Objectives: It was hypothesised that patients admitted to forensic mental health facilities are stratified along the pathway through care according to levels of need. Level of risk and psychopathology should vary with different levels of security.

Method: Seventy-five men in a forensic hospital were interviewed by three trained clinicians using the HCR-20 (Historical Clinical Risk Assessment) – clinical and risk items, The Health of the Nation Scales – Secure (HoNOS-SECURE), PANSS (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale), GAF (Global Assessment of Functioning) and the CANFOR (Camberwell Assessment of need Forensic Version).

Results: The mean scores on a variety of clinical measures were higher in admission/high security areas and progressively lower in rehabilitation and pre-discharge areas. As patients moved through the pathways of care, they improved in a number of areas including psychiatric morbidity, risk, function, unmet needs. The following results stratified significantly; the HCR-20 summated clinical and risk (F = 9.2, df = 5, p < 0.001), the HoNOS secure (F = 18.2, df = 5, p < 0.001), PANSS (positive, general and total), GAF, staff and user unmet needs on the CANFOR.

Conclusions: The data indicate that the theoretical organisation of the units of the hospital into high, medium and low security units to form a coherent pathway through care is reflected in practice. This is a transparent route out of secure care in which restrictions are proportionate to risk and supports proportionate to need. It is unclear whether alternative models, consisting of a series of generic unstratified units for admission and discharge, all at the same level of therapeutic security, allow for the provision of treatment programmes and relational interventions appropriate to the patient's stage of recovery and rehabilitation.

Objective: The aim of this study was to help clarify the range of acute medical problems experienced by patients on an acute psychiatric unit during a period of 28 days and nights, as encountered by psychiatric trainees, and to document any difficulties experienced by the trainee during these patient contacts.

Method: This survey was carried out prospectively over 28 days and nights in an acute psychiatric ward attached to a teaching University Hospital. Following contact with an individual patient, the trainee recorded diagnosis, intervention and any difficulties encountered.

Results: Thirty-three patient contacts were recorded (n = 33). Trainees faced a range of primary care problems 22/33 (67%), but moreover, three patients demonstrated more serious and potentially life threatening problems, leading to 11/33 (33%) patient contacts requiring urgent interventions.

Conclusions: While the debate continues as to who is best placed to provide medical healthcare for psychiatric patients, this study provides evidence that psychiatry trainees are required to draw on their previous medical and surgical experience on an almost daily basis. As psychiatrists we should consider our options on how best to manage medical problems on the acute psychiatric unit and consequently ensure confident liaison with our medical and surgical colleagues.

Objective: Over recent years in England there has been widespread development of assertive outreach teams supporting patients with severe mental illness living in the community. Assertive outreach staff members are exposed to a variety of new stressors and risks. This study investigated the emotional impact on keyworkers of working with assertive outreach patients. This was considered in terms of the attitudes keyworkers hold towards patients with particular types of difficulty. The study also measured individual keyworker stress.

Methods: Keyworkers from three teams in Birmingham were surveyed regarding their attitudes towards individual patients. Questionnaires measuring attitudes and patient difficulties were derived for the purpose of the study. Strengths of attitudes were correlated against different patient difficulties. Keyworker stress was measured using the General Health Questionnaire, GHQ12.

Results: Certain patient difficulties, in particular poor engagement, psychotic symptoms and aggression were associated with feelings of failure in keyworkers whilst drug use, particularly crack cocaine use, was associated with fear of visiting patients at home. Some 41% of keyworkers met ‘caseness’ criteria on the GHQ12. Negative attitudes appeared to be independent of GHQ scores.

Conclusions: Keyworkers expressed a number of positive and negative attitudes in relation to patient difficulties. Negative attitudes did not appear to be simply a feature of keyworker stress, however it is acknowledged that the sample size was small. Keyworkers' responses suggested a sense of personal failure when their patients were unwell or poorly engaged, despite patients being selected for assertive outreach on the basis of such difficulties. Recognition of negative attitudes may help in the improvement of training and supervision of staff members.

Objective: This audit aimed to (a) systematically identify problems related to rates of attendance and non-attendance at one psychiatry outpatient clinic; (b) quantify these problems; (c) implement strategies to improve service delivery; and (d) re-audit after three months.

Methods: Specific standards were set in relation to patterns of attendance at the outpatient clinic. Audit was performed over two weeks; changes to practice were agreed and implemented for three months; re-audit was performed.

