provide insight into how multidisciplinary care is carried out in this setting. In doing so, we offer a model of care coordination that can be applied to a variety of healthcare settings where comprehensive, multidisciplinary care is offered, and we also provide recommendations to overcome common challenges faced by care coordinators.

Gary E. Shealy Memorial ALS Clinic at ETSU

The Gary E. Shealy Memorial ALS Clinic was founded in February 2017 through the efforts of Dr. Faith Aiken, her late husband Gary E. Shealy, and ETSU. Recognizing the lack of ALS resources in Appalachia, they established a clinic to serve eastern Tennessee, Kentucky, North Carolina, and southwest Virginia. Patients in these areas are largely underserved and unserved considering severe barriers to care including transportation challenges, provider shortages, and overlapping healthcare costs. Rural residents consistently report poorer outcomes and less access to specialty care compared to urban populations (Pollack et al. Reference Pollack, Andrilla and Peterson2023). With no multidisciplinary ALS clinic within 90 miles, our clinic provides essential access and is the only non-billing clinic in the state of Tennessee.

Our team includes professionals in respiratory therapy, physical therapy, speech-language pathology, occupational therapy, nursing, pharmacy, family medicine, behavioral health, assistive technology, nutrition, counseling, bereavement support, and end-of-life planning. ETSU-affiliated providers also manage faculty roles and as such are in a unique position to offer applied care experiences to train interprofessional student teams, combining patient-centered care with hands-on education.

The clinic began as a half-day monthly session at ETSU’s Internal Medicine Office. Growing demand led to relocation to the Nave Center for Rehabilitation and expansion into a full clinic day held monthly. Between July 2024 and July 2025, we provided 81 visits for 40 unique patients. Each visit involves the entire team, with patients remaining in 1 room while providers rotate through. Collaboration fosters continuity of care, which is essential in chronic disease management (McNeil et al. Reference McNeil, Mitchell and Parker2014). In rural areas, team-based care alleviates strain from geographic isolation and shortages while improving engagement and adherence (Reed et al. Reference Reed, Reed and Bailey2021). Moreover, interprofessional collaboration and transparent communication align with best practices, breaking down silos, and prioritizing patient needs (Parker et al. Reference Parker, McNeil and Higgins2013; Martin et al. Reference Martin, Pighills and Burge2021). By adopting these strategies, the clinic strengthens patient flow, optimizes outcomes, and contributes to a resilient healthcare system (Bidwell and Copeland Reference Bidwell and Copeland2017; Sun et al. Reference Sun, Zhao and Li2020).

Role of the Clinic Coordinator

ETSU’s Gary E. Shealy Memorial ALS Clinic Coordinator ensures efficient delivery of care and oversees clinical operations. Responsibilities include managing electronic health care records, training and supervising a Graduate Assistant, managing a team of over 13 providers, overseeing workflow on clinic days, processing durable medical equipment (DME) orders and mental health referrals, monitoring intake, surveying patient experiences, and being the liaison between patients and providers on non-clinic days. Two groups of patients are seen, 5 in the morning from 9:00 to 12:00 and 5 in the afternoon from 1:00 to 4:00. On clinic day, a dry-erase board is used to track provider flow, reduce delays, and improve coordination. A table is drawn with patients listed on the y-axis and providers on the x-axis. Upon leaving to see a patient, the provider puts a dot and the time they started their appointment with the patient. The Clinic Coordinator tracks time spent with patients and checks in when 20 min have elapsed. This helps with workflow and manages the total amount of time patients are required to be physically present at clinic, which is important considering that those in progressed stages become easily fatigued. This model reflects “team-based care,” which emphasizes role clarity, shared responsibility, time management, and communication to improve outcomes. Effective communication among team members and with care-providing families is essential in offering quality care to patients. One way in which ETSU’s Clinic achieves this is by pairing providers to see patients together. For instance, physical and occupational therapists along with the assistive technology provider are grouped given the complementary nature of their disciplines, allowing for coordinated evaluations and discussions with patients and families. Similarly, speech language pathology and nutrition providers are paired as are the mental health counseling provider and the grief, bereavement, and end-of-life planning provider.

The Clinic Coordinator also manages logistical operations on clinic days such as space setup, attendance tracking, organizing lunch for providers, and snacks for patients. In addition to Clinic Coordinator roles, the current Clinic Coordinator also serves as the grief, bereavement, and end-of-life planning provider by offering emotional support, facilitating difficult conversations, and connection to resources to help patients and families prepare for end-of-life transitions. Such comprehensive coordination reflects best practices for clinics serving patients with complex conditions like ALS (Neel et al. Reference Neel, Baselga‐Garriga and Benson2024). The Immediate Past Clinic Coordinator simultaneously served as the speech-language pathologist provider to provide communication and swallow support.

