Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-vgfm9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-20T17:41:16.049Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Is it necessary to split nitrogen fertilization for winter wheat? On-farm research on Luvisols in South-West Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2014

R. SCHULZ
Affiliation:
Institute of Crop Science: Fertilization and Soil Matter Dynamics (340i), University of Hohenheim, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany
T. MAKARY
Affiliation:
Institute of Crop Science: Fertilization and Soil Matter Dynamics (340i), University of Hohenheim, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany
S. HUBERT
Affiliation:
Nuertingen-Geislingen University, Agronomy, D-72622 Nürtingen, Germany
K. HARTUNG
Affiliation:
Institute of Crop Science: Bioinformatics (340c), University of Hohenheim, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany
S. GRUBER
Affiliation:
Institute of Crop Science: Agronomy (340a), University of Hohenheim, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany
S. DONATH
Affiliation:
Institute of Crop Science: Fertilization and Soil Matter Dynamics (340i), University of Hohenheim, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany
J. DÖHLER
Affiliation:
Institute of Crop Science: Fertilization and Soil Matter Dynamics (340i), University of Hohenheim, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany
K. WEIß
Affiliation:
Landratsamt Tübingen, 72072 Tübingen, Germany
E. EHRHART
Affiliation:
Regierungspräsidium Tübingen, 72072 Tübingen, Germany
W. CLAUPEIN
Affiliation:
Institute of Crop Science: Agronomy (340a), University of Hohenheim, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany
H.-P. PIEPHO
Affiliation:
Institute of Crop Science: Bioinformatics (340c), University of Hohenheim, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany
C. PEKRUN
Affiliation:
Institute of Crop Science: Agronomy (340a), University of Hohenheim, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany
T. MÜLLER*
Affiliation:
Institute of Crop Science: Fertilization and Soil Matter Dynamics (340i), University of Hohenheim, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: Torsten.Mueller@uni-hohenheim.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Mineral nitrogen (N) fertilization in cereals is commonly split into three or four applications. In order to simplify N fertilization, a single N application either broadcast or placed on the soil surface was compared to conventionally split fertilization for winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The 4-year experiment (2007–2010) was performed using a participatory approach on farmers’ fields on deep loamy soils (Luvisols) in South-West Germany.

Grain yield and crude protein contents differed only slightly or not at all between treatments including different N fertilizer types (calcium ammonium nitrate, urea ammonium nitrate solution, urea) and application techniques (broadcast, placed). Furthermore, no differences were found for the yield components ears/m2 and thousand grain weight. Inorganic N in the soil profile after harvest was generally below 40 kg N/ha and did not differ between treatments. In the area where N was placed, mineral N was depleted during the vegetation period.

At the experimental sites a single N application in the period between tillering and stem elongation was sufficient to achieve high yield and quality of winter wheat without increased risk of nitrate leaching. This finding was independent of the method of application or the type of fertilizer.

Information

Type
Crops and Soils Research Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014
Figure 0

Table 1. Fertilizer types, application technique, number of applications, application times and number of fields (replicates)

Figure 1

Table 2. Weather conditions 2007–2010 during the main growing season and deviation from mean values of the last two decades 1991–2010. (Institute of Physics and Meteorology, University of Hohenheim)

Figure 2

Table 3. Overview of year×farm×field×treatment combinations available in the dataset. Crosses identify the available combinations

Figure 3

Table 4. F-tests (fixed effects) and variance component estimates (random effects) for yield and crude protein for analyses across years and per year. For a single year there is no Y×Field effect but only a FIELD effect, but these effects are reported in a single column

Figure 4

Table 5. Adjusted means, mean grouping by letters (±s.e.m.) for the five fertilizer treatments for yield and crude protein for analyses across years and per year

Figure 5

Fig. 1. Mean grain yield of the fertilization treatments calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN), urea and urea ammonium nitrate solution (UAN) 2007–2010. Bars show s.e. of the means.

Figure 6

Fig. 2. Grain yield of the split (3×, 2×) and single (1×) applications of calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) in 2009 and 2010. Bars show s.e. of the means.

Figure 7

Fig. 3. Mean crude protein content of the fertilization treatments three times (3×) and single application (1×) of calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN), and single application of urea and urea ammonium nitrate solution (UAN) 2007–2010. Bars show s.e. of the means.

Figure 8

Fig. 4. Crude protein content of the fertilization treatments three times (3×) and single application (1×) of calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN), and single application of urea and urea ammonium nitrate solution (UAN) in 2010. Bars show s.e. of the means.

Figure 9

Fig. 5. NO3-N after harvest in the soil layers 0–30, 30–60 and 60–90 cm of the split (3×, 2×) and single (1×) applications of calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) in 2009 and 2010. Bars show s.d.

Figure 10

Fig. 6. NH4+-N and NO3-N in the placement band of urea ammonium nitrate solution (UAN) 10 and 40 days after fertilization in 2008.