Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-8mwbx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-27T00:50:58.136Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Converting Narratives and Alleviating Constitutional Inequality through Taxation: Lessons from Conscription Disparities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2026

David Gliksberg*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Law, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel

Abstract

This article explores the potential effect of converting a constitutional narrative into a tax narrative that might help to address a constitutional controversy. The article examines, as a case study, the deep and long-standing issue of inequality in mandatory conscription. All efforts made over the decades to resolve the conflict or reduce its scope have failed. The article sets up a novel framework by conceptualising mandatory service as a ‘tax in-kind’, proposing a mandatory army tax credit (MATC) as a significant tool to alleviate the inequality. The proposed regime bridges the tension between Israel’s ‘people’s army’ ethos and the growing inequality. The proposed tax regime leverages the framing effect to preserve the ‘people’s army’ ethos while addressing inequities. Our insights apply to any country with mandatory military service facing issues of inequality: should conscription controversies be addressed solely through constitutional narrative, or through tax narrative as well? In addition, the approach of the article challenges traditional tax perspectives and public policy by incorporating non-monetary obligations into the tax discourse.

Information

Type
Articles
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the Faculty of Law, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Figure 0

Table 1. Enrolment percentages (2022, %)

Figure 1

Table 2. The measurement’s components of the mandatory army tax (MAT) for the entire mandatory service (men; ILS)

Figure 2

Table 3. The measurement’s components of the mandatory army tax (MAT) for the entire mandatory service (women; ILS)

Figure 3

Figure 1. Age of MATC partial or full utilisation (retirement age 67; men).

Figure 4

Figure 2. The percentage of unutilised MATC at retirement (retirement age 67; men).

Figure 5

Figure 3. Age of MATC partial or full utilisation (retirement age 65; women).

Figure 6

Figure 4. The percentage of unutilised MATC at retirement (retirement age 65; women).

Figure 7

Figure 5. Age of partial or full MATC utilisation, sensitivity check – 20% MAT reduction (retirement age 67; men).

Figure 8

Figure 6. Age of partial or full MATC utilisation, sensitivity check – 20% MAT reduction (retirement age 67; women).