Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-jhf8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-01T16:24:09.273Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of the endoscopic stapling technique with more established procedures for pharyngeal pouches: results and patient satisfaction survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

S. Van Eeden ,
R. V. Lloyd  and
R. M. Tranter
S. Van Eeden
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, UK.
R. V. Lloyd
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, UK.
R. M. Tranter*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, UK.
*
Address for correspondence: Mr R. M. Tranter, F.R.C.S., Department of ENT, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Eastern Road, Brighton.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pharyngeal pouch surgery by the external approach has been shown to be effective but has a relatively high complication rate. We compared the outcome of 17 patients who had cricopharyngeal myotomy alone or combined with excision/inversion/suspension, simple pouch excision and Dohlman's procedure with 17 patients who had the relatively new Endo GIA-30 endoscopic stapling technique. Results were obtained retrospectively by postal questionnaire and medical records. We conclude that endoscopic stapling shortens the return to normal diet and in-patient stay. These patients also experience better swallowing and are generally more satisfied with the procedure. We have accepted endoscopic stapling as the method of choice for the treatment of pharyngeal pouches.

Keywords

PharynxDiverticulumSurgeryendoscopicTreatment outcome

Information

Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 113 , Issue 3 , March 1999 , pp. 237 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Collard, J. M., Otte, J. B., Kestens, P. J. (1993) Endoscopic stapling technique of esophagodiverticulostomy for Zenker's diverticulum. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 56: 573–576.Google Scholar
Dorion, D., Brown, D. H., Gullane, P. J. (1994) How I do it: Zenker's stapler diverticulectomy. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 23: 145–147.Google Scholar
Freeland, A. P., Bates, G. J. (1987) The surgical treatment of pharyngeal pouch: inversion or excision? Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 69: 57–58.Google ScholarPubMed
Juby, H. B. (1978) The treatment of pharyngeal pouches. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 92: 1101–1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koay, C. B., Bates, G. J. (1996) Endoscopic stapling diverticulotomy for pharyngeal pouch. Clinical Otolaryngology 21: 371–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackay, I. S. (1976) The treatment of pharyngeal pouch. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 90: 183–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maran, A. G. D., Wilson, J. A., Al Muhanna, A. H. (1986) Pharyngeal diverticula. Clinical Otolaryngology 11: 219–255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin-Hirsch, D. P., Newbegin, C. J. R. (1993) Autosuture GIA gun: a new application in the treatment of hypopharyngeal diverticula. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 107: 723–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scher, R. L., Richtsmeier, W. J. (1996) Endoscopic stapleassisted eso-phagodiverticulostomy for Zenker's diverticulum. Laryngoscope 106: 951–956.Google Scholar
Todd, G. B. (1974) The treatment of pharyngeal pouch. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 88: 307–315.Google Scholar
Tribble, W. M. (1975) The surgical treatment of Zenker's diverticulum: endoscopic vs. external operation. Southern Medical Journal 68: 1260–1262.Google Scholar