3.1 Photoluminescence spectra for InGaN layers and MQWs. Dependence of growth temperature and donor doping

It is now well established that InGaN has a strong tendency for phase separation when grown at a temperature above about 750 °C Reference Koukitu, Takahashi, Taki and Seki[7] Reference Saito and Arakawa[8]. We have studied the influence of this problem on the MQW properties with the aid of four typical nominally undoped samples in this work. Two samples were coherently strained bulk InGaN layers (thickness about 50 nm) grown at different temperatures, 700 °C and 780 °C, respectively. In addition we studied two MQW samples, where the InGaN layers were grown at the same two temperatures. The PL spectra for the coherently strained InGaN layers, grown at 700 °C and 780 °C, respectively, are for both samples composed of a slightly broadened peak with weaker LO phonon replicas towards lower photon energies. (Figure 3). The PL peak energies (with laser excitation) are at 2.81 eV and 2.85 eV, respectively, in fair agreement with other recent data for strained InGaN layers with this composition Reference Takeuchi, Sota, Katsuragawa, Komori, Takeuchi, Amano and Akasaki[4] Reference Wetzel, Takeuchi, Yamaguchi, Katoh, Amano and Akasaki[9]. The PLE spectra for these emissions are severely broadened (Figure 3c), and no accurate value of a Stokes shift (i e difference in peak position in PL emission and PLE) can be obtained. A weak peak at about 2.9 eV may indicate a Stokes shift of about 0.1 – 0.2 eV. This is consistent with the difference between the photoreflectance (PR) data and the PL data in Ref Reference Wetzel, Takeuchi, Yamaguchi, Katoh, Amano and Akasaki[9]. The large broadening might be an indication of a mixed relaxation regime at this thickness, so that some regions of the layers may be partly relaxed Reference Kawaguchi, Shimizu, Hiramatsu and Sawaki[10]. The transient decay time at 2 K is short, less than 1 ns, in both samples (Figure 4). This is a radiative lifetime, and the value is typical for localized bulk 3D excitons. The localization potentials in this case are the InGaN alloy fluctuations, which are expected to be amplified by segregation of the alloy. There is evidence of such a process from the weaker low energy peaks present in Figure 3 (b)

Figure 3.

Stationary PL spectra at 2 K of two coherently strained thick In_0.15Ga_0.85N epilayers grown on sapphire at the temperatures indicated: (a) left panel, 700 °C, (0.06 μm thick layer) (b) right panel, 780 °C (0.10 μm thick layer). Note that the presence of a spectral contribution at lower photon energies in (b) indicates some segregation.

Figure 3c.

In (c) are shown two PLE spectra for the same sample as in (b), detected at two different photon energies. The PL spectrum obtained with low intensity lamp excitation is also shown.

Figure 4.

PL transient response at 2 K of the PL peak for the sample in Figure 3 (a). Note the welldefined radiative lifetime of 0.85 ns.

In Figure 5 we show the corresponding PL spectra with weak lamp excitation for the two MQW samples, together with PLE spectra. The PL spectra are quite similar for the two samples (apart from a larger width for the lower InGaN growth temperatures), as are the PLE spectra. The PLE curves are more or less featureless ramps, with no sign of excitonic states in the InGaN QW. This is expected from the reduced near bandgap oscillator strength induced by the PZ field, but also from the Stokes shift due to localization potentials. The broad PL peaks are downshifted from the expected position of the unperturbed QW bandgap by about 0.3 – 0.4 eV in both samples. The broad peak also shows a continuous upshift with increased excitation intensity, as shown for one sample in Figure 5c

Figure 5.

Stationary PL spectra as well as PLE spectra at 2 K of two coherently strained and nominally undoped In_0.15Ga_0.85N/GaN MQWs grown on sapphire with the InGaN layer growth temperatures indicated: (a) left panel, 700 °C, (b) right panel, 780 °C. The spectra are obtained with low intensity excitation employing a Xe lamp. The PL signal at lower photon energies is very weak in both cases. The PLE spectra are obtained with detection at the peak of the PL signal.

Figure 5c.

In Fig 5 (c) is shown the dependence of the peak position on the excitation intensity for the same sample as in 5 (b).

