Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-xnzfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-31T18:44:00.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two decades of ESKAPE pathogens: Longitudinal analysis of antibiotic resistance trends between 2002 and 2024 in a Hungarian clinical centre

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2026

Bence Sajerli
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Szeged , Hungary
Ágnes Sarkadi-Nagy
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Szeged , Hungary
Katalin Burián
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Szeged , Hungary
László Orosz*
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Szeged , Hungary
*
Corresponding author: László Orosz; Email: orosz.laszlo@med.u-szeged.hu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This retrospective study analysed 14,625 isolates of the six major hospital-associated ‘ESKAPE’ pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter spp.) collected between 2002 and 2024 in a Hungarian tertiary-care centre. Antimicrobial resistance was assessed using the antibiotic resistance index (ARI), multidrug resistance (MDR) ratios, and resistance instability index (RII). A. baumannii and E. faecium showed the highest resistance burdens and instability. Age showed a significant monotonic association with resistance (Spearman r = 0.88), with peaks in infants, middle-aged women, and the elderly. Species-specific age trends varied, with a negative correlation seen in Enterobacter spp. Hierarchical clustering grouped pathogens by resistance trajectory rather than taxonomy. Pairwise resistance distances confirmed divergence between Gram-positive and Gram-negative species. Resistance to aminoglycosides and sulphonamides showed the highest year-to-year variability, as quantified by the RII, particularly in A. baumannii and E. faecium. Vector autoregressive (VAR) modelling predicted continued MDR increases in these species. A strong correlation was found between ARI and RII (Pearson r = 0.85, p = 0.032). These findings underscore the importance of integrating resistance magnitude and volatility in surveillance.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Antibiotic panel used for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of ESKAPE pathogens (2002–2024)

Figure 1

Figure 1. Distribution and temporal trends of ESKAPE pathogens. (a) Total number of patients per pathogen based on all clinical isolates collected between 2002 and 2024. (b) Annual number of patients infected with each ESKAPE species from 2002 to 2024. The dashed line represents the overall mean across species, whereas the shaded area indicates the COVID-19 era.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Distribution and temporal trends of antibiotic resistance among ESKAPE pathogens. (a) Violin plots presenting the annual distribution of ARI for each species between 2002 and 2024. The dashed line represents the median, and the shaded area indicates the interquartile range. (b) Annual resistance ratios by species across the study period. The dashed black line represents the average resistance ratio across all ESKAPE species. The shaded area marks the COVID-19 era.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Distribution and temporal dynamics of MDR among ESKAPE pathogens. (a) Bar chart displaying the overall proportion of multidrug-resistant isolates per species. (b) Annual MDR ratios for each species. The dashed black line represents the overall annual mean MDR ratio across all ESKAPE species. The shaded region highlights the COVID-19 era.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Age distribution of antibiotic resistance and patient counts. (a) Correlation between age and the resistance ratio among all ESKAPE isolates. Each dot represents the mean resistance ratio for a given age (years). A fitted linear regression line with the 95% confidence interval is presented. (b) Age distribution of patients with ESKAPE infections between 2002 and 2024. The plot highlights three major age peaks. (c) Age distribution of infected patients stratified by sex. The arrow highlights the second age peak, around 30 years, at which a distinct distribution pattern is observed.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Association between patient age and the antibiotic resistance ratio among ESKAPE pathogens. Spearman’s correlation coefficient (r) and the slope of linear regression models are presented within each panel. Each data point represents the resistance ratio for a given age (years).

Figure 6

Figure 6. Projected MDR trends in ESKAPE pathogens. Temporal trends in MDR ratios from 2002 to 2024 are presented, with the COVID-19 era highlighted in grey and future projections until 2030 shaded in red. The dashed line represents the mean MDR trend across all species.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Hierarchical clustering of ESKAPE species based on antibiotic resistance trajectories. The dendrogram displays species-level clustering derived from resistance pattern similarity across antibiotics and years. Branch lengths indicate the relative dissimilarity in resistance profiles.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Species-level distance matrix based on antibiotic resistance profiles. The heatmap displays pairwise distance values between ESKAPE species calculated using Adjusted Rand Index-based resistance profile dissimilarities. Higher values (green) indicate greater divergence, whereas lower values (red) reflect higher similarity. The diagonal cells are excluded (white boxes). Species are grouped by Gram status (Gram-positive vs. Gram-negative) as denoted by dashed separators. The colour scale bar reflects resistance distance values from low (red) to high (green).

Figure 9

Figure 9. Hierarchical clustering of antibiotic resistance by ESKAPE species. The dendrogram displays the clustering of antibiotics based on resistance similarity across ESKAPE pathogens. Each antibiotic is colour-coded according to its associated species, and branches reflect the degree of dissimilarity in resistance trajectories (distance). Closely clustered antibiotics share similar resistance trends within a species.

Figure 10

Figure 10. RII by antibiotic class across ESKAPE species. Bar charts depict the RIIs for major antibiotic classes within each ESKAPE species. Higher RIIs indicate greater year-to-year variability in resistance trends. Data are stratified by species.

Figure 11

Figure 11. Heatmap of RIIs by species and antibiotic class. The matrix presents RIIs for each ESKAPE species across selected antibiotic classes. Higher RIIs (shaded red) indicate greater year-to-year fluctuations in resistance trends, whereas lower values (shaded green) reflect more stable resistance profiles. Empty cells represent drug-species combinations in which resistance data were not available or not relevant because of intrinsic resistance. The rightmost column summarizes the mean RIIs across all species for each antibiotic class. Gram-positive and Gram-negative species are delineated by dashed lines.

Figure 12

Figure 12. Correlation between ARI and RII across ESKAPE species. Each point represents one species, plotted by its ARI (x-axis) and RII (y-axis). A strong positive correlation was observed (Pearson’s r = 0.85, R2 = 0.72, p = 0.032), indicating that species with higher resistance burdens tend to exhibit greater temporal resistance variability. Acinetobacter baumannii had both high ARI and RII values, whereas most other species clustered in the lower-left region, reflecting lower resistance and instability. The dotted rectangle denotes this low-ARI/low-RII cluster.

Supplementary material: File

Sajerli et al. supplementary material

Sajerli et al. supplementary material
Download Sajerli et al. supplementary material(File)
File 15 KB