Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-5bvrz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-13T01:50:52.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

HEALTH EDUCATION AND THE CONTROL OF UROGENITAL SCHISTOSOMIASIS: ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF THE JUMA NA KICHOCHO COMIC-STRIP MEDICAL BOOKLET IN ZANZIBAR

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

J. R. Stothard*
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
A. N. Khamis
Affiliation:
Helminth Control Laboratory Unguja, NTD Control Programme, Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Zanzibar
I. S. Khamis
Affiliation:
Helminth Control Laboratory Unguja, NTD Control Programme, Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Zanzibar
C. H. E. Neo
Affiliation:
Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
I. Wei
Affiliation:
Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
D. Rollinson
Affiliation:
Parasites and Vectors Division, Natural History Museum, London, UK
*
1Corresponding author. Email: Russell.Stothard@lstmed.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Endeavours to control urogenital schistosomiasis on Unguja Island (Zanzibar) have focused on school-aged children. To assess the impact of an associated health education campaign, the supervised use of the comic-strip medical booklet Juma na Kichocho by Class V pupils attending eighteen primary schools was investigated. A validated knowledge and attitudes questionnaire was completed at baseline and repeated one year later following the regular use of the booklet during the calendar year. A scoring system (ranging from 0.0 to 5.0) measured children’s understandings of schistosomiasis and malaria, with the latter being a neutral comparator against specific changes for schistosomiasis. In 2006, the average score from 751 children (328 boys and 423 girls) was 2.39 for schistosomiasis and 3.03 for malaria. One year later, the score was 2.43 for schistosomiasis and 2.70 for malaria from 779 children (351 boys and 428 girls). As might be expected, knowledge and attitudes scores for schistosomiasis increased (+0.05), but not as much as originally hoped, while the score for malaria decreased (−0.33). According to a Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, neither change was statistically significant. Analysis also revealed that 75% of school children misunderstood the importance of reinfection after treatment with praziquantel. These results are disappointing. They demonstrate that it is mistaken to assume that knowledge conveyed in child-friendly booklets will necessarily be interpreted, and acted upon, in the way intended. If long-term sustained behavioural change is to be achieved, health education materials need to engage more closely with local understandings and responses to urogenital schistosomiasis. This, in turn, needs to be part of the development of a more holistic, biosocial approach to the control of schistosomiasis.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press, 2016
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Epidemiological aspects of the lifecycle of urogenital schistosomiasis; a schematic diagram of the contamination and infection processes as played out in fresh water. Process 1: a previously infected child/adult enters the local area; Process 2: fresh water habitat where susceptible snails exist is contaminated by infected urine containing schistosome eggs; Process 3: hatched miracidia infect and develop in snail(s), which later release schistosome cercariae, often on a daily basis until the snail dies, typically infecting people upon subsequent water contact(s). (Note that the person responsible for original contamination can become hyper-parasitized by further water contact(s)); Process 4: additional people become infected and in turn contribute to Process 2; Process 5: individuals can be treated with praziquantel (40 mg/kg) by school teachers or health centre staff; and Process 6: if treatment is successful and the current infection is cleared the individual cannot contaminate the environment but is still vulnerable to reinfection should water contact continue.

Figure 1

Table 1 Locations and names of the eighteen sampled schools with egg-patent prevalences of infection as observed in 2004 surveys and number of pupils completing the knowledge and attitudes questionnaire in 2006 and 2007

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Outline map of Unguja Island (light grey) with the locations of the eighteen sampled study schools. The associated responses for five knowledge and attitudes (KA) questions each posed specifically for malaria and schistosomiasis are indicated by school. The corresponding pie charts of mean responses are depicted in the central portion of the plot. Owing to poor-quality data, i.e. probably being fictitious, responses from four schools were omitted. Black portion of pie chart corresponds to a correct response while white portion is an incorrect response; sectors in grey are a correct fractional response to a multiple choice question.

Figure 3

Fig. 3 Changes in average knowledge and attitudes (KA) score in fourteen sampled schools in box-and-whisker plots by year (2006 and 2007). With the overlapping nature of the quintiles, observed changes in scores were not of statistical significance although observed improvements at Kizimkazi, a school in the non-endemic zone, show near significance for knowledge and attitudes for schistosomiasis alone.

Figure 4

Fig. 4 Line plot of cumulative knowledge and attitudes (KA) scores for 2006 and 2007 showing a general decrease in score for malaria with a largely identical distribution of scores for schistosomiasis.

Figure 5

Fig. 5 Bar chart with 95% confidence interval error bars of recalled water contact behaviours of children examined as part of annual surveys within 24 sentinel schools on Unguja Island (Stothard et al., 2009b). Water-contact scores are expressed as percentages of a maximum score of 1 representing positive answers to each of three water-contact questions, i.e. playing, working and washing in water bodies. Water contamination is assessed by the prevalence of positive answers to the question of whether the child urinated in water.