Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-vdhp9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-15T04:17:01.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Antarctic and Arctic science in the classroom and for society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2025

Magda Vila*
Affiliation:
Institut de Ciències del Mar (ICM-CSIC) , Barcelona, Spain
Vanessa Balagué
Affiliation:
Institut de Ciències del Mar (ICM-CSIC) , Barcelona, Spain
Clara Cardelús
Affiliation:
Institut de Ciències del Mar (ICM-CSIC) , Barcelona, Spain
Adelina Geyer
Affiliation:
Geosciences Barcelona (GEO3BCN), CSIC , Barcelona, Spain
Santiago Giralt
Affiliation:
Geosciences Barcelona (GEO3BCN), CSIC , Barcelona, Spain
Josep-Maria Gili
Affiliation:
Institut de Ciències del Mar (ICM-CSIC) , Barcelona, Spain
Dolors Vaqué
Affiliation:
Institut de Ciències del Mar (ICM-CSIC) , Barcelona, Spain
*
Corresponding author: Magda Vila; Email: magda@icm.csic.es
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Earth’s poles have always aroused great interest and fascination, first for explorers looking for the Northern Pass in the Arctic or for a new continent and natural resources to exploit, and today for scientists due to the significant role that the Arctic and Antarctic oceans play in the dynamics and future of our planet, especially in the current context of global change. To raise awareness of the importance and vulnerability of the polar oceans and to bring scientific advances in marine science to schools and the general public, we have worked from different approaches: 1) the online participation of students in polar oceanographic expeditions (through the ICM Divulga educational website), 2) face-to-face talks and workshops on polar ecosystems involving the observation of samples and/or videos, 3) the coordination and the edition of the book Observando los polos with a global and multidisciplinary vision of the state of scientific knowledge on polar areas, 4) the elaboration of the photographic exhibition ‘Una mirada polar’ and 5) the multi-institutional collaborative project surrounding the XIth Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) International Biology Symposium. These approaches, some of which involved Dr Andrés Barbosa’s collaboration, align with his objective of disseminating the results of research and scientific experience to the public. An evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the diverse strategies used to provide education about polar science is presented.

Information

Type
Biological Sciences
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - SA
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is used to distribute the re-used or adapted article and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Antarctic Science Ltd
Figure 0

Table I. Outreach activities carried out and type of audience learning. Learning is classified according to the degree of bottom-up audience participation into knowledge transfer, dialogue-based learning and active learning.

Figure 1

Table II. Outreach activities ranked according to four key factors: the audience they reached, the duration of their impact over time and the effort involved in carrying them out (economic cost and time dedication). The levels considered for ‘audience reached’ were low (fewer than 300 people reached), medium (between 300 and 2000 people reached), high (between 2000 and 10 000 people reached) and very high (more than 10 000 people reached). The levels considered for ‘duration over time’ were low (ephemeral, the resource is inaccessible after the event), medium (resource partially accessible after the event) and high (resource fully accessible for a long period of at least several months). The levels considered for effort in terms of ‘economic cost’ were low (no extra money dedicated), medium (some money dedicated, less than 5000 euros) and high (more than 5000 euros dedicated). The levels considered for effort in terms of ‘time dedicated’ were low (less than half a month dedicated per activity), medium (between half a month and half a year dedicated per activity) and high (more than half a year dedicated per activity). The assignment of values to each category and the ratio calculations are explained in the ‘Materials and methods’ section.

Figure 2

Table III. Outreach activities produced to educate on Antarctic science in the classroom and for society. Some indicators such as audience (people reached), effort vs reach and lifespan of the content generated are indicated.

Figure 3

Figure 1. POLAR CHANGE oceanographic expedition (February–March 2022) to the Antarctic Ocean. a. Challenges proposed to the students participating in the online expedition. b. POLAR CHANGE researchers sampling the sea ice (March 2022). c. Answers to the marine trophic network challenges by students participating in the online exploration.

Figure 4

Figure 2. Reproduction of some figures from the book Observando los polos. a. Routes of pioneer Antarctic explorers, by A. Barbosa and N. Schamuells. b. Comparison of ear sizes of Arctic (left) and Antarctic (right) mammals, by A. Barbosa and N. Schamuells. c. Chinstrap penguin (Pygoscelis antarcticus), by A. Barbosa. d. Antarctic marine trophic network, where some of the most representative species are illustrated, by A. Barbosa, J.M. Gili, D. Vaqué and N. Schamuells.

Figure 5

Figure 3. Photographic exhibition ‘A Polar Gaze’. a. Example of two panels. Irregular iceberg castle type in the Bransfield Strait (left) and nest tagging of Adélie penguins in the Hope Bay penguin colony on the northern Antarctic Peninsula (right; both photographs by Dr Andrés Barbosa). b. Example of one of the pages of the digital book A polar gaze: a visual journey to the ends of the Earth: (left) image of an Antarctic landscape at Spitsbergen Island (Svalbard archipelago, Norway; photograph by Dr Andrés Barbosa); (right) aerial image of the eastern coast of Greenland (photograph by Santiago Giralt). c. ‘A Polar Gaze’ exhibited in the public library of Corró d’Avall (Franqueses del Vallès, Catalonia). d. Example of an educational project derived from the exhibition ‘A Polar Gaze’ at a primary school (CPR Compañía de María, Galicia).

Figure 6

Figure 4. Multi-institutional collaborative project around the XIth Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) International Biology Symposium. a. Exhibition poster entitled ‘Life in Antarctica: Boundaries and Gradients in a Changing Environment’. b. & c. Examples of two panels from the exhibition. d. The exhibition at the Maritime Museum of Barcelona.

Figure 7

Figure 5. Impact and effort related to the outreach activities. a. Impact in terms of audience (public reached) and duration over time. b. Effort invested in terms of economic costs and time dedication. c. Impact/effort ratio and impact/effort over time ratio. Book = Observando los polos; Exh M = exhibition at the Maritime Museum of Barcelona; T Exh = travelling exhibition; POLCH = challenge-based campaign POLAR CHANGE; SSS+ARC = challenge-based campaigns SSSICE-SO and ARCTIC-MON; PEG+PI = dialogue-based campaigns PEGASO and PI-ICE; Lect = lectures, workshops and conferences at the Maritime Museum of Barcelona; Worksh = workshops; Talk S = talk series.

Figure 8

Table IV. Main strengths and weaknesses of the five groups of outreach activities.

Supplementary material: File

Vila et al. supplementary material

Vila et al. supplementary material
Download Vila et al. supplementary material(File)
File 56.1 KB