Felt presence (also referred to as ‘sensed presence’) is the experience of an external entity in the nearby environment without clear sensory evidence.Reference Barnby, Park, Baxter, Rosen, Brugger and Alderson-Day1 Although typically associated with Parkinson's disease,Reference Fénelon, Soulas, Cleret de Langavant, Trinkler and Bachoud-Lévi2 felt presence is increasingly recognised as a transdiagnostic phenomenon occurring in schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, neurological diseases and under psychologically or physically taxing conditions.Reference Barnby, Park, Baxter, Rosen, Brugger and Alderson-Day1 Felt presence is closely linked to body-related hallucinatory phenomenaReference Rosen, Park, Baxter, Tufano and Giersch3 and to ultra-high risk for psychosis.Reference Park and Baxter4
Despite growing awareness, felt presence continues to be under-recognised in clinical and research contexts. It is poorly understood compared with more widely known psychotic experiences, and is sometimes described as falling between hallucinations and delusions.Reference Koehler and Sauer5 Currently, reports of felt presence are limited to case studies (summarised in Barnby et alReference Barnby, Park, Baxter, Rosen, Brugger and Alderson-Day1) and small-scale phenomenological studies.Reference Alderson-Day, Woods, Moseley, Common, Deamer and Dodgson6 So far, no studies have examined felt presence in a large population sample and little is known about its wider non-clinical presentation.
A few years ago, such data were gathered as part of a study by Linszen et alReference Linszen, de Boer, Schutte, Begemann, de Vries and Koops7 in which psychotic-like experiences were assessed via self-report in a large sample from the general Dutch population. Given previously noted associations with the development of psychosis, we hypothesised that felt presence should be understood as a hallucination-like experience and that it would show similar associations with key risk factors for hallucinations. Therefore, in the current study, we tested for the expected relationship of felt presence with other forms of hallucinations and delusions in this sample, and for associations with key psychosis risks, including adverse events, loneliness and sleep disruption.
Method
In a national online survey among the general Dutch population,Reference Linszen, de Boer, Schutte, Begemann, de Vries and Koops7 10 447 participants aged ≥14 years rated their propensity for psychotic-like experiences (69% female; median age 32 years, range 14–88 years) using the Questionnaire for Psychotic Experiences. Of these, 165 (1.6%) reported experiencing felt presence in the past month in response to a question on the presence of hallucination-like experiences (Appendix) and a follow-up free-text question asking participants to describe such experiences. A content analysis of the free-text responses was performed to derive codes further categorising the replies. In addition, we asked about the number of years since their first felt presence, past adverse events (not further specified) and experiences of other hallucinations (auditory, visual, tactile, and olfactory) and delusion-like thinking. Furthermore, we compared people who experienced felt presence with a subgroup of the larger sample who reported hallucination-like experiences in the past month but did not report felt presences (n = 5169) (‘noFP’ group). We explored associations with loneliness and sleep using the De Jong Gierveld Loneliness ScaleReference De Jong Gierveld and Van Tilburg8 and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Inventory.Reference Buysse, Reynolds, Monk, Berman and Kupfer9
The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. The medical ethical committee of the University of Utrecht (IRB number 16–408/C) exempted the study from medical ethical review owing to its non-invasive and non-medical nature. All participants gave written informed consent before participation.
Results
Of the 165 participants who had experienced felt presence in the past month, 85% were women. This proportion is significantly larger than in the group with hallucination-like experiences but no felt presence – the noFP group (75%) (χ 2 = 7.65, P = 0.006). There was an over-representation of felt presence among those aged under 30, but not above that age (t = 2.77, P = 0.006). The median age of the participants who had experienced felt presence was 26 years (IQR = 19) and median age at which the first experience of felt presence occurred was 12 years (IQR = 10).
Most participants (72%) experienced felt presence not more than once a month; 22% reported weekly felt presence. Few participants reported daily (4%) or continuous felt presence (2%). A quarter of participants indicated that their felt presence had some relation with a past adverse advent, whereas only 5% of the noFP group reported such a relation for other hallucination-like experiences (χ 2 = 116, P < 0.001). No further details about these adverse events were collected.
When compared with the noFP group, people who experienced felt presence showed a higher prevalence of additional visual and tactile hallucinations in the past month, as well as delusion-like thinking (specifically delusions of reference) (all χ 2 > 4.3, all P < 0.039) (Fig. 1). The prevalence of auditory and olfactory hallucinations did not differ between the felt presence and noFP groups (all χ 2 < 1.61, all P > 0.203). Compared with the noFP group, experiencing felt presence in the past month was associated with greater loneliness (t = 1.92, P = 0.030) and poorer sleep quality (t = 2.74, P = 0.007).
