Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-vgfm9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-16T14:38:16.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Revisiting the Past: Material Negotiations between the Classic Maya and an Entombed Sweat Bath at Xultun, Guatemala

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2020

Mary E. Clarke
Affiliation:
Archaeology ProgramBoston University675 Commonwealth AveBoston, MA 02215USAEmail: meclarke@bu.edu
Ashley E. Sharpe
Affiliation:
Center for Tropical Paleoecology and ArchaeologySmithsonian Tropical Research InstituteLuis Clement Ave., Bldg. 401Tupper Balboa AnconPanama CityPanamaEmail: SharpeAE@si.edu
Elizabeth M. Hannigan
Affiliation:
Department of AnthropologyCalifornia State University Chico400 West First StChico, CA 95929USAEmail: ehannigan1@mail.csuchico.edu
Megan E. Carden
Affiliation:
HistoryMiami MuseumUniversity of Miami101 West Flagler StMiami, FL 33130USAEmail: Mec2301@columbia.edu
Gabriella Velásquez Luna
Affiliation:
Department of ArchaeologyUniversidad de San Carlos de GuatemalaBuilding S-1, 2nd LevelZone 12, Guatemala CityGuatemalaEmail: LunaArq14@gmail.com
Boris Beltrán
Affiliation:
Department of AnthropologySkidmore College815 North BroadwaySaratoga Springs, NY 12866USAEmail: bbeltran@skidmore.edu
Heather Hurst
Affiliation:
Department of AnthropologySkidmore College815 North BroadwaySaratoga Springs, NY 12866USAEmail: hhurst@skidmore.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Large material accumulations from single events found in the archaeological record are frequently defined as evidence of ritual. They are interpreted as generalized deposit categories that imply rather than infer human motivations. While useful in the initial collection of data, these categories can, over time, become interpretations in and of themselves. The emic motivations behind the formation process of ‘ritual deposits’ ought to be considered using a relational ontology as an approach to understanding how past populations interacted with non-human actors, such as structures and natural features on the landscape. The present study evaluates the assembly and possible function of a dense deposit of artifacts recovered from a Classic period sweat bath at Xultun, Guatemala. Analyses of the various artifact types and human remains in the deposit in relation to what is known of the social history of the sweat bath itself illustrate ontological relationships among offered materials as well as between the offering and the personified place in which it was recovered. We observe that with a better understanding of place, it is possible to evaluate the ritual logic in Classic Maya material negotiations.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research
Figure 0

Table 1. Mesoamerican chronological periods for Xultun.

Figure 1

Figure 1. The location of Los Sapos at the site of Xultun with the site's global position illustrated within the inset map. (Map of Xultun produced by Carlos Chiriboga, 2016, elaborated by Mary Clarke, 2019.)

Figure 2

Figure 2. The sweat bath, Los Sapos: (A) reconstruction of Los Sapos depicting both preserved façades and the adjoining staircase; (B) composite photograph of Los Sapos north façade (Courtesy of National Geographic Society, 2012); (C, D) detailed photographs of the painted iconography.

Figure 3

Figure 3. The Nahua Codex Magliabecchiano depicting a sweat bath with the goddess Tlazoteotl's face centred above the doorway.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Representations of the reptilian goddess from the Classic period: (A) Yaxha, Stela 13 (after a field sketch by Ian Graham); (B) the entablature of the symbolic sweat bath, the Temple of the Cross, Palenque, Mexico (after an illustration by Karl Taube).

Figure 5

Figure 5. Early to Late Classic period burial located with the doorway of Los Sapos: (A) schematic of the sweat bath; (B) burned bones in situ with the fill context surrounding the remains (Photograph: Jennifer Wildt, 2012); (C) flow patterns visible in the structure's interior fill; (D) recovered skeletal elements (Photograph: David Del Cid, 2019); (E, F) Evidence of burning on distal left femur.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Details and contextual positioning of materials included in the Los Sapos deposit: (A) schematic of the sweat bath; (B) pottery assemblage; (C) cranium (Photograph: Jennifer Wildt, 2012); (D) postcranial skeleton (Photograph: Jennifer Wildt, 2012); (E) oxidation ring from burning event; (F) burn patterning on the cist-tomb's masonry; (G) north profile of the cist tomb.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Selected vessel fragments mentioned in the text: (A) vessel #6; (B) vessel #16; (C) body #21; (D) body #23; (E) vessel #13; (F) vessel #1; (G) body #31; (H) graffiti sherd with head. All shown with 2 cm scales. (Photographs: David Del Cid, 2019.)

Figure 8

Figure 8. Figurine fragments mentioned in the text: (A, B, C) representations of human heads; (D) depicts a reptile; (E) shows a woman and child; (F) appears to be the lower half of a human with evidence of burning. All scales 2 cm. (Photographs: David Del Cid, 2019.)

Figure 9

Figure 9. Juvenile skeleton. Vertebrae are organized into groups of cervical/thoracic/lumbar but are not necessarily in the correct order; phalanges/carpals/tarsals are arranged at the base of the image; unsided and unidentified fragments/elements are located in groups left of the juvenile. (Photograph: David Del Cid., 2019)

Figure 10

Figure 10. Two partial parietal/frontal bones from a gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) cranium. Scale 2 cm.

Figure 11

Figure 11. Some of the skeletal elements belonging to the four iguanas (Iguanidae): (A) mixed skeletal elements (humeri, femurs, tibia, ulna, maxilla, sternum, and pelvis); (B) maxilla, close-up; (C) unfused pelvic bones belonging to juvenile iguanas; (D) large thoracic and lumbar vertebrae of an older individual (note these two sets of vertebrae are fused); (E) a burned ulna. All scales 2 cm.

Figure 12

Figure 12. The assortment of toad bones placed in the offering: (A) cranium of one of the large cane toads (Rhinella marina); (B) partial cranium of the second large cane toad in the offering; (C) vertebrae of large cane toads (mixed, from both toads); (D) innominate (pelvis) of one large toad; (E) assorted elements from a large cane toad (tibiotarsi, humerus, pelvis, urostyle); (F) assorted elements from a small toad or frog (humeri, tibiotarsus, pelvis innominate). All scales 2 cm.

Figure 13

Figure 13. Examples of juvenile animals in the deposit: (A) leg elements of a young stilt-legged bird (femur, tibiotarsi, tarsometatarsus; note proximal ends of bones are not yet fully developed); (B) unfused pelvic bone of a very young deer; (C) unfused humerus missing proximal head of a subadult deer, an older individual than B. All scales 2 cm.

Figure 14

Table 2. Subadult and juvenile individuals recovered from different contexts, according to MNI estimates. Subadults are near-adult size with unfused or fusing appendages. Juveniles have unfused appendages and are considerably smaller than adult size. No young animals were recovered from the EC/LC construction fill context.

Figure 15

Table 3. Evidence of burning within the assemblages. Percentages based on number of individual specimens within the context area, including unidentified vertebrates but excluding terrestrial snails. No evidence of burning was recovered from the EC/LC construction fill context.

Figure 16

Figure 14. Examples of bone artifacts found in the deposit: (A) a finely crafted pin; (B) one of the bone tubes found in the deposit, this example having been carved across the exterior surface and not possible to identify to species; (C) two ‘rings’, probably cut from the same bone; (D) the four shells found together in the deposit: an apple snail (Pomacea flagellata), a freshwater mussel (Unionidae), a fighting conch (Strombus pugilis) and an olive shell (Olividae). All scales 2 cm.

Supplementary material: File

Clarke et al. supplementary material

Clarke et al. supplementary material

Download Clarke et al. supplementary material(File)
File 40.4 KB