We have studied the effect of shallow donor doping in the QW on the optical spectra. A set of samples with the InGaN growth temperature 700 C was Si-doped in the QWs during growth, at doping densities up to 2 × 10¹⁸ cm⁻³. As shown in Figure 6, a strong upshift of the PL peak photon energy is observed with donor doping, which could be expected from screening of both the PZ field and the localization potentials. An observed variation of the peak position across the sample is interpreted as mainly an effect of uneven donor concentration. The effect of donor doping on PL spectra in these samples is surprisingly strong, as discussed in more detail below.

Figure 6.

Stationary PL spectra at 2 K of three coherently strained In_0.15Ga_0.85N/GaN MQWs grown on sapphire at 700 °C. Sample 1 is nominally undoped, but has a background Si donor doping of about 1 × 10¹⁷ cm⁻³ in the well. The other two samples are Si-doped in the wells, to a density of about 4 × 10¹⁷ cm⁻³ for sample 2 and about 2 × 10¹⁸ cm⁻³ for sample 3. The GaN barriers are not Si-doped.

3.2 Transient PL spectra for MQWs

We have investigated the transient behavior of the PL over a wide time scale and dynamic range. On the short time scale there is a very fast capture process into the QW, as evidenced by the very sharp onset of the PL emission across the entire spectrum in the streak camera data (see Figure 7). The rise time is at most corresponding to the time resolution of the set up, i e about 15 ps, which is then an upper limit for the rise time of the PL emission. This experiment has been performed with above barrier bandgap excitation as well, leading to a very similar result. The main broad radiative recombination peak is obviously established within a very short time via very fast carrier (or exciton) capture into the QWs. At later times slower processes lead to spectral changes as we shall demonstrate below. The recombination processes as well as spectral diffusion essentially occur on a time scale longer than 1 ns.

Figure 7.

Streak camera panel at 2 K for the same MQW sample as in Figure 5 (a), obtained with fs pulse excitation at about 3.2 eV. Each transient is marked with the corresponding PL emission wavelength (in Å units). Note the short rise time across the whole broad PL spectrum.

The PL decay over a longer time scale (ns - μs) has been measured with photon counting technique over the entire spectral range covered by the PL emission. The results are shown in Figure 8 and Figure 9 for selected samples at low temperature. In Figure 8 we compare the time resolved spectra of an undoped (a) and a Si-doped sample (b) (n = 2 × 10¹⁸ cm⁻³), respectively. The two spectra show a similar behavior as the stationary spectra in Figure 6 concerning the upshift with Si-doping. It is noted that the spectra for the doped samples are considerably narrower, with the impression that the lower energy part of the spectrum in Figure 8 (a) is simply missing in the spectrum (b). This will be discussed further below. There is also a rather strong shift downwards for the peak energy with delay time, which is expected due to screening by the excited e-h pairs, and also due to spectral diffusion by carrier hopping before recombination.

Figure 8.

Timeresolved PL spectra for two MQW samples obtained at 2 K with excitation at 3.6 eV. The time interval between each spectrum is 0.8 ns. In (a) left panel, are shown spectra for the undoped sample D1 in Figure 6, and in (b) right panel, are shown corresponding data for the doped sample D3 in Figure 6. Note the strong spectral shift between the two samples.

In Figure 9 we show a few examples of decay curves for various photon energies across the emission. Clearly the decay curves are very nonexponential, with a clear tendency towards a faster decay at the higher photon energy end of the emission. At long decay times (Figure 9 (b)), there is virtually no difference in the decay behavior for different parts of the emission, however.

Figure 9.

Decay curves at different photon energies within the broad PL peak, obtained at 2 K with excitation at 3.2 eV for the same MQW samples at in Figure 5 (b). In (a) left panel, is shown the intermediate time regime, on the right panel (b) is shown the long time behavior.

In Figure 10 we show a comparison of the timeresolved spectra taken at 2 K and 300 K, for an MQW sample with the InGaN layers grown at 700 °C. The spectra show a quite similar downward shift with delay time, but the 300 K spectrum is broadened considerably and selectively on the high energy side, even at long delay times. This will be discussed below in connection with the strong localization potentials in the system. Also, the decay is faster at 300 K, presumably due to the presence of a nonradiative recombination component at this temperature. The low temperature decay times are identified as the radiative decay times in the MQWs, since they are independent of the excitation power.

Figure 10.

Timeresolved PL spectra for an MQW sample with the InGaN layer grown at 700 °C, obtained at 2 K, left panel (a) and at 300 K, right panel (b), respectively, and with excitation at 3.2 eV. The 300 K spectra are broadened towards higher energy, and also have shorter decay time.

The values of the decay times are not welldefined at any temperature, since the decay curves are not exponential. Defining an effective decay time (measured as the time for a decrease of intensity by a factor 1/e of the initial value) we obtain a value about 30 ns at 2 K for the sample with the InGaN layers grown at 700 °C and about 150 ns at 2 K for the sample with the InGaN layers grown at 780 C (both samples were undoped). The effective decay times for these two samples are illustrated at three different temperatures in Figure 11 (a, b). The temperature dependence of the decay times is not strong; in fact it seems like the radiative decay times are rather independent of temperature, so that the faster decay at 300 K is due to the presence of a nonradiative component at this temperature. Our measurements do not allow an accurate separation of radiative and nonradiative decay times at room temperature, however. Also, the sample in Figure 11 (a), with InGaN growth temperature 700 °C, evidently has a shorter radiative decay time. This might be related to some unknown difference in the short range structure of the alloy in the QW with different InGaN growth temperature

Figure 11.

Effective decay times for the same two MQW samples as in Figure 5 (a), left panel, and (b), right panel, respectively. The data are shown for 3 different measurement temperatures, 2K, 100 K, and 300 K, and for a number of different wavelengths across the broad PL emission. The excitation wavelength is about 3.2 eV.

4.1 The expected influence of the PZ field on PL spectra

In several papers on PL spectra and recombination for InGaN MQWs the PL spectrum consisted of more than one peak Reference Narukawa, Kawakami, Fujita, Fujita and Nakamura[2] Reference Deguchi, Shikanai, Torii, Sota, Chichibu and Nakamura[11] Reference Perlin, Kisielowski, Iota, Weinstein, Mattos, Shapiro, Kruger, Weber and Yang[12]. Several explanations have been offered for such multi-peak spectra, the most frequent being related to the segregation problem in the InGaN, i e the different peaks are due to regions with different In composition in the InGaN QW material. Our data do not show such behavior, i. e. only a single PL peak is observed.

The shape of the broad PL spectrum from these InGaN MQWs does not give any direct hint towards the recombination mechanism. The somewhat narrower PL peaks observed in similar systems with lower In composition can more consistently be ascribed to QW excitons Reference Narukawa, Kawakami, Fujita, Fujita and Nakamura[2] Reference Hangleiter, Im, Kollmer, Heppel, Off and Scholz[5] Reference Zeng, Smith, Lin and Jiang[13]. For the broader peaks observed in this case, it is not obvious that excitons are involved. Further, the relative importance of the PZ field effects vs localization in potential fluctuations for the PL lineshape has to be determined. We shall below attempt to develop a coherent picture of the recombination process in these MQW systems, considering the total experimental information developed above.

In order to compare our results with previous data published in literature we need to point out that the description of the relation between composition x and bandgap of In_xGa_1−xN is quite confusing in the literature. Recent data suggest a rather high value for the bowing parameter (in the range 2.6 – 3.8 eV) for pseudomorphically strained InGaN layers for x-vales x = 0 to x = 0.25 Reference Wetzel, Takeuchi, Yamaguchi, Katoh, Amano and Akasaki[9] Reference Takeuchi, Takeuchi, Sota, Sakai, Amano and Akasaki[14] Reference McCluskey, Van de Walle, Master, Romano and Johnson[15], while other data suggest a bowing parameter in this case of only about 1 Reference Nakamura and Fasol[1] Reference Narukawa, Kawakami, Fujita, Fujita and Nakamura[2] Reference Zeng, Smith, Lin and Jiang[13]. In this work the higher bowing parameter has been used Reference Wetzel, Takeuchi, Yamaguchi, Katoh, Amano and Akasaki[9]. This means that when comparing with our data the x-values given in many earlier papers need to be reduced by a factor approximately 2, in order to allow a proper comparison of the optical data.

The following relation of the bandgap of a pseudomorphically strained In_xGa_1−xN layer vs x has been adopted in this work:

at 2 K. This expression is the same as given in Ref Reference Takeuchi, Takeuchi, Sota, Sakai, Amano and Akasaki[14], but up-shifted in energy by 0.08 eV to compensate for the bandgap increase between 300 K and 2 K. For x = 0.15 we then obtain E_g = 2.94 eV at 2 K. This value is consistent with the PL peak positions in Figure 3, considering a Stokes shift of about 100 meV. Assuming that 75 % of the band offset is in the conduction band Reference Van der Walle and Neugebauer[16], an electron effective mass of 0.22 m₀, a hole effective mass of 1.0 m₀ Reference Suzuki, Uenoyama and Gil[17], we have solved the transcendental textbook equations Reference Bastard[18] for the confinement energies in the QW. These energies for electrons and holes add to about 0.11 eV, leading to an estimated QW bandgap of about 3.05 eV at 2 K for x = 0.15 and a QW width of 30 Å.

