Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-vgfm9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-20T15:22:05.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Images of otoscopy: rate and extent of non-compliance with good practice standards

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2015

G Crundwell*
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
J Harmer
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK Emmeline Hearing Implant Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
M Maltby
Affiliation:
Department of Vision and Hearing Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK
T Mills
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
C Neumann
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
L Walsh
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
D Baguley
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK Emmeline Hearing Implant Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mrs Gemma Crundwell, Department of Audiology (Box 94), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK Fax: 01223 586 912, E-mail: gemma.crundwell@addenbrookes.nhs.uk

Abstract

Background:

The British Society of Audiology has produced clear guidelines as to how otoscopy should be undertaken; however, no nationally recognised guidelines exist for the wider clinical community. Images of otoscopy appear in many books, journals, magazines and websites.

Objective:

This study aimed to determine the rate of non-compliance with good practice in images of otoscopy, the seriousness of the breach, and whether this is more common in sites for professionals or the general public.

Method:

Google Images was searched using the terms ‘otoscopy’ and ‘ear examination’. A total of 200 images were identified and collated. The images were reviewed for compliance with good practice standards.

Results:

Only 12.75 per cent of the images were graded as having no breach of good practice standards.

Conclusion:

Professional websites have a responsibility to show best practice. When choosing an image, the source of the image needs to be carefully considered.

Information

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable