Empiricism in Interpretivist Sociolinguistics

doi:10.1017/9781009572859.007

6 - Empiricism in Interpretivist Sociolinguistics

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 January 2026

Jérémie Bouchard

Edited by

Jérémie Bouchard and

Karin Zotzmann

Show author details

Jérémie Bouchard: Affiliation:
Hokkai-Gakuen University
Karin Zotzmann: Affiliation:
University of Southampton

Book contents

Get access

Summary

This chapter offers an immanent critique of empiricism within interpretivist sociolinguistics, traces of which can be noted in scholars’ tendencies to reproduce the epistemic fallacy, and to explain broader social mechanisms and phenomena including linguistic inequalities by drawing directly from empirical evidence found in texts. Of specific critical interest in this chapter are works in raciolinguistics, a recent strand of interpretivist sociolinguistics which critically unpacks the said co-naturalisation of language and race. Although revealing valuable insight into the colonialist heritage of academic research on language and society, works in raciolinguistics are critiqued in this chapter as (a) reducing discourses to their producers, (b) failing to account for the necessary relationship between discourse and non-discursive phenomena, (c) providing reductive views of conceptual abstractions in sociolinguistics, and finally (d) denying the importance of universalism as crucial to the broader project of social emancipation. The contribution of critical realism in strengthening sociolinguistics as an interdisciplinary strand of the social sciences is also highlighted.

Keywords

academic discourse conceptual abstractions empiricism epistemic fallacy interpretivist sociolinguistics linguistic inequalities raciolinguistics social emancipation universalism

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Critical Realism in Applied Linguistics , pp. 146 - 173

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009572859.007 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2026

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Albury, N. J. (2016) ‘Defining Māori language revitalisation: A project in folk linguistics’, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(3), pp. 287–311.10.1111/josl.12183CrossRef Google Scholar

Alderson, P. (2021) Critical realism for health and illness research. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar

Alim, H. S. (2016) ‘Introducing raciolinguistics: Racing language and languaging race in hyperracial times’ in Alim, H. S., Rickford, J. R. and Ball, A. F. (eds.), Raciolinguistics: How language shapes our ideas about race. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–30.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190625696.001.0001CrossRef Google Scholar

Archer, M. S. (1995) Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511557675CrossRef Google Scholar

Archer, M. S. (2000) Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bhaskar, R. (1986) Scientific realism and human emancipation. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Bhaskar, R. (1998) The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Block, D. (2014) Social class in applied linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Block, D. (2018) Political economy and sociolinguistics: Neoliberalism, inequality and social class. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Blommaert, J. (2005) Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511610295CrossRef Google Scholar

Bouchard, J. (2017) Ideology, agency, and intercultural communicative competence: A stratified look into Japanese EFL education. Singapore: Springer.10.1007/978-981-10-3926-3CrossRef Google Scholar

Bouchard, J. (2018) ‘On language, culture, and controversies’, Asian Englishes, 20, pp. 268–275.Google Scholar

Bouchard, J. (2020) ‘The resilience of native-speakerism: A realist perspective’ in Houghton, S. A. and Bouchard, J. (eds.), Native-speakerism: Its resilience and undoing. Singapore: Springer, pp. 17–45.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bouchard, J. (2021) Complexity, emergence, and causality in applied linguistics. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-88032-3CrossRef Google Scholar

Bouchard, J. (2022) ‘Critical applied linguistics’, JALT Journal, 44(1), pp. 153–169.10.37546/JALTJJ44.1-8CrossRef Google Scholar

Bouchard, J. (2023) ‘Sociolinguistics as scientific project: Insight from critical realism’, Journal of Critical Realism, 22(2), pp. 173–194.10.1080/14767430.2022.2150009CrossRef Google Scholar

Bouchard, J. (2024) ‘Sociolinguistics and universalism’, Sociolinguistica, 38(1), pp. 1–24.10.1515/soci-2023-0016CrossRef Google Scholar

Bouchard, J. and Glasgow, G. P. (2019) ‘Agency in language policy and planning: A theoretical model’ in Bouchard, J. and Glasgow, G. P. (eds.), Agency in language policy and planning: Critical inquiries. London: Routledge, pp. 22–76.Google Scholar

Canagarajah, A. S. (2005) Reclaiming the local in language policy and planning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Carter, B. (2000) Realism and racism: Concepts of race in sociological research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Carter, B. and Sealey, A. (2004) ‘Researching “real” language’ in Carter, B. and New, C. (eds.), Making realism work: Realist social theory and empirical research. London: Routledge, pp. 111–130.Google Scholar