The energy position of the broad PL peak is consistent with a downshift expected from a strong piezoelectric field across the QW, as first described by Takeuchi et al. Reference Takeuchi, Sota, Katsuragawa, Komori, Takeuchi, Amano and Akasaki[4]. The peak position observed for undoped MQW samples in low intensity stationary PL spectra (about 2.65 eV), as well as in the timeresolved spectra at a long time delay after the excitation pulse, are in good agreement with the spectral positions projected in Ref. Reference Takeuchi, Sota, Katsuragawa, Komori, Takeuchi, Amano and Akasaki[4] for MQW samples with similar In compositions. The downshift from the estimated unperturbed QW bandgap energy is about 0.4 eV. We therefore conclude that the PL peak position is consistent with a major effect of the PZ field across the QW. The value of the PZ field necessary to explain the large downshift is about 1 MV/cm, in agreement with previous work Reference Takeuchi, Sota, Katsuragawa, Komori, Takeuchi, Amano and Akasaki[4] Reference Hangleiter, Im, Kollmer, Heppel, Off and Scholz[5]. (Since the spontaneous polarization (SP) effect is believed to be an order of magnitude smaller in this InGaN QW system, as compared to the PZ polarization, the SP induced fields are neglected in our discussion in this paper). As discussed further below, potential fluctuations are indeed the origin of part of this shift, however.

4.2 Screening effects by donors and carriers

The rather large upward shifts of the PL peak position with Si donor doping in the QWs, as well as with excitation intensity, points towards strong effects of carrier screening of the piezoelectric field as well as of the potential fluctuations. We have made an investigation of the effect of donor screening on the PZ field. The most extreme screening effect one could achieve from shallow donors would be if one puts all the donor ions on one side and the electrons on the other side of the QW; this would be a gross overestimation of the ability of the carriers to screen the field. We found with this approximation that this screening would only reduce the potential drop across the well with 12%, for the highest doping concentration 2×10¹⁸ cm⁻³. A similar modelling with ordered electron-hole pairs at this density, as required to simulate the spectral shifts with excitation intensity and delay time, gives the same result. A doping (or excited electron-hole pair) concentration of the order 10¹⁹ cm⁻³ would be needed to reproduce the observed maximum experimental shifts described above (see also Ref. Reference Della Sala, Di Carlo, Lugli, Bernardino, Fiorentini, Scholz and Jancu[19]). We conclude that a perfect QW system affected essentially by the PZ field is not a proper model for the observed behaviour of this MQW system. Obviously it needs a rather drastic modification, which is supplied by the potential fluctuations in the QWs.

From the magnitude of the Stokes shift in Figure 5 (a,b) and from the PL line widths there is evidence for the presence of potential fluctuations of the order at least 0.1 eV in the QWs. We have made some simple modelling to find out if the doping induced blue shift of the PL spectrum (Figure 6) could be reproduced from lateral screening of potential fluctuations in the QW. In a 3D system we know that the screening increases with carrier concentration; the Thomas-Fermi screening length decreases. In a 2D system the Thomas-Fermi screening length is unaffected by a change in carrier concentration. However, the Thomas-Fermi screening length only describes the screening of a slowly varying potential or the resulting potential far away from the center of the potential. The higher the carrier concentration is, the better the system screens a rapidly varying potential or the core of the potential. This means that the effective depth of a potential well caused by fluctuations can vary with doping or carrier concentration. In the present discussion we assume that the shallow donor electrons are ionized, e. g. by the strongly fluctuating electric field in the QW.