Results: The initial audit showed that (a) 93 people attended the clinic over two mornings with a non-attendance rate of 13.9%; (b) 30.1% of individuals who attended did not have an appointment; (c) 20.4% of attendances were ‘inappropriate’; (d) 2.2% did not live in the clinic's catchment area. Based on these results, the clinic introduced a protocol for individuals who attended without appointment; a protocol for streamlining the provision of prescriptions; and a renewed emphasis on transferring the care of individuals not residing in the catchment area. Three months later, re-audit showed that (a) the number attending over two mornings decreased from 93 to 43, but the non-attendance rate had not changed; (b) the proportion of individuals presenting without an appointment (9.3%) decreased significantly compared to the initial audit (30.1 %); (c) the proportion of ‘inappropriate’ attendances (9.3%) tended to decrease compared to the initial audit (20.4%) but this was not statistically significant; (d) there was no difference in the proportion of patients who did not live in the catchment area; these proportions were low in both the initial audit (2.2%) and re-audit (2.3%).

Conclusions: A relatively simple audit such as this can result in a more efficient and appropriate delivery of outpatient mental health services. On this basis, there is a need to provide ongoing resources for further cycles of clinical audit in mental health services.

Methadone substitution improves maternal and neonatal outcomes. However methadone induced neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) is common. Buprenorphine-exposed neonates may be at a lower risk of NAS. Currently in the Republic of Ireland, buprenorphine does not have a special licence for use in pregnancy. We describe here the history and neonatal outcomes of the first Irish woman maintained on buprenorphine during two pregnancies.

Supervised urinanalysis on this mother between and throughout both pregnancies did not reveal any illicit drug use. She delivered two post-term babies of normal birth weight and length. The second infant required treatment for NAS for 21 days with morphine sulphate. Although the use of buprenorphine in pregnancy does not remove the possibility of NAS, neonatal outcomes of buprenorphine-maintained women compares favourably to methadone. As the use of buprenorphine becomes more established in Ireland, the management of buprenorphine-exposed neonates will become more common.

We describe a case of primary progressive aphasia (PPA) in a 62 year old right handed Irish woman who had progressive speech and language difficulty over a period of six years. She continued to work for a remarkable length of time and lived independently managing all her activities of daily living. The case posed a diagnostic challenge because initial presentation was suggestive of a conversion disorder. She also displayed signs and symptoms which overlapped with a fronto-temporal dementia and possibly early Alzheimer's disease. In our discussion, we explore the possible reasons for this overlap and the implication for psychiatrists. The need for adequate and sensitive investigations and a multi-disciplinary approach cannot be overemphasised as PPA cases are easily missed depending on the stage at which the patient presents.

A patient with a 20-year history of dysthymia had been treated with a range of anti-depressants over a period of two decades. He had experienced no clinically significant symptomatic relief for 14 years until he was recommenced on fluoxetine, a drug which had been of limited benefit to him previously. He showed no improvement in motivation, chronic anergia or easy fatiguability. He commenced an anti-smoking agent, bupropion hydrochloride (Zyban), without informing his treating psychiatrist and following the manufacturers' instructions, took the drug for four weeks, while initially continuing to smoke. He failed to discontinue smoking. However, his energy, motivation and general sense of wellbeing improved markedly, to the extent that his friends and colleagues commented upon the change.

Bupropion hydrochloride is a well-known anti-depressant agent not currently licensed for use in Ireland. His combination of fluoxetine and bupropion has improved his functioning to its best level in 20 years. The improvement has been sustained for over six months. We examine the issues raised by this unusual combination, which I have termed ‘southern comfort’, in recognition of its geographical site of clinical impact.

Objectives: By the early 19th century the social manifestations of psychiatric disorder had become a matter of public and parliamentary pre-occupation in Ireland. This concern led to legislative provision for the establishment of a national system of district lunatic asylums. This paper describes some details of the early foundation of this system.

Method: Examination of House of Commons papers on the lunatic asylums of Ireland 1835-1839.

Results: Details are presented concerning the activities, numbers of residents, admissions and costs of the 11 asylums in operation by 1839.

Conclusions: By 1839 the operational, administrative and cultural characteristics of a national asylum system that would take another half century to complete and would extend well into the 20th century had been established.