Percentages of participants who reported at least one hallucination-like experience in a particular sensory modality or delusional thinking in the past month.
Felt presence is not counted among the listed experiences: instead, the participants are separated into those who experienced felt presence (FP) in the past month (n = 165) and those who did not (noFP) (n = 5169). Statistics from χ 2-tests comparing the felt presence and noFP groups are given, with significant group differences in bold. a. A subset of participants filled out questions regarding the presence of delusions: n = 100 individuals (61%) in the FP group and n = 3276 (63%) in the noFP group.
When asked to describe their felt presences, participants typically reported ‘sensing’ that someone was there without seeing anyone. In some cases, participants indicated that they felt as if they were being watched (18%) or they concurrently felt a hand on their shoulder (12%).
Discussion
Our main objective was to offer a view of felt presence as it occurs in a general population sample. As hypothesised, we found that individuals who experienced felt presence also experienced other types of hallucination, along with delusional ideas. Well-known risk factors for hallucinations – adverse events, loneliness and poor sleep quality – were also more prevalent among people with felt presence. These findings corroborate the theory that felt presence shares a common underlying mechanism with other psychosis-like experiences. Felt presence might therefore be seen as a marker for general hallucination proneness.
Concurrent reports of overlap with other senses, such as feeling a hand on a shoulder, can be hypothesised to strengthen the experience of the presence of an ‘other’ entity, in which the felt presence is focused on the individual. Rather than sensing a passively present entity, the experiencer feels as if they are at the centre of the presence's attention, as evidenced by accounts of ‘being watched’ or touched by the felt presence. This tallies with our finding of a specifically high rate of delusions of reference among people who experience felt presence.
Although the significant association of felt presence with visual and tactile but not auditory hallucinations suggests a profile more typical of hallucinations in Parkinson's disease,Reference Fénelon, Soulas, Cleret de Langavant, Trinkler and Bachoud-Lévi2 this is difficult to reconcile with the relatively young age of the participants. Previously, Larøi et alReference Larøi, Bless, Laloyaux, Kråkvik, Vedul-Kjelsås and Kalhovde10 also reported the lack of an association between felt presence and auditory hallucinations, and found felt presence to be more common in those also experiencing tactile and olfactory hallucinations, across the lifespan. Further research is needed to gain a better understanding of this weaker link between felt presence and hallucinations in the auditory domain compared with those in other senses.
Limitations
It must be noted that response bias probably affects the current data-set, as participation in the survey might have been more appealing to people with psychotic experiences, leading to over-representation of these phenomena. In addition, women and younger people generally participate more often in online surveys, which was the case for the current study and resulted in a skewed sample.
Further research and clinical implications
Although women were over-represented in this sample, our data confirm the previous observation that women may be more susceptible to experiencing felt presence than men.Reference Alderson-Day, Moseley, Mitrenga, Moffatt, Lee and Foxwell11 Future studies are needed to replicate and assess what drives this link, for example by examining gender differences in prevalence of certain types of adverse event.
By providing an account of felt presence as occurring in the general population, we aimed to contribute to its wider recognition among at-risk populations and clinical groups. As these are the experiences that patients say clinicians are currently missing,Reference Pagdon and Jones12 increasing awareness of the occurrence of felt presence is crucial going forward.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, S.G.B., on reasonable request. They are not made publicly available as they contain information that could potentially compromise participants’ privacy. The analytic code can also be requested with the data. There are no other materials supporting the findings that are available to other researchers.
Author contributions
J.N.d.B., M.M.J.L. and I.E.C.S. designed the project and coordinated data collection. S.G.B. and M.M.J.L. helped with data preparation and designing of the data set. S.G.B. analysed the data. S.G.B. and B.A.-D. wrote the initial draft, and all authors contributed to, read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
I.E.C.S. received a grant from the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw, project 91213009).
Declaration of interest
None.
Appendix
Participants were asked about their experiences of hallucination-like phenomena in the tactile sensory domain: ‘Some people have experienced being touched by someone or feeling a hand on their shoulder while nobody was nearby. Another example is people having the feeling as if bugs are crawling under their skin. Have you ever experienced something like that? If so, have you experienced this in the past week? If not in the past week, have you experienced this in the past month?’. Of the 165 reports of felt presence most (89%) were in response to this question, but a small proportion of the felt-presence reports – or elaborations on felt presence – were given in response to similar questions about hallucination-like experiences in the visual (13%) and auditory (1%)Reference Larøi, Bless, Laloyaux, Kråkvik, Vedul-Kjelsås and Kalhovde10 domains.
Open access
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.