Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-dqfph Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-16T20:34:20.783Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Risk factors and diagnostic indicators for congenital syphilis: a Nationwide retrospective survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2025

Hiroyuki Shimizu
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Fujisawa City Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
Munehiro Furuichi
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Noriko Takeuchi
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Medical Mycology Research Center, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
Kenta Ito
Affiliation:
Department of General Pediatrics, Aichi Children’s Health and Medical Center, Obu, Japan
Takanori Funaki
Affiliation:
Center for Research Planning and Coordination, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan
Yoshinori Ito
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Japan
Masaaki Mori
Affiliation:
Division of Rheumatology and Allergology, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan Department of Lifelong Immunotherapy, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Hiroyuki Moriuchi
Affiliation:
National Research Center for the Control and Prevention of Infectious Diseases, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
Takuya Yamagishi
Affiliation:
Antimicrobial Resistance Research Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan
Masayoshi Shinjoh*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
*
Corresponding author: Masayoshi Shinjoh; Email: m-shinjo@keio.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This nationwide retrospective study in Japan aimed to identify risk factors and diagnostic indicators for congenital syphilis (CS) and improve diagnostic accuracy. Data were collected from 230 pregnant women diagnosed with syphilis and their infants between 2015 and 2024. Of these, 49 infants were diagnosed with definite or highly probable CS, while 73 infants with excluded CS served as the control group. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed two significant risk factors for CS: maternal treatment not completed more than 4 weeks before delivery (odds ratio [OR]: 7.20; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.38–37.56; p = 0.02) and elevated total IgM levels in the infant (>20 mg/dL) (OR: 65.31; 95% CI: 4.53–941.39; p = 0.002). When using infant rapid plasma reagin (RPR) ≥1 as a diagnostic indicator, sensitivity was 93.8% (n = 48). In contrast, the infant-to-mother RPR ratio ≥1 showed a lower sensitivity of 34.3%, with fewer cases available for analysis (n = 35) due to limited maternal data. These findings indicate that delayed maternal treatment and high total IgM levels in the infant are significant risk factors, while the infant’s RPR titre serves as a useful diagnostic indicator for CS.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Final diagnostic definition of congenital syphilis

Figure 1

Figure 1. Flowchart of study participants.A total of 230 pregnant women with syphilis and their infants were included. No patients were excluded due to opting out of consent. Based on diagnostic criteria, 49 infants were classified as having a definite or highly probable diagnosis of congenital syphilis (Categories A1, A2, B1, B2), 73 were classified as excluded (Categories C1, C2), and 108 remained undiagnosed (Category D).

Figure 2

Table 2. Clinical characteristics of pregnant women with syphilis

Figure 3

Table 3. Clinical characteristics of infants born to mothers with syphilis

Figure 4

Table 4. A univariate analysis of predictors of congenital syphilis

Figure 5

Table 5. A multivariate analysis of predictors of congenital syphilis

Figure 6

Table 6. Comparison of serological findings

Supplementary material: File

Shimizu et al. supplementary material

Shimizu et al. supplementary material
Download Shimizu et al. supplementary material(File)
File 64.3 KB