Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-kcxw8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-17T02:54:37.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The socio-economic shield limits Lassa virus spillover in urban West Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2026

David Simons*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, USA
*
Corresponding author: David Simons; Email: dzs6259@psu.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Spatial risk models for Lassa fever (LF) generally predict the primary reservoir, Mastomys natalensis, is restricted to rural landscapes. This study integrates multispecies biotic interactions and anthropogenic land-use into a high-resolution framework to evaluate LF’s urban potential. I implemented an integrated multispecies occupancy model to reconstruct the reservoir’s realized niche, accounting for sampling bias and invasive rodent competitors. A socio-economic filter, proxied by night-time lights, was introduced to model the dampening effect of urban infrastructure on spillover. Annual infections were estimated using a demographic compartmental model incorporating empirical seroreversion rates. Results indicate high biological hazard across the peri-urban fringes of major West African cities. However, an infrastructure-driven socio-economic shield decouples this hazard from human incidence in dense urban cores. Accounting for spatial shielding and antibody waning yields an estimated 2.6 million annual Lassa virus infections. Comparing predictions to clinical data reveals substantial surveillance gaps, identifying highly suitable silent districts in Nigeria, Benin, and Togo with zero reported cases. LF possesses the biological potential to become a peri-urban disease; addressing these surveillance gaps at the peri-urban interface is a critical public health priority.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Spatial distribution of biological and epidemiological data. (a) Small mammal trapping locations used to train the IMSOM, stratified by ecological guild: the primary reservoir M. natalensis (orange), invasive competitors R. rattus/M. musculus (blue), and the wider native community (grey). The dashed black line represents the IUCN range of M. natalensis within West Africa. (b) LASV prevalence data points. Red circles indicate rodent testing sites (polymerase chain reaction (PCR)/serology); gold triangles indicate human serosurveys used for calibration; black asterisks indicate synthetic urban absence anchors added to constrain model predictions in high-density city centres. (c) Reported cases resolved to administrative level two areas. Red Local Government Areas (LGAs) in Nigeria indicate those that have reported at least one confirmed case between 2018 and 2025 (obtained from weekly situation reports produced by the NCDC). Outside of Nigeria, administrative level two areas are coloured by the number of cases (log transformed) reported in the period 2012–2022. Labels refer to the focal cities for the spatially explicit gradient analyses. The inset map shows the extent of the study area within Africa.Figure 1. long description.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Predicted reservoir niche (DM). (a) IMSOM predicted occupancy probability for M. natalensis. (b) Difference map highlighting spatial divergence from previous climatic models, with positive values indicating higher predicted suitability in the IMSOM, particularly in urban zones.Figure 2. long description.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Mechanisms of urban tolerance. (a) Urban zooms showing reservoir persistence in peri-urban fringes for three example locations (Lagos, Nigeria; Tamale, Ghana; and Jos, Nigeria). (b) Functional response curves of host occupancy to human population density for the climate-based occupancy modelling (blue) and the IMSOM derived occupancy modelling (orange).Figure 3. long description.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Predictors of Lassa virus prevalence. (a) Variable importance from the BRT model. (b) Partial dependence plot showing the non-linear association with greenness persistence (NDVI minimum). (c) Partial dependence plot showing the positive association with R. rattus occupancy.Figure 4. long description.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Predicted pathogen hazard (DL). Spatial distribution of viral prevalence in the reservoir host, conditional on reservoir presence.Figure 5. long description.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Pathogen urban tolerance. (a) Predicted viral prevalence (DL) in and around key cities, contrasting the biotically informed model (left) with the climatic baseline (right). Contours indicate distance from city centre (20 km). (b) Functional response of predicted prevalence to human population density (log10), showing the custom model’s (orange) persistence at higher densities compared to the climatic baseline (blue).Figure 6. long description.

Figure 6

Figure 7. The socio-economic shield. Bootstrapped calibration curves showing the decoupling of ecological hazard and human seroprevalence in urban (blue) versus rural (orange) settings. Ribbons indicate 95% confidence intervals; points indicate raw, unbinned observed seroprevalence from human serosurveys, with point size proportional to the total sample size of each study.Figure 7. long description.

Figure 7

Figure 8. Spatial decoupling of hazard and risk. Radial profiles of ecological hazard (orange), infrastructure shield (dotted yellow), and predicted incidence (black) for representative cities. Lines represent smoothed means (LOESS); arrows indicate the location of peak incidence.Figure 8. long description.

Figure 8

Figure 9. Predicted annual incidence of Lassa virus infection. Estimates account for seroreversion (λ=0.03) and the urban shield effect. Scale is log transformed.Figure 9. long description.

Figure 9

Table 1. Estimated annual burden of Lassa virus infection by countryTable 1. long description.

Figure 10

Figure 10. Surveillance gaps and model validation. (a) Nigeria: risk stratification of LGAs with zero reported cases (NCDC data). (b) Mano River Union: validation against historical case counts (Moore et al.). Red districts indicate confirmed endemic presence; orange and yellow districts represent ‘silent’ areas with high predicted risk but zero reported cases. (c) Scatter plot of predicted annual infections versus reported annual cases across all subnational districts, coloured by country, illustrating the impact of zero-reporting on overall correlation.Figure 10. long description.

Supplementary material: File

Simons supplementary material

Simons supplementary material
Download Simons supplementary material(File)
File 30.6 KB