Introduction
Women have consistently been shown to have a twofold higher risk of depression compared to men (Kuehner, Reference Kuehner2017; Pedersen et al., Reference Pedersen, Mors, Bertelsen, Waltoft, Agerbo, McGrath and Eaton2014), with this risk particularly elevated during periods of hormonal fluctuation, such as pregnancy, the postpartum period, and menopause (Lokuge et al., Reference Lokuge, Frey, Foster, Soares and Steiner2011; Palomba et al., Reference Palomba, Daolio, Romeo, Battaglia, Marci and La Scala2018). Reproductive system disorders (RSDs), including conditions such as endometriosis, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), and disorders involving abnormal bleeding and pain, affect a significant portion of women (Cooney, Lee, Sammel, & Dokras, Reference Cooney, Lee, Sammel and Dokras2017; Estes et al., Reference Estes, Huisingh, Chiuve, Petruski-Ivleva and Missmer2021; Fortin, Flyckt, & Falcone, Reference Fortin, Flyckt and Falcone2018). While the etiology of these disorders varies, they are uniformly associated with poor mental health and decreased quality of life (Cooney et al., Reference Cooney, Lee, Sammel and Dokras2017; Estes et al., Reference Estes, Huisingh, Chiuve, Petruski-Ivleva and Missmer2021; Fortin et al., Reference Fortin, Flyckt and Falcone2018). Many RSDs are also associated with reduced fertility, further exacerbating the risk of depression (‘Infertility’, n.d.). In addition, imbalances in sex hormones, a key feature of many RSDs, can directly influence mental health, contributing to higher rates of depression among affected women (Kundakovic & Rocks, Reference Kundakovic and Rocks2022). These intertwined relationships between reproductive disorders and mental well-being underscore the importance of a comprehensive understanding of these conditions.
Despite the clear association between RSDs and mental health challenges, the relationship between RSDs and depression in women of reproductive age remains poorly understood. Both RSDs and depressive disorders are frequently characterized by considerable diagnostic delays, which complicated the establishment of temporal patterns or causality. While much of the existing research has focused on specific conditions, particularly PCOS, there is a need for broader investigations into the mental health impact of a wider range of RSDs (Zaks et al., Reference Zaks, Batuure, Lin, Rommel, Reichenberg, Grice and Janecka2023). Moreover, previous studies have not fully explored the potential bidirectionality of the relationship between RSDs and depression, leaving gaps in our understanding of these correlations.
To address these gaps, we aimed to investigate the incidence and prevalence of depression in women of reproductive age before and after their incident diagnosis of RSDs. Our study provides a comprehensive examination of depression risk surrounding the diagnosis of 24 different RSDs, utilizing a nationwide cohort to assess the mental health impact across a large population.
Methods
We conducted a descriptive cohort study using nationwide health registers in Denmark. The primary aim was to characterize the temporal cooccurrence between RSDs and depression. The study included all women with any of the 24 main RSDs, classified by third level of the International Classification of Diseases, version 10 (ICD-10), between 2005 and 2018. We examined the incidence rates and prevalence proportions of depression, defined either by a registered hospital diagnosis or the filling of any antidepressant prescription within a 3-year period before and after the first diagnosis of any RSD. Age-matched women without an RSD diagnosis served as comparators.
Data sources
Denmark’s tax-funded healthcare system provides universal coverage for all residents, and each individual is assigned a unique personal identification number. This number enables linkage across all healthcare and administrative registers (Morten Schmidt et al., Reference Schmidt, Schmidt, Adelborg, Sundbøll, Laugesen, Ehrenstein and Sørensen2019). Since 1995, the Danish National Patient Register (Patient Register) has recorded all in- and outpatient hospital contacts, including psychiatric services and emergency room visits (Morten Schmidt et al., Reference Schmidt, Schmidt, Sandegaard, Ehrenstein, Pedersen and Sørensen2015). The Patient Register contains information on the date of contact and assigned diagnoses according to ICD-10 (‘WHO | ICD-10 Online Versions’, n.d.). The Danish National Prescription Registry (Prescription Registry) contains information on all prescriptions filled at outpatient pharmacies since 1995(Pottegård et al., Reference Pottegård, Schmidt, Wallach-Kildemoes, Sørensen, Hallas and Schmidt2017), using the WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification system (Norwegian Institute of Public Health, n.d.). This registry includes data on dispensing dates, ATC codes, and treatment indications with high validity (Harbi & Pottegård, Reference Harbi and Pottegård2024; Pottegård et al., Reference Pottegård, Schmidt, Wallach-Kildemoes, Sørensen, Hallas and Schmidt2017). The Danish Civil Registration System provides data on date of death and migration (Schmidt, Pedersen, & Sorensen, Reference Schmidt, Pedersen and Sorensen2014).
Population
We identified all women aged 15–49 years in Denmark with an incident diagnosis of any RSD from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2018, using the Patient Register (Morten Schmidt et al., Reference Schmidt, Schmidt, Sandegaard, Ehrenstein, Pedersen and Sørensen2015). RSDs included inflammatory diseases of the female pelvic organs (ICD-10 N70–77), noninflammatory disorders of the female genital tract (N80–94), and ovarian dysfunction (E28) (Zaks et al., Reference Zaks, Batuure, Lin, Rommel, Reichenberg, Grice and Janecka2023). The disorders were categorized at the third level of the ICD-10 classification, resulting in 24 distinct categories, each with its own subcategories (see ST 1 for the full list of categories and subcategories). We excluded conditions related to pregnancy and childbirth (e.g. abortion, infertility), as we hypothesized these events may have distinct etiological relationships with mental health.
We constructed an overall RSD cohort and 24 subcohorts for each third-level ICD-10 RSD diagnosis category. Both primary and secondary diagnosis codes were used to define case status. Women were considered incident cases in the RSD overall cohort upon their first-ever diagnosis of any RSD, and incident cases in the specific RSD subcohorts were based on the first diagnosis of that RSD. An 8-year run-in period was applied to exclude women who immigrated less than 8 years prior to their first RSD diagnosis. In the overall RSD analyses, women could have incident diagnoses in multiple disorder categories but were counted only once. The date of the first diagnosis was defined as the index date. For each RSD case within each disorder category, five women without the index diagnosis were randomly selected from the general female population (matched on birth month and year) using risk set sampling (SF 1). These women formed the comparison group, with the same 8-year run-in period applied.
Definition of depression and period of interest
For the main analyses, we defined depression as either (1) a primary or secondary diagnosis of depressive disorder (ICD-10 code F32–39) during an inpatient or outpatient hospital contact or (2) the filling of a prescription of antidepressants (ATC code N06A). Since most women with depressive disorders are diagnosed and treated in general practice or by privately practicing psychiatrists (Musliner et al., Reference Musliner, Liu, Gasse, Christensen, Wimberley and Munk-Olsen2019) and may not be captured in the Patient Register, antidepressant prescriptions serve as a proxy measure for a depressive disorder. Depression was tracked from 3 years before to 3 years after the index date (day of RSD diagnosis) until the date of death, migration, or 3 years after the index date, whichever occurred first. Women in the comparator group were also censored upon an RSD diagnosis.
Incident depression was defined as the first depression diagnosis or antidepressant prescription in women with no such history in the preceding 5 years. Once a woman was identified as having incident depression, she was considered a prevalent case for the remainder of the study period.
Statistical analyses
We conducted the following analyses for each of the 24 level 3 ICD-10 RSD categories, as specified in Table 1, and for the age-matched comparison groups.
Number of incident cases of women with a reproductive system disorder overall and by diagnosis group in Denmark (2000–2018)
Note: Numbers do not add up as one individual could be diagnosed with more than one disorder.
a Including subcategories.
b Percentage of all reproductive system disorders.
c Interquartile range.
First, we calculated the quarterly incidence rates of depression from 3 years before to 3 years after the index date (day of incident RSD diagnosis). Time was split into yearly quartiles to describe detailed trajectories. The numerator was the number of incident depression cases per quarter, and the denominator was the total risk time contributed by the population in that quarter, measured in ‘person-quartiles’ (91 days).
We applied locally estimated scatterplot smoothing, a nonparametric method that uses local regression to fit a smooth curve through the data points (Cleveland & Devlin, Reference Cleveland and Devlin1988). Notably, there was a general trend of decreasing depression incidence in the total population during the study period.
Second, we calculated 2-year incidence rates of depression from 1 year before to 1 year after the index date, keeping person-quartiles as a time measure for comparison. We then calculated the depression incidence rate ratio for each RSD category by comparing the rates in RSD patients with those in the age-matched comparison group.
Third, we described the quarterly prevalence of depression from 3 years before to 3 years after the index date by dividing the number of women with prevalent depression in each quarter by the total number of women contributing time in that quarter. Women diagnosed with incident depression prior to the study period were considered prevalent cases throughout the study period.
Supplementary analyses
We performed additional analyses to refine our findings. First, we repeated the incidence and prevalence analyses, restricting antidepressant prescriptions to those specifically indicated for depression, to exclude prescriptions for other indications. Second, we restricted the analyses to hospital-diagnosed depression cases to identify women with more severe depression.
All analyses were conducted using R, version 4.3.2.
Results
Among the 2,295,824 women aged 15–49 years in Denmark from 2005 to 2018, we identified 265,891 women (12%) with at least one registered RSD (Table 1). Below, we present results for the most prevalent RSDs with sample sizes greater than 15,000 (a total of nine subcohorts). Results for the overall RSD cohort and the remaining 15 specific RSDs are available in the Supplementary Material.
The most frequently diagnosed RSD category was excessive, frequent, and irregular menstruation (n = 98,607, 37% of all RSDs), followed by noninflammatory disorders of the ovary, fallopian tube, and broad ligament (n = 37,741, 14%) and dysplasia of the cervix uteri (n = 34,992, 13%). Endometriosis and ovarian dysfunction, including PCOS, were diagnosed in 18,525 (7.0%) and 15,302 (5.8%) individuals, respectively. The median age at incident RSD diagnosis varied by condition, ranging from 22 years (interquartile range 18–28 years) for women with female pelvic inflammatory disorders in diseases classified elsewhere to 42 years for those with excessive, frequent, and irregular menstruation, polyp of the female genital tract, and women with other noninflammatory disorders of the uterus, except the cervix.
Within the nine most frequent RSD groups, the quarterly incidence rates of depression were higher for women with RSDs compared to the comparator groups during the 3 years before and after the index date (Figure 1). Most RSDs showed elevated depression incidence rates within the first year after the index date, with the highest rates observed in women with pain and other conditions associated with female genital organs and the menstrual cycle and in those with endometriosis. Similar patterns were observed for the less frequent RSDs (Supplementary Figure 2), although larger variations and wider confidence intervals (CIs) were noted due to fewer observations.
Incidence rate of depression (defined by ICD-10 codes F32–39 or ATC codes N06A) in quarterly intervals, 3 years before and after diagnosis of the nine most common reproductive system disorders (RSDs) (red), compared to age- and calendar-matched women (blue). Panels are presented in order of RSD prevalence (starting upper right): Abnormal menstruation: ICD-10 N92; Noninflammatory disorders: ICD-10 N83; Dysplasia of cervix uteri: ICD-10 N87; Pain, reproductive system: ICD-10 N94; Polyp of genital tract: ICD-10 N84; Other abnormal bleeding: ICD-10 N93; Endometriosis: ICD-10 N80; Genital prolapse: ICD-10 N81; Ovarian dysfunction including polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): ICD-10 E28. The dotted lines indicate index date (day of incident RSD diagnosis).
The 2-year depression incidence rates from 1 year before to 1 year after the index date were also increased for the nine most common RSD categories compared to the comparators, with incidence rate ratios ranging between 1.15 (95% CI 1.06–1.25) for polyp of the female genital tract to 2.09 (95% CI 1.98–2.21) for pain and other conditions associated with female genital organs and the menstrual cycle (Table 2). Similar trends were seen for the less common RSDs, although with wider CIs (Supplementary Table 2).
Incidence and incidence rate ratio of depression (defined by ICD-10 codes F32–39 or ATC codes N06A) within 12 months before and after the date of incident diagnosis of selected reproductive system disorders (RSDs), among women with the nine most common RSDs and an age-matched comparator group. RSDs are ordered by frequency
a Incidence rate per 100 person quarters person time.
b Incidence rate ratio.
c Polycystic ovary syndrome.
During the entire time window of interest (3 years before and after the index date), the prevalence of depression was higher in women with any of the 24 RSD categories compared to their matched comparators (Figure 2 and Supplementary Figure 3). Notably, the prevalence of depression was already 44% higher in women with any RSD 3 years prior to their incident RSD diagnosis (prevalence ratio in the overall RSD 1.44) compared to the comparators, indicating that the disparity existed well before our study window. Among the nine most common RSDs, the largest initial difference in depression prevalence was seen in women with pain and other conditions associated with female genital organs and the menstrual cycle, with a 60% higher prevalence at the index date (prevalence ratio 1.60). The smallest difference was found in women with a polyp of female genital tract (prevalence ratio 1.10).
Prevalence proportion of depression (defined by ICD-10 codes F32–39 or ATC codes N06A) in quarterly intervals, 3 years before and after diagnosis of the nine most common reproductive system disorders (RSDs) (red), compared to age- and calendar-matched women (blue). Panels are presented in order of RSD prevalence (starting upper right): Abnormal menstruation: ICD-10 N92; Noninflammatory Disorders: ICD-10 N83; Dysplasia of cervix uteri: ICD-10 N87; Pain, reproductive system: ICD-10 N94; Polyp of genital tract: ICD-10 N84; Other abnormal bleeding: ICD-10 N93; Endometriosis: ICD-10 N80; Genital prolapse: ICD-10 N81; Ovarian dysfunction including polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): ICD-10 E28. The dotted lines indicate index date (day of incident RSD diagnosis).
Supplementary results
When conditioning on antidepressant prescriptions filled solely for depression, the incidence and prevalence trends across the 24 RSD categories were similar to the main results, although the incidence and prevalence estimates of depression were lower (Supplementary Figures 4 and 5).
When restricting the depression definition to hospital-diagnosed depression as a marker of severity, incidence rates decreased as expected, but the differences between women with RSDs and their comparators remained. However, a more pronounced peak in depression incidence rates was observed near the index date for women with RSDs compared to the main analysis, while incidence rates in the comparator group remained stable throughout the time window of interest (Supplementary Figure 6). Similarly, hospital-diagnosed depression prevalence was lower than the broader definition used in the main analysis, but differences in depression prevalence between women with RSDs and their comparators remained evident (Supplementary Figure 7). In cases of rarer RSDs, small sample sizes resulted in wider CIs and imprecise estimates.
Discussion
In this nationwide study based on Danish register data, we described the incidence and prevalence of depression in women with RSDs compared to age-matched comparators within a 6-year window surrounding their first RSD diagnosis. We hypothesized that RSDs would be associated with depression and, due to the challenges of precisely identifying the onset of both conditions, that associations with depression would be observed both before and after RSD diagnosis.
We found that women with any of the 24 RSD subtypes exhibited a substantially higher risk of depression than the comparators as early as 3 years before their RSD diagnosis. This elevated risk persisted despite suggested differences in both the etiology and biology of these RSDs. The incidence rate of depression remained elevated throughout the 6-year time window observed, indicating that mental well-being is compromised years before their RSD diagnosis and throughout. The difference persisted even when the analyses were restricted to cases where antidepressant prescriptions were specifically for depression, and to severe depression marked by hospital contacts.
