Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-ktprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T14:12:36.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A preliminary study of the rare earth element-enriched Twyfelskupje carbonatite complex, southern Namibia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2022

Alan G. Marlow
Affiliation:
Avanti Resources, Mornington, VIC 3931, Australia
Martin R. Palmer*
Affiliation:
School of Ocean and Earth Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Martin R. Palmer, Email: mrp1@soton.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Twyfelskupje carbonatite complex, Southern Namibia, exhibits the typical igneous emplacement structures of carbonatites, including plugs, cone sheets and dyke stockworks. The excellent exposure allows for detailed studies of the high-level geochemical and structural evolution of the carbonatite, and the nature of the concomitant rare earth element mineralization. Radiogenic isotope analyses (Sr, Nd, Pb) reveal that, in common with many other carbonatites, the Twyfelskupje carbonatite complex appears to be predominantly derived from mixing between HIMU and EM1 mantle end-members. Following partial melting of these mantle sources, the geochemical and structural evolution of the Twyfelskupje carbonatite complex proceeded by a staged process involving separate magma pulses, a series of emplacement structures, sub-solidus crystallization, fractionation and low-temperature hydrothermal alteration. The dominant rare earth element minerals in the Twyfelskupje carbonatite complex are fluorcarbonates and monazite, and are characterized by variable Ca, high F and light rare earth elements in the order Ce>La>Nd. Comparison between the rare earth element concentrations of the whole rocks, dominant rare earth element minerals and carbonates suggests that ∼95 % of the total rare earth element abundance of the Twyfelskupje carbonatite complex is contained within fluorcarbonates and monazite. Overall, the early calcio-carbonatite plugs are rare earth element enriched (mean 4.47 wt % rare earth oxides) relative to the magnesio-carbonatite cone sheets (mean 2.51 wt % rare earth oxides).

Information

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Southern Namibia carbonatite localities.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Twyfelskupje carbonatite complex (TCC). (a) The direction of view is approximately SSE. The outcrops extend to ∼120 m above the desert plain. (b) Aerial view of the TCC (scale bar is 500 m).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Simplified geological map of the Twyfelskupje carbonatite complex.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Field photographs of the TCC (see text for details). (a) Basement contact at the base of the TK6 cone sheet, showing apophyses of carbonatite extending into the basement. Diameter of lens cap for scale is 6 cm. (b) Block of layered fluorcarbonate mineralization in carbonatite matrix in TK1A. (c) Intensely folded fluorcarbonate layers in TK1B. (d) Brittle and ductile deformation in fluorcarbonate layers in TK1A. Length of hammer for scale is 33 cm. (e) Euhedral fluorcarbonate grains (3–4 mm) and fine-grained magnetite in carbonatite matrix in TK1A. Horizontal field of view ∼2 cm. (f) Fine-scale banding in TK5 parallel to basement contact.

Figure 4

Table 1. Characteristic features of TK structural components

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Backscattered electron images of TCC samples. (a) Fibro-radial aggregates of fluorcarbonate (from TK1). (b) Radiating rhythmic alternations of barite with calcite and Fe–Mn-oxide (from TK3). (c) Bladed aggregates of apatite intergrown with carbonate and Fe- and Fe–Mn-oxides (from TK2). (d) Monazite overgrowing and including apatite and carbonate (from TK2). (e) Colloform banded, concentric assemblages of fluorite and Mn-oxide (from TK3). (f) Celestine overgrowing barite and fluorcarbonate (from TK1).

Figure 6

Table 2. Average major-element concentrations (wt %) of TCC outcrop areas

Figure 7

Table 3. Rare earth element concentrations (ppm) of TCC outcrop areas

Figure 8

Table 4. Trace-element concentrations (ppm) of TCC outcrop areas

Figure 9

Fig. 6. Major-element ternary plots for the TCC. Symbols: TK1 – circles; TK2 – squares; TK3 and 5 – triangles; TK4 – +; TK6 and 7 – ×. The hydrothermal alteration trends are those expected for fluids consisting predominantly of Fe, Mn and Si. (a) Carbonatite classification diagram (Woolley & Kempe, 1989). (b) MgO–CaO–SiO2 plot.

Figure 10

Fig. 7. REE plots. (a) Average chondrite-normalized REE patterns for TCC outcrops (symbols as in Fig. 6). (b) Selected carbonatites from elsewhere. Symbols: TCC – circles; Bear Lodge – squares; Kalkfeld – crosses; Mountain Pass – diamonds; Wicheeda – triangles. Data from Haxel (2007), Bühn (2008), Moore et al. (2015) and Trofanenko et al. (2016). (c) Comparison between REE patterns of REE-enriched minerals determined by LA-ICP-MS (dashed line), REE-enriched minerals determined by EDS (dotted line), carbonate minerals (dash-dot line) and average TCC whole rock (solid line).