Operational challenges often involve addressing unmet expectations from patients or staff. Specifically, many patients need assistance in navigating care outside of the clinic in ways that avoid insurance barriers, and many patients reflect not fully understanding the details associated insurance decisions surround coverage on various needs. The Clinic Coordinator facilitates problem-solving conversations to maintain a supportive environment and address barriers to care. Having a specialist such as a Nurse Case Manager or Medical Social Worker on these multidisciplinary teams is helpful in overcoming such barriers. Another common challenge for our patients is avoiding cost burdens on items that insurance does not cover. To overcome this, we often seek out and save information on available financial assistance programs either in the form of available funds for patients or through DME companies that offer programs to address larger co-pays. As mentioned earlier, both Clinic Coordinators managed their roles alongside being a provider. Both agree that operating simultaneously as Clinic Coordinator and provider presents time constraints and competing priorities that must be managed in strategic ways to provide quality services in both roles. This can be achieved through structured scheduling, utilizing time management tools, and implementing strong organizational techniques.

Conclusion

ALS poses significant healthcare challenges, particularly in Appalachia, where access to specialty care is limited. Sustaining free multidisciplinary clinics is essential to improving patient outcomes and reducing disparities. Our workflow where patients remaining in 1 room while providers rotate illustrates an efficient, collaborative model of care. The Clinic Coordinator is central to managing providers, logistical operations, and patient needs, ensuring a patient-centered environment. This manuscript highlights the importance of integrated care strategies, collaborative practices, and resilient healthcare systems in addressing ALS, particularly in underserved rural populations.

Competing interests

Our manuscript is different from the Bidwell article in that focus on patient-centered clinical care where Bidwell and colleagues focused more on professional development. We also have a disease-specific focus on ALS and we are also based in the United States, which differentiates our paper from Bidwell's work. The current paper focuses on the role of the Clinic Coordiantor to offer a model on coordinated care roles and focuses on a practice-based approach instead of self-reported perceptions.

References

Bidwell, S and Copeland, A (2017) A model of multidisciplinary professional development for health professionals in rural Canterbury, New Zealand. Journal of Primary Health Care 9(4), 292. doi:10.1071/hc17049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardiman, O, Berg, L and Kiernan, M (2011) Clinical diagnosis and management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nature Reviews Neurology 7(11), 639649. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2011.153CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kariisa, M and Seiber, E (2015) Distribution of cardiovascular disease and associated risk factors by county type and health insurance status: results from the 2008 Ohio Family Health Survey. Public Health Reports 130(1), 8795. doi:10.1177/003335491513000111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, P, Pighills, A, Burge, V, et al. (2021) Promoting interprofessional education and collaborative practice in rural health settings: learnings from a state-wide multi-methods study. International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health 18(10), 5162. doi:10.3390/ijerph18105162CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNeil, K, Mitchell, R and Parker, V (2014) The paradoxical effects of workforce shortages on rural interprofessional practice. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. 29(1), 7382. doi:10.1111/scs.12129CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neel, D, Baselga‐Garriga, C, Benson, M, et al. (2024) Multicenter expanded access program for access to investigational products for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Muscle and Nerve 70(2), 232239. doi:10.1002/mus.28169CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, V, McNeil, K, Higgins, I, et al. (2013) How health professionals conceive and construct interprofessional practice in rural settings: a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research 13(1), 500. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-500CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollack, SW, Andrilla, CHA, Peterson, LE, et al. (2023) Rural versus urban family medicine residency scope of training and practice. Family Medicine 55(3), 162. doi:10.22454/FamMed.2023.807915CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, K, Reed, B, Bailey, J, et al. (2021) Interprofessional education in the rural environment to enhance multidisciplinary care in future practice: breaking down silos in tertiary health education. Australian Journal of Rural Health 29(2), 127136. doi:10.1111/ajr.12733CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhudy, C, Schadler, A, Huffmyer, M, et al. (2023) Rural disparities in emergency department utilization for migraine care. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain 64(1), 3747. doi:10.1111/head.14659CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, Q, Zhao, X, Li, S, et al. (2020) CSF neurofilament light chain elevation predicts ALS severity and progression. Frontiers in Neurology 11, 919. doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.00919CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, X, Shoben, A, Felix, A, et al. (2023) Differences in obesity-related health behaviors and health outcomes by rural and Appalachian residency. Cancer Causes and Control 34(12), 11131121. doi:10.1007/s10552-023-01741-8Google ScholarPubMed