The behaviour of the 2D, low temperature, RPA dielectric function was shown in figure 4 (a) of Ref. Reference Monemar, Bergman, Dalfors, Pozina, Sernelius, Holtz, Amano and Akasaki[20] for different electron concentrations. The analytical expression for the dielectric function is:

It was first derived by Stern Reference Stern[21]. We have modelled a potential of the form

, i.e., a Gaussian potential. (Figure 12 (a)). We chose the parameter β to be 0.01 Å ⁻¹, which means that the potential has a spatial extent of 100 Å. The resulting curves in Figure 12 (a) scale with the strength of the potential, and therefore the plot in Figure 12> (a) is normalised. If we choose the unscreened value V₀(0) = 390 meV (i. e. the value expected in the absence of screening electrons) we get the well depths equal to 272 meV, 234 meV and 134 meV, respectively for the densities 2×10¹⁷ cm⁻³, 4×10¹⁷ cm⁻³ and 2×10¹⁸ cm⁻³. This corresponds to the blue shifts 38 meV and 100 meV as compared to the experimental values 40 meV and up to 200 meV, respectively, when going from 2×10¹⁷ cm⁻³ to 4×10¹⁷ cm⁻³ and from 4×10¹⁷ cm⁻³ to 2×10¹⁸ cm⁻³.

Figure 12.

(a). The screening effect on a gaussian potential of width 100 Å in one of the quantum wells. The dotted curve is the bare potential. The dash-dotted, dashed, full and dash-triple-dotted curves are for the carrier concentrations 2×10¹⁷ cm⁻³, 4×10¹⁷ cm⁻³, 2×10¹⁸ cm⁻³ and 1×10¹⁹ cm⁻³, respectively. All curves have been scaled to the value at the center of the unscreened potential. We have plotted the potentials with reverted sign to get the impression of a potential well. The screened potentials have Friedel oscillations at large separations. (b). The well depths of screened gaussian potentials for different carrier concentrations, indicated in the figure, as functions of potential width.

In Figure 12 (b) we show the results of a calculation of the dependence of this short range 2D screening on the extent of the Gaussian potential. This is of interest, since in our samples we have no direct experimental information on the extension of the short range perturbation potentials. It is clear from Figure 12 (b), that the screening efficiency varies most strongly with electron density for potentials of an extent 50 – 150 Å.

In order to explain the large spectral shifts observed with doping we therefore need to assume that the presence of rather strong potential fluctuations V₀(r) in the QW over a short distance of 100 Å. The unscreened magnitude of these fluctuations could be as large as 0.4 eV. The partly screened potentials seen in the experiment may be considerably weaker, however.

A major effect not taken into account in the simple screening model above is carrier transfer, which needs to be considered in a realistic model to explain the experimental data. In the above discussion the average electron concentration from the donors was considered. In practice, assuming the presence of rather short range potential fluctuations, carrier transfer processes (hopping) between different potentials may easily occur before recombination. The carriers will then have a tendency to be transferred to the lowest energy fluctuating potentials, selectively screening these. This transfer effect would explain part of the upshift of the PL peak with doping (Figure 6), and the apparent absence of the low energy part of the PL spectrum in the timeresolved spectra in Figure 8 (b). The size of the typical bare fluctuation potential V₀(r) needed to explain the spectral shifts is therefore smaller than the one estimated above, but would still realistically be of the order 0.2 – 0.3 eV in our samples. Considering a typical background doping of about 2 x10¹⁷ cm⁻³, the average depth of the experimentally observed screened potentials V(r) should be of the order 0.1 – 0.2 eV to explain our data.

A spectral downshift with delay time observed in the timeresolved PL spectra is expected to occur, due to screening of the PZ field by the photoexcited carriers. Excited electron - hole pairs (or excitons) will be polarized in the PZ field in the QW and are thus expected to screen the PZ field quite efficiently. Total screening is expected at a very high e-h density, of the order 10¹⁹ cm⁻³, in this case, as discussed above Reference Monemar, Bergman, Dalfors, Pozina, Sernelius, Holtz, Amano and Akasaki[20]. This is also reasonably consistent with the data recently published for modulation-doped InGaN MQW samples Reference Cho, Song, Keller, Minsky, Hu, Mishra and DenBaars[22]. However, considering again the presence of strong potential fluctuations and lateral screening of these, a much lower carrier concentration may cause substantial spectral shifts. At short delay time (say < 1 ns) after the pulse the PL peak position is at about 2.9 eV (Figure 10 (a)). The difference between this value and the unperturbed QW bandgap 3.05 eV is 0.15 eV, and should be made up from both the residual PZ field-induced Stark shift and the Stokes shift from the localization in the partially screened potential fluctuations, both probably of comparable magnitude. The maximum observed downshift with delay time in some cases is larger than 200 meV for the time-delayed spectra observed with short pulse excitation (Figure 10 (a)). This requires an initial excited excess carrier density of the order a few 10¹⁸ cm⁻³, which is realistic under our experimental conditions. Most of the shift occurs during the first 10 ns, as expected in the screening model since the decay is fastest during this period. We note, however, that this spectral downshift with delay time should be composed of two contributions: the PZ induced Stark shift which is enhanced by a reduced screening at longer delay times, and the recombination of carriers from localization potentials, which become progressively deeper as the screening carrier concentration declines upon decay of the PL emission. It is difficult without a detailed modeling to judge which of these processes dominates, we only conclude here that they appear to be of comparable magnitude in our samples. As further discussed below, the potential fluctuations are in these QWs enhanced by the action of the PZ field. Therefore shifts due to these two effects are indeed closely connected.

