Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-zlvph Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-16T17:45:23.860Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adorno, Kant and Enlightenment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2020

Deborah Cook
Deborah Cook*
Affiliation:
University of Windsor, Ontario
*
dcook@uwindsor.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Theodor W. Adorno often made reference to Immanuel Kant’s famous essay on enlightenment. Although he denied that immaturity is self-incurred, the first section of this article will show that he adopted many of Kant’s ideas about maturity in his philosophically informed critique of monopoly conditions under late capitalism. The second section will explore Adorno’s claim that the educational system could foster maturity by encouraging critical reflection on the social conditions that have made us what we are. Finally, this article will demonstrate that Adorno links enlightenment to Kant’s idea of a realm of ends.

Keywords

AdornoKantmaturityautonomyenlightenmentrealm of ends

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 25 , Special Issue 4: Special Issue on Kant and the Frankfurt School , December 2020 , pp. 541 - 557
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Kantian Review

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adorno, Theodor W. (1967) ‘Sociology and Psychology’. Trans. Irving N. Wohlfarth. New Left Review, 46, 67–80.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. (1969-70) ‘Society’. Trans. Fredric Jameson. Salmagundi, 10/11, 144–53.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. (1972a) ‘Individuum und Organisation’. In Soziologische Schriften I (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp), 440–56.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. (1972b) ‘Postscriptum’. In Soziologische Schriften I (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp), 86–92.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. (1973) Negative Dialectics. Trans. Ashton, E. B.. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. (1974) Minima Moralia: Reflections from Damaged Life. Trans. Jephcott, E. F. N.. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. (1987) ‘Late Capitalism or Industrial Society?’ Trans. Fred van Gelder. In Meja, V., Misgeld, D. and Stehr, N. (eds), Modern German Sociology (New York: Columbia University Press), 232–47.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. (1991) ‘How to Look at Television’. In Bernstein, J. M. (ed.), The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture (London: Routledge). pp. 158–77.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. (1998a) ‘Critique’. In Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords. Trans. Henry, W. Pickford (New York: Columbia University Press), 281–8.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. (1998b) ‘Education After Auschwitz’. In Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords. Trans. Henry W. Pickford (New York: Columbia University Press), 191–204.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. (1998c) ‘Marginalia to Theory and Praxis’. In Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords. Trans. Henry W. Pickford (New York: Columbia University Press), 259–78.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. (1998d) ‘The Meaning of Working through the Past’. In Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords. Trans. Henry W. Pickford (New York: Columbia University Press), 89–104.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. (1998e) ‘Progress’. In Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords. Trans. Henry W. Pickford (New York: Columbia University Press), 143–60.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. (1998f) ‘Resignation’. In Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords. Trans. Henry W. Pickford (New York: Columbia University Press), 289–94.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. (1998g) ‘On Subject and Object’. In Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords. Trans. Henry W. Pickford (New York: Columbia University Press), 245–58.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. (2000) Problems of Moral Philosophy. Ed. Thomas Schröder, Trans. Rodney Livingstone. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. (2001a) Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Ed. Tiedemann, Rolf, trans. Rodney Livingstone. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. (2001b) Metaphysics: Concept and Problems. Ed. Tiedemann, Rolf, trans. E. F. N. Jephcott. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. (2003) ‘Reflections on Class Theory’. Trans. Rodney Livingstone. In Rolf, Tiedemann (ed.), Can One Live after Auschwitz?: A Philosophical Reader (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press), 93–110.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. (2006) History and Freedom: Lectures 1964–1965. Ed. Tiedemann, Rolf, trans. Rodney Livingstone. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. and Hellmut Becker (1983) ‘Education for Autonomy’. Trans. David J. Parent. Telos, 56, 103–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. and —— (1999) ‘Education for Maturity and Responsibility’. Trans. Robert French, Jem Thomas and Dorothee Weymann. History of the Human Sciences, 12 (3), 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. Else Frenkel-Brunswik, Daniel J. Levinson and R. Nevitt Sanford (1950) The Authoritarian Personality, abridged ed. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
French, Robert, and Jem, Thomas (1999) ‘Maturity and Education, Citizenship and Enlightenment: An Introduction to Theodor Adorno and Hellmut Becker, “Education for Maturity and Responsibility”’. History of the Human Sciences, 12 (3), 1–19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freyenhagen, Fabian (2008) ‘Moral Philosophy’. In Deborah, Cook (ed.), Adorno: Key Concepts. (Stocksfield: Acumen), 99–114 Google Scholar
Freyenhagen, Fabian (2013) Adorno’s Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996a) ‘An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment?’ In Practical Philosophy. Trans. and ed. Mary J. McGregor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 17–22.TGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996b) ‘On the Common Saying: “This may be True in Theory, But it does Not Apply in Practice”’. In Practical Philosophy. Trans. and ed. Mary, J. McGregor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 277–309.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2007) ‘Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim’. In Gṻnter, Zőller and Loudon, Robert B. (eds), Anthropology, History, and Education. Trans. Allen Wood (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 107–20.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Engels, Friedrich (1978) The Marx-Engels Reader, 2nd ed. Ed. Robert, C. Tucker. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Riesman, David, with Reuel Denney and Nathan Glazer (1950) The Lonely Crowd: A Study of the Changing American Character. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar