Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-nlwjb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-10T08:15:07.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Culturomics: Bringing culture back to the forefront for effective gastrointestinal bacterial capture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2024

Lingxi Chen
Affiliation:
MoE Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Institute of Dairy Sciences, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Yujie An
Affiliation:
MoE Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Institute of Dairy Sciences, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Kailang Huang
Affiliation:
MoE Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Institute of Dairy Sciences, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Junhong Wang
Affiliation:
MoE Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Institute of Dairy Sciences, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Yuanyuan Zhang
Affiliation:
MoE Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Institute of Dairy Sciences, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Jiakun Wang*
Affiliation:
MoE Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Institute of Dairy Sciences, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Key laboratory of Animal Feed and Nutrition of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
*
Corresponding author: Jiakun Wang; Email: jiakunwang@zju.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The gastrointestinal microbiota plays a crucial role in host nutrition and health. While culture-independent techniques have advanced microbial research, they often overlook low-abundance bacteria in the microbial community. Furthermore, empirical studies and mechanistic research rely on bacterial isolates obtained through culturing. The introduction of culturomics in 2012 significantly advanced culture-dependent techniques, contributing to microbial research. However, these methods remain labor-intensive, time-consuming, and costly, similar to traditional culture methods. This review provides an overview of the contributions of culturomics, summarizes procedures for optimizing sample and culture processes, and offers guidance on utilizing metagenomic data to enhance culturomics workflows. By collating and synthesizing these developments, this review aims to provide valuable insights into improving the practicality and productivity of culturomics for capturing gastrointestinal bacterial communities.

Information

Type
Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Zhejiang University and Zhejiang University Press.
Figure 0

Figure 1. The contribution of culturomics (created with BioRender.com).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Multi-dimensional evaluation of medium (Tao et al. 2023).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Comparison of the culture-independent sequencing and culture results. (A) The difference in 16S rRNA gene sequences was detected between fecal samples and plate contents (Goldman et al. 2022). (B) The difference between pyrosequencing and culture results (Pfleiderer et al. 2013).

Figure 3

Table 1. Composition (g/L) of the protectant medium patented under the following number (N°1H53316 CAS 25 FR) by Bellali et al. (2019)

Figure 4

Figure 4. Experimental factors affecting cultivability (Zehavi et al. 2018). (A) The proportion of the cultivable prokaryotic microorganisms in each rumen dilution. (B) The impact of abundance on cultivability.

Figure 5

Figure 5. The impact of ethanol treatment (Afouda et al. 2020).

Figure 6

Table 2. List of the 16 best culture conditions recommended for culturomics of human gut bacteriota by Diakite et al. (2020)

Figure 7

Figure 6. The enriched specific ASVs of interest in pigs with the 53 culture conditions (Wang et al. 2021).

Figure 8

Table 3. The media are suitable for bacterial samples from diverse hosts

Figure 9

Figure 7. Improving the culturomics workflows (created with BioRender.com).

Figure 10

Figure 8. Novel technology used in metagenomic-directed cultureomics (created with BioRender.com).