Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-z2ts4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-05T22:18:41.138Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Imaging the adult zebrafish cone mosaic using optical coherence tomography—CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2017

ALISON L. HUCKENPAHLER ,
MELISSA A. WILK ,
ROBERT F. COOPER ,
FRANCIE MOEHRING ,
BRIAN A. LINK ,
JOSEPH CARROLL  and
ROSS F. COLLERY
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Information

Type
Corrigendum
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 34 , 2017 , E005
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952523816000092. Published by Cambridge University Press, 17 October, 2016.

When originally published, the article by the author included the wrong information in Figure 2, panel 2B as shown on page 3. The measurement was incorrectly listed as 257µm instead of 238µm.

The authors apologize for this error.

The corrected version of Figure 2, together with the full caption are shown below.

Fig. 2.

Deriving the lateral scale of in vivo OCT images of the fli1:eGFP zebrafish retina. (A) En face image generated by positioning the custom contour within the RNFL. Measurements (in pixels) were taken between multiple blood vessel branch points (white dots). (B) Corresponding ex vivo fluorescent microscopy image of the same retina, with measurements (in µm) taken between the same blood vessel branch points in (A). The OCT:microscopy measurements were averaged for each eye and used to determine the size of the OCT scan in µm. A scaling coefficient for each scan was calculated as the ratio between the measured size of the OCT scan to the nominal OCT scan size (in this case, 1200 µm). (C) The scaling coefficient for each scan was plotted against the axial length for that eye and fit with a linear model. Error bars represent one standard deviation for each eye.

References

Huckenpahler, A.L., Wilk, M.A., Cooper, R.F., Moehring, F., Link, B.A., Carroll, J., & Collery, R.F. (2016). Imaging the adult zebrafish cone mosaic using optical coherence tomography. Visual Neuroscience, 33, E011, 1 -7.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 2. Deriving the lateral scale of in vivo OCT images of the fli1:eGFP zebrafish retina. (A) En face image generated by positioning the custom contour within the RNFL. Measurements (in pixels) were taken between multiple blood vessel branch points (white dots). (B) Corresponding ex vivo fluorescent microscopy image of the same retina, with measurements (in µm) taken between the same blood vessel branch points in (A). The OCT:microscopy measurements were averaged for each eye and used to determine the size of the OCT scan in µm. A scaling coefficient for each scan was calculated as the ratio between the measured size of the OCT scan to the nominal OCT scan size (in this case, 1200 µm). (C) The scaling coefficient for each scan was plotted against the axial length for that eye and fit with a linear model. Error bars represent one standard deviation for each eye.