4.3 Origin of potential fluctuations

Having concluded that potential fluctuations are important in this MQW system, we need to discuss their possible origin. One obvious cause is the alloy fluctuations, which are always present in any alloy, but of different size due to the relative difference in the atomic pseudopotentials Reference Schubert, Göbel, Horikoshi, Ploog and Quiesser[23] Reference Zimmermann[24] Reference Lee and Bajaj[25]. In the InGaN system these fluctuations are expected to be enhanced by segregation effects Reference Koukitu, Takahashi, Taki and Seki[7] Reference Saito and Arakawa[8], in particular if the growth of the InGaN layers takes place at a temperature above 750 °C. Another source of fluctuations that is wellknown for QW systems is due to the interface roughness. There is a dispersion in the QW bandgap value with QW width, which naturally is translated into a distribution of QW bandgap energies if the interfaces are rough. The observation of these effects of interface roughness in optical spectra depends on the length scale of these fluctuations. If this length scale is less than the extent of the exciton wavefunction, the effects will be averaged in optical spectra, and a broadening will be observed of the resulting PL spectra, as discussed in detail for the AlGaAs/GaAs QW system Reference Weisbuch, Dingle, Gossard and Wiegmann[26] Reference Bastard, Delalande, Meynadier, Frijlink and Voos[27].

In the present case with InGaN QWs these fluctuations will be enhanced by the presence of local strain. Both fluctuations in In composition and QW width directly translate into a corresponding fluctuation in the size of the local strain field, since the InGaN layers are coherently grown on a thick GaN layer. The strain fluctuation itself will change the bandgap locally, this effect will be enhanced by the effect of the PZ field, which is also directly proportional to the in-plane strain Reference Takeuchi, Sota, Katsuragawa, Komori, Takeuchi, Amano and Akasaki[4] Reference Bodin, André, Cibert, Dang, Bellet, Feuillet and Jouneau[28]. The combined action of these effects explains the rather strong potential fluctuations observed in this system, probably of the order 0.2 eV for this particular In composition, under our growth conditions. The width of the PL emission is clearly a measure of the size of these potential fluctuations. In order to get a precise relation between linewidth and the average depth of potential fluctuations a more detailed modeling is needed, to establish e g which potential depth is most active in a particular time window during decay of the PL emission. Such modeling is not warranted without independent data for the localization potentials.

4.4 The detailed recombination process. Excitons or free carriers?

Clearly excitons have a rather large binding energy in the InGaN QWs and are therefore as such thermally stable particles well above room temperature. An important question is whether excitons will survive in the QW in the presence of strong potential fluctuations. Such fluctuations are necessarily connected with corresponding lateral electric field fluctuations in the plane of the QW. In the presence of carriers the threshold field for impact excitation is rather small. In bulk GaN it has been shown to be of the order 10 V/cm Reference Volm, Oettinger, Streibl, Kovalev, Ben-Chorin, Diener, Meyer, Majewski, Eckey, Hoffman, Amano, Akasaki, Hiramatsu and Detchprohm[29], no corresponding experiments have been performed in GaN/InGaN QWs. We may assume that the threshold field for impact ionization in the QW is about an order of magnitude higher than for bulk GaN, in analogy with the situation in GaAs/AlGaAs QWs Reference Weman, Treacy, Hjalmarsson, Law, Merz and Gossard[30]. A fluctuating field of the order 100 V/cm in the QW plane would thus be sufficient for impact excitation of excitons, provided energetic carriers are present in the initial relaxation process. In reality these fluctuating fields are much larger, of the order 10³ – 10⁵V/cm, depending on the lateral extent of the short range localization potentials Reference Buyanov, Bergman, Sandberg, Sernelius, Holtz, Monemar, Amano and Akasaki[31]. Already a random distribution of donors at a total residual density of 10¹⁷ cm⁻³ is sufficient to cause local fields of the order kV/cm in the QW plane. In fact the fluctuations modeled in Figure 12 invoke a lateral field of the order 10⁶ V/cm at the short range potential fluctuations. We may therefore assume that the excitons initially created by optical excitation in the QW are ionized to a large extent via the interaction with energetic carriers (electrons) which are present during the initial relaxation process.

