Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-nqrmd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-19T03:17:33.759Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Older mothers produce smaller eggs without compromising offspring quality: a study of a thelytokous mite predator (Acari: Phytoseiidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2024

Keshi Zhang
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1072, New Zealand Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research, Auckland 1072, New Zealand
Zhenguo Liu
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Non-grain Feed Resources (Co-construction by Ministry and Province), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Efficient Feeding, Department of Animal Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, Shandong 271017, People's Republic of China
Zhi-Qiang Zhang*
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1072, New Zealand Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research, Auckland 1072, New Zealand
*
Corresponding author: Zhi-Qiang Zhang; Email: zhiqiang.zhang@auckland.ac.nz
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Negative relationships between the parental age and offspring life history traits have been widely observed across diverse animal taxa. However, there is a lack of studies examining the influence of parental age on offspring performance using mites, particularly phytoseiid predators as subjects. This study explored the influence of maternal age on offspring life history traits in Amblyseius herbicolus (Chant) (Acari: Mesostigmata), a phytoseiid predatory mite reproducing through thelytokous parthenogenesis. We hypothesised that increased maternal age negatively impacts offspring traits, including developmental duration, body size, fecundity and lifespan. Amblyseius herbicolus was reared under controlled laboratory conditions, and the life history traits of offspring from mothers of varying ages were analysed using linear mixed-effect models. Our results showed that the increase in maternal age significantly reduced individual egg volume, but did not significantly affect offspring developmental duration, body size, fecundity or lifespan. These findings indicate that while older A. herbicolus females produced smaller eggs, the subsequent performance (i.e. body size, fecundity and lifespan) of offspring remained largely unaffected, suggesting possible compensatory mechanisms in the offspring or alternative maternal provisioning strategies. The results of this study offer useful insights into the reproductive strategies of phytoseiid predators and asexually reproducing species, enhancing our understanding of how maternal age affects offspring fitness. Further studies can examine how offspring of A. herbicolus from mothers of different ages perform under adverse environmental conditions.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Reproductive parameters of Amblyseius herbicolus mothers fed with 40 frozen eggs of Carpoglyphus lactis during immature development and five frozen adult females of C. lactis replenished daily during adulthood

Figure 1

Figure 1. Relationship between individual egg volume of Amblyseius herbicolus offspring and maternal age at oviposition. The regression line (black) is accompanied by the 95% confidence interval (grey margins). The regression equation is shown on the graph. Pearson's correlation: t = −7.071, df = 334; the P-value is shown on the graph.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Body size (measured by the dorsal plate length) and developmental duration (from egg to adult) of Amblyseius herbicolus offspring vs. maternal age at oviposition and initial egg size (volume) of offspring. (A) Body size vs. age at oviposition; (B) body size vs. egg volume; (C) developmental duration vs. age at oviposition; (D) developmental duration vs. egg volume. The regression line (black) is accompanied by the 95% confidence interval (grey margins). The regression equations are shown on the graphs. Pearson's correlation: df = 135 for all correlations; (A) t = 1.436; (B) t = 1.492; (C) t = 0.690; and (D) t = −2.371; P-values are shown on the graphs.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Fecundity and lifespan of Amblyseius herbicolus offspring regressed against maternal age at oviposition and initial egg size (volume) of offspring. (A) Fecundity vs. age at oviposition; (B) fecundity vs. egg volume; (C) lifespan vs. age at oviposition; (D) lifespan vs. egg volume. The regression line (black) is accompanied by the 95% confidence interval (grey margins). The regression equations are shown on the graphs. Pearson's correlation: df = 146 for all correlations; (A) t = −0.095; (B) t = 0.590; (C) t = −0.209; and (D) t = −0.128; P-values are shown on the graphs.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Pre-oviposition period and post-oviposition period of Amblyseius herbicolus offspring regressed against maternal age at oviposition and initial egg size (volume) of offspring. (A) Pre-oviposition period vs. age at oviposition; (B) pre-oviposition period vs. egg volume; (C) post-oviposition period vs. age at oviposition; (D) post-oviposition period vs. egg volume. The regression line (black) is accompanied by the 95% confidence interval (grey margins). The regression equations are shown on the graphs. Pearson's correlation: df = 135 for all correlations; (A) t = 0.542; (B) t = 1.378; (C) t = −1.812; and (D) t = 0.134; P-values are shown on the graphs.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Oviposition period and daily oviposition rate of Amblyseius herbicolus offspring regressed against maternal age at oviposition and initial egg size (volume) of offspring. (A) Oviposition period vs. age at oviposition; (B) oviposition period vs. egg volume; (C) daily oviposition rate vs. age at oviposition; (D) daily oviposition rate vs. egg volume. The regression line (black) is accompanied by the 95% confidence interval (grey margins). The regression equations are shown on the graphs. Pearson's correlation: df = 135 for all correlations; (A) t = −1.867; (B) t = 1.200; (C) t = 3.993; and (D) t = −0.356; P-values are shown on the graphs.