Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-mzsfj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-15T09:18:36.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Toxicity of antidepressants: rates of suicide relative to prescribing and non-fatal overdose

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Keith Hawton*
Affiliation:
Centre for Suicide Research, University of Oxford, Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford
Helen Bergen
Affiliation:
Centre for Suicide Research, University of Oxford, Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford
Sue Simkin
Affiliation:
Centre for Suicide Research, University of Oxford, Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford
Jayne Cooper
Affiliation:
Centre for Suicide Prevention, University of Manchester, Manchester
Keith Waters
Affiliation:
Derbyshire Mental Health Service NHS Trust, Mental Health Resource Centre, Rehabilitation Centre, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby
David Gunnell
Affiliation:
Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol
Navneet Kapur
Affiliation:
Centre for Suicide Prevention, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
*
Correspondence: Keith Hawton, Centre for Suicide Research, University of Oxford, Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK. Email: keith.hawton@psych.ox.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Self-poisoning is a common method of suicide and often involves ingestion of antidepressants. Information on the relative toxicity of antidepressants is therefore extremely important.

Aims

To assess the relative toxicity of specific tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), a serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), a noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant (NaSSA), and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).

Method

Observational study of prescriptions (UK), poisoning deaths involving single antidepressants receiving coroners' verdicts of suicide or undetermined intent (England and Wales) and non-fatal self-poisoning episodes presenting to six general hospitals (in Oxford, Manchester and Derby) between 2000 and 2006. Calculation of fatal toxicity index based on ratio of rates of deaths to prescriptions, and case fatality based on ratio of rates of deaths to non-fatal self-poisonings.

Results

Fatal toxicity and case fatality indices provided very similar results (rho for relative ranking of indices 0.99). Case fatality rate ratios showed greater toxicity for TCAs (13.8, 95% CI 13.0–14.7) than the SNRI venlafaxine (2.5, 95% CI 2.0–3.1) and the NaSSA mirtazapine (1.9, 95% CI 1.1–2.9), both of which had greater toxicity than the SSRIs (0.5, 95% CI 0.4–0.7). Within the TCAs, compared with amitriptyline both dosulepin (relative toxicity index 2.7) and doxepin (2.6) were more toxic. Within the SSRIs, citalopram had a higher case fatality than the other SSRIs (1.1, 95% CI 0.8–1.4 v. 0.3, 95% CI 0.2–0.4).

Conclusions

There are wide differences in toxicity not only between classes of antidepressants, but also within classes. The findings are relevant to prescribing decisions, especially in individuals at risk, and to regulatory policy.

Information

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2010 
Figure 0

Table 1 Deaths by suicide and undetermined intent in England and Wales, prescriptions in the UK and self-poisoning episodes in three centres in England involving each antidepressant, for people aged 10 years and over, for 2000–2006a

Figure 1

Table 2 Fatal toxicity: rate ratios and relative toxicity indices for individual antidepressants based on rates of death (suicide and undetermined intent) in England and Wales, and prescription rates in the UK

Figure 2

Table 3 Case fatality: rate ratios and relative toxicity indices for individual antidepressants based on rates of death (suicide and undetermined intent) in England and Wales, and rates of non-fatal self-poisoning in three centres

Supplementary material: PDF

Hawton et al. supplementary material

Supplementary Table S1

Download Hawton et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 36.1 KB

This journal is not currently accepting new eletters.

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.