Figure 11

Fig. 8. Chondrite-normalized La/Nd versus La/Ce ratios for samples from the TCC and Bear Lodge (Moore et al.2015). Symbols: TCC parisite – squares; synchysite – diamonds; monazite – triangles; whole-rock carbonatite from difference centres – open circles. Bear Lodge parisite – ×; synchysite – +; monazite – asterisks; whole-rock carbonatites – filled circles.

Figure 12

Fig. 9. Primitive-mantle normalized spider diagram for whole-rock carbonatites. (a) TCC. Symbols as in Figure 7a. (b) Selected REE-enriched carbonatites. Symbols and data sources as in Figure 7b.

Figure 13

Table 5. TCC radiogenic isotope data

Figure 14

Fig. 10. Initial Sr–Nd–Pb isotope systematics of TK units (+; this study), Dicker Willem (×; Cooper & Reid, 2000), East African carbonatites (open circles; Bell & Tilton, 2001) and Walvis Ridge, South Atlantic (filled circles; Homrighausen et al.2018). In all cases, the analytical uncertainties of the data obtained for the TCC samples are smaller than the data symbols. The Namibian data are initial ratios based on the 49 ± 1 Ma age for Dicker Willem (Reid et al.1990). (a) 143Nd/144Nd versus 87Sr/86Sr. (b) 207Pb/204Pb versus 206Pb/204Pb. (c) 208Pb/204Pb versus 206Pb/204Pb. (d) 87Sr/86Sr versus 206Pb/204Pb. DMM – depleted mid-ocean ridge basalt mantle; EM1 – enriched mantle 1; HIMU – high-μ. Initial Sr–Nd–Pb isotope systematics of TK units (+; this study), Dicker Willem (×; Cooper & Reid, 2000), East African carbonatites (open circles; Bell & Tilton, 2001) and Walvis Ridge, South Atlantic (filled circles; Homrighausen et al.2018). In all cases, the analytical uncertainties of the data obtained for the TCC samples are smaller than the data symbols. The Namibian data are initial ratios based on the 49 ± 1 Ma age for Dicker Willem (Reid et al.1990). (e) 143Nd/144Nd versus 206Pb/204Pb. (f) 87Sr/86Sr versus 208Pb/204Pb. (g) 143Nd/144Nd versus 208Pb/204Pb. (h) f(Nd, Pb) versus 87Sr/86Sr, where f(Nd, Pb) = ((143Nd/144Nd)2 + (206Pb/204Pb)2)0.5.(sin(arctan(143Nd/144Nd/206Pb/204Pb) + 0.000064)) (Zindler et al. 1982; Bell & Tilton, 2001). DMM – depleted mid-ocean ridge basalt mantle; EM1 – enriched mantle 1; HIMU – high-μ.

Figure 15

Fig. 11. Schematic evolution of the TCC. Stage 1: Initial emplacement of REE-enriched calcio-carbonatites to form linear plugs at the top of a volcanic neck, at least 400 m in diameter, above a shallow magma chamber. Crystallization of REE-enriched melt resulted in abundant REE fluorcarbonates and REE-rich monazite within the plugs. Shear stress associated with frictional plug–wall shear (photo 1). Stage 2: A change in the dominant shear stress direction and dilation associated with the emplacement of cone sheets peripheral to the plugs resulted in deformation of the REE fluorcarbonate layers formed during crystal settling within the plugs. Deformation produced flow fold fabrics in the plugs (photo 2). Subsequent fractionation of the melt and emplacement of magnesio-carbonatite cone sheets from REE-depleted melt, within a ring fracture peripheral to the volcanic neck, resulted in a lower abundance of REE minerals within the cone sheets. Stage 3: Stockwork of dominant calcio-carbonatite and subordinate magnesio-carbonatite dykes (photo 3) emplaced around the central plugs. The dykes were emplaced from additional influx of melt enriched in REE, P2O5 and SrO to the original magma chamber following the intrusion of the cone sheets. The final stage in the evolution was characterized by pervasive low-temperature SiO2–FeO–MnO hydrothermal alteration throughout the complex.

Supplementary material: File

Marlow and Palmer supplementary material

Marlow and Palmer supplementary material 1

Download Marlow and Palmer supplementary material(File)
File 47.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Marlow and Palmer supplementary material

Marlow and Palmer supplementary material 2

Download Marlow and Palmer supplementary material(File)
File 53.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Marlow and Palmer supplementary material

Marlow and Palmer supplementary material 3

Download Marlow and Palmer supplementary material(File)
File 50.8 KB