Collier, A. (1999) Being and worth. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Collier, A. (2003) In defence of objectivity and other essays: On realism, existentialism and politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Connell, R. (2007) Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge in social science. Crows Nest: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Corson, D. (1997) ‘Critical realism: An emancipatory philosophy for applied linguistics?’, Applied Linguistics, 18(2), pp. 166–188.CrossRef Google Scholar

Coupland, N. (ed.). (2016) Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107449787CrossRef Google Scholar

Coupland, N., Sarangi, S., and Candlin, C. N. (eds.). (2001) Sociolinguistics and social theory. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar

Danemark, B., Ekström, M., and Karlsson, J. C. (2019) Explaining society: Critical realism in the social sciences. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

de Sousa Santos, B. (2017) Decolonizing the university: The challenge of deep cognitive justice. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar

De Varennes, F. (2006) ‘The fallacies in the ‘universalism versus cultural relativism’ debate in human rights law’, Asia–Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law, 1, pp. 67–84.10.1163/157181506778218120CrossRef Google Scholar

Donati, P. (2011) Relational sociology: A new paradigm for the social sciences. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Donati, P. and Archer, M. S. (2015) The relational subject. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316226780CrossRef Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. (2010) Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar

Figueroa, E. (1994) Sociolinguistic metatheory. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Flores, N. and Rosa, J. (2023) ‘Undoing raciolinguistics’, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 27(5), pp. 421–427.CrossRef Google Scholar

Flowerdew, J. and Richardson, J. E. (2018) The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1972) The archaeology of knowledge: and the discourse on language. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

García, O., Flores, N., and Spotti, M. (2017) The Oxford handbook of language and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Glasgow, G. P. and Bouchard, J. (2023) ‘Agency in second language teacher education: A social realist perspective’, The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 12(1), pp. 91–109.Google Scholar

Heinich, N. (2021) Oser l’universalisme: Contre le communautarisme [Daring universalism: Against communitarianism]. Lormont: Bord de l’Eau.Google Scholar

Heller, M. (2001) ‘Undoing the macro/micro dichotomy: Ideology and categorisation in a linguistic minority school’ in Coupland, N., Sarangi, S., and Candlin, C. (eds.), Sociolinguistics and social theory. London: Routledge, pp. 212–234.Google Scholar

Heller, M. (2007) ‘Bilingualism as ideology and practice’ in Heller, M. (ed.), Bilingualism: A social approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–22.10.1057/9780230596047CrossRef Google Scholar

Heller, M. (2011) Paths to post-nationalism: A critical ethnography of language and identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199746866.001.0001CrossRef Google Scholar

Heller, M. and Duchêne, A. (2012) Language in late capitalism: Pride and profit. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kramsch, C. (1998) Language and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kramsch, C. (2012) ‘Imposture: A late modern notion in poststructuralist SLA research’, Applied Linguistics, 33(5), pp. 483–502.10.1093/applin/ams051CrossRef Google Scholar

Kramsch, C. (2015) ‘Applied linguistics: A theory of the practice’, Applied Linguistics, 36(4), pp. 454–465.10.1093/applin/amv039CrossRef Google Scholar

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006) ‘Dangerous liaison: Globalization, empire and TESOL’ in Edge, J. (ed.), (Re-)locating TESOL in an age of empire. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar

Lass, R. (1980) On explaining language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Leonard, W. Y. (2023) ‘Who is (not) engaged with undoing raciolinguistics?’, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 27(5), pp. 441–444.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mann, S. (2011) ‘A critical review of qualitative interviews in applied linguistics’, Applied Linguistics, 32(1), pp. 6–24.10.1093/applin/amq043CrossRef Google Scholar

Melo-Pfeifer, S. and Tavares, V. (2024) ‘An inconvenient truth: When ideologies of multilingualism lead to auto-inflicted epistemic exclusion by multilingual students in higher education’, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(3), pp. 1–18.Google Scholar

Mignolo, W. D. (2002) ‘The geopolitics of knowledge and the colonial difference’, The South Atlantic Quarterly, 101(1), pp. 57–96.10.1215/00382876-101-1-57CrossRef Google Scholar

Milroy, L. and Gordon, M. (2003) Sociolinguistics: Method and interpretation. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9780470758359CrossRef Google Scholar

Molinari, J. (2023) What makes writing academic: Rethinking theory for practice. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar

Ndhlovu, F. (2017) Language, migration, diaspora: Challenging the big battalions of groupism’ in García, O., Flores, N., and Spotti, M. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 141–159.Google Scholar

Ndhlovu, F. (2023) ‘Troubling sociolinguistics practice and the coloniality of universalism’, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 27(5), pp. 449–452.10.1111/josl.12644CrossRef Google Scholar

Norton, B. (2000) Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar

Norton, B. and De Costa, P. I. (2018) ‘Research tasks on identity in language learning and teaching’, Language Teaching, 51(1), pp. 90–112.10.1017/S0261444817000325CrossRef Google Scholar