Another argument for the dominance of free carriers in the recombination process is derived from the observed radiative decay times. For an excitonic process in a 30 Å QW the PZ field has been estimated to reduce the oscillator strength by about a factor 3 compared to the case of no PZ field Reference Nardelli, Rapcewicz and Bernholc[32]. Assuming an excitonic radiative lifetime (localized QW excitons) of < 1 ns at 2 K, the exciton decay time would not be more than 3 ns. Our observed values are of the order 100 ns, i e more than one order of magnitude larger, as expected if recombination between free (or separately localized) carriers dominate. It should be pointed out that in QWs with considerably smaller In composition, and consequently smaller potential fluctuations, the recombination appears to be dominated by excitons Reference Takeuchi, Sota, Katsuragawa, Komori, Takeuchi, Amano and Akasaki[4] Reference Hangleiter, Im, Kollmer, Heppel, Off and Scholz[5]. Also, the PL linewidth is then smaller than reported in this work Reference Takeuchi, Sota, Katsuragawa, Komori, Takeuchi, Amano and Akasaki[4] Reference Hangleiter, Im, Kollmer, Heppel, Off and Scholz[5].

If we assume that most of the recombination in our samples actually occurs with separately localized electrons and holes, this will have consequences for the detailed interpretation of the spectral linewidth. Clearly if electrons and holes localize independently and diffuse via an acoustic phonon assisted hopping process Reference Holstein, Lyo, Orbach, Yen and Selzer[33], they will be able to lower the recombination photon energy more than in the case of excitons. The width of the PL peak could therefore partly be explained as recombination of localized electron-hole pairs, with a variation in e-h distance, also giving a spread in radiative lifetimes. These processes (i. e. a varying e-h distance and the hopping) are also consistent with the nonexponential decay behavior observed, as well as the spectral diffusion during the decay (in fact in a similar way as with the screening of the PZ field) Reference Kuskovsky, Neumark, Bondarev and Pikhitsa[34]. As mentioned before, potential fluctuations of the order 0.1 – 0.2 eV may easily exist, sufficient to explain the emission peak shape. In addition, part of the line width might be explained by some minor fluctuations in the properties between the five QWs building up the structure.

As mentioned above, the radiative lifetime appears to be approximately independent of temperature up to room temperature. This is a typical behavior for recombination of localized carriers (or excitons for that matter), independent of the dimensionality of the system. Fluctuations of the order > 0.1 eV might cause localization up to the room temperature region. A temperature independent radiative lifetime is therefore not an exclusive argument for the presence of “quantum dot excitons” in the system Reference Narukawa, Kawakami, Fujita, Fujita and Nakamura[2]. A definite proof of the QD exciton model would be the observation of very sharp exciton lines in near field micro-PL experiments, which was so far not reported Reference Crowell, Young, Keller, Hu and Awshalom[35] Reference Vertikov, Kuball, Nurmikko, Chen and Wang[36]. It is likely that QD excitons do exist, but the topology of the localization potentials may be complicated, and further the QD exciton recombination may be largely obscured by other processes, such as e g separate carrier recombination.

Finally we would like to comment on the shape of the PLE curves as shown in Figure 5. The curve has the shape of a continuous ramp with no obvious excitonic features. Clearly the ground state exciton would have a very low oscillator strength in a strong PZ field, and is not expected to be seen. Excited excitonic states could be expected, but in our case the electrons are probably not confined in the QW, they are pushed up above the conduction band of the barrier. The potential fluctuations may broaden and wipe out any peaks to be expected in the absorption of excited excitonic states. In addition the lifetimes of such excited states are expected to be very short, also a source of spectral broadening. Clearly the above discussed impact processes will also contribute to a broadening of the excitonic absorption shapes in this case. The combination of these effects will wipe out the otherwise expected excitonic absorption edge in this case.