Material studied

The Museum sample containing biagioniite comes from the Hemlo gold deposit, which is located near the northeast shore of Lake Superior, 35 km east of Marathon, Ontario (Harris, Reference Harris1989; Tomkins et al., Reference Tomkins, Pattison and Zaleski2004). The deposit, discovered in 1982, is of Archean age and occurs at the contact of felsic metavolcanics and pelitic metasediments. It consists of several mineralised zones, of which the main zone extends for a length of 2900 m, for a distance of 2500 m down-dip and ranges in thickness from 3 to 45 m. The ore minerals were formed from hydrothermal fluids that may in part be related to the shear zone.

Native gold is the principal gold mineral in the deposit (Harris, Reference Harris1989). The gold ore is substantially enriched in Mo, V, As, Sb, Hg, Tl and Ba and contains a diverse assemblage of minerals. Interestingly, there is a close spatial association between the mercury and thallium minerals. In this regard, the realgar–cinnabar-rich quartz veins that occur within the central portion of the deposit are common hosts for the thallium minerals (Harris, Reference Harris1989). Routhierite is the most common thallium mineral, parapierrotite is less abundant, while vaughanite and criddleite are rare.

Physical and optical properties

Biagioniite occurs as very rare crystals grown on a calcite matrix (Fig. 1). The mineral exhibits a subhedral to anhedral grain morphology, and shows no inclusions of, or intergrowths with, other minerals. The maximum grain size of biagioniite is ~65 μm. It is black in colour and shows a black streak. The mineral is opaque in transmitted light and exhibits a metallic lustre. No cleavage is observed, and the fracture is uneven. The calculated density (for Z = 8) for the empirical formula (see below) is 6.192 g/cm³. Unfortunately, the density could not be measured here because of the small grain size. The Mohs hardness, estimated with respect to the surrounding calcite, is ~3.

Fig. 1.

Incident-light image of biagioniite associated with stibarsen on a calcite matrix. Museo di Storia Naturale of the University of Florence, catalogue number 46582/G.

In plane-polarised incident light, biagioniite is creamy in colour, moderately bireflectant and not pleochroic. Between crossed polars, biagioniite is weakly anisotropic with blueish to light-blue rotation tints. Internal reflections are absent and there is no optical evidence of growth zonation.

Reflectance measurements were performed in air by means of a MPM-200 Zeiss microphotometer equipped with a MSP-20 system processor on a Zeiss Axioplan ore microscope. The filament temperature was ~3350 K. An interference filter was adjusted, in turn, to select four wavelengths for measurement (471.1, 548.3, 586.6 and 652.3 nm). Readings were taken for specimen and standard (SiC) maintained under the same focus conditions. The diameter of the circular measuring area was 0.04 mm. Reflectance percentages for R _min and R _max are: 35.9 and 37.5 (471.1 nm); 34.7 and 36.2 (548.3 nm); 33.8 and 35.3 (586.6 nm); and 31.5 and 33.7 (652.3 nm), respectively.

Chemical composition

A preliminary chemical analysis using energy-dispersive spectrometry performed on the crystal fragment used for the structural study did not indicate the presence of elements (Z > 9) other than Tl, Sb, S and minor Ag. Analyses were carried out using a JEOL 8200 microprobe (wavelength dispersive spectrometry mode, 25 kV, 20 nA, 1 μm beam size, counting times 20 s for peak and 10 s for background). The following lines were used: AgLα, TlMα, SbLβ and SKα. The standards employed were: synthetic TlI (Tl), pure element (Ag), synthetic Sb₂Te₃ (Sb) and pyrite (S). The crystal fragment was found to be homogeneous within analytical error. The average chemical compositions (four analyses on different spots) together with wt.% ranges of elements are reported in Table 1. On the basis of 5 atoms, the empirical formula of biagioniite is (Tl_1.87Ag_0.19)_Σ2.06Sb_0.97S_1.97. The simplified ideal formula is (Tl,Ag)₂SbS₂, and the ideal formula is Tl₂SbS₂ (Z = 8), which requires Tl 68.74, Sb 20.48, S 10.78, total 100 wt.%.

