Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-r6c6k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T15:44:26.138Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

TESS observations of newly discovered pulsating A and F stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2026

Andrzej S. Baran*
Affiliation:
ARDASTELLA Research Collaboration, Missouri State University, USA
Jonah Vercher
Affiliation:
ARDASTELLA Research Collaboration, Missouri State University, USA
Hannah Worters
Affiliation:
SAAO, South Africa
Mateo Guerra-Toro
Affiliation:
ARDASTELLA Research Collaboration, Missouri State University, USA
Joyce Ann Guzik
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Research Laboratory, USA
David Kilkenny
Affiliation:
University of the Western Cape, South Africa
*
Corresponding author: Andrzej Baran; Email: andysbaran@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We have analysed photometric data from a sample of pulsating stars observed by the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite. By applying Fourier and prewhitening techniques, we extracted the significant frequencies for each star. We investigated the presence of rotationally split multiplets and evaluated frequency spacings using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. These analyses allow us to estimate stellar parameters such as the large frequency spacing, which in turn provides insights into the stellar mean densities. However, identifying clear multiplets and frequency spacings in ${\unicode{x03B4}}$ Scuti stars remains challenging due to the complexity of their oscillation spectra. Our rotationally-split mode findings are yet to be confirmed, while the K–S test revealed no convincing large frequency spacings that could be used toward mass estimation. We derived orbital periods for stars we identified to be in binary systems. We provide spectral type classifications to confirm the ${\unicode{x03B4}}$ Sct and/or ${\unicode{x03B3}}$ Dor nature of the stars we found. Out of 43 stars presented in this paper, 18 are identified as ${\unicode{x03B4}}$ Sct/${\unicode{x03B3}}$ Dor hybrids (including five candidates), 20 as ${\unicode{x03B4}}$ Sct stars, one as a ${\unicode{x03B3}}$ Dor star and four as binary systems without any signature of pulsation.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that no alterations are made and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press or the rights holder(s) must be obtained prior to any commercial use and/or adaptation of the article.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Astronomical Society of Australia
Figure 0

Table 1. Basic parameters of stars analysed in this work. Bold sector numbers indicate the ones used in our analysis, and the listed cadence corresponds to those bold face sectors. The # superscripts in the ‘var type’ column denote hybrid candidates. Atmospheric parameters were adopted from Gaia DR3. Spectral types were adopted from the literature, with details given in the star’s individual paragraphs (Section 5), whereas those with asterisk superscripts were derived in this work from spectra taken at SAAO (see Section 2).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Pan-STARRS image overlaid with a $5\times 5$ pixel TESS image. A ${\unicode{x03B4}}$ Sct candidate (TIC 51026945) is the brightest star in the target mask, while a hot subdwarf (TIC 51026936) star is separated by only about one pixel towards the south-west.

Figure 2

Table 2. List of frequencies we detected in our targets. Numbers in parentheses denote uncertainties.

Figure 3

Figure 2. SAAO spectra of the stars analysed in this work. Spectral types derived in this work are given below the TIC designations.

Figure 4

Figure 3. Same as Figure 2 for five different stars. The top two panels show spectra of the same star with differing spectral classifications. (Note, for example, the stronger G band (near 4 300 Å) in the lower panel.

Figure 5

Figure 4. K–S tests of stars with prominent troughs flagged. These are discussed for individual stars in Section 5.

Figure 6

Figure 5. Close-ups of the amplitude spectra of stars analysed in this work.

Figure 7

Figure 6. Same as in Figure 5 but for another seven stars.

Figure 8

Figure 7. Same as in Figure 5 but for another seven stars.

Figure 9

Figure 8. Same as in Figure 5 but for another seven stars.

Figure 10

Figure 9. Same as in Figure 5 but for another seven stars.

Figure 11

Figure 10. Same as in Figure 5 but for another eight stars.