Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-jhrpq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-13T09:10:06.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mineralization of bagged pruning waste in agrosystem on the subtropical coast of Andalusia (Spain)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2021

M. P. Reyes-Martín*
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, University of Granada, Av. de Fuente Nueva s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain
M. L. Martínez-Cartas
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical, Environmental and Materials Engineering, University of Jaen, Campus Las Lagunillas s/n, 23071 Jaén, Spain
I. Ortiz-Bernad
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, University of Granada, Av. de Fuente Nueva s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain
L. M. San-Emeterio
Affiliation:
Department of Biogeochemistry and Plant and Microbial Ecology, Institute of Natural Resources and Agrobiology (IRNAS), Av. Reina Mercedes 10, 41012 Seville, Spain
E. Fernández-Ondoño
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, University of Granada, Av. de Fuente Nueva s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain
*
Author for correspondence: M. P. Reyes-Martín, E-mail: marinoreyes@ugr.es
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Spreading of pruning waste over the soil surface may increase soil organic carbon, thus improving soil physical properties and serving as a source of nutrients and energy for microbial populations. The aim of this study was to test the effect of the environmental conditions and the biochemical composition of pruning waste from avocado, cherimoya, mango and gardens on their decomposition process in a Mediterranean subtropical climate. Bagged pruning and garden waste were placed on the ground at a distance of 1 m around the trunk of the three trees from each crop. The concentrations in C, N, lignin, cellulose, hemicellulose, other extracts and ash were determined at the beginning of the experiment (T0), after six (T6) and 24 (T24) months in the field. Initially, significant differences were detected for all types of waste, especially in lignin, hemicellulose, cellulose and other extracts. No significant differences were found in the N content and the C content in mango pruning waste was significantly lower than that in avocado. The greatest weight loss recorded at T24 (63.2%) was related to the lower content in lignin, cellulose and other extracts. Weight losses and C concentrations showed negative correlations with lignin content. Despite the intense decomposition of all the waste, between 55 and 36.8% of the original weights were recorded at the end of the experiment. Recalcitrant C could be the result of the lignin concentrating in the case of the garden waste applied to the different crops.

Information

Type
Climate Change and Agriculture Research Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Temperature, rainfall, reference ETo and relative humidity averages per month during the study period.

Figure 1

Table 1. Total cumulative irrigation doses applied per tree (litre) to the three crops during the study period

Figure 2

Fig. 2. General scheme of the placement of bagged pruning waste in the sample design.

Figure 3

Table 2. Mean values ± standard deviation for the attributes weight (W), C and N concentrations, C : N ratio, lignin (L), cellulose (CL), hemicellulose (H), other extracts (OE) and ash in crops in each sampling period (time)

Figure 4

Table 3. Mean values ± standard deviation for the attributes weight (W), C, N, C : N ratio, lignin (L), cellulose (CL), hemicellulose (H), other extracts (OE) and ash in garden waste in each sampling period (time)

Figure 5

Fig. 3. (Colour online) Pools of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) in species (avocado pruning waste on avocado crop (AA), cherimoya pruning waste on cherimoya crop (CC) and mango pruning waste on mango crop (MM)) and garden waste (garden waste on avocado crop (GA), garden waste on cherimoya crop (GC) and garden waste on mango crop (GM)) in each sampling period. Note: Thin bars represent the standard error of the sample. P < 0.05.

Figure 6

Table 4. Pearson bivariate correlations between weight and the studied variables in pruning waste over time

Figure 7

Fig. 4. (Colour online) Fibre pool (lignin (L), cellulose (CL), other extracts (OE) and hemicellulose (H)) in species (avocado pruning waste on avocado crop (AA), cherimoya pruning waste on cherimoya crop (CC) and mango pruning waste on mango crop (MM)) and garden waste (garden waste on avocado crop (GA), garden waste on cherimoya crop (GC) and garden waste on mango crop (GM)) in each sampling period. Note: Thin bars represent the standard error of the sample. P < 0.05.

Figure 8

Fig. 5. NMDS plot of all the pruning waste generated, including all the variables (vectors) studied (carbon (C), nitrogen (N), lignin (L), cellulose (CL), hemicellulose (H), other extracts (OE) and water input (water)) and relating them to the weight over time (T0, T6 and T24). Note: ‘G’ garden waste at T0 because the garden waste have the same composition at T0 in all locations (crops), and this composition varies differently over time (T6 and T24) for the different crops. The length of the vector represents the influence of the variable. The direction of the vector (variable) explains the distribution of the data.