Table 1.

Electron microprobe analysis results (four analytical spots, wt.% of elements) for biagioniite.

X-ray crystallography and crystal-structure determination

The same crystal fragment (40 × 50 × 65 μm) used to obtain the chemical data was selected for X-ray single-crystal diffraction. Data were collected using a Bruker D8 Venture diffractometer equipped with an Photon II CCD detector, with graphite-monochromatised MoKα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å). Biagioniite was found to be monoclinic, with a = 11.0895(9), b = 14.3124(11), c = 7.9352(6) Å, β = 96.230(8)°, V = 1252.02(17) ų and Z = 8. The analysis of the systematic absences (h0l: l = 2n and 00l: l = 2n) led to the choice of the space groups Pc and P2/c. Although the statistical tests on the distribution of |E| values (|E ²–1| = 0.812) indicated the absence of an inversion centre, suggesting the choice of the space group Pc, the structure was preliminarily solved in the P2/c space group. A residual R ₁ = 0.18 value was achieved quickly. However, the preliminary structural model obtained indicated a large atomic disorder. The structure model was subsequently optimised, and an ordered model was sought, but no improvement in R could be achieved. At this point, a thorough analysis of the structure (essentially based upon the observation of the very large atomic displacement parameters for particular atoms) suggested that some symmetry element of the P2/c space group should be removed. The reflection and atomic position data sets were then adapted to the Pc space group (showing the same reflections conditions) and the structure refined. After several cycles, an ordered solution with full site occupancies was finally determined by carefully removing atoms with low site occupancies and/or non-realistic distances with neighbouring atoms and adding significant positions found in the difference-Fourier syntheses. The structure could be smoothly refined in Pc without any damping factor or restrictions by the program SHELXL (Sheldrick, Reference Sheldrick2008). The occupancy of all the sites was left free to vary (Tl vs. □; Sb vs. □; S vs. □, where □ = a vacancy) but all the positions were found to be fully occupied. Neutral scattering curves for Tl, As and S were taken from the International Tables for X-ray Crystallography (Wilson, Reference Wilson1992). At the last stage, with anisotropic atomic displacement parameters for all the atoms and no constraints, the residual value settled at R ₁ = 0.0243 for 2655 observed reflections [2σ(I) level] and 182 parameters and at R ₁ = 0.0315 for all 4520 independent reflections.

Note that the acentric structural model we obtained does not show high values in the correlation matrix between pairs of atoms which are equivalent in the centrosymmetric space group P2/c. To test whether the acentric model is to be preferred to the centric one we also tested the presence of twinning by inversion in the non-centrosymmetric structure refinement. Indeed, as is well known, a centrosymmetric structure that is refined as non-centrosymmetric will show a twin scale factor, equivalent to the Flack parameter in the case of inversion twinning (Flack et al., Reference Flack, Bernardinelli, Clemente, Lindenc and Spek2006; Müller et al., Reference Müller, Herbst-Irmer, Spek, Schneider and Sawaya2006), that refines to 50% within analytical uncertainty. We found the racemic twin-component scale factor refined to 0.09(2), consistent with a highly asymmetrical distribution of the enantiomorphic components and indicating the acentric model as the right choice.

Experimental details and R indices are given in Table 2. Fractional atomic coordinates and atomic displacement parameters are reported in Table 3. Bond distances are given in Table 4. The crystallographic information files have been deposited with the Principal Editor of Mineralogical Magazine and are available as Supplementary material (see below).

Table 2.

Crystallographic data and experimental details for the selected biagioniite crystal.

Table 3.

Atoms, fractional atom coordinates (Å), and atomic displacement parameters (Ų) for biagioniite.

Table 4.

Selected bond distances (Å) for biagioniite.

Powder X-ray diffraction data (Table 5) were collected with an Oxford Diffraction Excalibur PX Ultra diffractometer fitted with a 165 mm diagonal Onyx CCD detector and using copper radiation (CuKα, λ = 1.54138 Å). The least squares refinement gave the following values: a = 11.0999(9), b = 14.273(1), c = 7.9323(7) Å, β = 96.29(1)° and V = 1249.1(1) ų.

Table 5.

Observed and calculated* powder X-ray diffraction data (d in Å) for biagioniite

*Calculated diffraction pattern obtained with the atom coordinates and occupancies reported in Table 3 (only reflections with I _rel ≥ 8 are listed).

Description of the structure and discussion

The structure of biagioniite projected down [001] is reported in Fig. 2. It is isostructural with dervillite, Ag₂AsS₂ (Bindi et al., Reference Bindi, Nestola, De Battisti and Guastoni2013). An enlarged projection of the structure (Fig. 3) allows one to distinguish Tl₄(Sb₂)₂S₆ ribbons parallel to [001], stacked along [010], to form undulated layers along [100]. These layers are separated by a one-atom-thick Tl₄S₂ layer. It is noteworthy, there are two Sb–Sb pairs, Sb1–Sb3 (2.843 Å) and Sb2–Sb4 (2.830 Å).

Fig. 2.

The crystal structure of biagioniite down [001]: unit-cell content, atoms labels and Sb–Sb bond lengths (Å). Tl, Sb and S atoms are given as purple, green and yellow circles, respectively.

Fig. 3.

Biagioniite: 2a × 2b cell. Tl₄(Sb₂)₂S₆ ribbons parallel to [001], stacked along [010], form undulated layers along [100]. These layers are separated by a one-atom-thick layer of Tl₄S₂.

The coordination of these pairs is represented in Fig. 4. Coordination of each pair with four S atoms corresponds to a hemi-octahedron cut along a symmetry plane (through two opposite edges of the cube – Fig. 5). Two neighbouring hemi-octahedra brought closer allow a single octahedron to be rebuilt.

Fig. 4.

Coordination of the Sb pairs with S atoms.

Fig. 5.

Coordination of each Sb pair (down, reduced to a central blue atom) with four S atoms corresponding to a hemi-octahedron cut along a symmetry plane (through two opposite edges of the cube). Two neighbouring hemi-octahedra brought closer allow the rebuilding of the octahedron (above).

In the Tl₄(Sb₂)₂S₆ ribbon layer, Tl1 and Tl3 exhibit a tetrahedral coordination with S, whereas the coordination is triangular for Tl4 and Tl5. Nevertheless, the coordination environment for Tl4 and Tl5 is completed by additional short Tl–Sb bonds (Tl5–Sb1 = 3.067 Å and Tl4–Sb4 = 3.175 Å).

The coordination of Tl atoms of the Tl₄S₂ layer is shown in Fig. 6. There is a central zig-zag row of tetrahedral Tl atoms, flanked by two stripes of triangular Tl, and then two stripes of linear Tl. Contrary to the Tl₄(Sb₂)₂S₆ ribbon-layer (see below), here there is linear Tl on one mirror position, and tetrahedral Tl along the second mirror position. It is worth noting the linear coordination of Tl7. To the best of our knowledge, biagioniite seems to be the first example of a natural chalcogenide showing Tl in linear coordination. For a review of Tl chalcogenides see Makovicky (Reference Makovicky2018).

Fig. 6.

Coordination of Tl atoms in the Tl₄S₂ layer in the structure of biagioniite. Tl2: tetrahedral; Tl6 and Tl8: triangular; Tl7: linear.

In Fig. 7, the Sb₂ pairs have been replaced by a single atom (G) at their gravity centre, and an anionic vacancy (□) has been added. One Tl₄(Sb₂)₂S₆ ribbon (now Tl₄G₂S₆□₂) has been selected. Projection of this ribbon (Fig. 8) shows that it is a distorted derivative of the PbS structure. The Pb₆S₈ ideal ribbon (Fig. 9) is parallel to [310], two-atoms-thick, and three-octahedra large. The junction between two ribbons along [010] (mirror in the structure, with a shift along c, to preclude S–S short bond in the interface) corresponds to (131) of PbS. The two sides of such a junction (the two different mirror positions) have the same topology.

