Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-8wtlm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-27T15:46:22.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seasonal mass-balance gradients in Norway

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2017

L.A. Rasmussen
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-1310, USA E-mail: lar@ess.washington.edu
L.M. Andreassen
Affiliation:
Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE), PO Box 5091, Majorstua, NO-0301 Oslo, Norway Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, Blindern, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previously discovered regularity in vertical profiles of net balance, b n(z), on ten glaciers in Norway also exists in profiles of both winter, b w(z), and summer, b s(z), seasonal balances. All three profiles, unlike those of many glaciers elsewhere in the world, are remarkably linear. Variations of gradients, db w/dz and db s/dz, from year to year are small and correlate poorly with glacier-total balances b w and b s. Glacier-to-glacier correlation is weak for both gradients but is strongly positive for b w and b s. There are two direct consequences of these properties of the gradients that apply to both seasonal balances b w and b s. First, because db/dz varies so little from year to year, the difference in balance, ∆b, from year to year is nearly the same over the entire glacier, except near the top and bottom of its altitude range. Therefore, balance at a site near the middle of the altitude range of the glacier correlates very well with glacier-total balance. Second, this correlation, combined with the strong positive correlation of balance from glacier to glacier, is the reason balance at one altitude on one glacier correlates well with glacier-total balance at other nearby glaciers.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 2005
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Glacier locations. See Table 1 for names.

Figure 1

Table 1. Years with bw(z) and bs(z) profiles used in this analysis. Altitude interval is 50 m, except for glaciers 1, 2 and 6, where it is 100 m

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Storbreen 2003 probing sites (small circles), stakes (large circles) and snow pit (square). Coordinates are Universal Transverse Mercator zone 32 (meters).

Figure 3

Table 2. Means and standard deviations of mass-balance components, and r correlations between components (boldface significant at 99%)

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Storbreen balance profiles for 19 individual years.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Mean altitude profiles bs (open circles), bw (solid circles) and bn (connected solid circles). Vertical line is b = 0, and horizontal line is ELA. See Table 1 for glacier names and period of record.

Figure 6

Table 3. Results of fitting bn(z), bw(z) and bs(z) profiles for n individual years. The fit of individual linear functions with generally different gradients each year is and the fit of a family of linear functions with the same gradient each year is All r2 are significant at 99%

Figure 7

Table 4. Means and standard deviations σ of vertical gradients of balance bn, bw and bs in m w.e. per km of altitude. Correlation of bn with bn is rnn, of bw with bw is rww, of bs with bs is rss, of bw with bn is rwn and of bs with bn is rsn (boldface significant at 99%)

Figure 8

Fig. 5. Hellstugubreen b(z) profiles for four extreme years. In each panel, the more positive curves are 1990 (thick) and 1989 (thin); the more negative curves are 2003 (thick) and 2002 (thin).

Figure 9

Fig. 6. Glacier-to-glacier correlation of balance b (solid circles) and of its gradient b’ (open circles) vs distance D between the glaciers.

Figure 10

Table 5. Altitude zn where reported balance bn(zn) has best correlation with glacier-total balance bn, and similarly for and Correlation of bw(zn) with bw is and of bs(zn) with bs is All r2 are significant at 99%

Figure 11

Table 6. The r correlation between (1) balance at 1650 m on Nigardsbreen and (2) glacier-total balance at each glacier over n years of common record. The rms error is from the regression of (2) on (1). All r are significant at 99% except Langfjordjøkelen