Our findings confirm that depression and RSDs frequently co-occur, although determining the exact timing of onset remains difficult. It is well documented that diagnostic delays in chronic RSDs, such as endometriosis, PCOS, and pain-related pelvic disorders, are considerable, with a mean time of symptom onset to diagnosis of 4–11 years (Armour et al., Reference Armour, Sinclair, Ng, Hyman, Lawson, Smith and Abbott2020; Pino et al., Reference Pino, Belloni, Barbera, Solima, Radice and Angioni2023; Soliman, Fuldeore, & Snabes, Reference Soliman, Fuldeore and Snabes2017). Furthermore, research suggests that women’s self-reported pain related to their reproductive system is often discounted until objective evidence for the cause of pain is identified (Hoffmann & Tarzian, Reference Hoffmann and Tarzian2001). While we cannot establish causality from our study, it is plausible that delays in RSD diagnosis and treatment gradually impair mental health. Other explanations for the observed cooccurrence may include shared underlying risk factors. For example, previous research has suggested a potential genetic overlap between PCOS and psychiatric disorders, including depression (Cesta et al., Reference Cesta, Kuja-Halkola, Lehto, Iliadou and Landén2017; Chen et al., Reference Chen, Cheng, Chen, Wu, Lin, Su and Wang2024). In addition, common lifestyle-related factors—such as metabolic disturbances and stress —may also contribute to both RSDs and poor mental health. (Gao et al., Reference Gao, Qin, Jiao, Hao, Zhao, Wang and Wang2024; Zaks et al., Reference Zaks, Batuure, Lin, Rommel, Reichenberg, Grice and Janecka2023). These findings highlight the importance of accurate and timely diagnosis of RSDs, coupled with an emphasis on mental health care for these women. The observed cooccurrence may also reflect the broader burden of physical comorbidities. Women with chronic or painful RSDs often experience other somatic conditions that can contribute to depressive symptoms through shared biological or psychosocial pathways. These interrelated mechanisms highlight that the association between RSDs and depression likely arises from a complex clustering of physical and mental health factors.
Our results align with previous studies examining specific RSD categories, particularly endometriosis and PCOS, which have consistently demonstrated significant overlap between RSDs and poor mental health (e.g. depression and anxiety) (Muharam et al., Reference Muharam, Amalia, Pratama, Harzif, Agiananda, Maidarti and Tulandi2022; van Barneveld et al., Reference van Barneveld, Manders, van Osch, van Poll, Visser, van Hanegem and Leue2022; Zaks et al., Reference Zaks, Batuure, Lin, Rommel, Reichenberg, Grice and Janecka2023). Although the mechanisms linking RSDs and depression are not fully understood, the potential drivers include decreased quality of life as a consequence of RSD symptoms (Muharam et al., Reference Muharam, Amalia, Pratama, Harzif, Agiananda, Maidarti and Tulandi2022; van Barneveld et al., Reference van Barneveld, Manders, van Osch, van Poll, Visser, van Hanegem and Leue2022). Additionally, the link between these somatic and psychiatric disorders may involve hormonal changes or dysregulation (Lokuge et al., Reference Lokuge, Frey, Foster, Soares and Steiner2011), and chronic pain, which can impact day-to-day life and exacerbate depressive symptoms (Rayner et al., Reference Rayner, Hotopf, Petkova, Matcham, Simpson and McCracken2016). For example, alterations in the central nervous system have been observed in women experiencing pain due to endometriosis, possibly contributing to the heightened risk of depression (Bashir et al., Reference Bashir, Redden, Raj, Arcanjo, Stasiak, Li and Nowak2023; Maulitz et al., Reference Maulitz, Stickeler, Stickel, Habel, Tchaikovski and Chechko2022). Likewise, prior research has linked premenstrual disorders, included in the RSD category Pain and other conditions associated with female genital organs and menstrual cycle, to elevated depression risk,(Liu, Lin, & Zhang, Reference Liu, Lin and Zhang2024; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Keijser, Chen, Yu, Hysaj, Hägg and Lu2025; Yonkers, O’Brien, & Eriksson, Reference Yonkers, O’Brien and Eriksson2008). Consistent with these findings, we found the highest difference in depression risk in women diagnosed with pain-related RSDs, such as Pain and other conditions associated with female genital organs and menstrual cycle and endometriosis.
The strengths of our study include the use of a nationwide population-based cohort, which provides comprehensive health register data from a tax-funded healthcare system. This ensures full overview of all diagnosed RSDs and complete follow-up and eliminates selection and recall biases (Morten Schmidt et al., Reference Schmidt, Schmidt, Adelborg, Sundbøll, Laugesen, Ehrenstein and Sørensen2019). The detailed nature of the register data allowed us to granularly track depression incidence and prevalence in quarterly intervals around the time of RSD diagnosis.
However, our study also has limitations. We used filled prescriptions as a proxy for depression, and while these are generally considered more reliable than medical records or questionnaires (Furu et al., Reference Furu, Wettermark, Andersen, Martikainen, Almarsdottir and Sørensen2010), we cannot confirm that the medications were consumed. Nevertheless, a filled prescription indicates a treatment need assessed by a medical doctor and is indicative of a self-evaluated need. Our supplementary analyses, which excluded antidepressants prescribed for indications other than depression (Harbi & Pottegård, Reference Harbi and Pottegård2024) and focused solely on diagnoses, mirrored the main findings, reinforcing the robustness of our results. Additionally, we cannot rule out referral bias, as women seeking treatment for RSDs may be more likely to have their depression recognized. Due to the nature of the data, we capture RSDs and depression diagnosed in hospital settings and/or depression measured by filled prescriptions, which may limit the generalizability to women with RSDs identified. There is a risk of misclassification of both RSDs and depression due to diagnostic delay and milder cases of either not registered. Finally, we have defined prevalence of depression as any time after an incident depression diagnosis/filled prescription resulting in a heterogeneous group of prevalent depressed. However, having had any a diagnosis of depression is an indicator of vulnerability and risk of recurrence is considerable (Moriarty et al., Reference Moriarty, Coventry, Hudson, Cook, Fenton, Bower and McMillan2020).
Conclusion
Depression is more common among women with RSDs compared to women without RSDs, beginning as early as 3 years before the diagnosis and persisting for years afterward. Although the causal relationship between RSDs and depression remains indeterminate, the clear overrepresentation of depression in women with RSDs highlights the need for collaborative approaches between somatic and psychiatric healthcare systems. Integrating mental health screening and care into the treatment of RSDs, and vice versa, should become an essential part of future clinical guidelines.
Supplementary material
The supplementary material for this article can be found at http://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291725102602.
Data availability statement
Individual-level data cannot be shared by the authors owing to Danish data protection regulations. Deidentified data can be made available to authorized researchers after application to Forskerservice at the Danish Health Data Authority. Scripts can be acquired upon request. A registered study protocol can be found here: OSF | Depression among women with disorders of the reproductive organs.
Funding statement
This project was partly funded by Novo Nordisk Foundation (grant Number NNF21OC0072397) (Sofie Egsgaard, Trine Munk-Olsen, Mette Bliddal) and the Region of Southern Denmark (grant Numbers A1784 and A5752) (Sofie Egsgaard). The funding source was not involved in any part of the study.
Competing interests
Trine Munk-Olsen has received a speaker fee from Lundbeck A/S for unrelated work. Lotte Rasmussen reports participation in a regulator-mandated phase IV study funded by Novo Nordisk, with funds paid to the institution where she is employed (no personal fees) and with no relation to the present study. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Ethical standard
The study is registered at the University of Southern Denmark (registration No. 11.627) and has been approved by the Danish Health Data Authority. In accordance with Danish legislation, register-based studies do not require ethical approval or informed consent from included individuals.
Open access