Fig. 7.

Sb₂ pairs have been replaced by a single atom (G, green) at their gravity centre, and an anionic vacancy (□, red) has been added. One Tl₄(Sb₂)₂S₆ ribbon (now Tl₄G₂S₆□₂) has been selected.

Fig. 8.

One Tl₄G₂S₆□₂ ribbon in the crystal structure of biagioniite can be described as a distorted derivative of PbS structure.

Fig. 9.

A Pb₆S₈ ideal ribbon parallel to [310], two-atoms-thick, and three-octahedra large. The junction between two ribbons in the structure of biagioniite along [010] corresponds to (131) of PbS.

Bond-valence calculations (Table 6) have been computed on the basis of the following bond parameters: R _Sb,S = 2.45 (Brese and O'Keeffe, Reference Brese and O'Keeffe1991), R _Tl,S = 2.55 (Biagioni et al., Reference Biagioni, Bonaccorsi, Moëlo, Orlandi, Bindi, D'Orazio and Vezzoni2014) and R _Sb,Sb = 2.82 (O'Keeffe and Brese, Reference O'Keeffe and Brese1992). Tl atoms are overbonded (bond valence from 1.11 up to 1.36 valence units, vu), but we have not considered in the computation the presence of minor Ag disordered at the Tl positions, although it would be very minor. Sb–Sb bond lengths (2.830 and 2.843 Å) agree well with R _Sb,Sb corresponding to one vu; nevertheless, Sb atoms are underbonded varying from 2.31 to 2.57 vu. This feature has also been observed in sartorite (Berlepsch et al. Reference Berlepsch, Armbruster, Makovicky and Topa2003) and in minerals such as dadsonite (Makovicky et al., Reference Makovicky, Topa and Mumme2006), and was discussed in detail by Mills et al. (Reference Mills, Christy, Chen and Raudsepp2009). The overall bond-valence sum of the eight S sites is 15.95, very close to the theoretical value (16 vu). These results may be due to uncertainty in the positions of some S atoms: a small shift closer to Sb atoms would reduce Sb underbonding together with Tl overbonding, without significant change of the S bond-valence sum.

Table 6.

Bond-valence sums (vu) for biagioniite.

The presence of dimeric [Sb₂S₄]^4– ions with a central Sb–Sb bond in biagioniite means the formula could be written as [Tl⁺¹]₄[Sb₂]⁴⁺[S^2–]₄. However, it is difficult to analyse such polycationic compounds in strict bond-valence terms, as the electronegativity of such elements lies between that of common cations and common anions. The weak Tl–Sb bonds in biagioniite are good examples of the ‘anionic’ behaviour, which could be explained through dative donation of the Sb lone pair to the closed-shell d ¹⁰ Tl cations. On the contrary, in dervillite, short Ag–As bonds are lacking (Bindi et al., Reference Bindi, Nestola, De Battisti and Guastoni2013).

Tl₂SbS₂ has never been described either in Nature or as synthetic compound. Actually, the experimental TlSbS₂–Tl section includes three ternary compounds, namely Tl₂SbS₂, Tl₄SbS₂ and Tl₅SbS₂. The former two compounds melt congruently at 613 and 683 K, whereas the latter one decomposes by peritectic reaction at 663 K (Jafarov et al., Reference Jafarov, Ismayilova, Aliev, Imamaliyeva, Yusibov and Babanly2016). But, in fact, the Tl₂SbS₂ compound has been found to be Tl₃SbS₃ + Sb – a two-phase mixture instead of a single, independent chemical compound. Such a S-deficient formula for biagioniite indicates its formation at Hemlo at low $f_{{\rm S}_ 2}$, in accordance to its association with stibarsen, SbAs, aurostibite, AuSb₂, and criddleite, TlAg₂Au₃Sb₁₀S₁₀ (also S-deficient).