O’Regan, J. P. (2014) ‘English as a lingua franca: An immanent critique’, Applied Linguistics, 35(5), pp. 533–552.CrossRef Google Scholar

O’Regan, J. (2021) Global English and political economy. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315749334CrossRef Google Scholar

Pennycook, A. (2001) Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781410600790CrossRef Google Scholar

Pennycook, A. (2013) ‘Language policies, language ideologies and local language practices’ in Wee, L., Goh, R. B. H., and Lim, L. (eds.), The politics of English: South Asia, Southeast Asia and the Asia Pacific. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar

Pennycook, A. and Makoni, S. (2020) Innovations and challenges in applied linguistics from the global south. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Pennycook, A. and Otsuji, E. (2015) Metrolingualism: Language in the city. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315724225CrossRef Google Scholar

Pietikäinen, S. (2016) ‘Critical debates: Discourse, boundaries and social change’ in Coupland, N. (ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 263–281.10.1017/CBO9781107449787.013CrossRef Google Scholar

Pilgrim, D. (2023) ‘Race, ethnicity and the limitations of identity politics’, Journal of Critical Realism, 22(2), pp. 240–255.10.1080/14767430.2022.2150000CrossRef Google Scholar

Porpora, D. (2015) Reconstructing sociology: The critical realist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316227657CrossRef Google Scholar

Rampton, B. (1997) ‘Retuning in applied linguistics’, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), pp. 3–25.10.1111/j.1473-4192.1997.tb00101.xCrossRef Google Scholar

Rampton, B. (2006) Language in late modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486722CrossRef Google Scholar

Roberts, C. (2001) ‘“Critical” social theory: Good to think with or something more?’ in Coupland, N., Sarangi, S., and Candlin, C. N. (eds.), Sociolinguistics and social theory. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited, pp. 323–333.Google Scholar

Rosa, J. and Flores, N. (2017) ‘Unsettling race and language: Toward a raciolinguistic perspective’, Language in Society, 46(5), pp. 621–647.10.1017/S0047404517000562CrossRef Google Scholar

Sayer, A. (1997) ‘Essentialism, social constructionism, and beyond’, The Sociological Review, 45(3), pp. 453–487.10.1111/1467-954X.00073CrossRef Google Scholar

Sayer, A. (2011) Why things matter to people: Social science, values and ethical life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511734779CrossRef Google Scholar

Sealey, A. (2007) ‘Linguistic ethnography in realist perspective’, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(5), pp. 641–660.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00344.xCrossRef Google Scholar

Sealey, A. and Carter, B. (2004) Applied linguistics as social science. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Shohamy, E. (2006) Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203387962CrossRef Google Scholar

Tilley, J. (2000) ‘Cultural relativism’, Human Rights Quarterly, 22(1), pp. 501–547; online version (2001), with minor corrections and changes, available at https://philpapers.org/archive/TILCR.pdf.10.1353/hrq.2000.0027CrossRef Google Scholar

van Dijk, T. (2001) ‘Critical discourse analysis’ in Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., and Hamilton, H. E. (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis. London: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 352–371.Google Scholar

van Hattum, F. (2019) ‘Review of Raciolinguistics: How language shapes our ideas about race edited by H. S. Alim, J. R. Rickford and A. F. Ballby’, Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 16(4), pp. 293–295.10.1080/15427587.2018.1522864CrossRef Google Scholar

Wacquant, L. J. and Bourdieu, P. (1992) An invitation to reflexive sociology. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Williams, G. (1992) Sociolinguistics: A sociological critique. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Wodak, R. (1996) Disorders of discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Zotzmann, K. and Hernández-Zamora, G. (2013) ‘Beyond the “cultural turn”: The politics of recognition versus the politics of redistribution in the field of intercultural communication’, The Language Learning Journal, 41(3), pp. 357–369.10.1080/09571736.2013.836351CrossRef Google Scholar

Zotzmann, K. and O’Regan, J. P. (2023) ‘Critical discourse analysis, critical discourse studies, and critical applied linguistics’ in Wei, L., Hua, Z., and Simpson, J. (eds.), The Routledge handbook of applied linguistics. London: Routledge, pp. 57–67.CrossRef Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.2 AAA

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The HTML of this chapter complies with version 2.2 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), offering more comprehensive accessibility measures for a broad range of users and attains the highest (AAA) level of WCAG compliance, optimising the user experience by meeting the most extensive accessibility guidelines.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.

Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.

Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.

Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.

Visualised data also available as non-graphical data
You can access graphs or charts in a text or tabular format, so you are not excluded if you cannot process visual displays.

Visual Accessibility

Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.

Use of high contrast between text and background colour
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.