Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-ktprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-14T05:40:35.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

One Year of Monitoring the Vela Pulsar Using a Phased Array Feed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2017

John M. Sarkissian*
Affiliation:
CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science, Parkes Observatory, PO Box 276, Parkes NSW 2870, Australia
John E. Reynolds
Affiliation:
CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science, Australia Telescope National Facility, PO Box 76, Epping NSW 1710, Australia
George Hobbs
Affiliation:
CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science, Australia Telescope National Facility, PO Box 76, Epping NSW 1710, Australia
Lisa Harvey-Smith
Affiliation:
CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science, Australia Telescope National Facility, PO Box 76, Epping NSW 1710, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We have observed the Vela pulsar for 1 year using a phased array feed receiver on the 12-m antenna of the Parkes Test-Bed Facility. These observations have allowed us to investigate the stability of the phased array feed beam weights over time, to demonstrate that pulsars can be timed over long periods using phased array feed technology and to detect and study the most recent glitch event that occurred on 2016 December 12. The beam weights are shown to be stable to 1% on time scales on the order of three weeks. We discuss the implications of this for monitoring pulsars using phased array feeds on single dish telescopes.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 2017 
Figure 0

Table 1. Observations of the Vela pulsar using the PAF on the PTF.

Figure 1

Figure 1. On-axis (boresight) response of beam weights as a function of their age plotted as the ratio of the S/N of the pulse profile using the original weights to the S/N obtained with recent weights. Error bars are standard errors in the mean after averaging the 16 independent 1 MHz frequency channels. It is clear that the beam weights are stable to 1% over a period of order 3 weeks.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Typical pulse profiles of the Vela pulsar achieved with the PTF. The top plot shows a high S/N profile from 2017 January 3 and the bottom plot a more typical pulse profile obtained on 2017 January 1.

Figure 3

Figure 3. The full data set showing the glitch event (top); the observed timing residuals after removing a fixed frequency and time derivative only (upper panel), and after fitting for the glitch event (lower panel).

Figure 4

Table 2. Parameters for the 2016 December 12 Vela glitch. Uncertainties are given in parenthesis and refer to the last significant digit. The top five parameters are the determined values. The bottom three parameters are derived values.

Figure 5

Figure 4. The rms timing residual obtained using a grid search for different glitch time decay constants. The smallest value occurs at 0.98 d.