Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:06:14.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Outcome of computer-assisted surgery in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2009

S A Mueller
Affiliation:
Department of General Surgery, Spital Oberengadin, Samedan, Switzerland
M Caversaccio*
Affiliation:
University Clinic of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital Berne, Switzerland
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Marco Caversaccio, Deputy Chairman, University Clinic of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital Berne, Freiburgstrasse, 3010 Berne, Switzerland. Fax: +41 31 632 49 00 E-mail: marco.caversaccio@insel.ch

Abstract

Objective:

To compare the complication rates and outcome of computer-assisted versus non-computer-assisted functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Methods:

We reviewed retrospectively the medical records of 276 patients who had undergone sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with (n = 108) or without (n = 168) computer assistance, from 1996 to 2004, to determine the incidence of complications and need for revision surgery.

Results:

The incidence of complications was 6.5 per cent in the computer-assisted group and 6.0 per cent in the non-computer-assisted group (p = 1.00). In the computer-assisted group, 9.2 per cent needed revision surgery, compared with 10.7 per cent in the non-assisted group (p = 0.84).

Conclusions:

Although our study found no significant difference in complications or revision rates, computer-assisted surgery serves as an important orientation aid during functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Mosges, R, Klimek, L. Computer-assisted surgery of the paranasal sinuses. J Otolaryngol 1993;22:6971Google ScholarPubMed
2Anon, JB, Lipman, SP, Oppenheim, D, Halt, RA. Computer-assisted endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 1994;104:901–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Anon, JB, Klimek, L, Mosges, R, Zinreich, J. Computer-assisted endoscopic sinus surgery. An international review. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1997;30:389401CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Metson, RB, Cosenza, MJ, Cunningham, MJ, Randolph, GW. Physician experience with an optical image guidance system for sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 2000;110:972–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Metson, R. Image-guided sinus surgery: lessons learned from the first 1000 cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;128:813CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Tabaee, A, Kacker, A, Kassenoff, TL, Anand, V. Outcome of computer-assisted sinus surgery: a 5-year study. Am J Rhinol 2003;17:291–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Loehrl, TA, Toohill, RJ, Smith, TL. Use of computer-aided surgery for frontal sinus ventilation. Laryngoscope 2000;110:1962–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Citardi, MJ, Batra, PS. Intraoperative surgical navigation for endoscopic sinus surgery: rationale and indications. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;15:23–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Tschopp, KP, Thomaser, EG. Outcome of functional endonasal sinus surgery with and without CT-navigation. Rhinology 2008;46:116–20Google ScholarPubMed
10Gibbons, MD, Gunn, CG, Niwas, S, Sillers, MJ. Cost analysis of computer-aided endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol 2001;15:71–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Caversaccio, M, Freysinger, W. Computer assistance for intraoperative navigation in ENT surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2003;12:3651CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Grevers, G, Menauer, F, Leunig, A, Caversaccio, M, Kastenbauer, E. Navigation surgery in diseases of the paranasal sinuses [in German]. Laryngorhinootologie 1999;78:41–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Fried, MP, Kleefield, J, Gopal, H, Reardon, E, Ho, BT, Kuhn, FA. Image-guided endoscopic surgery: results of accuracy and performance in a multicenter clinical study using an electromagnetic tracking system. Laryngoscope 1997;107:594601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Knott, PD, Batra, PS, Butler, RS, Citardi, MJ. Contour and paired-point registration in a model for image-guided surgery. Laryngoscope 2006;116:1877–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Casiano, RR, Numa, WA Jr.Efficacy of computed tomographic image-guided endoscopic sinus surgery in residency training programs. Laryngoscope 2000;110:1277–82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Caversaccio, M, Zheng, G, Nolte, LP. Computer-aided surgery of the paranasal sinuses and the anterior skull base. HNO 2008;56:376–8, 780–2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology. European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps. Rhinol Suppl 2005;18:187Google Scholar
18Lund, VJ, Mackay, IS. Staging in rhinosinusitis. Rhinology 1993;31:183–4Google Scholar
19Caversaccio, M, Bächler, R, Lädrach, K, Schroth, G, Nolte, LP, Häusler, R. The “Bernese” frameless optical computer aided surgery system. Comput Aided Surg 1999;4:328–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Fried, MP, Moharir, VM, Shin, J, Taylor-Becker, M, Morrison, P. Comparison of endoscopis sinus surgery with and without image guidance. Am J Rhinol 2002;16:193–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Javer, AR, Genoway, KA. Patient quality of life improvements with and without computer assistance in sinus surgery: outcomes study. J Otolaryngol 2006;35:373–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Tabaee, A, Hsu, AK, Shrime, MG, Rickert, S, Close, LG. Quality of life and complications following image-guided endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;135:7680Google ScholarPubMed
23Senior, BA, Kennedy, DW, Tanabodee, J, Kroger, H, Hassab, M, Lanza, D. Long-term results of functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 1998;108:151–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed